TED@State
Paul Collier: New rules for rebuilding a broken nation
Filmed:
Readability: 4.9
458,202 views
Long conflict can wreck a country, leaving behind poverty and chaos. But what's the right way to help war-torn countries rebuild? At TED@State, Paul Collier explains the problems with current post-conflict aid plans, and suggests 3 ideas for a better approach.
Paul Collier - Economist
Paul Collier’s book The Bottom Billion shows what is happening to the poorest people in the world, and offers ideas for opening up opportunities to all. Full bio
Paul Collier’s book The Bottom Billion shows what is happening to the poorest people in the world, and offers ideas for opening up opportunities to all. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:16
I'm going to talk about post-conflict recovery
0
0
6000
00:22
and how we might do post-conflict recovery better.
1
6000
5000
00:27
The record on post-conflict recovery is not very impressive.
2
11000
5000
00:32
40 percent of all post-conflict situations,
3
16000
4000
00:36
historically, have reverted back to conflict within a decade.
4
20000
4000
00:40
In fact, they've accounted for half of all civil wars.
5
24000
5000
00:45
Why has the record been so poor?
6
29000
3000
00:48
Well, the conventional approach
7
32000
3000
00:51
to post-conflict situations
8
35000
2000
00:53
has rested on, on kind of, three principles.
9
37000
4000
00:57
The first principle is: it's the politics that matters.
10
41000
5000
01:02
So, the first thing that is prioritized is politics.
11
46000
3000
01:05
Try and build a political settlement first.
12
49000
5000
01:10
And then the second step is to say,
13
54000
3000
01:13
"The situation is admittedly dangerous, but only for a short time."
14
57000
3000
01:16
So get peacekeepers there, but get them home as soon as possible.
15
60000
5000
01:21
So, short-term peacekeepers.
16
65000
3000
01:24
And thirdly, what is the exit strategy for the peacekeepers?
17
68000
4000
01:28
It's an election.
18
72000
2000
01:30
That will produce a legitimate and accountable government.
19
74000
5000
01:35
So that's the conventional approach.
20
79000
3000
01:38
I think that approach denies reality.
21
82000
4000
01:42
We see that there is no quick fix.
22
86000
4000
01:46
There's certainly no quick security fix.
23
90000
3000
01:49
I've tried to look at the risks of reversion to conflict,
24
93000
3000
01:52
during our post-conflict decade.
25
96000
2000
01:54
And the risks stay high throughout the decade.
26
98000
4000
01:58
And they stay high regardless of the political innovations.
27
102000
7000
02:05
Does an election produce an accountable and legitimate government?
28
109000
5000
02:10
What an election produces is a winner and a loser.
29
114000
5000
02:15
And the loser is unreconciled.
30
119000
5000
02:20
The reality is that we need to reverse the sequence.
31
124000
4000
02:24
It's not the politics first;
32
128000
2000
02:26
it's actually the politics last.
33
130000
3000
02:29
The politics become easier as the decade progresses
34
133000
3000
02:32
if you're building on a foundation
35
136000
3000
02:35
of security and economic development --
36
139000
5000
02:40
the rebuilding of prosperity.
37
144000
2000
02:42
Why does the politics get easier?
38
146000
2000
02:44
And why is it so difficult initially?
39
148000
2000
02:46
Because after years of stagnation and decline,
40
150000
4000
02:50
the mentality of politics is that it's a zero-sum game.
41
154000
6000
02:56
If the reality is stagnation,
42
160000
2000
02:58
I can only go up if you go down.
43
162000
3000
03:01
And that doesn't produce a productive politics.
44
165000
5000
03:06
And so the mentality has to shift from
45
170000
3000
03:09
zero-sum to positive-sum
46
173000
2000
03:11
before you can get a productive politics.
47
175000
4000
03:15
You can only get positive, that mental shift,
48
179000
2000
03:17
if the reality is that prosperity is being built.
49
181000
4000
03:21
And in order to build prosperity, we need security in place.
50
185000
5000
03:26
So that is what you get when you face reality.
51
190000
2000
03:28
But the objective of facing reality
52
192000
2000
03:30
is to change reality.
53
194000
2000
03:32
And so now let me suggest
54
196000
2000
03:34
two complimentary approaches
55
198000
4000
03:38
to changing the reality of the situations.
56
202000
3000
03:41
The first is to recognize the interdependence
57
205000
4000
03:45
of three key actors, who are different actors,
58
209000
5000
03:50
and at the moment are uncoordinated.
59
214000
3000
03:53
The first actor is the Security Council.
60
217000
3000
03:56
The Security Council typically has the responsibility
61
220000
4000
04:00
for providing the peacekeepers
62
224000
2000
04:02
who build the security.
63
226000
3000
04:05
And that needs to be recognized,
64
229000
2000
04:07
first of all, that peacekeeping works.
65
231000
3000
04:10
It is a cost-effective approach.
66
234000
2000
04:12
It does increase security.
67
236000
3000
04:15
But it needs to be done long-term.
68
239000
2000
04:17
It needs to be a decade-long approach,
69
241000
2000
04:19
rather than just a couple of years.
70
243000
2000
04:21
That's one actor, the Security Council.
71
245000
3000
04:24
The second actor, different cast of guys,
72
248000
3000
04:27
is the donors.
73
251000
2000
04:29
The donors provide post-conflict aid.
74
253000
3000
04:32
Typically in the past,
75
256000
3000
04:35
the donors have been interested in the first couple of years,
76
259000
3000
04:38
and then they got bored.
77
262000
2000
04:40
They moved on to some other situation.
78
264000
3000
04:43
Post-conflict economic recovery
79
267000
2000
04:45
is a slow process.
80
269000
2000
04:47
There are no quick processes in economics
81
271000
3000
04:50
except decline.
82
274000
2000
04:52
You can do that quite fast.
83
276000
2000
04:54
(Laughter)
84
278000
1000
04:55
So the donors have to stick with this situation
85
279000
5000
05:00
for at least a decade.
86
284000
4000
05:04
And then the third key actor
87
288000
2000
05:06
is the post-conflict government.
88
290000
3000
05:09
And there are two key things it's got to do.
89
293000
2000
05:11
One is it's got to do economic reform,
90
295000
4000
05:15
not fuss about the political constitution.
91
299000
3000
05:18
It's got to reform economic policy.
92
302000
2000
05:20
Why? Because during conflict
93
304000
3000
05:23
economic policy typically deteriorates.
94
307000
3000
05:26
Governments snatch short-term opportunities
95
310000
4000
05:30
and, by the end of the conflict, the chickens have come home to roost.
96
314000
4000
05:34
So this legacy of conflict is really bad economic policy.
97
318000
3000
05:37
So there is a reform agenda, and there is an inclusion agenda.
98
321000
4000
05:41
The inclusion agenda doesn't come from elections.
99
325000
3000
05:44
Elections produce a loser, who is then excluded.
100
328000
5000
05:49
So the inclusion agenda means genuinely
101
333000
3000
05:52
bringing people inside the tent.
102
336000
3000
05:55
So those three actors.
103
339000
2000
05:57
And they are interdependent
104
341000
2000
05:59
over a long term.
105
343000
3000
06:02
If the Security Council doesn't commit to security
106
346000
4000
06:06
over the course of a decade,
107
350000
2000
06:08
you don't get the reassurance which produces private investment.
108
352000
4000
06:12
If you don't get the policy reform and the aid,
109
356000
4000
06:16
you don't get the economic recovery,
110
360000
2000
06:18
which is the true exit strategy for the peacekeepers.
111
362000
4000
06:22
So we should recognize that interdependence,
112
366000
4000
06:26
by formal, mutual commitments.
113
370000
3000
06:29
The United Nations actually has a language
114
373000
3000
06:32
for these mutual commitments, the recognition of mutual commitments;
115
376000
3000
06:35
it's called the language of compact.
116
379000
4000
06:39
And so we need a post-conflict compact.
117
383000
3000
06:42
The United Nations even has an agency which could broker these compacts;
118
386000
3000
06:45
it's called the Peace Building Commission.
119
389000
4000
06:49
It would be ideal to have a standard set of norms
120
393000
5000
06:54
where, when we got to a post-conflict situation,
121
398000
3000
06:57
there was an expectation of these mutual commitments
122
401000
4000
07:01
from the three parties.
123
405000
3000
07:04
So that's idea one:
124
408000
3000
07:07
recognize interdependence.
125
411000
3000
07:10
And now let me turn to the second approach, which is complimentary.
126
414000
4000
07:14
And that is to focus on a few critical objectives.
127
418000
9000
07:23
Typical post-conflict situation is a zoo
128
427000
3000
07:26
of different actors with different priorities.
129
430000
4000
07:30
And indeed, unfortunately, if you navigate by needs
130
434000
4000
07:34
you get a very unfocused agenda,
131
438000
3000
07:37
because in these situations, needs are everywhere,
132
441000
3000
07:40
but the capacity to implement change is very limited.
133
444000
4000
07:44
So we have to be disciplined and focus on things that are critical.
134
448000
5000
07:49
And I want to suggest that in the typical post-conflict situation
135
453000
3000
07:52
three things are critical.
136
456000
3000
07:55
One is jobs.
137
459000
2000
07:57
One is improvements in basic services --
138
461000
2000
07:59
especially health, which is a disaster during conflict.
139
463000
4000
08:03
So jobs, health, and clean government.
140
467000
5000
08:08
Those are the three critical priorities.
141
472000
4000
08:12
So I'm going to talk a little about each of them.
142
476000
2000
08:14
Jobs.
143
478000
2000
08:16
What is a distinctive approach
144
480000
3000
08:19
to generating jobs in post-conflict situations?
145
483000
3000
08:22
And why are jobs so important?
146
486000
2000
08:24
Jobs for whom? Especially jobs for young men.
147
488000
5000
08:29
In post-conflict situations,
148
493000
2000
08:31
the reason that they so often revert to conflict,
149
495000
4000
08:35
is not because elderly women get upset.
150
499000
3000
08:38
It's because young men get upset.
151
502000
3000
08:41
And why are they upset? Because they have nothing to do.
152
505000
3000
08:44
And so we need a process of generating jobs,
153
508000
6000
08:50
for ordinary young men, fast.
154
514000
3000
08:53
Now, that is difficult.
155
517000
3000
08:56
Governments in post-conflict situation
156
520000
2000
08:58
often respond by puffing up the civil service.
157
522000
4000
09:02
That is not a good idea.
158
526000
2000
09:04
It's not sustainable.
159
528000
2000
09:06
In fact, you're building a long-term liability
160
530000
3000
09:09
by inflating civil service.
161
533000
2000
09:11
But getting the private sector to expand is also difficult,
162
535000
4000
09:15
because any activity which is open to international trade
163
539000
5000
09:20
is basically going to be uncompetitive
164
544000
2000
09:22
in a post-conflict situation.
165
546000
2000
09:24
These are not environments where you can build export manufacturing.
166
548000
5000
09:29
There's one sector which isn't exposed to international trade,
167
553000
5000
09:34
and which can generate a lot of jobs,
168
558000
3000
09:37
and which is, in any case, a sensible sector
169
561000
2000
09:39
to expand, post-conflict,
170
563000
2000
09:41
and that is the construction sector.
171
565000
4000
09:45
The construction sector has a vital role,
172
569000
3000
09:48
obviously, in reconstruction.
173
572000
3000
09:51
But typically that sector has withered away during conflict.
174
575000
5000
09:56
During conflict people are doing destruction.
175
580000
2000
09:58
There isn't any construction going on. And so the sector shrivels away.
176
582000
4000
10:02
And then when you try and expand it,
177
586000
2000
10:04
because it's shriveled away,
178
588000
2000
10:06
you encounter a lot of bottlenecks.
179
590000
3000
10:09
Basically, prices soar
180
593000
2000
10:11
and crooked politicians then milk the rents from the sector,
181
595000
4000
10:15
but it doesn't generate any jobs.
182
599000
2000
10:17
And so the policy priority is to break the bottlenecks
183
601000
3000
10:20
in expanding the construction sector.
184
604000
3000
10:23
What might the bottlenecks be?
185
607000
2000
10:25
Just think what you have to do
186
609000
3000
10:28
successfully to build a structure, using a lot of labor.
187
612000
3000
10:31
First you need access to land.
188
615000
2000
10:33
Often the legal system is broken down
189
617000
2000
10:35
so you can't even get access to land.
190
619000
2000
10:37
Secondly you need skills,
191
621000
2000
10:39
the mundane skills of the construction sector.
192
623000
4000
10:43
In post-conflict situations we don't just need Doctors Without Borders,
193
627000
4000
10:47
we need Bricklayers Without Borders,
194
631000
2000
10:49
to rebuild the skill set.
195
633000
3000
10:52
We need firms. The firms have gone away.
196
636000
3000
10:55
So we need to encourage the growth of local firms.
197
639000
3000
10:58
If we do that, we not only get the jobs,
198
642000
3000
11:01
we get the improvements in public infrastructure,
199
645000
3000
11:04
the restoration of public infrastructure.
200
648000
3000
11:07
Let me turn from jobs to the second objective,
201
651000
6000
11:13
which is improving basic social services.
202
657000
4000
11:17
And to date, there has been a sort of a schizophrenia
203
661000
4000
11:21
in the donor community,
204
665000
2000
11:23
as to how to build basic services
205
667000
3000
11:26
in post-conflict sectors.
206
670000
2000
11:28
On the one hand it pays lip service
207
672000
2000
11:30
to the idea of rebuild an effective state
208
674000
4000
11:34
in the image of Scandinavia in the 1950s.
209
678000
3000
11:37
Lets develop line ministries of this, that, and the other,
210
681000
3000
11:40
that deliver these services.
211
684000
3000
11:43
And it's schizophrenic because in their hearts
212
687000
3000
11:46
donors know that's not a realistic agenda,
213
690000
3000
11:49
and so what they also do is the total bypass:
214
693000
3000
11:52
just fund NGOs.
215
696000
4000
11:56
Neither of those approaches is sensible.
216
700000
3000
11:59
And so what I'd suggest
217
703000
4000
12:03
is what I call Independent Service Authorities.
218
707000
3000
12:06
It's to split the functions of a monopoly line ministry up into three.
219
710000
5000
12:11
The planning function and policy function stays with the ministry;
220
715000
4000
12:15
the delivery of services on the ground,
221
719000
3000
12:18
you should use whatever works --
222
722000
2000
12:20
churches, NGOs, local communities,
223
724000
3000
12:23
whatever works.
224
727000
2000
12:25
And in between, there should be a public agency,
225
729000
3000
12:28
the Independent Service Authority,
226
732000
2000
12:30
which channels public money,
227
734000
2000
12:32
and especially donor money,
228
736000
2000
12:34
to the retail providers.
229
738000
3000
12:37
So the NGOs become part of a public government system,
230
741000
5000
12:42
rather than independent of it.
231
746000
3000
12:45
One advantage of that is that you can allocate money coherently.
232
749000
4000
12:49
Another is, you can make NGOs accountable.
233
753000
3000
12:52
You can use yardstick competition,
234
756000
2000
12:54
so they have to compete against each other
235
758000
3000
12:57
for the resources.
236
761000
2000
12:59
The good NGOs, like Oxfam, are very keen on this idea.
237
763000
3000
13:02
They want to have the discipline and accountability.
238
766000
6000
13:08
So that's a way to get basic services scaled up.
239
772000
3000
13:11
And because the government would be funding it,
240
775000
3000
13:14
it would be co-branding these services.
241
778000
2000
13:16
So they wouldn't be provided thanks to
242
780000
4000
13:20
the United States government and some NGO.
243
784000
4000
13:24
They would be co-branded
244
788000
2000
13:26
as being done by the post-conflict government, in the country.
245
790000
5000
13:31
So, jobs, basic services, finally, clean government.
246
795000
6000
13:37
Clean means follow their money.
247
801000
3000
13:40
The typical post-conflict government is so short of money
248
804000
5000
13:45
that it needs our money
249
809000
2000
13:47
just to be on a life-support system.
250
811000
3000
13:50
You can't get the basic functions of the state done
251
814000
3000
13:53
unless we put money into the core budget of these countries.
252
817000
4000
13:57
But, if we put money into the core budget,
253
821000
4000
14:01
we know that there aren't the budget systems with integrity
254
825000
7000
14:08
that mean that money will be well spent.
255
832000
3000
14:11
And if all we do is put money in and close our eyes
256
835000
4000
14:15
it's not just that the money is wasted --
257
839000
2000
14:17
that's the least of the problems --
258
841000
2000
14:19
it's that the money is captured.
259
843000
3000
14:22
It's captured by the crooks who are at the heart of the political problem.
260
846000
6000
14:28
And so inadvertently we empower the people who are the problem.
261
852000
5000
14:33
So building clean government means, yes, provide money
262
857000
3000
14:36
to the budget,
263
860000
2000
14:38
but also provide a lot of scrutiny,
264
862000
5000
14:43
which means a lot of technical assistance that follows the money.
265
867000
3000
14:46
Paddy Ashdown, who was the grand high nabob of Bosnia
266
870000
5000
14:51
to the United Nations,
267
875000
2000
14:53
in his book about his experience, he said,
268
877000
2000
14:55
"I realize what I needed
269
879000
3000
14:58
was accountants without borders,
270
882000
4000
15:02
to follow that money."
271
886000
2000
15:04
So that's the -- let me wrap up,
272
888000
3000
15:07
this is the package.
273
891000
3000
15:10
What's the goal?
274
894000
2000
15:12
If we follow this, what would we hope to achieve?
275
896000
4000
15:16
That after 10 years,
276
900000
3000
15:19
the focus on the construction sector
277
903000
3000
15:22
would have produced both jobs
278
906000
2000
15:24
and, hence, security --
279
908000
2000
15:26
because young people would have jobs --
280
910000
2000
15:28
and it would have reconstructed the infrastructure.
281
912000
4000
15:32
So that's the focus on the construction sector.
282
916000
3000
15:35
The focus on the basic service delivery
283
919000
2000
15:37
through these independent service authorities
284
921000
3000
15:40
would have rescued basic services
285
924000
3000
15:43
from their catastrophic levels,
286
927000
3000
15:46
and it would have given ordinary people
287
930000
3000
15:49
the sense that the government was doing something useful.
288
933000
4000
15:53
The emphasis on clean government
289
937000
3000
15:56
would have gradually squeezed out the political crooks,
290
940000
3000
15:59
because there wouldn't be any money
291
943000
4000
16:03
in taking part in the politics.
292
947000
2000
16:05
And so gradually the selection,
293
949000
2000
16:07
the composition of politicians,
294
951000
2000
16:09
would shift from the crooked to the honest.
295
953000
5000
16:14
Where would that leave us?
296
958000
3000
16:17
Gradually it would shift
297
961000
2000
16:19
from a politics of plunder
298
963000
3000
16:22
to a politics of hope. Thank you.
299
966000
3000
16:25
(Applause)
300
969000
5000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Paul Collier - EconomistPaul Collier’s book The Bottom Billion shows what is happening to the poorest people in the world, and offers ideas for opening up opportunities to all.
Why you should listen
Paul Collier studies the political and economic problems of the very poorest countries: 50 societies, many in sub-Saharan Africa, that are stagnating or in decline, and taking a billion people down with them. His book The Bottom Billion identifies the four traps that keep such countries mired in poverty, and outlines ways to help them escape, with a mix of direct aid and external support for internal change.
From 1998 to 2003, Collier was the director of the World Bank's Development Research Group; he now directs the Centre for the Study of African Economies at Oxford, where he continues to advise policymakers.
Paul Collier | Speaker | TED.com