TEDIndia 2009
Sendhil Mullainathan: Solving social problems with a nudge
Filmed:
Readability: 3.7
581,215 views
MacArthur winner Sendhil Mullainathan uses the lens of behavioral economics to study a tricky set of social problems -- those we know how to solve, but don't. We know how to reduce child deaths due to diarrhea, how to prevent diabetes-related blindness and how to implement solar-cell technology ... yet somehow, we don't or can't. Why?
Sendhil Mullainathan - Behavioral economist
Sendhil Mullainathan asks a compelling question: what are the irrational choices we make that perpetuate poverty, corruption, discrimination? Full bio
Sendhil Mullainathan asks a compelling question: what are the irrational choices we make that perpetuate poverty, corruption, discrimination? Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
As a researcher, every once in a while
0
0
3000
00:18
you encounter something
1
3000
2000
00:20
a little disconcerting.
2
5000
2000
00:22
And this is something that changes your understanding of the world around you,
3
7000
3000
00:25
and teaches you that you're very wrong
4
10000
2000
00:27
about something that you really believed firmly in.
5
12000
4000
00:31
And these are unfortunate moments,
6
16000
3000
00:34
because you go to sleep that night
7
19000
2000
00:36
dumber than when you woke up.
8
21000
3000
00:39
So, that's really the goal of my talk,
9
24000
2000
00:41
is to A, communicate that moment to you
10
26000
2000
00:43
and B, have you leave this session
11
28000
2000
00:45
a little dumber than when you entered.
12
30000
2000
00:47
So, I hope I can really accomplish that.
13
32000
3000
00:50
So, this incident that I'm going to describe
14
35000
3000
00:53
really began with some diarrhea.
15
38000
3000
00:56
Now, we've known for a long time the cause of diarrhea.
16
41000
3000
00:59
That's why there's a glass of water up there.
17
44000
3000
01:02
For us, it's a problem, the people in this room.
18
47000
2000
01:04
For babies, it's deadly.
19
49000
3000
01:07
They lack nutrients, and diarrhea dehydrates them.
20
52000
4000
01:11
And so, as a result, there is a lot of death,
21
56000
2000
01:13
a lot of death.
22
58000
3000
01:16
In India in 1960,
23
61000
2000
01:18
there was a 24 percent child mortality rate,
24
63000
2000
01:20
lots of people didn't make it. This is incredibly unfortunate.
25
65000
4000
01:24
One of the big reasons this happened was
26
69000
2000
01:26
because of diarrhea.
27
71000
2000
01:28
Now, there was a big effort to solve this problem,
28
73000
3000
01:31
and there was actually a big solution.
29
76000
4000
01:35
This solution has been called, by some,
30
80000
2000
01:37
"potentially the most important medical
31
82000
2000
01:39
advance this century."
32
84000
3000
01:42
Now, the solution turned out to be simple.
33
87000
3000
01:45
And what it was was oral rehydration salts.
34
90000
4000
01:49
Many of you have probably used this.
35
94000
2000
01:51
It's brilliant. It's a way to get sodium
36
96000
2000
01:53
and glucose together so that when you add it to water
37
98000
3000
01:56
the child is able to absorb it even during situations of diarrhea.
38
101000
3000
01:59
Remarkable impact on mortality.
39
104000
4000
02:03
Massive solution to the problem.
40
108000
2000
02:05
Flash forward: 1960, 24 percent child mortality
41
110000
3000
02:08
has dropped to 6.5 percent today.
42
113000
2000
02:10
Still a big number, but a big drop.
43
115000
3000
02:13
It looks like the technological problem is solved.
44
118000
3000
02:16
But if you look, even today
45
121000
2000
02:18
there are about 400,000 diarrhea-related deaths
46
123000
2000
02:20
in India alone.
47
125000
2000
02:22
What's going on here?
48
127000
2000
02:24
Well the easy answer is, we just haven't gotten those salts
49
129000
3000
02:27
to those people.
50
132000
2000
02:29
That's actually not true.
51
134000
2000
02:31
If you look in areas where these salts are completely available,
52
136000
3000
02:34
the price is low or zero, these deaths still continue abated.
53
139000
3000
02:37
Maybe there's a biological answer.
54
142000
2000
02:39
Maybe these are the deaths that simple rehydration
55
144000
2000
02:41
alone doesn't solve. That's not true either.
56
146000
3000
02:44
Many of these deaths were completely preventable,
57
149000
5000
02:49
and this what I want to think of as the disconcerting thing,
58
154000
3000
02:52
what I want to call "the last mile" problem.
59
157000
2000
02:54
See, we spent a lot of energy, in many domains --
60
159000
4000
02:58
technological, scientific, hard work,
61
163000
2000
03:00
creativity, human ingenuity --
62
165000
2000
03:02
to crack important social problems with technology solutions.
63
167000
4000
03:06
That's been the discoveries of the last 2,000 years,
64
171000
2000
03:08
that's mankind moving forward.
65
173000
2000
03:10
But in this case we cracked it,
66
175000
3000
03:13
but a big part of the problem still remains.
67
178000
2000
03:15
Nine hundred and ninety-nine miles went well,
68
180000
2000
03:17
the last mile's proving incredibly stubborn.
69
182000
3000
03:20
Now, that's for oral rehydration therapy.
70
185000
4000
03:24
Maybe this is something unique about diarrhea.
71
189000
2000
03:26
Well, it turns out -- and this is where things get really disconcerting --
72
191000
2000
03:28
it's not unique to diarrhea.
73
193000
2000
03:30
It's not even unique to poor people in India.
74
195000
2000
03:32
Here's an example from a variety of contexts.
75
197000
3000
03:35
I've put a bunch of examples up here.
76
200000
2000
03:37
I'll start with insulin, diabetes
77
202000
3000
03:40
medication in the U.S.
78
205000
2000
03:42
OK, the American population.
79
207000
2000
03:44
On Medicaid -- if you're fairly poor you get Medicaid,
80
209000
2000
03:46
or if you have health insurance -- insulin is pretty straightforward.
81
211000
2000
03:48
You get it, either in pill form or you get it as an injection;
82
213000
4000
03:52
you have to take it every day to maintain your blood sugar levels.
83
217000
2000
03:54
Massive technological advance:
84
219000
2000
03:56
took an incredibly deadly disease, made it solvable.
85
221000
2000
03:58
Adherence rates. How many people are taking their insulin every day?
86
223000
3000
04:01
About on average, a typical person is taking it 75 percent of the time.
87
226000
4000
04:05
As a result, 25,000 people a year go blind,
88
230000
5000
04:10
hundreds of thousands lose limbs, every year,
89
235000
2000
04:12
for something that's solvable.
90
237000
2000
04:14
Here I have a bunch of other examples,
91
239000
2000
04:16
all suffer from the last mile problem.
92
241000
2000
04:18
It's not just medicine.
93
243000
2000
04:20
Here's another example from technology:
94
245000
2000
04:22
agriculture. We think
95
247000
2000
04:24
there's a food problem, so we create new seeds.
96
249000
2000
04:26
We think there's an income problem, so we create
97
251000
2000
04:28
new ways of farming that increase income.
98
253000
3000
04:31
Well, look at some old ways, some ways that we'd already cracked.
99
256000
3000
04:34
Intercropping. Intercropping really increases income.
100
259000
2000
04:36
Sometimes in rice we found incredible increases in yield
101
261000
3000
04:39
when you mix different varieties of rice side by side.
102
264000
2000
04:41
Some people are doing that,
103
266000
2000
04:43
many are not. What's going on?
104
268000
2000
04:45
This is the last mile.
105
270000
2000
04:47
The last mile is, everywhere, problematic.
106
272000
2000
04:49
Alright, what's the problem?
107
274000
2000
04:51
The problem is this little three-pound machine
108
276000
3000
04:54
that's behind your eyes and between your ears.
109
279000
4000
04:58
This machine is really strange,
110
283000
2000
05:00
and one of the consequences is that people are weird.
111
285000
4000
05:04
They do lots of inconsistent things.
112
289000
4000
05:08
(Applause)
113
293000
2000
05:10
They do lots of inconsistent things.
114
295000
3000
05:13
And the inconsistencies
115
298000
2000
05:15
create, fundamentally, this last mile problem.
116
300000
3000
05:18
See, when we were dealing with our biology, bacteria,
117
303000
3000
05:21
the genes, the things inside here, the blood?
118
306000
3000
05:24
That's complex, but it's manageable.
119
309000
3000
05:27
When we're dealing with people like this?
120
312000
3000
05:30
The mind is more complex.
121
315000
2000
05:32
That's not as manageable, and that's what we're struggling with.
122
317000
2000
05:34
Let me go back to diarrhea for a second.
123
319000
3000
05:37
Here's a question that was asked in the National Sample Survey,
124
322000
3000
05:40
which is a survey asked of many Indian women:
125
325000
2000
05:42
"Your child has diarrhea.
126
327000
2000
05:44
Should you increase, maintain or decrease the number of fluids?"
127
329000
3000
05:47
Just so you don't embarrass yourselves, I'll give you the right answer:
128
332000
3000
05:50
It's increase.
129
335000
2000
05:54
Now, diarrhea's interesting
130
339000
1000
05:55
because it's been around for thousands of years,
131
340000
2000
05:57
ever since humankind really
132
342000
3000
06:00
lived side by side enough to have really polluted water.
133
345000
3000
06:03
One Roman strategy that was very interesting
134
348000
2000
06:05
was that -- and it really gave them a comparative advantage --
135
350000
2000
06:07
they made sure their soldiers didn't drink
136
352000
3000
06:10
even remotely muddied waters.
137
355000
2000
06:12
Because if some of your troops get diarrhea they're not that effective
138
357000
3000
06:15
on the battlefield.
139
360000
2000
06:17
So, if you think of Roman comparative advantage part of it was the breast shields,
140
362000
2000
06:19
the breastplates, but part of it was drinking the right water.
141
364000
4000
06:23
So, here are these women. They've seen their parents
142
368000
2000
06:25
have struggled with diarrhea, they've struggled with diarrhea,
143
370000
2000
06:27
they've seen lots of deaths. How do they answer this question?
144
372000
3000
06:30
In India, 35 to 50 percent say "Reduce."
145
375000
4000
06:34
Think about what that means for a second.
146
379000
2000
06:36
Thirty-five to 50 percent of women
147
381000
2000
06:38
forget oral rehydration therapy,
148
383000
2000
06:40
they are increasing --
149
385000
2000
06:42
they are actually making their child
150
387000
3000
06:45
more likely to die through their actions.
151
390000
3000
06:48
How is that possible?
152
393000
2000
06:50
Well, one possibility -- I think that's how most people respond to this --
153
395000
3000
06:53
is to say, "That's just stupid."
154
398000
4000
06:57
I don't think that's stupid.
155
402000
2000
06:59
I think there is something very profoundly right in what these women are doing.
156
404000
3000
07:02
And that is, you don't put water
157
407000
2000
07:04
into a leaky bucket.
158
409000
2000
07:06
So, think of the mental model that goes behind reducing the intake.
159
411000
4000
07:10
Just doesn't make sense.
160
415000
2000
07:12
Now, the model is intuitively right.
161
417000
3000
07:15
It just doesn't happen to be right about the world.
162
420000
4000
07:19
But it makes a whole lot of sense at some deep level.
163
424000
3000
07:22
And that, to me, is the fundamental challenge
164
427000
3000
07:25
of the last mile.
165
430000
5000
07:30
This first challenge is what I refer to as the persuasion challenge.
166
435000
3000
07:33
Convincing people to do something --
167
438000
2000
07:35
take oral rehydration therapy, intercrop, whatever it might be --
168
440000
2000
07:37
is not an act of information:
169
442000
3000
07:40
"Let's give them the data,
170
445000
2000
07:42
and when they have data they'll do the right thing."
171
447000
2000
07:44
It's more complex than that.
172
449000
2000
07:46
And if you want to understand how it's more complex
173
451000
2000
07:48
let me start with something kind of interesting.
174
453000
4000
07:52
I'm going to give you a little math problem,
175
457000
2000
07:54
and I want you to just yell out the answer as fast as possible.
176
459000
3000
07:57
A bat and a ball together cost $1.10.
177
462000
2000
07:59
The bat costs a dollar more than the ball.
178
464000
3000
08:02
How much does the ball cost? Quick.
179
467000
3000
08:05
So, somebody out there says, "Five."
180
470000
2000
08:07
A lot of you said, "Ten."
181
472000
2000
08:09
Let's think about 10 for a second.
182
474000
3000
08:12
If the ball costs 10, the bat costs...
183
477000
4000
08:16
this is easy, $1.10.
184
481000
2000
08:18
Yeah. So, together they would cost $1.20.
185
483000
3000
08:21
So, here you all are, ostensibly educated people.
186
486000
3000
08:24
Most of you look smart.
187
489000
3000
08:27
The combination of that produces
188
492000
3000
08:30
something that is actually, you got this thing wrong.
189
495000
2000
08:32
How is that possible? Let's go to something else.
190
497000
3000
08:35
I know algebra can be complicated.
191
500000
3000
08:38
So, let's dial this back. That's what? Fifth grade? Fourth grade?
192
503000
3000
08:41
Let's go back to kindergarten. OK?
193
506000
3000
08:44
There's a great show on American television that you have to watch.
194
509000
2000
08:46
It's called "Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader?"
195
511000
2000
08:48
I think we've learned the answer to that here.
196
513000
3000
08:51
Let's move to kindergarten. Let's see if we can beat five-year-olds.
197
516000
3000
08:54
Here's what I'm going to do: I'm going to put objects on the screen.
198
519000
3000
08:57
I just want you to name the color of the object.
199
522000
4000
09:01
That's all it is. OK?
200
526000
2000
09:03
I want you to do it fast, and say it out loud with me,
201
528000
3000
09:06
and do it quickly. I'll make the first one easy for you.
202
531000
2000
09:08
Ready? Black.
203
533000
2000
09:10
Now the next ones I want you to do quickly and say it out loud.
204
535000
2000
09:12
Ready? Go.
205
537000
2000
09:14
Audience: Red. Green.
206
539000
2000
09:16
Yellow. Blue. Red.
207
541000
2000
09:18
(Laughter)
208
543000
3000
09:21
Sendhil Mullainathan: That's pretty good.
209
546000
4000
09:25
Almost out of kindergarten.
210
550000
2000
09:27
What is all this telling us?
211
552000
2000
09:29
You see, what's going on here, and in the bat and ball problem
212
554000
3000
09:32
is that you have some intuitive ways of interacting with the world,
213
557000
3000
09:35
some models that you use to understand the world.
214
560000
2000
09:37
These models, like the leaky bucket,
215
562000
2000
09:39
work well in most situations.
216
564000
2000
09:41
I suspect most of you --
217
566000
2000
09:43
I hope that's true for the rest of you --
218
568000
2000
09:45
actually do pretty well with addition and subtraction in the real world.
219
570000
4000
09:49
I found a problem, a specific problem
220
574000
2000
09:51
that actually found an error with that.
221
576000
3000
09:54
Diarrhea, and many last mile problems, are like that.
222
579000
2000
09:56
They are situations where the mental model
223
581000
2000
09:58
doesn't match the reality.
224
583000
2000
10:00
Same thing here:
225
585000
2000
10:02
You had an intuitive response to this that was very quick.
226
587000
2000
10:04
You read "blue" and you wanted to say "blue," even though you knew your task was red.
227
589000
3000
10:07
Now, I do this stuff because it's fun.
228
592000
2000
10:09
But it's more profound than fun.
229
594000
4000
10:13
I'll give you a good example of how it actually effects persuasion.
230
598000
3000
10:16
BMW is a pretty safe car.
231
601000
3000
10:19
And they are trying to figure out, "Safety is good.
232
604000
2000
10:21
I want to advertise safety. How am I going to advertise safety?"
233
606000
2000
10:23
"I could give people numbers. We do well on crash tests."
234
608000
3000
10:26
But the truth of the matter is, you look at that car,
235
611000
2000
10:28
it doesn't look like a Volvo,
236
613000
2000
10:30
and it doesn't look like a Hummer.
237
615000
2000
10:32
So, what I want you to think about for a few minutes
238
617000
2000
10:34
is: How would you convey safety of the BMW? Okay?
239
619000
3000
10:37
So now, while you're thinking about that let's move to a second task.
240
622000
3000
10:40
The second task is fuel efficiency. Okay?
241
625000
3000
10:43
Here's another puzzle for all of you.
242
628000
2000
10:45
One person walks into a car lot,
243
630000
2000
10:47
and they're thinking about buying this Toyota Yaris.
244
632000
3000
10:50
They are saying, "This is 35 miles per gallon. I'm going to do
245
635000
2000
10:52
the environmentally right thing, I'm going to buy the Prius,
246
637000
2000
10:54
50 miles per gallon."
247
639000
2000
10:56
Another person walks into the lot,
248
641000
2000
10:58
and they're about to buy a Hummer, nine miles per gallon,
249
643000
2000
11:00
fully loaded, luxury.
250
645000
2000
11:02
And they say, "You know what? Do I need turbo? Do I need this heavyweight car?"
251
647000
4000
11:06
I'm going to do something good for the environment.
252
651000
2000
11:08
I'm going to take off some of that weight,
253
653000
2000
11:10
and I'm going to buy a Hummer that's 11 miles per gallon."
254
655000
3000
11:13
Which one of these people has done more for the environment?
255
658000
3000
11:16
See, you have a mental model.
256
661000
2000
11:18
Fifty versus 35, that's a big move. Eleven versus nine? Come on.
257
663000
3000
11:21
Turns out, go home and do the math,
258
666000
3000
11:24
the nine to 11 is a bigger change. That person has saved more gallons.
259
669000
3000
11:27
Why? Because we don't care about miles per gallon, we care about
260
672000
2000
11:29
gallons per mile.
261
674000
2000
11:31
Think about how powerful that is if you're trying to encourage fuel efficiency.
262
676000
3000
11:34
Miles per gallon is the way we present things.
263
679000
2000
11:36
If we want to encourage change of behavior,
264
681000
3000
11:39
gallons per mile would have far more effectiveness.
265
684000
2000
11:41
Researchers have found these type of anomalies.
266
686000
3000
11:44
Okay, back to BMW. What should they do?
267
689000
3000
11:47
The problem BMW faces is this car looks safe.
268
692000
3000
11:50
This car, which is my Mini, doesn't look that safe.
269
695000
4000
11:54
Here was BMW's brilliant insight, which they embodied into an ad campaign.
270
699000
3000
11:57
They showed a BMW driving down the street.
271
702000
2000
11:59
There's a truck on the right. Boxes fall out of the truck.
272
704000
3000
12:02
The car swerves to avoid it, and therefore doesn't get into an accident.
273
707000
5000
12:07
BWM realizes safety, in people's minds, has two components.
274
712000
4000
12:11
You can be safe because when you're hit, you survive,
275
716000
4000
12:15
or you can be safe because you avoid accidents.
276
720000
2000
12:17
Remarkably successful campaign, but notice the power of it.
277
722000
2000
12:19
It harnesses something you already believe.
278
724000
3000
12:22
Now, even if I persuaded you to do something,
279
727000
4000
12:26
it's hard sometimes to actually get action as a result.
280
731000
4000
12:30
You all probably intended to wake up,
281
735000
2000
12:32
I don't know, 6:30, 7 a.m.
282
737000
3000
12:35
This is a battle we all fight every day,
283
740000
2000
12:37
along with trying to get to the gym.
284
742000
3000
12:40
Now, this is an example of that battle,
285
745000
3000
12:43
and makes us realize intentions don't always translate into action,
286
748000
3000
12:46
and so one of the fundamental challenges
287
751000
2000
12:48
is how we would actually do that. OK?
288
753000
4000
12:52
So, let me now talk about the last mile problem.
289
757000
3000
12:55
So far, I've been pretty negative.
290
760000
3000
12:58
I've been trying to show you the oddities of human behavior.
291
763000
3000
13:01
And I think maybe I'm being too negative.
292
766000
2000
13:03
Maybe it's the diarrhea.
293
768000
2000
13:05
Maybe the last mile problem really should be thought of
294
770000
2000
13:07
as the last mile opportunity.
295
772000
2000
13:09
Let's go back to diabetes.
296
774000
2000
13:11
This is a typical insulin injection.
297
776000
3000
13:14
Now, carrying this thing around is complicated.
298
779000
3000
13:17
You gotta carry the bottle, you gotta carry the syringe.
299
782000
4000
13:21
It's also painful.
300
786000
2000
13:23
Now, you may think to yourself, "Well, if my eyes depended on it,
301
788000
4000
13:27
you know, I would obviously use it every day."
302
792000
2000
13:29
But the pain, the discomfort,
303
794000
2000
13:31
you know, paying attention, remembering to put it in your purse
304
796000
2000
13:33
when you go on a long trip:
305
798000
2000
13:35
These are the day-to-day of life, and they do pose problems.
306
800000
4000
13:39
Here is an innovation, a design innovation.
307
804000
3000
13:42
This is a pen, it's called an insulin pen, preloaded.
308
807000
4000
13:46
The needle is particularly sharp.
309
811000
1000
13:47
You just gotta carry this thing around.
310
812000
2000
13:49
It's much easier to use, much less painful.
311
814000
2000
13:51
Anywhere between five and 10 percent increase in adherence,
312
816000
4000
13:55
just as a result of this.
313
820000
2000
13:57
That's what I'm talking about as a last mile opportunity.
314
822000
3000
14:00
You see, we tend to think the problem is solved
315
825000
3000
14:03
when we solve the technology problem.
316
828000
2000
14:05
But the human innovation, the human problem
317
830000
2000
14:07
still remains, and that's a great frontier that we have left.
318
832000
4000
14:11
This isn't about the biology of people;
319
836000
2000
14:13
this is now about the brains, the psychology of people,
320
838000
4000
14:17
and innovation needs to continue all the way through
321
842000
2000
14:19
the last mile.
322
844000
2000
14:21
Here's another example of this.
323
846000
2000
14:23
This is from a company called Positive Energy.
324
848000
3000
14:26
This is about energy efficiency.
325
851000
2000
14:28
We're spending a lot of time on fuel cells right now.
326
853000
3000
14:31
What this company does is they send a letter
327
856000
2000
14:33
to households that say, "Here's your energy use,
328
858000
2000
14:35
here's your neighbor's energy use: You're doing well." Smiley face.
329
860000
3000
14:38
"You're doing worse." Frown.
330
863000
2000
14:40
And what they find is just this letter, nothing else,
331
865000
3000
14:43
has a two to three percent reduction in electricity use.
332
868000
2000
14:45
And you want to think about the social value of that
333
870000
2000
14:47
in terms of carbon offsets, reduced electricity,
334
872000
2000
14:49
900 million dollars per year.
335
874000
2000
14:51
Why? Because for free,
336
876000
2000
14:53
this isn't a new technology, this is a letter --
337
878000
2000
14:55
we're getting a Big Bang in behavior.
338
880000
2000
14:57
So, how do we tackle the last mile?
339
882000
4000
15:01
I think this tells us there is an opportunity.
340
886000
3000
15:04
And I think to tackle it, we need to combine
341
889000
2000
15:06
psychology,
342
891000
2000
15:08
marketing,
343
893000
2000
15:10
art, we've seen that.
344
895000
2000
15:12
But you know what we need to combine it with?
345
897000
2000
15:14
We need to combine this with the scientific method.
346
899000
2000
15:16
See what's really puzzling and frustrating about the last mile, to me,
347
901000
4000
15:20
is that the first 999 miles are all about science.
348
905000
3000
15:23
No one would say, "Hey, I think this medicine works, go ahead and use it."
349
908000
4000
15:27
We have testing, we go to the lab, we try it again, we have refinement.
350
912000
2000
15:29
But you know what we do on the last mile?
351
914000
3000
15:32
"Oh, this is a good idea. People will like this. Let's put it out there."
352
917000
3000
15:35
The amount of resources we put in are disparate.
353
920000
2000
15:37
We put billions of dollars into fuel-efficient technologies.
354
922000
3000
15:40
How much are we putting into
355
925000
2000
15:42
energy behavior change
356
927000
2000
15:44
in a credible, systematic, testing way?
357
929000
3000
15:47
Now, I think that we're on the verge of something big.
358
932000
3000
15:50
We're on the verge of a whole new social science.
359
935000
3000
15:53
It's a social science that recognizes --
360
938000
2000
15:55
much like science recognizes the complexity of the body,
361
940000
3000
15:58
biology recognizes the complexity of the body -- we'll recognize
362
943000
2000
16:00
the complexity of the human mind.
363
945000
2000
16:02
The careful testing, retesting, design,
364
947000
2000
16:04
are going to open up vistas of understanding,
365
949000
3000
16:07
complexities, difficult things.
366
952000
2000
16:09
And those vistas will both create new science,
367
954000
3000
16:12
and fundamental change in the world as we see it, in the next hundred years.
368
957000
4000
16:16
All right. Thank you very much.
369
961000
2000
16:18
(Applause)
370
963000
2000
16:20
Chris Anderson: Sendhil, thank you so much.
371
965000
2000
16:22
So, this whole area is so fascinating.
372
967000
3000
16:25
I mean, it sometimes feels, listening to behavioral economists
373
970000
3000
16:28
that they are kind of putting into place
374
973000
3000
16:31
academically, what great marketers
375
976000
2000
16:33
have sort of intuitively known for a long time.
376
978000
3000
16:36
How much is your field talking to great marketers
377
981000
4000
16:40
about their insights into human psychology?
378
985000
2000
16:42
Because they've seen it on the ground.
379
987000
2000
16:44
Sendhil Mullainathan: Yeah, we spend a lot of time talking to marketers,
380
989000
2000
16:46
and I think 60 percent of it is exactly what you say,
381
991000
3000
16:49
there are insights to be gleaned there.
382
994000
2000
16:51
Forty percent of it is about what marketing is.
383
996000
2000
16:53
Marketing is selling an ad to a firm.
384
998000
5000
16:58
So, in some sense, a lot of marketing is about
385
1003000
2000
17:00
convincing a CEO, "This is a good ad campaign."
386
1005000
3000
17:03
So, there is a little bit of slippage there.
387
1008000
2000
17:05
That's just a caveat. That's different from actually having an effective ad campaign.
388
1010000
4000
17:09
And one of the new movements in marketing is: How do we actually
389
1014000
2000
17:11
measure effectiveness? Are we effective?
390
1016000
2000
17:13
CA: How you take your insights here
391
1018000
4000
17:17
and actually get them integrated
392
1022000
3000
17:20
into working business models on the ground,
393
1025000
3000
17:23
in Indian villages, for example?
394
1028000
2000
17:25
SM: So, the scientific method I alluded to is pretty important.
395
1030000
3000
17:28
We work closely with companies that have operational capacity,
396
1033000
2000
17:30
or nonprofits that have operational capacity.
397
1035000
2000
17:32
And then we say, "Well, you want to get this behavior change.
398
1037000
2000
17:34
Let's come up with a few ideas, test them,
399
1039000
3000
17:37
see which is working, go back, synthesize,
400
1042000
2000
17:39
and try to come up with a thing that works,"
401
1044000
2000
17:41
and then we're able to scale with partners.
402
1046000
2000
17:43
It's kind of the model that has worked in other contexts.
403
1048000
2000
17:45
If you have biological problems
404
1050000
2000
17:47
we try and fix it, see if it works, and then work the scale.
405
1052000
2000
17:49
CA: Alright Sendhil, thanks so much for coming to TED. Thank you.
406
1054000
3000
17:52
(Applause)
407
1057000
3000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Sendhil Mullainathan - Behavioral economistSendhil Mullainathan asks a compelling question: what are the irrational choices we make that perpetuate poverty, corruption, discrimination?
Why you should listen
To study big questions such as "What are the measurable effects of corruption?"" Sendhil Mullainathan and his collaborators look at the day-to-day decisions made by real people, running deep-data studies on groups around the world to tease out patterns. Awarded a MacArthur ""genius"" grant in 2002, he has produced and collaborated on a string of research papers that make for a must-read CV -- including a fascinating, if dispiriting, study of the corruption involved in getting a driver's license in India.
Lately he and his team have been studying women who sell fruit and vegetables on the streets in developing countries. They're usually in debt to a moneylender in the market, who takes about half their profits each day as interest. Some of the women have figured a simple way to get out of debt and keep all their profits. But most of the women make a choice every day that keeps them in debt. How would these businesswomen behave, he wondered, if the slate was wiped clean? So he got a grant, paid off their debt, and waits to see what happens next."
Sendhil Mullainathan | Speaker | TED.com