TED2008
Paul Collier: The "bottom billion"
Filmed:
Readability: 4.4
1,479,650 views
Around the world right now, one billion people are trapped in poor or failing countries. How can we help them? Economist Paul Collier lays out a bold, compassionate plan for closing the gap between rich and poor.
Paul Collier - Economist
Paul Collier’s book The Bottom Billion shows what is happening to the poorest people in the world, and offers ideas for opening up opportunities to all. Full bio
Paul Collier’s book The Bottom Billion shows what is happening to the poorest people in the world, and offers ideas for opening up opportunities to all. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:19
So, can we dare to be optimistic?
0
1000
3000
00:22
Well, the thesis of "The Bottom Billion"
1
4000
1000
00:23
is that a billion people have been stuck living
2
5000
5000
00:28
in economies that have been stagnant for 40 years,
3
10000
5000
00:33
and hence diverging from the rest of mankind.
4
15000
4000
00:37
And so, the real question to pose is not, "Can we be optimistic?"
5
19000
3000
00:40
It's, "How can we give credible hope to that billion people?"
6
22000
5000
00:45
That, to my mind, is the fundamental challenge now of development.
7
27000
6000
00:51
What I'm going to offer you is a recipe,
8
33000
3000
00:54
a combination of the two forces that changed the world for good,
9
36000
5000
00:59
which is the alliance of compassion and enlightened self-interest.
10
41000
7000
01:06
Compassion, because a billion people are living in societies
11
48000
5000
01:11
that have not offered credible hope.
12
53000
5000
01:16
That is a human tragedy.
13
58000
3000
01:19
Enlightened self-interest, because if that economic divergence
14
61000
5000
01:24
continues for another 40 years,
15
66000
5000
01:29
combined with social integration globally,
16
71000
4000
01:33
it will build a nightmare for our children.
17
75000
4000
01:37
We need compassion to get ourselves started,
18
79000
4000
01:41
and enlightened self-interest to get ourselves serious.
19
83000
6000
01:47
That's the alliance that changes the world.
20
89000
3000
01:50
So, what does it mean to get serious about providing hope for the bottom billion?
21
92000
7000
01:57
What can we actually do?
22
99000
4000
02:01
Well, a good guide is to think,
23
103000
3000
02:04
"What did we do last time the rich world got serious
24
106000
5000
02:09
about developing another region of the world?"
25
111000
4000
02:13
That gives us, it turns out, quite a good clue,
26
115000
4000
02:17
except you have to go back quite a long time.
27
119000
3000
02:20
The last time the rich world got serious
28
122000
2000
02:22
about developing another region was in the late 1940s.
29
124000
6000
02:28
The rich world was you, America,
30
130000
5000
02:33
and the region that needed to be developed was my world, Europe.
31
135000
5000
02:38
That was post-War Europe.
32
140000
3000
02:41
Why did America get serious?
33
143000
3000
02:44
It wasn't just compassion for Europe, though there was that.
34
146000
4000
02:48
It was that you knew you had to,
35
150000
3000
02:51
because, in the late 1940s, country after country in Central Europe
36
153000
5000
02:56
was falling into the Soviet bloc, and so you knew you'd no choice.
37
158000
6000
03:02
Europe had to be dragged into economic development.
38
164000
3000
03:05
So, what did you do, last time you got serious?
39
167000
4000
03:09
Well, yes, you had a big aid program. Thank you very much.
40
171000
4000
03:13
That was Marshall aid: we need to do it again. Aid is part of the solution.
41
175000
5000
03:18
But what else did you do?
42
180000
3000
03:21
Well, you tore up your trade policy, and totally reversed it.
43
183000
7000
03:28
Before the war, America had been highly protectionist.
44
190000
4000
03:32
After the war, you opened your markets to Europe,
45
194000
4000
03:36
you dragged Europe into the then-global economy, which was your economy,
46
198000
4000
03:40
and you institutionalized that trade liberalization
47
202000
2000
03:42
through founding the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
48
204000
4000
03:46
So, total reversal of trade policy.
49
208000
3000
03:49
Did you do anything else?
50
211000
1000
03:50
Yes, you totally reversed your security policy.
51
212000
3000
03:53
Before the war, your security policy had been isolationist.
52
215000
4000
03:57
After the war, you tear that up, you put 100,000 troops in Europe
53
219000
6000
04:03
for over 40 years.
54
225000
2000
04:05
So, total reversal of security policy. Anything else?
55
227000
5000
04:10
Yes, you tear up the "Eleventh Commandment" --
56
232000
4000
04:14
national sovereignty.
57
236000
3000
04:17
Before the war, you treated national sovereignty as so sacrosanct
58
239000
5000
04:22
that you weren't even willing to join the League of Nations.
59
244000
3000
04:25
After the war, you found the United Nations,
60
247000
3000
04:28
you found the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,
61
250000
4000
04:32
you found the IMF, you encouraged Europe to create the European Community --
62
254000
5000
04:37
all systems for mutual government support.
63
259000
4000
04:41
That is still the waterfront of effective policies:
64
263000
6000
04:47
aid, trade, security, governments.
65
269000
4000
04:51
Of course, the details of policy are going to be different,
66
273000
3000
04:54
because the challenge is different.
67
276000
2000
04:56
It's not rebuilding Europe, it's reversing the divergence
68
278000
6000
05:02
for the bottom billion, so that they actually catch up.
69
284000
3000
05:05
Is that easier or harder?
70
287000
4000
05:09
We need to be at least as serious as we were then.
71
291000
5000
05:14
Now, today I'm going to take just one of those four.
72
296000
5000
05:19
I'm going to take the one that sounds the weakest,
73
301000
3000
05:22
the one that's just motherhood and apple pie --
74
304000
3000
05:25
governments, mutual systems of support for governments --
75
307000
3000
05:28
and I'm going to show you one idea
76
310000
4000
05:32
in how we could do something to strengthen governance,
77
314000
5000
05:37
and I'm going to show you that that is enormously important now.
78
319000
7000
05:44
The opportunity we're going to look to
79
326000
5000
05:49
is a genuine basis for optimism about the bottom billion,
80
331000
6000
05:55
and that is the commodity booms.
81
337000
3000
05:58
The commodity booms are pumping unprecedented amounts of money
82
340000
6000
06:04
into many, though not all, of the countries of the bottom billion.
83
346000
6000
06:10
Partly, they're pumping money in because commodity prices are high,
84
352000
4000
06:14
but it's not just that. There's also a range of new discoveries.
85
356000
7000
06:21
Uganda has just discovered oil, in about the most disastrous location on Earth;
86
363000
6000
06:27
Ghana has discovered oil;
87
369000
2000
06:29
Guinea has got a huge new exploitation of iron ore coming out of the ground.
88
371000
5000
06:34
So, a mass of new discoveries.
89
376000
3000
06:37
Between them, these new revenue flows dwarf aid.
90
379000
5000
06:42
Just to give you one example:
91
384000
3000
06:45
Angola alone is getting 50 billion dollars a year in oil revenue.
92
387000
5000
06:50
The entire aid flows to the 60 countries of the bottom billion last year were 34 billion.
93
392000
6000
06:56
So, the flow of resources from the commodity booms
94
398000
5000
07:01
to the bottom billion are without precedent.
95
403000
5000
07:06
So there's the optimism.
96
408000
2000
07:08
The question is, how is it going to help their development?
97
410000
4000
07:12
It's a huge opportunity for transformational development.
98
414000
4000
07:16
Will it be taken?
99
418000
2000
07:18
So, here comes a bit of science, and this is a bit of science I've done
100
420000
4000
07:22
since "The Bottom Billion," so it's new.
101
424000
3000
07:25
I've looked to see what is the relationship between
102
427000
4000
07:29
higher commodity prices of exports,
103
431000
3000
07:32
and the growth of commodity-exporting countries.
104
434000
2000
07:34
And I've looked globally, I've taken all the countries in the world
105
436000
3000
07:37
for the last 40 years,
106
439000
2000
07:39
and looked to see what the relationship is.
107
441000
3000
07:42
And the short run -- say, the first five to seven years -- is just great.
108
444000
9000
07:51
In fact, it's hunky dory: everything goes up.
109
453000
5000
07:56
You get more money because your terms of trade have improved,
110
458000
2000
07:58
but also that drives up output across the board.
111
460000
3000
08:01
So GDP goes up a lot -- fantastic! That's the short run.
112
463000
6000
08:07
And how about the long run?
113
469000
2000
08:09
Come back 15 years later.
114
471000
3000
08:12
Well, the short run, it's hunky dory,
115
474000
2000
08:14
but the long run, it's humpty dumpty.
116
476000
5000
08:19
You go up in the short run, but then most societies
117
481000
4000
08:23
historically have ended up worse than if they'd had no booms at all.
118
485000
5000
08:28
That is not a forecast about how commodity prices go;
119
490000
4000
08:32
it's a forecast of the consequences, the long-term consequences,
120
494000
4000
08:36
for growth of an increase in prices.
121
498000
5000
08:41
So, what goes wrong? Why is there this "resource curse," as it's called?
122
503000
5000
08:46
And again, I've looked at that, and it turns out
123
508000
3000
08:49
that the critical issue is the level of governance,
124
511000
4000
08:53
the initial level of economic governance,
125
515000
2000
08:55
when the resource booms accrue.
126
517000
3000
08:58
In fact, if you've got good enough governance,
127
520000
2000
09:00
there is no resource boom.
128
522000
2000
09:02
You go up in the short term, and then you go up even more in the long term.
129
524000
5000
09:07
That's Norway, the richest country in Europe. It's Australia. It's Canada.
130
529000
6000
09:13
The resource curse is entirely confined to countries
131
535000
2000
09:15
below a threshold of governance.
132
537000
2000
09:17
They still go up in the short run.
133
539000
2000
09:19
That's what we're seeing across the bottom billion at the moment.
134
541000
4000
09:23
The best growth rates they've had -- ever.
135
545000
3000
09:26
And the question is whether the short run will persist.
136
548000
6000
09:32
And with bad governance historically, over the last 40 years, it hasn't.
137
554000
4000
09:36
It's countries like Nigeria, which are worse off than if they'd never had oil.
138
558000
8000
09:44
So, there's a threshold level above which you go up in the long term,
139
566000
5000
09:49
and below which you go down.
140
571000
2000
09:51
Just to benchmark that threshold,
141
573000
2000
09:53
it's about the governance level of Portugal in the mid 1980s.
142
575000
7000
10:00
So, the question is, are the bottom billion above or below that threshold?
143
582000
5000
10:05
Now, there's one big change since the commodity booms of the 1970s,
144
587000
5000
10:10
and that is the spread of democracy.
145
592000
3000
10:13
So I thought, well, maybe that is the thing
146
595000
2000
10:15
which has transformed governance in the bottom billion.
147
597000
2000
10:17
Maybe we can be more optimistic because of the spread of democracy.
148
599000
4000
10:21
So, I looked. Democracy does have significant effects --
149
603000
5000
10:26
and unfortunately, they're adverse.
150
608000
3000
10:29
Democracies make even more of a mess of these resource booms than autocracies.
151
611000
6000
10:35
At that stage I just wanted to abandon the research, but --
152
617000
3000
10:38
(Laughter)
153
620000
2000
10:40
-- it turns out that democracy is a little bit more complicated than that.
154
622000
3000
10:43
Because there are two distinct aspects of democracy:
155
625000
4000
10:47
there's electoral competition, which determines how you acquire power,
156
629000
5000
10:52
and there are checks and balances, which determine how you use power.
157
634000
6000
10:58
It turns out that electoral competition is the thing
158
640000
2000
11:00
that's doing the damage with democracy,
159
642000
2000
11:02
whereas strong checks and balances make resource booms good.
160
644000
5000
11:07
And so, what the countries of the bottom billion need
161
649000
3000
11:10
is very strong checks and balances.
162
652000
2000
11:12
They haven't got them.
163
654000
2000
11:14
They got instant democracy in the 1990s:
164
656000
3000
11:17
elections without checks and balances.
165
659000
3000
11:20
How can we help improve governance and introduce checks and balances?
166
662000
6000
11:26
In all the societies of the bottom billion,
167
668000
2000
11:28
there are intense struggles to do just that.
168
670000
5000
11:33
The simple proposal is that we should have some international standards,
169
675000
5000
11:38
which will be voluntary, but which would spell out the key decision points
170
680000
5000
11:43
that need to be taken in order
171
685000
3000
11:46
to harness these resource revenues.
172
688000
3000
11:49
We know these international standards work
173
691000
2000
11:51
because we've already got one.
174
693000
2000
11:53
It's called the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative.
175
695000
3000
11:56
That is the very simple idea that governments should report
176
698000
5000
12:01
to their citizens what revenues they have.
177
703000
3000
12:04
No sooner was it proposed
178
706000
2000
12:06
than reformers in Nigeria adopted it, pushed it and published the revenues in the paper.
179
708000
7000
12:13
Nigerian newspapers circulations spiked.
180
715000
2000
12:15
People wanted to know what their government was getting
181
717000
3000
12:18
in terms of revenue.
182
720000
3000
12:21
So, we know it works. What would the content be of these international standards?
183
723000
7000
12:28
I can't go through all of them, but I'll give you an example.
184
730000
5000
12:33
The first is how to take the resources out of the ground --
185
735000
4000
12:37
the economic processes, taking the resources out of the ground
186
739000
3000
12:40
and putting assets on top of the ground.
187
742000
3000
12:43
And the first step in that is selling the rights to resource extraction.
188
745000
4000
12:47
You know how rights to resource extraction are being sold at the moment,
189
749000
4000
12:51
how they've been sold over the last 40 years?
190
753000
2000
12:53
A company flies in, does a deal with a minister.
191
755000
4000
12:57
And that's great for the company,
192
759000
2000
12:59
and it's quite often great for the minister --
193
761000
2000
13:01
(Laughter)
194
763000
1000
13:02
-- and it's not great for their country.
195
764000
3000
13:05
There's a very simple institutional technology
196
767000
2000
13:07
which can transform that,
197
769000
2000
13:09
and it's called verified auctions.
198
771000
5000
13:14
The public agency with the greatest expertise on Earth
199
776000
6000
13:20
is of course the treasury -- that is, the British Treasury.
200
782000
3000
13:23
And the British Treasury decided that it would sell the rights
201
785000
3000
13:26
to third-generation mobile phones
202
788000
2000
13:28
by working out what those rights were worth.
203
790000
3000
13:31
They worked out they were worth two billion pounds.
204
793000
3000
13:34
Just in time, a set of economists got there and said,
205
796000
3000
13:37
"Why not try an auction? It'll reveal the value."
206
799000
3000
13:40
It went for 20 billion pounds through auction.
207
802000
4000
13:44
If the British Treasury can be out by a factor of 10,
208
806000
3000
13:47
think what the ministry of finance in Sierra Leone is going to be like.
209
809000
3000
13:50
(Laughter)
210
812000
1000
13:51
When I put that to the President of Sierra Leone,
211
813000
2000
13:53
the next day he asked the World Bank to send him a team
212
815000
3000
13:56
to give expertise on how to conduct auctions.
213
818000
5000
14:01
There are five such decision points;
214
823000
2000
14:03
each one needs an international standard.
215
825000
4000
14:07
If we could do it, we would change the world.
216
829000
4000
14:11
We would be helping the reformers in these societies,
217
833000
4000
14:15
who are struggling for change.
218
837000
3000
14:18
That's our modest role. We cannot change these societies,
219
840000
4000
14:22
but we can help the people in these societies
220
844000
3000
14:25
who are struggling and usually failing,
221
847000
3000
14:28
because the odds are so stacked against them.
222
850000
6000
14:34
And yet, we've not got these rules.
223
856000
3000
14:37
If you think about it, the cost of promulgating international rules
224
859000
4000
14:41
is zilch -- nothing.
225
863000
3000
14:44
Why on Earth are they not there?
226
866000
4000
14:48
I realized that the reason they're not there
227
870000
4000
14:52
is that until we have a critical mass of informed citizens in our own societies,
228
874000
6000
14:58
politicians will get away with gestures.
229
880000
3000
15:01
That unless we have an informed society,
230
883000
5000
15:06
what politicians do, especially in relation to Africa, is gestures:
231
888000
6000
15:12
things that look good, but don't work.
232
894000
3000
15:15
And so I realized we had to go through the business
233
897000
3000
15:18
of building an informed citizenry.
234
900000
4000
15:22
That's why I broke all the professional rules of conduct for an economist,
235
904000
5000
15:27
and I wrote an economics book that you could read on a beach.
236
909000
3000
15:30
(Laughter).
237
912000
5000
15:35
However, I have to say, the process of communication
238
917000
4000
15:39
does not come naturally to me.
239
921000
2000
15:41
This is why I'm on this stage, but it's alarming.
240
923000
4000
15:45
I grew up in a culture of self-effacement.
241
927000
8000
15:53
My wife showed me a blog comment on one of my last talks,
242
935000
4000
15:57
and the blog comment said, "Collier is not charismatic --
243
939000
6000
16:03
(Laughter)
244
945000
3000
16:06
-- but his arguments are compelling."
245
948000
3000
16:09
(Laughter)
246
951000
4000
16:13
(Applause)
247
955000
7000
16:20
If you agree with that sentiment,
248
962000
3000
16:23
and if you agree that we need a critical mass of informed citizenry,
249
965000
6000
16:29
you will realize that I need you.
250
971000
4000
16:33
Please, become ambassadors.
251
975000
2000
16:35
Thank you.
252
977000
2000
16:37
(Applause)
253
979000
13000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Paul Collier - EconomistPaul Collier’s book The Bottom Billion shows what is happening to the poorest people in the world, and offers ideas for opening up opportunities to all.
Why you should listen
Paul Collier studies the political and economic problems of the very poorest countries: 50 societies, many in sub-Saharan Africa, that are stagnating or in decline, and taking a billion people down with them. His book The Bottom Billion identifies the four traps that keep such countries mired in poverty, and outlines ways to help them escape, with a mix of direct aid and external support for internal change.
From 1998 to 2003, Collier was the director of the World Bank's Development Research Group; he now directs the Centre for the Study of African Economies at Oxford, where he continues to advise policymakers.
Paul Collier | Speaker | TED.com