TEDGlobal 2010
Johan Rockström: Let the environment guide our development
Filmed:
Readability: 5.9
1,364,017 views
Human growth has strained the earth's resources, but as Johan Rockström reminds us, our advances also give us the science to recognize this and change behavior. His research has found nine "planetary boundaries" that can guide us in protecting our planet's many overlapping ecosystems.
Johan Rockstrom - Sustainability expert
Johan Rockström works to redefine sustainable development, and figure out what needs to happen. Full bio
Johan Rockström works to redefine sustainable development, and figure out what needs to happen. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
We live on a human-dominated planet,
0
0
3000
00:18
putting unprecedented pressure
1
3000
2000
00:20
on the systems on Earth.
2
5000
2000
00:22
This is bad news, but perhaps surprising to you,
3
7000
2000
00:24
it's also part of the good news.
4
9000
2000
00:26
We're the first generation -- thanks to science --
5
11000
3000
00:29
to be informed that we may be
6
14000
2000
00:31
undermining the stability and the ability
7
16000
2000
00:33
of planet Earth
8
18000
2000
00:35
to support human development as we know it.
9
20000
2000
00:37
It's also good news, because the planetary risks we're facing
10
22000
3000
00:40
are so large,
11
25000
2000
00:42
that business as usual is not an option.
12
27000
2000
00:44
In fact, we're in a phase
13
29000
2000
00:46
where transformative change is necessary,
14
31000
3000
00:49
which opens the window for innovation,
15
34000
2000
00:51
for new ideas and new paradigms.
16
36000
3000
00:54
This is a scientific journey on the challenges facing humanity
17
39000
3000
00:57
in the global phase of sustainability.
18
42000
2000
00:59
On this journey, I'd like to bring, apart from yourselves,
19
44000
3000
01:02
a good friend,
20
47000
2000
01:04
a stakeholder, who's always absent
21
49000
2000
01:06
when we deal with the negotiations on environmental issues,
22
51000
2000
01:08
a stakeholder who refuses to compromise --
23
53000
3000
01:11
planet Earth.
24
56000
2000
01:13
So I thought I'd bring her with me today on stage,
25
58000
3000
01:16
to have her as a witness
26
61000
2000
01:18
of a remarkable journey,
27
63000
3000
01:21
which humbly reminds us
28
66000
2000
01:23
of the period of grace we've had
29
68000
2000
01:25
over the past 10,000 years.
30
70000
2000
01:27
This is the living conditions on the planet over the last 100,000 years.
31
72000
3000
01:30
It's a very important period --
32
75000
2000
01:32
it's roughly half the period when we've been fully modern humans on the planet.
33
77000
3000
01:35
We've had the same, roughly, abilities
34
80000
2000
01:37
that developed civilizations as we know it.
35
82000
2000
01:39
This is the environmental conditions on the planet.
36
84000
2000
01:41
Here, used as a proxy, temperature variability.
37
86000
3000
01:44
It was a jumpy ride. 80,000 years back in a crisis,
38
89000
3000
01:47
we leave Africa, we colonize Australia
39
92000
2000
01:49
in another crisis, 60,000 years back,
40
94000
2000
01:51
we leave Asia for Europe
41
96000
2000
01:53
in another crisis, 40,000 years back,
42
98000
2000
01:55
and then we enter
43
100000
2000
01:57
the remarkably stable Holocene phase,
44
102000
3000
02:00
the only period in the whole history of the planet,
45
105000
3000
02:03
that we know of, that can support human development.
46
108000
2000
02:05
A thousand years into this period,
47
110000
2000
02:07
we abandon our hunting and gathering patterns.
48
112000
3000
02:10
We go from a couple of million people
49
115000
2000
02:12
to the seven billion people we are today.
50
117000
2000
02:14
The Mesopotamian culture: we invent agriculture,
51
119000
2000
02:16
we domesticate animals and plants.
52
121000
2000
02:18
You have the Roman, the Greek and the story as you know it.
53
123000
3000
02:21
The only phase, as we know it
54
126000
2000
02:23
that can support humanity.
55
128000
2000
02:25
The trouble is we're putting a quadruple sqeeze
56
130000
2000
02:27
on this poor planet,
57
132000
2000
02:29
a quadruple sqeeze, which, as its first squeeze,
58
134000
3000
02:32
has population growth of course.
59
137000
3000
02:35
Now, this is not only about numbers;
60
140000
2000
02:37
this is not only about the fact that we're seven billion people
61
142000
2000
02:39
committed to nine billion people, it's an equity issue as well.
62
144000
3000
02:42
The majority of the environmental impacts on the planet
63
147000
2000
02:44
have been caused by the rich minority,
64
149000
2000
02:46
the 20 percent that jumped onto the industrial bandwagon
65
151000
2000
02:48
in the mid-18th century.
66
153000
2000
02:50
The majority of the planet,
67
155000
2000
02:52
aspiring for development, having the right for development,
68
157000
2000
02:54
are in large aspiring for an unsustainable lifestyle,
69
159000
3000
02:57
a momentous pressure.
70
162000
2000
02:59
The second pressure on the planet is, of course the climate agenda --
71
164000
2000
03:01
the big issue -- where the policy interpretation of science
72
166000
2000
03:03
is that it would be enough
73
168000
2000
03:05
to stabilize greenhouse gases at 450 ppm
74
170000
3000
03:08
to avoid average temperatures
75
173000
2000
03:10
exceeding two degrees,
76
175000
2000
03:12
to avoid the risk that we may be destabilizing
77
177000
2000
03:14
the West Antarctic Ice Sheet,
78
179000
2000
03:16
holding six meters -- level rising,
79
181000
2000
03:18
the risk of destabilizing the Greenland Ice Sheet,
80
183000
2000
03:20
holding another seven meters -- sea level rising.
81
185000
2000
03:22
Now, you would have wished the climate pressure
82
187000
2000
03:24
to hit a strong planet, a resilient planet,
83
189000
2000
03:26
but unfortunately, the third pressure
84
191000
2000
03:28
is the ecosystem decline.
85
193000
2000
03:30
Never have we seen, in the past 50 years,
86
195000
2000
03:32
such a sharp decline
87
197000
2000
03:34
of ecosystem functions and services on the planet,
88
199000
3000
03:37
one of them being the ability to regulate climate on the long term,
89
202000
3000
03:40
in our forests, land and biodiversity.
90
205000
3000
03:43
The forth pressure is surprise,
91
208000
2000
03:45
the notion and the evidence
92
210000
2000
03:47
that we need to abandon our old paradigm,
93
212000
2000
03:49
that ecosystems behave linearly, predictably,
94
214000
3000
03:52
controllably in our -- so to say -- linear systems,
95
217000
3000
03:55
and that in fact, surprise is universal,
96
220000
2000
03:57
as systems tip over very rapidly, abruptly
97
222000
2000
03:59
and often irreversibly.
98
224000
2000
04:01
This, dear friends, poses a human pressure on the planet
99
226000
3000
04:04
of momentous scale.
100
229000
3000
04:07
We may, in fact, have entered a new geological era --
101
232000
3000
04:10
the Anthropocene,
102
235000
2000
04:12
where humans are the predominant driver of change
103
237000
2000
04:14
at a planetary level.
104
239000
2000
04:16
Now, as a scientist,
105
241000
2000
04:18
what's the evidence for this?
106
243000
2000
04:20
Well, the evidence is,
107
245000
2000
04:22
unfortunately, ample.
108
247000
2000
04:24
It's not only carbon dioxide
109
249000
2000
04:26
that has this hockey stick pattern of accelerated change.
110
251000
3000
04:29
You can take virtually any parameter
111
254000
2000
04:31
that matters for human well-being --
112
256000
2000
04:33
nitrous oxide, methane,
113
258000
2000
04:35
deforestation, overfishing
114
260000
2000
04:37
land degredation, loss of species --
115
262000
3000
04:40
they all show the same pattern
116
265000
2000
04:42
over the past 200 years.
117
267000
3000
04:45
Simultaneously, they branch off in the mid-50s,
118
270000
3000
04:48
10 years after the Second World War,
119
273000
3000
04:51
showing very clearly that the great acceleration of the human enterprise
120
276000
3000
04:54
starts in the mid-50s.
121
279000
2000
04:56
You see, for the first time, an imprint on the global level.
122
281000
3000
04:59
And I can tell you,
123
284000
2000
05:01
you enter the disciplinary research in each of these,
124
286000
2000
05:03
you find something remarkably important,
125
288000
3000
05:06
the conclusion that we may have come to the point
126
291000
3000
05:09
where we have to bend the curves,
127
294000
2000
05:11
that we may have entered the most challenging and exciting decade
128
296000
3000
05:14
in the history humanity on the planet,
129
299000
3000
05:17
the decade when we have to bend the curves.
130
302000
3000
05:20
Now, as if this was not enough --
131
305000
2000
05:22
to just bend the curves and understanding the accelerated pressure on the planet --
132
307000
3000
05:25
we also have to recognize the fact
133
310000
2000
05:27
that systems do have multiple stable states,
134
312000
3000
05:30
separated by thresholds -- illustrated here by this ball and cup diagram,
135
315000
3000
05:33
where the depth of the cup is the resilience of the system.
136
318000
3000
05:36
Now, the system may gradually --
137
321000
3000
05:39
under pressure of climate change,
138
324000
2000
05:41
erosion, biodiversity loss --
139
326000
2000
05:43
lose the depth of the cup, the resilience,
140
328000
2000
05:45
but appear to be healthy
141
330000
2000
05:47
and appear to suddenly, under a threshold,
142
332000
2000
05:49
be tipping over. Upff.
143
334000
2000
05:51
Sorry. Changing state
144
336000
3000
05:54
and literally ending up
145
339000
2000
05:56
in an undesired situation,
146
341000
3000
06:00
where new biophysical logic takes over,
147
345000
3000
06:03
new species take over, and the system gets locked.
148
348000
2000
06:05
Do we have evidence of this? Yes, coral reef systems.
149
350000
3000
06:09
Biodiverse, low-nutrient, hard coral systems
150
354000
3000
06:12
under multiple pressures of overfishing,
151
357000
3000
06:15
unsustainable tourism, climate change.
152
360000
2000
06:17
A trigger and the system tips over,
153
362000
2000
06:19
loses its resilience,
154
364000
2000
06:21
soft corals take over,
155
366000
2000
06:23
and we get undesired systems
156
368000
2000
06:25
that cannot support economic and social development.
157
370000
2000
06:27
The Arctic -- a beautiful system --
158
372000
2000
06:29
a regulating biome at the planetary level,
159
374000
2000
06:31
taking the knock after knock on climate change,
160
376000
3000
06:34
appearing to be in a good state.
161
379000
2000
06:36
No scientist could predict that in 2007,
162
381000
2000
06:38
suddenly, what could be crossing a threshold.
163
383000
3000
06:41
The system suddenly, very surprisingly, loses 30 to 40 percent
164
386000
2000
06:43
of its summer ice cover.
165
388000
2000
06:45
And the drama is, of course, that
166
390000
2000
06:47
when the system does this, the logic may change.
167
392000
2000
06:49
It may get locked in an undesired state,
168
394000
2000
06:51
because it changes color, absorbs more energy,
169
396000
2000
06:53
and the system may get stuck.
170
398000
2000
06:55
In my mind, the largest red flag warning for humanity
171
400000
3000
06:58
that we are in a precarious situation.
172
403000
3000
07:01
As a sideline, you know that the only red flag that popped up here
173
406000
3000
07:04
was a submarine from an unnamed country
174
409000
2000
07:06
that planted a red flag at the bottom of the Arctic
175
411000
3000
07:09
to be able to control the oil resources.
176
414000
3000
07:12
Now, if we have evidence, which we now have,
177
417000
3000
07:15
that wetlands, forests,
178
420000
2000
07:17
[unclear] monsoon system, the rainforests,
179
422000
2000
07:19
behave in this nonlinear way.
180
424000
2000
07:21
30 or so scientists around the world
181
426000
2000
07:23
gathered and asked a question for the first time,
182
428000
2000
07:25
"Do we have to put the planet into the the pot?"
183
430000
2000
07:27
So we have to ask ourselves:
184
432000
2000
07:29
are we threatening this extraordinarily stable Holocene state?
185
434000
4000
07:33
Are we in fact putting ourselves in a situation
186
438000
2000
07:35
where we're coming too close
187
440000
2000
07:37
to thresholds that could lead
188
442000
2000
07:39
to deleterious and very undesired,
189
444000
2000
07:41
if now catastrophic, change
190
446000
2000
07:43
for human development?
191
448000
2000
07:45
You know, you don't want to stand there.
192
450000
2000
07:47
In fact, you're not even allowed to stand
193
452000
2000
07:49
where this gentleman is standing,
194
454000
2000
07:51
at the foaming, slippery waters at the threshold.
195
456000
3000
07:54
In fact, there's a fence
196
459000
2000
07:56
quite upstream of this threshold,
197
461000
2000
07:58
beyond which you are in a danger zone.
198
463000
2000
08:00
And this is the new paradigm,
199
465000
2000
08:02
which we gathered two, three years back,
200
467000
2000
08:04
recognizing that our old paradigm
201
469000
2000
08:06
of just analyzing and pushing and predicting
202
471000
2000
08:08
parameters into the future,
203
473000
2000
08:10
aiming at minimalizing environmental impacts, is of the past.
204
475000
3000
08:13
Now we to ask ourselves:
205
478000
2000
08:15
which are the large environmental processes
206
480000
2000
08:17
that we have to be stewards of
207
482000
2000
08:19
to keep ourselves safe in the Holocene?
208
484000
2000
08:21
And could we even,
209
486000
2000
08:23
thanks to major advancements in Earth systems science,
210
488000
2000
08:25
identify the thresholds,
211
490000
2000
08:27
the points where we may expect nonlinear change?
212
492000
3000
08:30
And could we even define
213
495000
2000
08:32
a planetary boundary, a fence,
214
497000
3000
08:35
within which we then have a safe operating space for humanity?
215
500000
3000
08:38
This work, which was published in "Nature,"
216
503000
2000
08:40
late 2009,
217
505000
2000
08:42
after a number of years of analysis,
218
507000
2000
08:44
led to the final proposition
219
509000
3000
08:47
that we can only find
220
512000
2000
08:49
nine planetary boundaries
221
514000
2000
08:51
with which, under active stewardship,
222
516000
3000
08:54
would allow ourselves to have a safe operating space.
223
519000
3000
08:57
These include, of course, climate.
224
522000
2000
08:59
It may surprise you that it's not only climate.
225
524000
2000
09:01
But it shows that we are interconnected, among many systems on the planet,
226
526000
3000
09:04
with the three big systems, climate change,
227
529000
2000
09:06
stratospheric ozone depletion and ocean acidification
228
531000
3000
09:09
being the three big systems,
229
534000
2000
09:11
where the scientific evidence of large-scale thresholds
230
536000
3000
09:14
in the paleo-record of the history of the planet.
231
539000
3000
09:17
But we also include, what we call, the slow variables,
232
542000
3000
09:20
the systems that, under the hood,
233
545000
2000
09:22
regulate and buffer the capacity of the resilience of the planet --
234
547000
3000
09:25
the interference of the big nitrogen and phosphorus cycles on the planet,
235
550000
3000
09:28
land use change, rate of biodiversity loss,
236
553000
2000
09:30
freshwater use,
237
555000
2000
09:32
functions which regulate
238
557000
3000
09:35
biomass on the planet, carbon sequestration, diversity.
239
560000
3000
09:38
And then we have two parameters which we were not able to quantify --
240
563000
3000
09:41
air pollution,
241
566000
2000
09:43
including warming gases and air-polluting sulfates and nitrates,
242
568000
3000
09:46
but also chemical pollution.
243
571000
3000
09:49
Together, these form an integrated whole
244
574000
3000
09:52
for guiding human development in the Anthropocene,
245
577000
2000
09:54
understanding that the planet
246
579000
2000
09:56
is a complex self-regulating system.
247
581000
3000
09:59
In fact, most evidence indicates
248
584000
2000
10:01
that these nine may behave as three Musketeers,
249
586000
3000
10:04
"One for all. All for one."
250
589000
2000
10:06
You degrade forests, you go beyond the boundary on land,
251
591000
3000
10:09
you undermine the ability of the climate system
252
594000
2000
10:11
to stay stable.
253
596000
2000
10:13
The drama here is, in fact, that
254
598000
2000
10:15
it may show that the climate challenge
255
600000
2000
10:17
is the easy one,
256
602000
2000
10:19
if you consider the whole challenge
257
604000
2000
10:21
of sustainable development.
258
606000
3000
10:24
Now this is the Big Bang equivalent then of human development
259
609000
3000
10:27
within the safe operating space of the planetary boundaries.
260
612000
2000
10:29
What you see here in black line is the safe operating space,
261
614000
3000
10:32
the quantified boundaries,
262
617000
2000
10:34
as suggested by this analysis.
263
619000
2000
10:36
The yellow dot in the middle here is our starting point,
264
621000
2000
10:38
the pre-industrial point,
265
623000
2000
10:40
where we're very safely in the safe operating space.
266
625000
2000
10:42
In the '50s, we start branching out.
267
627000
3000
10:45
In the '60s already, through the green revolution
268
630000
2000
10:47
and the Haber-Bosch process
269
632000
2000
10:49
of fixing nitrogen from the atmosphere --
270
634000
2000
10:51
you know, human's today take out more nitrogen from the atmosphere
271
636000
3000
10:54
than the whole biosphere does naturally as a whole.
272
639000
3000
10:58
We don't transgress the climate boundary until the early '90s,
273
643000
3000
11:01
actually, right after Rio.
274
646000
2000
11:03
And today, we are in a situation where we estimate
275
648000
2000
11:05
that we've transgressed three boundaries,
276
650000
2000
11:07
the rate of biodiversity loss,
277
652000
2000
11:09
which is the sixth extinction period in the history of humanity --
278
654000
3000
11:12
one of them being the extinctions of the dinosaurs --
279
657000
3000
11:15
nitrogen and climate change.
280
660000
2000
11:17
But we still have some degrees of freedom on the others,
281
662000
2000
11:19
but we are approaching fast
282
664000
2000
11:21
on land, water, phosphorus and oceans.
283
666000
2000
11:23
But this gives a new paradigm
284
668000
2000
11:25
to guide humanity,
285
670000
2000
11:27
to put the light on our, so far
286
672000
3000
11:30
overpowered industrial vehicle,
287
675000
2000
11:32
which operates as if
288
677000
2000
11:34
we're only on a dark, straight highway.
289
679000
3000
11:37
Now the question then is:
290
682000
2000
11:39
how gloomy is this?
291
684000
2000
11:41
Is then sustainable development utopia?
292
686000
2000
11:43
Well, there's no science to suggest.
293
688000
2000
11:45
In fact, there is ample science
294
690000
2000
11:47
to indicate that we can do this transformative change,
295
692000
3000
11:50
that we have the ability
296
695000
2000
11:52
to now move into a new innovative,
297
697000
3000
11:55
a transformative gear,
298
700000
2000
11:57
across scales.
299
702000
2000
11:59
The drama is, of course,
300
704000
2000
12:01
is that 200 countries on this planet
301
706000
2000
12:03
have to simultaneously start moving
302
708000
2000
12:05
in the same direction.
303
710000
2000
12:07
But it changes fundamentally our governance and management paradigm,
304
712000
3000
12:10
from the current linear,
305
715000
2000
12:12
command and control thinking,
306
717000
2000
12:14
looking at efficiencies and optimization
307
719000
2000
12:16
towards a much more flexible,
308
721000
3000
12:19
a much more adaptive approach,
309
724000
2000
12:21
where we recognize that redundancy,
310
726000
2000
12:23
both in social and environmental systems,
311
728000
2000
12:25
is key to be able to deal
312
730000
2000
12:27
with a turbulent era of global change.
313
732000
3000
12:30
We have to invest in persistence,
314
735000
2000
12:32
in the ability of social systems and ecological systems
315
737000
3000
12:35
to withstand shocks and still remain in that desired cup.
316
740000
3000
12:38
We have to invest in transformations capability,
317
743000
3000
12:41
moving from crisis into innovation
318
746000
3000
12:44
and the ability to rise after a crisis,
319
749000
3000
12:47
and of course to adapt to unavoidable change.
320
752000
2000
12:49
This is a new paradigm.
321
754000
2000
12:51
We're not doing that at any scale on governance.
322
756000
3000
12:54
But is it happening anywhere?
323
759000
2000
12:56
Do we have any examples of success
324
761000
2000
12:58
on this mind shift being applied at the local level?
325
763000
3000
13:01
Well, yes, in fact we do
326
766000
3000
13:04
and the list can start becoming longer and longer.
327
769000
2000
13:06
There's good news here,
328
771000
2000
13:08
for example, from Latin America,
329
773000
2000
13:10
where plow-based farming systems
330
775000
3000
13:13
of the '50s and '60s
331
778000
2000
13:15
led farming basically to a dead-end,
332
780000
2000
13:17
with lower and lower yields, degrading the organic matter
333
782000
3000
13:20
and fundamental problems at the livelihood levels
334
785000
3000
13:23
in Paraguay, Uruguay and a number of countries, Brazil,
335
788000
3000
13:26
leading to innovation and entrepreneurship
336
791000
2000
13:28
among farmers in partnership with scientists
337
793000
2000
13:30
into an agricultural revolution of zero tillage systems
338
795000
3000
13:33
combined with mulch farming
339
798000
2000
13:35
with locally adapted technologies,
340
800000
2000
13:37
which today, for example, in some countries,
341
802000
3000
13:40
have led to a tremendous increase
342
805000
2000
13:42
in area under mulch, zero till farming
343
807000
3000
13:45
which, not only produces more food,
344
810000
2000
13:47
but also sequesters carbon.
345
812000
2000
13:49
The Australian Great Barrier Reef is another success story.
346
814000
3000
13:52
Under the realization from tourist operators,
347
817000
2000
13:54
fishermen,
348
819000
2000
13:56
the Australian Great Barrier Reef Authority and scientists
349
821000
3000
13:59
that the Great Barrier Reef is doomed
350
824000
2000
14:01
under the current governance regime.
351
826000
3000
14:04
Global change, beautification rack culture,
352
829000
2000
14:06
overfishing and unsustainable tourism,
353
831000
2000
14:08
all together placing this system
354
833000
2000
14:10
in the realization of crisis.
355
835000
2000
14:12
But the window of opportunity was innovation and new mindset,
356
837000
2000
14:14
which today has led to a completely new governance strategy
357
839000
3000
14:17
to build resilience,
358
842000
2000
14:19
acknowledge redundancy
359
844000
2000
14:21
and invest in the whole system as an integrated whole,
360
846000
3000
14:24
and then allow for much more redundancy in the system.
361
849000
3000
14:27
Sweden, the country I come from, has other examples,
362
852000
3000
14:30
where wetlands in southern Sweden were seen as --
363
855000
3000
14:33
as in many countries -- as flood-prone polluted nuisance
364
858000
3000
14:36
in the peri-urban regions.
365
861000
2000
14:38
But again, a crisis, new partnerships,
366
863000
3000
14:41
actors locally, transforming these
367
866000
2000
14:43
into a key component
368
868000
2000
14:45
of sustainable urban planning.
369
870000
2000
14:47
So crisis leading into opportunities.
370
872000
3000
14:51
Now, what about the future?
371
876000
2000
14:53
Well, the future, of course, has one massive challenge,
372
878000
3000
14:56
which is feeding a world of nine billion people.
373
881000
2000
14:58
We need nothing less than a new green revolution,
374
883000
2000
15:00
and the planet boundaries shows
375
885000
2000
15:02
that agriculture has to go from a source of greenhouse gases to a sink.
376
887000
3000
15:05
It has to basically do this on current land.
377
890000
3000
15:08
We cannot expand anymore,
378
893000
2000
15:10
because it erodes the planetary boundaries.
379
895000
2000
15:12
We cannot continue consuming water as we do today,
380
897000
3000
15:15
with 25 percent of world rivers not even reaching the ocean.
381
900000
3000
15:18
And we need a transformation.
382
903000
2000
15:20
Well, interestingly, and based on my work
383
905000
2000
15:22
and others in Africa, for example,
384
907000
2000
15:24
we've shown that even the most vulnerable small-scale rainfall farming systems,
385
909000
3000
15:27
with innovations and supplementary irrigation
386
912000
2000
15:29
to bridge dry spells and droughts,
387
914000
2000
15:31
sustainable sanitation systems to close the loop on nutrients
388
916000
3000
15:34
from toilets back to farmers' fields,
389
919000
3000
15:37
and innovations in tillage systems,
390
922000
2000
15:39
we can triple, quadruple, yield levels
391
924000
2000
15:41
on current land.
392
926000
2000
15:43
Elinor Ostrom,
393
928000
2000
15:45
the latest Nobel laureate of economics,
394
930000
2000
15:47
clearly shows empirically across the world
395
932000
2000
15:49
that we can govern the commons
396
934000
2000
15:51
if we invest in trust,
397
936000
3000
15:54
local, action-based partnerships
398
939000
3000
15:57
and cross-scale institutional innovations,
399
942000
4000
16:01
where local actors,
400
946000
3000
16:04
together, can deal with the global commons
401
949000
2000
16:06
at a large scale.
402
951000
2000
16:08
But even on the hard policy area we have innovations.
403
953000
3000
16:11
We know that we have to move from our fossil dependence
404
956000
2000
16:13
very quickly into a low-carbon economy in record time.
405
958000
3000
16:16
And what shall we do?
406
961000
2000
16:18
Everybody talks about carbon taxes -- it won't work -- emission schemes,
407
963000
3000
16:21
but for example, one policy measure,
408
966000
2000
16:23
feed-in tariffs on the energy system,
409
968000
2000
16:25
which is already applied,
410
970000
2000
16:27
from China doing it on offshore wind systems,
411
972000
2000
16:29
all the way to the U.S.
412
974000
2000
16:31
where you give the guaranteed price for investment in renewable energy,
413
976000
2000
16:33
but you can subsidize electricity to poor people.
414
978000
3000
16:36
You get people out of poverty.
415
981000
2000
16:38
You solve the climate issue with regards to the energy sector,
416
983000
2000
16:40
while at the same time, stimulating innovation --
417
985000
3000
16:43
examples of things that can be out scaled quickly
418
988000
2000
16:45
at the planetary level.
419
990000
2000
16:47
So there is -- no doubt -- opportunity here,
420
992000
2000
16:49
and we can list many, many examples
421
994000
3000
16:52
of transformative opportunities around the planet.
422
997000
3000
16:55
The key though in all of these,
423
1000000
2000
16:57
the red thread,
424
1002000
2000
16:59
is the shift in mindset,
425
1004000
2000
17:01
moving away from a situation where we simply are pushing ourselves
426
1006000
3000
17:04
into a dark future,
427
1009000
2000
17:06
where we instead backcast our future,
428
1011000
2000
17:08
and we say, "What is the playing field on the planet?
429
1013000
3000
17:11
What are the planetary boundaries
430
1016000
2000
17:13
within which we can safely operate?"
431
1018000
2000
17:15
and then backtrack innovations within that.
432
1020000
2000
17:17
But of course, the drama is, it clearly shows
433
1022000
2000
17:19
that incremental change is not an option.
434
1024000
3000
17:22
So, there is scientific evidence.
435
1027000
2000
17:24
They sort of say the harsh news,
436
1029000
2000
17:26
that we are facing the largest
437
1031000
2000
17:28
transformative development
438
1033000
2000
17:30
since the industrialization.
439
1035000
2000
17:32
In fact, what we have to do over the next 40 years
440
1037000
2000
17:34
is much more dramatic and more exciting
441
1039000
3000
17:37
than what we did when we moved into
442
1042000
3000
17:40
the situation we're in today.
443
1045000
2000
17:42
Now, science indicates that,
444
1047000
2000
17:44
yes, we can achieve a prosperous future
445
1049000
2000
17:46
within the safe operating space,
446
1051000
2000
17:48
if we move simultaneously,
447
1053000
2000
17:50
collaborating on a global level, from local to global scale,
448
1055000
3000
17:53
in transformative options, which build resilience on a finite planet.
449
1058000
3000
17:56
Thank you.
450
1061000
2000
17:58
(Applause)
451
1063000
5000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Johan Rockstrom - Sustainability expertJohan Rockström works to redefine sustainable development, and figure out what needs to happen.
Why you should listen
Johan Rockström leads the Stockholm Resilience Centre, focusing on a new approach to sustainability: the capacity to use change and crisis to spur renewal and innovative thinking. In 2009, working with an international team of scientists, he identified and quantified a set of nine planetary boundaries within which humanity can continue to develop and thrive for generations to come -- while crossing them could generate abrupt or irreversible environmental changes.
Since then, the boundaries research has spread among international organizations, governments, NGOs and companies and has been adopted as a new framework to guide the discussion about "sustainable growth". It is currently debated as a core part of setting the criteria that will follow the UN's Millennium Development Goals. Rockström also chairs Future Earth, an initiative to advance integrated science for global sustainability.
Johan Rockstrom | Speaker | TED.com