TED2009
Daniel Libeskind: 17 words of architectural inspiration
Filmed:
Readability: 3.7
1,045,285 views
Daniel Libeskind builds on very big ideas. Here, he shares 17 words that underlie his vision for architecture -- raw, risky, emotional, radical -- and that offer inspiration for any bold creative pursuit.
Daniel Libeskind - Architect
Being a designer of breathtaking and sometimes confounding buildings seems almost a footnote to the amazing life of architect Daniel Libeskind. Full bio
Being a designer of breathtaking and sometimes confounding buildings seems almost a footnote to the amazing life of architect Daniel Libeskind. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:12
I'll start with my favorite muse, Emily Dickinson,
0
0
3000
00:15
who said that wonder is not knowledge, neither is it ignorance.
1
3000
4000
00:19
It's something which is suspended
2
7000
2000
00:21
between what we believe we can be,
3
9000
2000
00:23
and a tradition we may have forgotten.
4
11000
2000
00:25
And I think, when I listen to these incredible people here,
5
13000
3000
00:28
I've been so inspired -- so many incredible ideas, so many visions.
6
16000
4000
00:32
And yet, when I look at the environment outside,
7
20000
4000
00:36
you see how resistant architecture is to change.
8
24000
2000
00:38
You see how resistant it is to those very ideas.
9
26000
3000
00:41
We can think them out. We can create incredible things.
10
29000
3000
00:44
And yet, at the end,
11
32000
2000
00:46
it's so hard to change a wall.
12
34000
2000
00:48
We applaud the well-mannered box.
13
36000
3000
00:51
But to create a space that never existed is what interests me;
14
39000
3000
00:54
to create something that has never been,
15
42000
3000
00:57
a space that we have never entered except in our minds and our spirits.
16
45000
3000
01:00
And I think that's really what architecture is based on.
17
48000
3000
01:03
Architecture is not based on concrete
18
51000
2000
01:05
and steel and the elements of the soil.
19
53000
2000
01:07
It's based on wonder.
20
55000
2000
01:09
And that wonder is really what has created the greatest cities,
21
57000
3000
01:12
the greatest spaces that we have had.
22
60000
2000
01:14
And I think that is indeed what architecture is. It is a story.
23
62000
4000
01:18
By the way, it is a story that is told through
24
66000
3000
01:21
its hard materials.
25
69000
2000
01:23
But it is a story of effort and struggle
26
71000
2000
01:25
against improbabilities.
27
73000
2000
01:27
If you think of the great buildings, of the cathedrals, of the temples,
28
75000
2000
01:29
of the pyramids, of pagodas,
29
77000
2000
01:31
of cities in India and beyond,
30
79000
3000
01:34
you think of how incredible this is that that was realized
31
82000
3000
01:37
not by some abstract idea, but by people.
32
85000
3000
01:40
So, anything that has been made can be unmade.
33
88000
2000
01:42
Anything that has been made can be made better.
34
90000
3000
01:45
There it is: the things that I really believe
35
93000
2000
01:47
are of important architecture.
36
95000
2000
01:49
These are the dimensions that I like to work with.
37
97000
2000
01:51
It's something very personal.
38
99000
2000
01:53
It's not, perhaps, the dimensions appreciated by art critics
39
101000
2000
01:55
or architecture critics or city planners.
40
103000
2000
01:57
But I think these are the necessary oxygen
41
105000
3000
02:00
for us to live in buildings, to live in cities,
42
108000
2000
02:02
to connect ourselves in a social space.
43
110000
3000
02:05
And I therefore believe that optimism is what drives architecture forward.
44
113000
3000
02:08
It's the only profession where you have to believe in the future.
45
116000
4000
02:12
You can be a general, a politician, an economist who is depressed,
46
120000
4000
02:16
a musician in a minor key, a painter in dark colors.
47
124000
3000
02:19
But architecture is that complete ecstasy that the future can be better.
48
127000
5000
02:24
And it is that belief that I think drives society.
49
132000
3000
02:27
And today we have a kind of evangelical pessimism all around us.
50
135000
3000
02:30
And yet it is in times like this
51
138000
2000
02:32
that I think architecture can thrive with big ideas,
52
140000
3000
02:35
ideas that are not small. Think of the great cities.
53
143000
3000
02:38
Think of the Empire State Building, the Rockefeller Center.
54
146000
2000
02:40
They were built in times that were
55
148000
2000
02:42
not really the best of times in a certain way.
56
150000
2000
02:44
And yet that energy and power of architecture
57
152000
4000
02:48
has driven an entire social and political space that these buildings occupy.
58
156000
5000
02:53
So again, I am a believer in the expressive.
59
161000
2000
02:55
I have never been a fan of the neutral.
60
163000
3000
02:58
I don't like neutrality in life, in anything.
61
166000
2000
03:00
I think expression.
62
168000
2000
03:02
And it's like espresso coffee, you know, you take the essence of the coffee.
63
170000
2000
03:04
That's what expression is.
64
172000
2000
03:06
It's been missing in much of the architecture,
65
174000
2000
03:08
because we think architecture is the realm of the neutered,
66
176000
4000
03:12
the realm of the kind of a state that has no opinion,
67
180000
4000
03:16
that has no value.
68
184000
2000
03:18
And yet, I believe it is the expression --
69
186000
2000
03:20
expression of the city, expression of our own space --
70
188000
3000
03:23
that gives meaning to architecture.
71
191000
2000
03:25
And, of course, expressive spaces are not mute.
72
193000
3000
03:28
Expressive spaces are not spaces
73
196000
2000
03:30
that simply confirm what we already know.
74
198000
2000
03:32
Expressive spaces may disturb us.
75
200000
2000
03:34
And I think that's also part of life.
76
202000
2000
03:36
Life is not just an anesthetic to make us smile,
77
204000
3000
03:39
but to reach out across the abyss of history,
78
207000
3000
03:42
to places we have never been,
79
210000
2000
03:44
and would have perhaps been, had we not been so lucky.
80
212000
3000
03:47
So again, radical versus conservative.
81
215000
3000
03:50
Radical, what does it mean? It's something which is rooted,
82
218000
3000
03:53
and something which is rooted deep in a tradition.
83
221000
2000
03:55
And I think that is what architecture is, it's radical.
84
223000
3000
03:58
It's not just a conservation in formaldehyde
85
226000
2000
04:00
of dead forms.
86
228000
2000
04:02
It is actually a living connection
87
230000
2000
04:04
to the cosmic event that we are part of,
88
232000
3000
04:07
and a story that is certainly ongoing.
89
235000
2000
04:09
It's not something that has a good ending or a bad ending.
90
237000
3000
04:12
It's actually a story in which our acts themselves
91
240000
3000
04:15
are pushing the story in a particular way.
92
243000
2000
04:17
So again I am a believer in the radical architecture.
93
245000
3000
04:20
You know the Soviet architecture of that building
94
248000
2000
04:22
is the conservation.
95
250000
2000
04:24
It's like the old Las Vegas used to be.
96
252000
2000
04:26
It's about conserving emotions, conserving the traditions
97
254000
3000
04:29
that have obstructed the mind in moving forward
98
257000
2000
04:31
and of course what is radical is to confront them.
99
259000
3000
04:34
And I think our architecture is a confrontation
100
262000
2000
04:36
with our own senses.
101
264000
2000
04:38
Therefore I believe it should not be cool.
102
266000
2000
04:40
There is a lot of appreciation for the kind of cool architecture.
103
268000
4000
04:44
I've always been an opponent of it. I think emotion is needed.
104
272000
3000
04:47
Life without emotion would really not be life.
105
275000
3000
04:50
Even the mind is emotional.
106
278000
2000
04:52
There is no reason which does not take a position
107
280000
2000
04:54
in the ethical sphere, in the philosophical mystery of what we are.
108
282000
4000
04:58
So I think emotion is a dimension
109
286000
3000
05:01
that is important to introduce into city space, into city life.
110
289000
4000
05:05
And of course, we are all about the struggle of emotions.
111
293000
3000
05:08
And I think that is what makes the world a wondrous place.
112
296000
3000
05:11
And of course, the confrontation of the cool, the unemotional with emotion,
113
299000
4000
05:15
is a conversation that I think
114
303000
2000
05:17
cities themselves have fostered.
115
305000
2000
05:19
I think that is the progress of cities.
116
307000
2000
05:21
It's not only the forms of cities,
117
309000
2000
05:23
but the fact that they incarnate emotions,
118
311000
2000
05:25
not just of those who build them,
119
313000
2000
05:27
but of those who live there as well.
120
315000
2000
05:29
Inexplicable versus understood. You know, too often we want to understand everything.
121
317000
3000
05:32
But architecture is not the language of words.
122
320000
3000
05:35
It's a language. But it is not a language that can be reduced
123
323000
4000
05:39
to a series of programmatic notes that we can verbally write.
124
327000
3000
05:42
Too many buildings that you see outside that are so banal
125
330000
2000
05:44
tell you a story, but the story is very short,
126
332000
3000
05:47
which says, "We have no story to tell you."
127
335000
2000
05:49
(Laughter)
128
337000
1000
05:50
So the important thing actually,
129
338000
2000
05:52
is to introduce the actual architectural dimensions,
130
340000
3000
05:55
which might be totally inexplicable in words,
131
343000
3000
05:58
because they operate in proportions,
132
346000
3000
06:01
in materials, in light.
133
349000
2000
06:03
They connect themselves into various sources,
134
351000
3000
06:06
into a kind of complex vector matrix
135
354000
2000
06:08
that isn't really frontal
136
356000
3000
06:11
but is really embedded in the lives,
137
359000
2000
06:13
and in the history of a city, and of a people.
138
361000
3000
06:16
So again, the notion that a building should just be explicit
139
364000
3000
06:19
I think is a false notion,
140
367000
2000
06:21
which has reduced architecture into banality.
141
369000
2000
06:23
Hand versus the computer.
142
371000
2000
06:25
Of course, what would we be without computers?
143
373000
2000
06:27
Our whole practice depends on computing.
144
375000
2000
06:29
But the computer should not just be the glove of the hand;
145
377000
4000
06:33
the hand should really be the driver of the computing power.
146
381000
4000
06:37
Because I believe that the hand
147
385000
2000
06:39
in all its primitive, in all its physiological obscurity,
148
387000
5000
06:44
has a source, though the source is unknown,
149
392000
3000
06:47
though we don't have to be mystical about it.
150
395000
2000
06:49
We realize that the hand has been given us
151
397000
3000
06:52
by forces that are beyond our own autonomy.
152
400000
3000
06:55
And I think when I draw drawings
153
403000
3000
06:58
which may imitate the computer, but are not computer drawings --
154
406000
3000
07:01
drawings that can come from sources
155
409000
2000
07:03
that are completely not known, not normal, not seen,
156
411000
4000
07:07
yet the hand -- and that's what I really, to all of you who are working --
157
415000
4000
07:11
how can we make the computer respond to our hand
158
419000
4000
07:15
rather than the hand responding to the computer.
159
423000
3000
07:18
I think that's part of what the complexity of architecture is.
160
426000
4000
07:22
Because certainly we have gotten used to the propaganda
161
430000
4000
07:26
that the simple is the good. But I don't believe it.
162
434000
2000
07:28
Listening to all of you, the complexity of thought,
163
436000
3000
07:31
the complexity of layers of meaning is overwhelming.
164
439000
3000
07:34
And I think we shouldn't shy away in architecture,
165
442000
3000
07:37
You know, brain surgery, atomic theory,
166
445000
3000
07:40
genetics, economics
167
448000
3000
07:43
are complex complex fields.
168
451000
2000
07:45
There is no reason that architecture should shy away
169
453000
2000
07:47
and present this illusory world of the simple.
170
455000
3000
07:50
It is complex. Space is complex.
171
458000
2000
07:52
Space is something that folds out of itself into completely new worlds.
172
460000
4000
07:56
And as wondrous as it is,
173
464000
2000
07:58
it cannot be reduced to a kind of simplification
174
466000
3000
08:01
that we have often come to be admired.
175
469000
2000
08:03
And yet, our lives are complex.
176
471000
2000
08:05
Our emotions are complex.
177
473000
2000
08:07
Our intellectual desires are complex.
178
475000
2000
08:09
So I do believe that architecture as I see it
179
477000
3000
08:12
needs to mirror that complexity in every single space that we have,
180
480000
4000
08:16
in every intimacy that we possess.
181
484000
2000
08:18
Of course that means that architecture is political.
182
486000
3000
08:21
The political is not an enemy of architecture.
183
489000
2000
08:23
The politeama is the city. It's all of us together.
184
491000
3000
08:26
And I've always believed that the act of architecture,
185
494000
2000
08:28
even a private house, when somebody else will see it, is a political act,
186
496000
4000
08:32
because it will be visible to others.
187
500000
2000
08:34
And we live in a world which is connecting us more and more.
188
502000
2000
08:36
So again, the evasion of that sphere,
189
504000
4000
08:40
which has been so endemic to that sort of pure architecture,
190
508000
3000
08:43
the autonomous architecture that is just an abstract object
191
511000
2000
08:45
has never appealed to me.
192
513000
2000
08:47
And I do believe that this interaction
193
515000
3000
08:50
with the history, with history that is often very difficult,
194
518000
4000
08:54
to grapple with it, to create
195
522000
2000
08:56
a position that is beyond our normal expectations and to create a critique.
196
524000
6000
09:02
Because architecture is also the asking of questions.
197
530000
2000
09:04
It's not only the giving of answers.
198
532000
2000
09:06
It's also, just like life, the asking of questions.
199
534000
3000
09:09
Therefore it is important that it be real.
200
537000
2000
09:11
You know we can simulate almost anything.
201
539000
2000
09:13
But the one thing that can be ever simulated
202
541000
2000
09:15
is the human heart, the human soul.
203
543000
3000
09:18
And architecture is so closely intertwined with it
204
546000
2000
09:20
because we are born somewhere and we die somewhere.
205
548000
3000
09:23
So the reality of architecture is visceral. It's not intellectual.
206
551000
4000
09:27
It's not something that comes to us from books and theories.
207
555000
3000
09:30
It's the real that we touch -- the door, the window,
208
558000
4000
09:34
the threshold, the bed --
209
562000
2000
09:36
such prosaic objects. And yet,
210
564000
2000
09:38
I try, in every building, to take that virtual world,
211
566000
2000
09:40
which is so enigmatic and so rich,
212
568000
3000
09:43
and create something in the real world.
213
571000
2000
09:45
Create a space for an office,
214
573000
2000
09:47
a space of sustainability
215
575000
2000
09:49
that really works between that virtuality
216
577000
3000
09:52
and yet can be realized as something real.
217
580000
2000
09:54
Unexpected versus habitual.
218
582000
2000
09:56
What is a habit? It's just a shackle for ourselves.
219
584000
3000
09:59
It's a self-induced poison.
220
587000
2000
10:01
So the unexpected is always unexpected.
221
589000
2000
10:03
You know, it's true, the cathedrals, as unexpected,
222
591000
3000
10:06
will always be unexpected.
223
594000
2000
10:08
You know Frank Gehry's buildings, they will continue to be unexpected in the future.
224
596000
3000
10:11
So not the habitual architecture that instills in us
225
599000
3000
10:14
the false sort of stability,
226
602000
2000
10:16
but an architecture that is full of tension,
227
604000
3000
10:19
an architecture that goes beyond itself
228
607000
3000
10:22
to reach a human soul and a human heart,
229
610000
2000
10:24
and that breaks out of the shackles of habits.
230
612000
3000
10:27
And of course habits are enforced by architecture.
231
615000
3000
10:30
When we see the same kind of architecture
232
618000
2000
10:32
we become immured in that world of those angles,
233
620000
3000
10:35
of those lights, of those materials.
234
623000
2000
10:37
We think the world really looks like our buildings.
235
625000
3000
10:40
And yet our buildings are pretty much limited by the techniques and wonders
236
628000
4000
10:44
that have been part of them.
237
632000
2000
10:46
So again, the unexpected which is also the raw.
238
634000
3000
10:49
And I often think of the raw and the refined.
239
637000
2000
10:51
What is raw? The raw, I would say
240
639000
2000
10:53
is the naked experience, untouched by luxury,
241
641000
3000
10:56
untouched by expensive materials,
242
644000
2000
10:58
untouched by the kind of refinement
243
646000
2000
11:00
that we associate with high culture.
244
648000
3000
11:03
So the rawness, I think, in space,
245
651000
3000
11:06
the fact that sustainability can actually, in the future
246
654000
3000
11:09
translate into a raw space,
247
657000
2000
11:11
a space that isn't decorated,
248
659000
2000
11:13
a space that is not mannered in any source,
249
661000
3000
11:16
but a space that might be cool in terms of its temperature,
250
664000
4000
11:20
might be refractive to our desires.
251
668000
3000
11:23
A space that doesn't always follow us
252
671000
3000
11:26
like a dog that has been trained to follow us,
253
674000
3000
11:29
but moves ahead into directions of demonstrating
254
677000
3000
11:32
other possibilities, other experiences,
255
680000
2000
11:34
that have never been part of the vocabulary of architecture.
256
682000
5000
11:39
And of course that juxtaposition is of great interest to me
257
687000
3000
11:42
because it creates a kind of a spark of new energy.
258
690000
4000
11:46
And so I do like something which is pointed, not blunt,
259
694000
3000
11:49
something which is focused on reality,
260
697000
3000
11:52
something that has the power, through its leverage,
261
700000
3000
11:55
to transform even a very small space.
262
703000
2000
11:57
So architecture maybe is not so big, like science,
263
705000
3000
12:00
but through its focal point
264
708000
3000
12:03
it can leverage in an Archimedian way
265
711000
2000
12:05
what we think the world is really about.
266
713000
2000
12:07
And often it takes just a building
267
715000
2000
12:09
to change our experience of what could be done, what has been done,
268
717000
4000
12:13
how the world has remained both in between stability and instability.
269
721000
5000
12:18
And of course buildings have their shapes.
270
726000
3000
12:21
Those shapes are difficult to change.
271
729000
2000
12:23
And yet, I do believe that in every social space,
272
731000
2000
12:25
in every public space,
273
733000
2000
12:27
there is a desire to communicate more
274
735000
2000
12:29
than just that blunt thought, that blunt technique,
275
737000
4000
12:33
but something that pinpoints, and can point in various directions
276
741000
4000
12:37
forward, backward, sideways and around.
277
745000
3000
12:40
So that is indeed what is memory.
278
748000
3000
12:43
So I believe that my main interest is to memory.
279
751000
4000
12:47
Without memory we would be amnesiacs.
280
755000
2000
12:49
We would not know which way we were going,
281
757000
2000
12:51
and why we are going where we're going.
282
759000
2000
12:53
So I've been never interested in the forgettable reuse,
283
761000
5000
12:58
rehashing of the same things over and over again,
284
766000
3000
13:01
which, of course, get accolades of critics.
285
769000
2000
13:03
Critics like the performance to be repeated again and again the same way.
286
771000
4000
13:07
But I rather play something
287
775000
2000
13:09
completely unheard of,
288
777000
2000
13:11
and even with flaws,
289
779000
2000
13:13
than repeat the same thing over and over which has been hollowed
290
781000
2000
13:15
by its meaninglessness.
291
783000
2000
13:17
So again, memory is the city, memory is the world.
292
785000
3000
13:20
Without the memory there would be no story to tell.
293
788000
2000
13:22
There would be nowhere to turn.
294
790000
2000
13:24
The memorable, I think, is really our world, what we think the world is.
295
792000
4000
13:28
And it's not only our memory,
296
796000
2000
13:30
but those who remember us,
297
798000
3000
13:33
which means that architecture is not mute.
298
801000
2000
13:35
It's an art of communication.
299
803000
2000
13:37
It tells a story. The story can reach into obscure desires.
300
805000
4000
13:41
It can reach into sources that are not explicitly available.
301
809000
3000
13:44
It can reach into millennia
302
812000
3000
13:47
that have been buried,
303
815000
2000
13:49
and return them in a just and unexpected equity.
304
817000
4000
13:53
So again, I think the notion that
305
821000
2000
13:55
the best architecture is silent has never appealed to me.
306
823000
4000
13:59
Silence maybe is good for a cemetery but not for a city.
307
827000
3000
14:02
Cities should be full of vibrations, full of sound, full of music.
308
830000
3000
14:05
And that indeed is the architectural mission
309
833000
2000
14:07
that I believe is important,
310
835000
2000
14:09
is to create spaces that are vibrant,
311
837000
2000
14:11
that are pluralistic,
312
839000
2000
14:13
that can transform the most prosaic activities,
313
841000
3000
14:16
and raise them to a completely different expectation.
314
844000
2000
14:18
Create a shopping center, a swimming place
315
846000
2000
14:20
that is more like a museum than like entertainment.
316
848000
3000
14:23
And these are our dreams.
317
851000
2000
14:25
And of course risk. I think architecture should be risky.
318
853000
4000
14:29
You know it costs a lot of money and so on, but yes,
319
857000
2000
14:31
it should not play it safe.
320
859000
2000
14:33
It should not play it safe, because if it plays it safe
321
861000
3000
14:36
it's not moving us in a direction that we want to be.
322
864000
4000
14:40
And I think, of course,
323
868000
2000
14:42
risk is what underlies the world.
324
870000
2000
14:44
World without risk would not be worth living.
325
872000
3000
14:47
So yes, I do believe that the risk we take in every building.
326
875000
4000
14:51
Risks to create spaces that have never been cantilevered to that extent.
327
879000
4000
14:55
Risks of spaces that have never been
328
883000
2000
14:57
so dizzying,
329
885000
3000
15:00
as they should be, for a pioneering city.
330
888000
3000
15:03
Risks that really move architecture
331
891000
3000
15:06
even with all its flaws, into a space which is much better
332
894000
3000
15:09
that the ever again repeated
333
897000
2000
15:11
hollowness of a ready-made thing.
334
899000
3000
15:14
And of course that is finally what I believe architecture to be.
335
902000
3000
15:17
It's about space. It's not about fashion.
336
905000
2000
15:19
It's not about decoration.
337
907000
2000
15:21
It's about creating with minimal means
338
909000
2000
15:23
something which can not be repeated,
339
911000
3000
15:26
cannot be simulated in any other sphere.
340
914000
2000
15:28
And there of course is the space that we need to breathe,
341
916000
4000
15:32
is the space we need to dream.
342
920000
2000
15:34
These are the spaces that are
343
922000
2000
15:36
not just luxurious spaces for some of us,
344
924000
3000
15:39
but are important for everybody in this world.
345
927000
2000
15:41
So again, it's not about the changing fashions, changing theories.
346
929000
4000
15:45
It's about carving out a space for trees.
347
933000
3000
15:48
It's carving out a space where nature can enter
348
936000
2000
15:50
the domestic world of a city.
349
938000
2000
15:52
A space where something which has never seen a light of day
350
940000
4000
15:56
can enter into the inner workings of a density.
351
944000
4000
16:00
And I think that is really the nature of architecture.
352
948000
4000
16:04
Now I am a believer in democracy.
353
952000
2000
16:06
I don't like beautiful buildings
354
954000
2000
16:08
built for totalitarian regimes.
355
956000
2000
16:10
Where people cannot speak, cannot vote, cannot do anything.
356
958000
2000
16:12
We too often admire those buildings. We think they are beautiful.
357
960000
3000
16:15
And yet when I think of the poverty of society
358
963000
2000
16:17
which doesn't give freedom to its people,
359
965000
2000
16:19
I don't admire those buildings.
360
967000
2000
16:21
So democracy, as difficult as it is, I believe in it.
361
969000
2000
16:23
And of course, at Ground Zero what else?
362
971000
3000
16:26
It's such a complex project.
363
974000
2000
16:28
It's emotional. There is so many interests.
364
976000
2000
16:30
It's political. There is so many parties to this project.
365
978000
4000
16:34
There is so many interests. There's money. There's political power.
366
982000
2000
16:36
There are emotions of the victims.
367
984000
2000
16:38
And yet, in all its messiness, in all its difficulties,
368
986000
4000
16:42
I would not have liked somebody to say,
369
990000
2000
16:44
"This is the tabula rasa, mister architect -- do whatever you want."
370
992000
3000
16:47
I think nothing good will come out of that.
371
995000
2000
16:49
I think architecture is about consensus.
372
997000
2000
16:51
And it is about the dirty word "compromise." Compromise is not bad.
373
999000
4000
16:55
Compromise, if it's artistic,
374
1003000
2000
16:57
if it is able to cope with its strategies --
375
1005000
3000
17:00
and there is my first sketch and the last rendering --
376
1008000
2000
17:02
it's not that far away.
377
1010000
2000
17:04
And yet, compromise, consensus,
378
1012000
2000
17:06
that is what I believe in.
379
1014000
2000
17:08
And Ground Zero, despite all its difficulties, it's moving forward.
380
1016000
3000
17:11
It's difficult. 2011, 2013. Freedom Tower, the memorial.
381
1019000
5000
17:16
And that is where I end.
382
1024000
2000
17:18
I was inspired when I came here as an immigrant
383
1026000
2000
17:20
on a ship like millions of others,
384
1028000
2000
17:22
looking at America from that point of view.
385
1030000
3000
17:25
This is America. This is liberty.
386
1033000
2000
17:27
This is what we dream about. Its individuality,
387
1035000
2000
17:29
demonstrated in the skyline. It's resilience.
388
1037000
3000
17:32
And finally, it's the freedom that America represents,
389
1040000
2000
17:34
not just to me, as an immigrant, but to everyone in the world. Thank you.
390
1042000
4000
17:38
(Applause)
391
1046000
5000
17:43
Chris Anderson: I've got a question.
392
1051000
2000
17:45
So have you come to peace
393
1053000
2000
17:47
with the process that happened at Ground Zero
394
1055000
3000
17:50
and the loss of the original, incredible design that you came up with?
395
1058000
3000
17:53
Daniel Libeskind: Look. We have to cure ourselves
396
1061000
4000
17:57
of the notion that we are authoritarian,
397
1065000
2000
17:59
that we can determine everything that happens.
398
1067000
2000
18:01
We have to rely on others, and shape the process in the best way possible.
399
1069000
4000
18:05
I came from the Bronx. I was taught not to be a loser,
400
1073000
3000
18:08
not to be somebody who just gives up in a fight.
401
1076000
2000
18:10
You have to fight for what you believe. You don't always win
402
1078000
2000
18:12
everything you want to win. But you can steer the process.
403
1080000
3000
18:15
And I believe that what will be built at Ground Zero
404
1083000
3000
18:18
will be meaningful, will be inspiring,
405
1086000
3000
18:21
will tell other generations of the sacrifices,
406
1089000
2000
18:23
of the meaning of this event.
407
1091000
2000
18:25
Not just for New York, but for the world.
408
1093000
2000
18:27
Chris Anderson: Thank you so much, Daniel Libeskind.
409
1095000
2000
18:29
(Applause)
410
1097000
2000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Daniel Libeskind - ArchitectBeing a designer of breathtaking and sometimes confounding buildings seems almost a footnote to the amazing life of architect Daniel Libeskind.
Why you should listen
A true renaissance man, Daniel Libeskind possesses a staggering array of creative interests -- he has been a free-verse poet, an opera set designer, a virtuoso musician. When he finally settled on architecture, it was not long (in architect-years, anyway) before he had taken the skylines of the world by storm.
His many buildings include the recently opened Contemporary Jewish Museum in San Francisco, in the deep footsteps of his acclaimed design for the Jewish Museum Berlin -- his first major building project, and one of the most visited museums in Europe. He also created the spectacular extension to the Denver Art Museum (completed in 2006), and construction is under way on a massive retail complex on the strip in Las Vegas.
Libeskind's ambitious and highly controversial design for the rebuilt World Trade Center is perhaps his most well known project, and despite almost a decade of political wrangling and bureaucratic whittling, he insists that the final design will retain the spirit of his original renderings.
Daniel Libeskind | Speaker | TED.com