TED2013
Jason Pontin: Can technology solve our big problems?
Filmed:
Readability: 5.3
1,587,751 views
In 1969, Buzz Aldrin’s historical step onto the moon leapt mankind into an era of technological possibility. The awesome power of technology was to be used to solve all of our big problems. Fast forward to present day, and what's happened? Are mobile apps all we have to show for ourselves? Journalist Jason Pontin looks closely at the challenges we face to using technology effectively ... for problems that really matter.
Jason Pontin - Editor
Jason Pontin is the editor-in-chief and publisher of MIT Technology Review. Full bio
Jason Pontin is the editor-in-chief and publisher of MIT Technology Review. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:12
So, we used to solve big problems.
0
627
4636
00:17
On July 21st, 1969,
1
5263
3520
00:20
Buzz Aldrin climbed out of Apollo 11's lunar module
2
8783
3587
00:24
and descended onto the Sea of Tranquility.
3
12370
3557
00:27
Armstrong and Aldrin were alone,
4
15927
2730
00:30
but their presence on the moon's gray surface
5
18657
2286
00:32
was the culmination of a convulsive, collective effort.
6
20943
5131
00:38
The Apollo program was the greatest
7
26074
2044
00:40
peacetime mobilization
8
28118
1737
00:41
in the history of the United States.
9
29855
1938
00:43
To get to the moon, NASA spent
10
31793
1496
00:45
around 180 billion dollars in today's money,
11
33289
3739
00:49
or four percent of the federal budget.
12
37028
2536
00:51
Apollo employed around 400,000 people
13
39564
3304
00:54
and demanded the collaboration of 20,000
14
42868
2838
00:57
companies, universities and government agencies.
15
45706
3696
01:01
People died, including the crew of Apollo 1.
16
49402
3944
01:05
But before the Apollo program ended,
17
53346
3601
01:08
24 men flew to the moon.
18
56947
2229
01:11
Twelve walked on its surface, of whom Aldrin,
19
59176
3074
01:14
following the death of Armstrong last year,
20
62250
2353
01:16
is now the most senior.
21
64603
2086
01:18
So why did they go?
22
66689
1985
01:20
They didn't bring much back:
23
68674
1917
01:22
841 pounds of old rocks,
24
70591
2659
01:25
and something all 24 later emphasized --
25
73250
4455
01:29
a new sense of the smallness
26
77705
2862
01:32
and the fragility of our common home.
27
80567
2943
01:35
Why did they go? The cynical answer is they went
28
83510
3080
01:38
because President Kennedy wanted to show
29
86590
1976
01:40
the Soviets that his nation had the better rockets.
30
88566
4107
01:44
But Kennedy's own words at Rice University in 1962
31
92673
4472
01:49
provide a better clue.
32
97145
1898
01:51
(Video) John F. Kennedy: But why, some say, the moon?
33
99043
2523
01:53
Why choose this as our goal?
34
101566
2944
01:56
And they may well ask,
35
104510
1923
01:58
why climb the highest mountain?
36
106433
2579
02:01
Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic?
37
109012
4016
02:05
Why does Rice play Texas?
38
113028
2184
02:07
We choose to go to the moon.
39
115212
2611
02:09
We choose to go to the moon.
40
117823
2577
02:12
(Applause)
41
120400
5270
02:17
We choose to go to the moon in this decade,
42
125670
2914
02:20
and do the other things,
43
128584
1647
02:22
not because they are easy, but because they are hard.
44
130231
4329
02:26
Jason Pontin: To contemporaries,
45
134560
2170
02:28
Apollo wasn't only a victory of West over East
46
136730
3253
02:31
in the Cold War.
47
139983
1215
02:33
At the time, the strongest emotion
48
141198
2005
02:35
was of wonder
49
143203
1725
02:36
at the transcendent powers of technology.
50
144928
3599
02:40
They went because it was a big thing to do.
51
148527
5419
02:45
Landing on the moon occurred in the context
52
153946
2520
02:48
of a long series of technological triumphs.
53
156466
3165
02:51
The first half of the 20th century produced
54
159631
2513
02:54
the assembly line and the airplane,
55
162144
2136
02:56
penicillin and a vaccine for tuberculosis.
56
164280
3274
02:59
In the middle years of the century,
57
167554
1302
03:00
polio was eradicated and smallpox eliminated.
58
168856
3692
03:04
Technology itself seemed to possess
59
172548
1997
03:06
what Alvin Toffler in 1970
60
174545
2584
03:09
called "accelerative thrust."
61
177129
2834
03:11
For most of human history,
62
179963
1844
03:13
we could go no faster than a horse
63
181807
2288
03:16
or a boat with a sail,
64
184095
2101
03:18
but in 1969, the crew of Apollo 10
65
186196
2401
03:20
flew at 25,000 miles an hour.
66
188597
3883
03:24
Since 1970, no human beings
67
192480
2900
03:27
have been back to the moon.
68
195380
1882
03:29
No one has traveled faster than the crew
69
197262
2219
03:31
of Apollo 10,
70
199481
1606
03:33
and blithe optimism about technology's powers
71
201087
3772
03:36
has evaporated
72
204859
1902
03:38
as big problems we had imagined technology would solve,
73
206761
3571
03:42
such as going to Mars,
74
210332
2303
03:44
creating clean energy, curing cancer,
75
212635
3331
03:47
or feeding the world have come to seem
76
215966
2809
03:50
intractably hard.
77
218775
2689
03:53
I remember watching the liftoff of Apollo 17.
78
221464
3709
03:57
I was five years old,
79
225173
2049
03:59
and my mother told me not to stare
80
227222
2368
04:01
at the fiery exhaust of a Saturn V rocket.
81
229590
3135
04:04
I vaguely knew this was to be the last
82
232725
2441
04:07
of the moon missions,
83
235166
1538
04:08
but I was absolutely certain there would be
84
236704
3766
04:12
Mars colonies in my lifetime.
85
240470
3310
04:15
So "Something happened
86
243780
2563
04:18
to our capacity to solve big problems with technology"
87
246343
4183
04:22
has become a commonplace.
88
250526
2392
04:24
You hear it all the time.
89
252918
1390
04:26
We've heard it over the last two days here at TED.
90
254308
3412
04:29
It feels as if technologists have diverted us
91
257720
3968
04:33
and enriched themselves with trivial toys,
92
261688
2685
04:36
with things like iPhones and apps and social media,
93
264373
3505
04:39
or algorithms that speed automated trading.
94
267878
3619
04:43
There's nothing wrong with most of these things.
95
271497
2394
04:45
They've expanded and enriched our lives.
96
273891
3081
04:48
But they don't solve humanity's big problems.
97
276972
4701
04:53
What happened?
98
281673
1213
04:54
So there is a parochial explanation in Silicon Valley,
99
282886
4914
04:59
which admits that it has been funding less ambitious companies
100
287800
3445
05:03
than it did in the years when it financed
101
291245
2302
05:05
Intel, Microsoft, Apple and Genentech.
102
293547
3158
05:08
Silicon Valley says the markets are to blame,
103
296705
2560
05:11
in particular the incentives that venture capitalists
104
299265
2917
05:14
offer to entrepreneurs.
105
302182
1580
05:15
Silicon Valley says that venture investing
106
303762
2116
05:17
shifted away from funding transformational ideas
107
305878
3863
05:21
and towards funding incremental problems
108
309741
2939
05:24
or even fake problems.
109
312680
2048
05:26
But I don't think that explanation is good enough.
110
314728
2751
05:29
It mostly explains what's wrong with Silicon Valley.
111
317479
3884
05:33
Even when venture capitalists were at their most
112
321363
2650
05:36
risk-happy, they preferred small investments,
113
324013
2839
05:38
tiny investments that offered an exit within 10 years.
114
326852
3864
05:42
V.C.s have always struggled
115
330716
2319
05:45
to invest profitably in technologies such as energy
116
333035
3075
05:48
whose capital requirements are huge
117
336110
2194
05:50
and whose development is long and lengthy,
118
338304
2708
05:53
and V.C.s have never, never funded the development
119
341012
3157
05:56
of technologies meant to solve big problems
120
344169
2998
05:59
that possess no immediate commercial value.
121
347167
2694
06:01
No, the reasons we can't solve big problems
122
349861
2212
06:04
are more complicated and more profound.
123
352073
4082
06:08
Sometimes we choose not to solve big problems.
124
356155
2987
06:11
We could go to Mars if we want.
125
359142
2418
06:13
NASA even has the outline of a plan.
126
361560
2867
06:16
But going to Mars would follow a political decision
127
364427
3489
06:19
with popular appeal, and that will never happen.
128
367916
3354
06:23
We won't go to Mars, because everyone thinks
129
371270
2742
06:26
there are more important things
130
374012
1949
06:27
to do here on Earth.
131
375961
2287
06:30
Sometimes, we can't solve big problems
132
378248
3044
06:33
because our political systems fail.
133
381292
2504
06:35
Today, less than two percent
134
383796
2098
06:37
of the world's energy consumption
135
385894
1687
06:39
derives from advanced, renewable sources
136
387581
2166
06:41
such as solar, wind and biofuels,
137
389747
2878
06:44
less than two percent,
138
392625
1582
06:46
and the reason is purely economic.
139
394207
2104
06:48
Coal and natural gas are cheaper
140
396311
2193
06:50
than solar and wind,
141
398504
1745
06:52
and petroleum is cheaper than biofuels.
142
400249
2519
06:54
We want alternative energy sources
143
402768
2681
06:57
that can compete on price. None exist.
144
405449
3001
07:00
Now, technologists, business leaders
145
408450
2705
07:03
and economists all basically agree
146
411155
2496
07:05
on what national policies and international treaties
147
413651
3501
07:09
would spur the development of alternative energy:
148
417152
3284
07:12
mostly, a significant increase in energy
149
420436
2715
07:15
research and development,
150
423151
1417
07:16
and some kind of price on carbon.
151
424568
2795
07:19
But there's no hope in the present political climate
152
427363
3204
07:22
that we will see U.S. energy policy
153
430567
2393
07:24
or international treaties that reflect that consensus.
154
432960
4767
07:29
Sometimes, big problems that had seemed technological
155
437727
4484
07:34
turn out not to be so.
156
442211
1899
07:36
Famines were long understood to be caused
157
444110
3218
07:39
by failures in food supply.
158
447328
2408
07:41
But 30 years of research have taught us
159
449736
2255
07:43
that famines are political crises
160
451991
2668
07:46
that catastrophically affect food distribution.
161
454659
3514
07:50
Technology can improve things like crop yields
162
458173
2963
07:53
or systems for storing and transporting food,
163
461136
4243
07:57
but there will be famines so long as there are bad governments.
164
465379
5245
08:02
Finally, big problems sometimes elude solution
165
470624
3515
08:06
because we don't really understand the problem.
166
474139
3466
08:09
President Nixon declared war on cancer in 1971,
167
477605
4944
08:14
but we soon discovered
168
482549
1413
08:15
there are many kinds of cancer,
169
483962
2533
08:18
most of them fiendishly resistant to therapy,
170
486495
3566
08:22
and it is only in the last 10 years
171
490061
2210
08:24
that effective, viable therapies
172
492271
2547
08:26
have come to seem real.
173
494818
2057
08:28
Hard problems are hard.
174
496875
3050
08:31
It's not true that we can't solve big problems through technology.
175
499925
4482
08:36
We can, we must, but these four elements
176
504407
3716
08:40
must all be present:
177
508123
1755
08:41
Political leaders and the public
178
509878
1944
08:43
must care to solve a problem;
179
511822
1742
08:45
institutions must support its solution;
180
513564
3171
08:48
It must really be a technological problem;
181
516735
3075
08:51
and we must understand it.
182
519810
3851
08:55
The Apollo mission,
183
523661
1447
08:57
which has become a kind of metaphor
184
525108
2737
08:59
for technology's capacity to solve big problems,
185
527845
3184
09:03
met these criteria.
186
531029
2211
09:05
But it is an irreproducible model for the future.
187
533240
3427
09:08
It is not 1961.
188
536667
1824
09:10
There is no galvanizing contest like the Cold War,
189
538491
4091
09:14
no politician like John Kennedy
190
542582
2359
09:16
who can heroize the difficult and the dangerous,
191
544941
3191
09:20
and no popular science fictional mythology
192
548132
3345
09:23
such as exploring the solar system.
193
551477
3106
09:26
Most of all, going to the moon
194
554583
2402
09:28
turned out to be easy.
195
556985
1862
09:30
It was just three days away.
196
558847
2048
09:32
And arguably it wasn't even solving
197
560895
2885
09:35
much of a problem.
198
563780
2604
09:38
We are left alone with our day,
199
566384
4080
09:42
and the solutions of the future will be harder won.
200
570464
5477
09:47
God knows, we don't lack for the challenges.
201
575941
2785
09:50
Thank you very much.
202
578726
1154
09:51
(Applause)
203
579880
6000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Jason Pontin - EditorJason Pontin is the editor-in-chief and publisher of MIT Technology Review.
Why you should listen
As the editor-in-chief and publisher of MIT Technology Review, Jason Pontin looks into the future, and thinks deeply about what technologies are going to get us there. Pontin has been editor-in-chief of the magazine since 2004 and publisher since 2005, at which point he began its transition to a digital-first magazine. Pontin reduced the number of annual print issues from eleven to six while refocusing the publication's energy toward original daily content. From 1996 to 2002, Pontin was the editor of the now-defunct Red Herring magazine.
Jason Pontin | Speaker | TED.com