TED2003
Noah Feldman: Politics and religion are technologies
Filmed:
Readability: 4.8
442,154 views
Noah Feldman makes a searing case that both politics and religion -- whatever their differences -- are similar technologies, designed to efficiently connect and manage any group of people.
Noah Feldman - Constitutional law scholar
Noah Feldman studies the intersection of religion, politics and law. Full bio
Noah Feldman studies the intersection of religion, politics and law. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:12
I want to argue to you that in fact, politics and religion,
0
0
5000
00:17
which are the two primary factors --
1
5000
2000
00:19
not the sole, but overwhelmingly, the primary factors --
2
7000
3000
00:22
which are driving towards a war which looks extremely likely --
3
10000
3000
00:25
bordering on the inevitable at this point,
4
13000
2000
00:27
whether one is in favor of that or not --
5
15000
2000
00:29
that politics and religion are, in fact, themselves
6
17000
3000
00:32
better conceptualized as kinds of technology,
7
20000
4000
00:36
and subject to kinds of questions that we regularly consider
8
24000
5000
00:41
in the space of conceptual design.
9
29000
3000
00:44
Here's what I mean. Politics and --
10
32000
3000
00:47
let's focus on the political system in particular question here,
11
35000
3000
00:50
which is the system of democracy.
12
38000
2000
00:52
Democracy, as a type of politics, is a technology
13
40000
4000
00:56
for the control and deployment of power.
14
44000
2000
00:58
You can deploy power in a wide range of ways.
15
46000
3000
01:01
The famous ones -- despotism is a good one;
16
49000
2000
01:03
anarchy is a way to not deploy the power in any organized way,
17
51000
3000
01:06
to do it in a radically diffused fashion;
18
54000
2000
01:08
and democracy is a set of technologies,
19
56000
2000
01:10
which have the effect of, in principle,
20
58000
3000
01:13
diffusing the power source to a large number of people
21
61000
3000
01:16
and then re-concentrating it in a smaller group of people who govern,
22
64000
3000
01:19
and who themselves are, in principle, authorized to govern
23
67000
4000
01:23
by virtue of what the broader public has done.
24
71000
3000
01:26
Now, consider religion -- in this case Islam,
25
74000
3000
01:29
which is the religion that, in some direct sense,
26
77000
3000
01:32
can be said to be precipitating what we're about to enter.
27
80000
4000
01:36
Let me say parenthetically why I think that's the case,
28
84000
2000
01:38
because I think it's a potentially controversial statement.
29
86000
3000
01:41
I would put it in the following equation: no 9/11, no war.
30
89000
4000
01:45
At the beginning of the Bush administration,
31
93000
4000
01:49
when President Bush, now President Bush, was running for president,
32
97000
3000
01:52
he made it very clear that he was not interested in intervening broadly in the world.
33
100000
3000
01:55
In fact, the trend was for disengagement with the rest of the world.
34
103000
3000
01:58
That's why we heard about the backing away from the Kyoto protocol, for example.
35
106000
3000
02:02
After 9/11, the tables were turned.
36
110000
3000
02:05
And the president decided, with his advisors,
37
113000
3000
02:08
to undertake some kind of an active intervention in the world around us.
38
116000
4000
02:12
That began with Afghanistan,
39
120000
2000
02:14
and when Afghanistan went extremely smoothly and quickly,
40
122000
3000
02:17
a decision was made through the technology of democracy --
41
125000
4000
02:21
again, notice, not a perfect technology --
42
129000
3000
02:24
but through the technology of democracy
43
132000
2000
02:26
that this administration was going to push in the direction of another war --
44
134000
3000
02:29
this time, a war in Iraq.
45
137000
2000
02:31
Now, the reason I begin by saying "no 9/11, no war"
46
139000
5000
02:36
is that we have to acknowledge that Islam,
47
144000
4000
02:40
as interpreted by a very, very small, extremely radical group of people,
48
148000
6000
02:46
was a precipitating cause of the 9/11 attacks --
49
154000
4000
02:50
the precipitating cause of the 9/11 attacks --
50
158000
2000
02:52
and as a consequence, at one degree of remove,
51
160000
3000
02:55
the precipitating cause of the coming war that we're about to be engaged in.
52
163000
4000
02:59
And I would add that bin Laden and his followers
53
167000
3000
03:02
are consciously devoted to the goal of creating a conflict between democracy,
54
170000
5000
03:07
or at least capitalist democracy, on the one hand,
55
175000
3000
03:10
and the world of Islam as they see and define it.
56
178000
4000
03:14
Now, how is Islam a technology in this conceptual apparatus?
57
182000
3000
03:17
Well, it's a technology for, first, salvation in its most basic sense.
58
185000
4000
03:21
It's meant to be a mechanism for construing the universe
59
189000
3000
03:24
in a way that will bring about the salvation of the individual believer,
60
192000
4000
03:28
but it's also meant by the Islamists --
61
196000
2000
03:30
and I use that term to mean people who believe that Islam --
62
198000
4000
03:34
they follow the slogan, Islam is the answer to a wide range of questions,
63
202000
3000
03:37
whether they're social, or political, or personal, or spiritual.
64
205000
3000
03:40
Within the sphere of people who have that view,
65
208000
2000
03:42
and it's a large number of people in the Muslim world
66
210000
2000
03:44
who disagree with bin Laden in his application,
67
212000
2000
03:46
but agree that Islam is the answer.
68
214000
2000
03:48
Islam represents a way of engaging the world
69
216000
3000
03:51
through which one can achieve certain desirable goals.
70
219000
3000
03:54
And the goals from the perspective of Muslims are, in principle,
71
222000
4000
03:58
peace, justice and equality,
72
226000
3000
04:01
but on terms that correspond to traditional Muslim teachings.
73
229000
4000
04:05
Now, I don't want to leave a misimpression
74
233000
3000
04:08
by identifying either of these propositions --
75
236000
3000
04:11
rather, either of these phenomena, democracy or Islam -- as technologies.
76
239000
4000
04:15
I don't want to suggest that they are a single thing that you can point to.
77
243000
3000
04:18
And I think a good way to prove this
78
246000
2000
04:20
is simply to demonstrate to you what my thought process was
79
248000
3000
04:23
when deciding what to put on the wall behind me when I spoke.
80
251000
3000
04:26
And I ran immediately into a conceptual problem:
81
254000
2000
04:28
you can't show a picture of democracy.
82
256000
2000
04:30
You can show a slogan, or a symbol, or a sign that stands for democracy.
83
258000
5000
04:35
You can show the Capitol --
84
263000
1000
04:36
I had the same problem when I was designing the cover
85
264000
2000
04:38
of my forthcoming book, in fact --
86
266000
2000
04:40
what do you put on the cover to show democracy?
87
268000
2000
04:42
And the same problem with respect to Islam.
88
270000
2000
04:44
You can show a mosque, or you can show worshippers,
89
272000
2000
04:46
but there's not a straightforward way of depicting Islam.
90
274000
2000
04:48
That's because these are the kinds of concepts
91
276000
2000
04:50
that are not susceptible to easy representation.
92
278000
3000
04:53
Now, it follows from that, that they're deeply contestable.
93
281000
3000
04:56
It follows from that that all of the people in the world
94
284000
3000
04:59
who say that they are Muslims can, in principle,
95
287000
2000
05:01
subscribe to a wide range of different interpretations
96
289000
3000
05:04
of what Islam really is, and the same is true of democracy.
97
292000
5000
05:09
In other words, unlike the word hope,
98
297000
3000
05:12
which one could look up in a dictionary and derive origins for,
99
300000
4000
05:16
and, perhaps, reach some kind of a consensual use analysis,
100
304000
3000
05:19
these are essentially contested concepts.
101
307000
2000
05:21
They're ideas about which people disagree in the deepest possible sense.
102
309000
6000
05:27
And as a consequence of this disagreement,
103
315000
3000
05:30
it's very, very difficult for anyone to say,
104
318000
2000
05:32
"I have the right version of Islam."
105
320000
2000
05:34
You know, post-9/11, we were treated to the amazing phenomenon
106
322000
3000
05:37
of George W. Bush saying, "Islam means peace."
107
325000
3000
05:40
Well, so says George W. Bush.
108
328000
3000
05:43
Other people would say it means something else.
109
331000
2000
05:45
Some people would say that Islam means submission.
110
333000
2000
05:47
Other people would say it means an acknowledgement
111
335000
2000
05:49
or recognition of God's sovereignty.
112
337000
2000
05:51
There are a wide range of different things that Islam can mean.
113
339000
3000
05:54
And ostensibly, the same is true of democracy.
114
342000
2000
05:56
Some people say that democracy consists basically in elections.
115
344000
3000
05:59
Other people say no, that's not enough,
116
347000
2000
06:01
there have to be basic liberal rights: free speech, free press, equality of citizens.
117
349000
4000
06:05
These are contested points, and it's impossible to answer them by saying,
118
353000
3000
06:08
"Ah ha, I looked in the right place, and I found out what these concepts mean."
119
356000
3000
06:12
Now, if Islam and democracy are at present
120
360000
4000
06:16
in a moment of great confrontation,
121
364000
2000
06:18
what does that mean?
122
366000
2000
06:20
Well, you could fit it into a range of different interpretative frameworks.
123
368000
4000
06:24
You could begin with the one that we began with a couple of days ago,
124
372000
3000
06:27
which was fear.
125
375000
2000
06:29
Fear is not an implausible reaction with a war just around the corner
126
377000
5000
06:34
and with a very, very high likelihood that many, many people are going to die
127
382000
3000
06:37
as a consequence of this confrontation --
128
385000
2000
06:39
a confrontation which many, many people
129
387000
2000
06:41
in the Muslim world do not want,
130
389000
2000
06:43
many, many people in the American democracy do not want,
131
391000
3000
06:46
many people elsewhere in the world do not want,
132
394000
2000
06:48
but which nonetheless is favored by a large enough number of people --
133
396000
3000
06:51
at least in the relevant space, which is the United States --
134
399000
4000
06:55
to actually go forward. So fear is not a crazy response at all.
135
403000
3000
06:58
And I think that that's, in fact, probably the first appropriate response.
136
406000
4000
07:02
What I want to suggest to you, though, in the next couple of minutes
137
410000
3000
07:05
is that there's also a hopeful response to this.
138
413000
4000
07:09
And the hopeful response derives from recognizing
139
417000
3000
07:12
that Islam and democracy are technologies.
140
420000
2000
07:14
And by virtue of being technologies, they're manipulable.
141
422000
3000
07:17
And they're manipulable in ways
142
425000
2000
07:19
that can produce some extremely positive outcomes.
143
427000
2000
07:21
What do I have in mind?
144
429000
2000
07:23
Well, all over the Muslim world there are people
145
431000
3000
07:26
who take Islam deeply seriously, people who care about Islam,
146
434000
4000
07:30
for whom it's a source either of faith, or of civilization, or of deep values,
147
438000
4000
07:34
or just a source of powerful personal identity,
148
442000
2000
07:36
who think and are saying loudly that Islam and democracy
149
444000
4000
07:40
are in fact not in conflict, but are in fact deeply compatible.
150
448000
4000
07:44
And these Muslims -- and it's the vast majority of Muslims --
151
452000
3000
07:47
disagree profoundly with bin Laden's approach, profoundly.
152
455000
5000
07:52
And they furthermore think overwhelmingly --
153
460000
3000
07:55
again one can't speak of every person, but overwhelmingly,
154
463000
2000
07:57
and one can find this by reading any of the sources
155
465000
2000
07:59
that they have produced, and they're all over the Internet
156
467000
3000
08:02
and in all sorts of languages -- one can see that they're saying
157
470000
3000
08:05
that their concern in their own countries is primarily to free up themselves
158
473000
6000
08:11
to have choice in the spheres of personal life,
159
479000
4000
08:15
in the sphere of economics, in the sphere of politics,
160
483000
3000
08:18
and, yes, in the sphere of religion,
161
486000
2000
08:20
which is itself closely regulated in most of the Muslim world.
162
488000
3000
08:23
And many of these Muslims further say
163
491000
2000
08:25
that their disagreement with the United States
164
493000
3000
08:28
is that it, in the past and still in the present,
165
496000
3000
08:31
has sided with autocratic rulers in the Muslim world
166
499000
4000
08:35
in order to promote America's short-term interests.
167
503000
6000
08:41
Now, during the Cold War, that may have been
168
509000
2000
08:43
a defensible position for the United States to take.
169
511000
2000
08:45
That's an academic question.
170
513000
2000
08:47
It may be that there was a great war to be fought between West and East,
171
515000
3000
08:50
and it was necessary on the axis of democracy against communism.
172
518000
4000
08:54
And it was necessary in some way for these to contradict each other,
173
522000
3000
08:57
and as a consequence you have to make friends wherever you can get them.
174
525000
3000
09:00
But now that the Cold War is over,
175
528000
2000
09:02
there's nearly universal consensus in the Muslim world --
176
530000
4000
09:06
and pretty close to the same here in the United States,
177
534000
2000
09:08
if you talk to people and ask them --
178
536000
2000
09:10
that in principle, there's no reason that democracy and Islam cannot co-exist.
179
538000
4000
09:14
And we see this among activist, practical Muslims,
180
542000
3000
09:17
like the Muslims who are presently the elected,
181
545000
2000
09:19
parliamentary, democratic government of Turkey,
182
547000
2000
09:21
who are behaving pragmatically, not ideologically,
183
549000
3000
09:24
who are promoting their own religious values,
184
552000
2000
09:26
who are elected by their own people
185
554000
2000
09:28
because they were perceived as honest and sincere
186
556000
2000
09:30
because of their religious values,
187
558000
2000
09:32
but who do not think that Islam and a democratic system of governance
188
560000
4000
09:36
are fundamentally incompatible.
189
564000
2000
09:38
Now, you may say, but surely, what we've seen on television about Saudi Islam
190
566000
5000
09:43
convinces us that it can't possibly be compatible
191
571000
2000
09:45
with what we consider the core of democracy --
192
573000
2000
09:47
namely, free political choice, basic liberty and basic equality.
193
575000
4000
09:51
But I'm here to tell you that technologies
194
579000
4000
09:55
are more malleable than that.
195
583000
2000
09:57
I'm here to tell you that many, many Muslims believe --
196
585000
3000
10:00
the vast majority, in fact -- in fact I think I would go so far as to say
197
588000
2000
10:02
that many Muslims in Saudi Arabia believe that the core values of Islam,
198
590000
4000
10:06
namely acknowledgement of God's sovereignty
199
594000
2000
10:08
and basic human equality before God,
200
596000
3000
10:11
are themselves compatible with liberty, equality and free political choice.
201
599000
4000
10:15
And there are Muslims, many Muslims out there, who are saying precisely this.
202
603000
5000
10:20
And they're making this argument wherever they're permitted to make it.
203
608000
3000
10:23
But their governments, needless to say, are relatively threatened by this.
204
611000
2000
10:25
And for the most part try to stop them from making this argument.
205
613000
3000
10:28
So, for example, a group of young activists in Egypt
206
616000
4000
10:32
try to form a party known as the Center Party,
207
620000
2000
10:34
which advocated the compatibility of Islam and democracy.
208
622000
2000
10:36
They weren't even allowed to form a party.
209
624000
2000
10:38
They were actually blocked from even forming a party
210
626000
2000
10:40
under the political system there. Why?
211
628000
2000
10:42
Because they would have done extraordinarily well.
212
630000
2000
10:44
In the most recent elections in the Muslim world --
213
632000
2000
10:46
which are those in Pakistan, those in Morocco
214
634000
3000
10:49
and those in Turkey -- in each case,
215
637000
2000
10:51
people who present themselves to the electorate as Islamic democrats
216
639000
3000
10:54
were far and away the most successful vote-getters
217
642000
3000
10:57
every place they were allowed to run freely.
218
645000
4000
11:01
So in Morocco, for example, they finished third in the political race
219
649000
4000
11:05
but they were only allowed to contest half the seats.
220
653000
2000
11:07
So had they contested a larger number of the seats,
221
655000
2000
11:09
they would have done even better.
222
657000
2000
11:11
Now what I want to suggest to you is that the reason for hope in this case
223
659000
3000
11:14
is that we are on the edge of a real transformation in the Muslim world.
224
662000
5000
11:19
And that's a transformation in which many sincerely believing Muslims --
225
667000
4000
11:23
who care very, very deeply about their traditions,
226
671000
3000
11:26
who do not want to compromise those values --
227
674000
3000
11:29
believe, through the malleability of the technology of democracy
228
677000
4000
11:33
and the malleability and synthetic capability of the technology of Islam,
229
681000
5000
11:38
that these two ideas can work together.
230
686000
3000
11:41
Now what would that look like?
231
689000
2000
11:43
What does it mean to say that there's an Islamic democracy?
232
691000
3000
11:46
Well, one thing is, it's not going to look identical
233
694000
2000
11:48
to democracy as we know it in the United States.
234
696000
3000
11:51
That may be a good thing, in light of some of the criticisms we've heard today --
235
699000
3000
11:54
for example, in the regulatory context -- of what democracy produces.
236
702000
4000
11:58
It will also not look exactly the way either the people in this room,
237
706000
4000
12:02
or Muslims out in the rest of the world --
238
710000
2000
12:04
I don't mean to imply there aren't Muslims here, there probably are --
239
712000
3000
12:07
conceptualize Islam.
240
715000
2000
12:09
It will be transformative of Islam as well.
241
717000
3000
12:12
And as a result of this convergence,
242
720000
3000
12:15
this synthetic attempt to make sense of these two ideas together,
243
723000
4000
12:19
there's a real possibility that, instead of a clash
244
727000
3000
12:22
of Islamic civilization -- if there is such a thing --
245
730000
3000
12:25
and democratic civilization -- if there is such a thing --
246
733000
2000
12:27
we'll in fact have close compatibility.
247
735000
3000
12:30
Now, I began with the war because it's the elephant in the room,
248
738000
4000
12:34
and you can't pretend that there isn't about to be a war
249
742000
2000
12:36
if you're talking about these issues.
250
744000
2000
12:38
The war has tremendous risks for the model that I'm describing
251
746000
3000
12:41
because it's very possible that as a consequence of a war,
252
749000
3000
12:44
many Muslims will conclude that the United States
253
752000
3000
12:47
is not the kind of place that they want to emulate
254
755000
2000
12:49
with respect to its forms of political government.
255
757000
3000
12:52
On the other hand, there's a further possibility that many Americans,
256
760000
3000
12:55
swept up in the fever of a war, will say, and feel, and think
257
763000
5000
13:00
that Islam is the enemy somehow --
258
768000
2000
13:02
that Islam ought to be construed as the enemy.
259
770000
3000
13:05
And even though, for political tactical reasons,
260
773000
2000
13:07
the president has been very, very good about saying that Islam is not the enemy,
261
775000
4000
13:11
nonetheless, there's a natural impulse when one enters war
262
779000
3000
13:14
to think of the other side as an enemy.
263
782000
2000
13:16
And one furthermore has the impulse to generalize, as much as possible,
264
784000
3000
13:19
in defining who that enemy is.
265
787000
2000
13:21
So the risks are very great.
266
789000
2000
13:23
On the other hand, the capacities for positive results in the aftermath of a war
267
791000
7000
13:30
are also not to be underestimated,
268
798000
2000
13:32
even by, and I would say especially by, people
269
800000
3000
13:35
who are deeply skeptical about whether we should go to war in the first place.
270
803000
3000
13:38
Those who oppose the war ought to realize that if a war happens,
271
806000
5000
13:43
it cannot be the right strategy,
272
811000
2000
13:45
either pragmatically, or spiritually, or morally, to say after the war,
273
813000
6000
13:51
"Well, let's let it all run itself out, and play out however it wants to play out,
274
819000
3000
13:54
because we opposed the war in the first place."
275
822000
2000
13:56
That's not the way human circumstances operate.
276
824000
2000
13:58
You face the circumstances you have in front of you
277
826000
2000
14:00
and you go forward.
278
828000
2000
14:02
Well, what I'm here to say then is,
279
830000
2000
14:04
for people who are skeptical about the war,
280
832000
2000
14:06
it's especially important to recognize that in the aftermath of the war
281
834000
3000
14:09
there is a possibility for the government of the United States
282
837000
4000
14:13
and the Muslim peoples with whom it interacts
283
841000
3000
14:16
to create real forms of government that are truly democratic
284
844000
3000
14:19
and also truly Islamic.
285
847000
2000
14:21
And it is crucial -- it is crucial in a practical, activist way --
286
849000
4000
14:25
for people who care about these issues to make sure
287
853000
4000
14:29
that within the technology of democracy, in this system,
288
857000
3000
14:32
they exercise their preferences, their choices and their voices
289
860000
3000
14:35
to encourage that outcome.
290
863000
2000
14:37
That's a hopeful message,
291
865000
2000
14:39
but it's a message that's hopeful only if you understand it
292
867000
2000
14:41
as incurring serious obligation for all of us.
293
869000
3000
14:44
And I think that we are capable of taking on that obligation,
294
872000
3000
14:47
but only if we put what we can into it.
295
875000
3000
14:50
And if we do, then I don't think that the hope will be unwarranted altogether.
296
878000
4000
14:54
Thanks.
297
882000
1000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Noah Feldman - Constitutional law scholarNoah Feldman studies the intersection of religion, politics and law.
Why you should listen
Noah Feldman is a professor and writer who tries to figure out how to make the government follow the rules; what the rules are that the government has to follow; and what to do if the rules are being broken. In his work, he asks questions like: How can a 225-year-old constitutional blueprint still work? Can you design a new and better constitution from scratch in places like Iraq and Tunisia? What rights do we have, really?
Feldman is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and a contributing writer for Bloomberg View. He served as senior constitutional advisor to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, and advised members of the Iraqi Governing Council on the drafting of the Transitional Administrative Law or interim constitution. He is writing a biography on James Madison, principal author of the Constitution and fourth president of the US; it's forthcoming in 2017.
Feldman is the author of six other books: Cool War: The Future of Global Competition (Random House, 2013); Scorpions: The Battles and Triumphs of FDR’s Great Supreme Court Justices (Twelve Publishing, 2010); The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State (Princeton University Press, 2008); Divided By God: America's Church-State Problem and What We Should Do About It (Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2005); What We Owe Iraq: War and the Ethics of Nation-building (Princeton University Press 2004) and After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic Democracy (Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2003. He most recently co-authored two textbooks: Constitutional Law, Eighteenth Edition (Foundation Press, 2013) and First Amendment Law, Fifth Edition (Foundation Press, 2013).
Noah Feldman | Speaker | TED.com