Steven Wise: Chimps have feelings and thoughts. They should also have rights
Steven Wise: Šimpanzy cítia a myslia. Mali by mať aj práva
By challenging long-held legal notions of “personhood”, Steven Wise seeks to grant cognitively advanced animals access to a full spectrum of fundamental rights. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
or the cars you own.
to my book or my car.
si môžem robiť, čo sa mi zachce.
named James Mollison
"James & Other Apes."
how every single one them,
že takmer všetky tieto opice sú siroty,
die before his eyes.
a great legal wall
oddeľuje právny múr.
from legal persons.
are invisible to judges.
na tie sudcovia nehľadia.
the capacity for legal rights.
are the legal persons.
sú osoby, právne subjekty.
for an infinite number of rights.
nekonečného množstvo práv.
are legal things.
v právnom zmysle vecami.
synonymous with a legal person.
Tak je tomu aj dnes.
are not synonymous.
nie sú synonymá.
mnoho ľudí právny štatút veci.
over the centuries
were sometimes legal things.
struggle over the last centuries
through that wall and begin to feed
v prerazení tohto právneho múru
and have them become legal persons.
na druhú stranu, medzi osoby.
limited to human beings.
legal persons who are not even alive.
that corporations are legal persons.
v Indii právnu subjektivitu
was a legal person,
of the Sikh religion was a legal person,
the indigenous peoples of New Zealand
s britskou kráľovnou dohodu,
that a river was a legal person
rieke a tá vlastní svoje koryto.
mal bujnú hnedú hrivu,
of lush, brown hair,
I wanted to speak for the voiceless,
a chránil bezbranných.
and defenseless the trillions,
sú bilióny, miliardy zvierat na svete.
as an animal protection lawyer.
za ochranu zvierat.
to accomplish something
že sa snažím o nemožné,
I was trying to defend,
pre súdy boli neviditeľní.
vedie cez tú dieru v múre.
was they had, at least some of them,
that we could open up again in that wall
nonhuman animals through that hole
na druhú stranu medzi právne subjekty.
of being legal persons.
very little known about or spoken about
o skutočných právach zvierat,
mohli byť osobnosti a mať práva.
or legal rights for a nonhuman animal,
to take a long time.
would take about 30 years
že prejde asi 30 rokov,
a strategic litigation,
začať so súdnymi žalobami
to punch another hole through that wall.
s cieľom preraziť ďalšiu dieru v múre.
that it only took 28.
to begin was not only
and teach classes, write books,
vyučovať a písať knihy.
to get down to the nuts and bolts
ako vôbec viesť takýto súdny spor.
was figure out what a cause of action was,
is a vehicle that lawyers use
prednášajú pred súdom svoje argumenty.
a very interesting case
in London called Somerset vs. Stewart,
had used the legal system
to a legal person.
eventually wrote an entire book about it.
o tom nakoniec napísal celú knihu.
when he was kidnapped from West Africa.
keď ho v Západnej Afrike uniesli.
named Charles Stewart in Virginia.
škótsky obchodník Charles Steward.
brought James Somerset to London,
he was going to escape.
was to get himself baptized,
a set of godparents,
krstného otca v 18. storočí bolo,
responsibilities of godfathers
James Somerset Stewardovi vzoprel.
with Charles Stewart.
but then James dropped out of sight.
Isté je len to, že James sa potom vyparil.
then hired slave catchers
najal lovcov otrokov,
ho naložili na loď Ann and Mary,
not back to Charles Stewart,
that was floating in London Harbour,
in the slave markets
years of life that a slave had
cukrovú trstinu zostávali.
swung into action.
Jamesovi krstní rodičia.
of the court of King's Bench,
ktorý predsedal kráľovskému súdu,
a common law writ of habeus corpus
vydal súdny príkaz „habeas corpus“.
má veľkú silu tzv. sudcovské právo.
that English-speaking judges can make
by statutes or constitutions,
právna norma, záväzný je precedens.
is called the Great Writ,
známy tiež ako Great Writ,
who are detained against our will.
proti vlastnej vôli.
to bring the detainee in
for depriving him of his bodily liberty.
prečo mu upiera telesnú slobodu.
a decision right off the bat,
was a legal thing,
for a writ of habeus corpus,
that he would assume,
was indeed a legal person,
sa musel aj s Jamesom dostaviť pred súd.
and James's body was brought in
over the next six months.
said that slavery was so odious,
že otroctvo je také ohavné –
and he ordered James free.
underwent a legal transubstantiation.
právne prevtelenie.
ktorý vyšiel zo súdnej siene,
out of the courtroom
who had walked in,
ktorý tam predtým vošiel,
they had nothing whatsoever in common.
nemali vôbec nič spoločné.
(Združenia za mimoľudské práva)
the Nonhuman Rights Project,
what kind of values and principles
chceme našu vec pred súdom zaštítiť.
did they imbibe with their mother's milk,
boli títo sudcovia odchovaní,
na právnických fakultách,
do they use every day,
and we chose liberty and equality.
to which you're entitled
jednoducho tým, že je.
a chráni základný záujem.
protects a fundamental interest.
v angloamerickom právnom systéme
and self-determination.
in a common law country,
odmietnete v nemocnici liečbu,
life-saving medical treatment,
ani keby vás to malo stáť život.
your self-determination and your autonomy.
of right to which you're entitled
in a relevant way,
podobáte na niekoho iného.
they have the right, you're like them,
a vy ste ako on,
draw lines all the time.
stále vytyčujú nejaké hranice.
at the bare minimum you must --
nejakým legitímnym cieľom.
to a legitimate end.
argues that drawing a line
and self-determining being
zotročenie autonómnych bytostí,
to find the jurisdiction
filing our first suit.
who our plaintiffs are going to be.
kto bude žalobcom.
was on our board of directors,
sedí v našom predstavenstve,
intenzívne skúmali šimpanzy
intensively for decades.
cognitive capabilities that they have,
that human beings have.
and we began to then canvass the world
odborníkov na ich psychológiu.
in chimpanzee cognition.
Scotland, England and the United States,
Nemecku, Anglicku a USA.
100 pages of affidavits
odborných stanovísk,
vyše 40 argumentov za to,
cognitive capability,
and self-determination.
that they were conscious.
že šimpanzy majú vedomie.
that they're conscious.
They know that others have minds.
Vedia, že ju majú aj druhí.
and that they can live.
a aj to, že sú živé.
and they will live tomorrow.
They remember what happened yesterday.
Pamätajú si, čo sa stalo včera.
a chimpanzee, especially alone.
hlavne osamote.
to our worst criminals,
without even thinking about it.
with human beings,
even when they're not required to do so.
a to aj keď nemusia.
They understand numbers.
or to stay out of the language wars,
aby sme sa vyhli sporu o jazyk,
and referential communication
zmysluplnou komunikáciou,
to the attitudes of those
a social culture.
in the Ivory Coast
these rocks to smash open
to learn how to do that,
and they found
this way of doing it,
toto otváranie orechov kameňmi,
for at least 4,300 years
nájsť nášho šimpanza.
in the state of New York.
we could even get our suits filed.
You see him behind me.
We found him in that cage.
that was filled with cages
trailer lot in central New York.
prívesov v centrálnom New Yorku.
storefront in western Massachusetts.
na západe Massachusets.
anatomical research at Stony Brook.
anatomický výskum v Stony Brook.
suits all across the state of New York
na rôznych súdoch štátu New York.
writ of habeus corpus argument
these common law writs of habeus corpus.
aby tento príkaz vydali.
to Save the Chimps,
sanctuary in South Florida
na Južnej Floride,
with 12 or 13 islands --
umelé jazero s 12 alebo 13 ostrovmi.
where two dozen chimpanzees live
a žijú na ňom dva tucty šimpanzov.
the life of a chimpanzee,
mohli žiť život šimpanza
that was as close to Africa as possible.
v prostredí podobnom Afrike.
ešte nie je uzavrený.
our Lord Mansfield.
na nášho Lorda Mansfielda.
litigation campaign. We shall.
On raz príde.
is that they're not the end,
the end of the beginning.
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Steven Wise - Animal rights lawyerBy challenging long-held legal notions of “personhood”, Steven Wise seeks to grant cognitively advanced animals access to a full spectrum of fundamental rights.
Why you should listen
Using a long-term litigation campaign based on existing habeas corpus law, Steven Wise and the Nonhuman Rights Project are redefining the playing field for animal rights law. While the high-profile New York lawsuits Wise has initiated on behalf of captive chimpanzees have yet to bear fruit, they’re only the first stage of a strategy that is changing the conversation about animal rights.
Wise’s work with the Nonhuman Rights Project is the subject of Unlocking the Cage, a forthcoming film by Chris Hegedus and D.A. Pennebaker.
Steven Wise | Speaker | TED.com