ABOUT THE SPEAKERS
Rebecca Newberger Goldstein - Philosopher and writer
Rebecca Newberger Goldstein writes novels and nonfiction that explore questions of philosophy, morality and being.

Why you should listen

In her latest book, Plato at the Googleplex: Why Philosophy Won't Go Away, Rebecca Newberger Goldstein makes the case for the importance of philosophy -- even as neuroscience tells us more about our brains, and connective technologies teach us more about the world around us. It's written in the form of a Socratic dialog, a form that Goldstein is passionate about teaching and exploring.

Meanwhile, her novels, from The Mind-Body Problem (Contemporary American Fiction) to 2011's 36 Arguments for the Existence of God: A Work of Fiction (Vintage Contemporaries), use techniques of fiction to untangle philosophical questions, such as: How should we balance heart and mind? What should we have faith in?

In 1996 Goldstein became a MacArthur Fellow, receiving the prize popularly known as the “Genius Award.” She was designated Humanist of the Year 2011 by the American Humanist Association. She's also the author of Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity, a combination memoir and history.

More profile about the speaker
Rebecca Newberger Goldstein | Speaker | TED.com
Steven Pinker - Psychologist
Steven Pinker is a professor of cognitive science (the study of the human mind) who writes about language, mind and human nature.

Why you should listen

Steven Pinker grew up in the English-speaking community of Montreal but has spent his adult life bouncing back and forth between Harvard and MIT. He is interested in all aspects of human nature: how we see, hear, think, speak, remember, feel and interact.

To be specific: he developed the first comprehensive theory of language acquisition in children, used verb meaning as a window into cognition, probed the limits of neural networks and showed how the interaction between memory and computation shapes language. He has used evolution to illuminate innuendo, emotional expression and social coordination. He has documented historical declines in violence and explained them in terms of the ways that the violent and peaceable components of human nature interact in different eras. He has written books on the language instinct, how the mind works, the stuff of thought and the doctrine of the blank slate, together with a guide to stylish writing that is rooted in psychology.

In his latest book, Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress, he writes about progress -- why people are healthier, richer, safer, happier and better educated than ever. His other books include The Language InstinctHow the Mind Works, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human NatureThe Stuff of Thought, and The Better Angels of Our Nature.

More profile about the speaker
Steven Pinker | Speaker | TED.com
TED2012

Steven Pinker and Rebecca Newberger Goldstein: The long reach of reason

Filmed:
1,110,252 views

Here's a TED first: an animated Socratic dialog! In a time when irrationality seems to rule both politics and culture, has reasoned thinking finally lost its power? Watch as psychologist Steven Pinker is gradually, brilliantly persuaded by philosopher Rebecca Newberger Goldstein that reason is actually the key driver of human moral progress, even if its effect sometimes takes generations to unfold. The dialog was recorded live at TED, and animated, in incredible, often hilarious, detail by Cognitive.
- Philosopher and writer
Rebecca Newberger Goldstein writes novels and nonfiction that explore questions of philosophy, morality and being. Full bio - Psychologist
Steven Pinker is a professor of cognitive science (the study of the human mind) who writes about language, mind and human nature. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:13
["Rebecca Newberger Goldstein"]
0
1592
2678
00:16
["Steven Pinker"]
1
4270
2079
00:18
["The Long Reach of Reason"]
2
6349
3277
00:23
Cabbie: Twenty-two dollars.
Steven Pinker: Okay.
3
11348
3293
00:29
Rebecca Newberger Goldstein: Reason
appears to have fallen on hard times:
4
17857
4118
00:33
Popular culture plumbs new depths of dumbth
5
21975
3335
00:37
and political discourse has become a race
6
25310
2466
00:39
to the bottom.
7
27776
3015
00:42
We're living in an era of scientific creationism,
8
30791
4554
00:47
9/11 conspiracy theories, psychic hotlines,
9
35345
4014
00:51
and a resurgence of religious fundamentalism.
10
39359
3107
00:54
People who think too well
11
42466
2054
00:56
are often accused of elitism,
12
44520
2356
00:58
and even in the academy,
13
46876
2159
01:01
there are attacks on logocentrism,
14
49035
2649
01:03
the crime of letting logic dominate our thinking.
15
51684
4885
01:08
SP: But is this necessarily a bad thing?
16
56569
2507
01:11
Perhaps reason is overrated.
17
59076
2219
01:13
Many pundits have argued that a good heart
18
61295
2143
01:15
and steadfast moral clarity
19
63438
1950
01:17
are superior to triangulations
of overeducated policy wonks,
20
65388
4238
01:21
like the best and brightest and that dragged us
21
69626
2665
01:24
into the quagmire of Vietnam.
22
72291
1862
01:26
And wasn't it reason that gave us the means
23
74153
1822
01:27
to despoil the planet
24
75975
1730
01:29
and threaten our species with
weapons of mass destruction?
25
77705
3021
01:32
In this way of thinking,
it's character and conscience,
26
80726
3239
01:35
not cold-hearted calculation, that will save us.
27
83965
3126
01:39
Besides, a human being is not a brain on a stick.
28
87091
3865
01:42
My fellow psychologists have shown that we're led
29
90956
2518
01:45
by our bodies and our emotions
30
93474
1901
01:47
and use our puny powers of reason
31
95375
1985
01:49
merely to rationalize our gut feelings after the fact.
32
97360
3360
01:52
RNG: How could a reasoned
argument logically entail
33
100720
3197
01:55
the ineffectiveness of reasoned arguments?
34
103917
3432
01:59
Look, you're trying to persuade
us of reason's impotence.
35
107349
3836
02:03
You're not threatening us or bribing us,
36
111185
2387
02:05
suggesting that we resolve the issue
37
113572
1631
02:07
with a show of hands or a beauty contest.
38
115203
3208
02:10
By the very act of trying to
reason us into your position,
39
118411
3937
02:14
you're conceding reason's potency.
40
122348
3018
02:17
Reason isn't up for grabs here. It can't be.
41
125366
3006
02:20
You show up for that debate
42
128372
1398
02:21
and you've already lost it.
43
129770
2842
02:24
SP: But can reason lead us in directions
44
132612
2715
02:27
that are good or decent or moral?
45
135327
2672
02:29
After all, you pointed out that reason
46
137999
2511
02:32
is just a means to an end,
47
140510
1774
02:34
and the end depends on the reasoner's passions.
48
142284
2466
02:36
Reason can lay out a road
map to peace and harmony
49
144750
2567
02:39
if the reasoner wants peace and harmony,
50
147317
1856
02:41
but it can also lay out a road
map to conflict and strife
51
149173
2827
02:44
if the reasoner delights in conflict and strife.
52
152000
2677
02:46
Can reason force the reasoner to want
53
154677
2326
02:49
less cruelty and waste?
54
157003
2309
02:51
RNG: All on its own, the answer is no,
55
159312
3272
02:54
but it doesn't take much to switch it to yes.
56
162584
2761
02:57
You need two conditions:
57
165345
2354
02:59
The first is that reasoners all care
58
167699
2559
03:02
about their own well-being.
59
170258
1710
03:03
That's one of the passions that has to be present
60
171968
2896
03:06
in order for reason to go to work,
61
174864
2204
03:09
and it's obviously present in all of us.
62
177068
1888
03:10
We all care passionately
63
178956
2530
03:13
about our own well-being.
64
181486
2264
03:15
The second condition is that reasoners
65
183750
1833
03:17
are members of a community of reasoners
66
185583
2485
03:20
who can affect one another's well-being,
67
188068
2074
03:22
can exchange messages,
68
190142
1513
03:23
and comprehend each other's reasoning.
69
191655
2828
03:26
And that's certainly true of our gregarious
70
194483
2986
03:29
and loquatious species,
71
197469
2012
03:31
well endowed with the instinct for language.
72
199481
2856
03:34
SP: Well, that sounds good in theory,
73
202337
2322
03:36
but has it worked that way in practice?
74
204659
2014
03:38
In particular, can it explain
75
206673
1834
03:40
a momentous historical development
76
208507
1931
03:42
that I spoke about five years ago here at TED?
77
210438
2867
03:45
Namely, we seem to be getting more humane.
78
213305
2645
03:47
Centuries ago, our ancestors would burn cats alive
79
215950
3360
03:51
as a form of popular entertainment.
80
219310
2260
03:53
Knights waged constant war on each other
81
221570
1879
03:55
by trying to kill as many of each
other's peasants as possible.
82
223449
3166
03:58
Governments executed people for frivolous reasons,
83
226615
2675
04:01
like stealing a cabbage
84
229290
1410
04:02
or criticizing the royal garden.
85
230700
2248
04:04
The executions were designed to be as prolonged
86
232948
2253
04:07
and as painful as possible, like crucifixion,
87
235201
2938
04:10
disembowelment, breaking on the wheel.
88
238139
2094
04:12
Respectable people kept slaves.
89
240233
2066
04:14
For all our flaws, we have abandoned
90
242299
1973
04:16
these barbaric practices.
91
244272
1493
04:17
RNG: So, do you think it's
human nature that's changed?
92
245765
2768
04:20
SP: Not exactly. I think we still harbor instincts
93
248533
2785
04:23
that can erupt in violence,
94
251318
1599
04:24
like greed, tribalism, revenge, dominance, sadism.
95
252917
4370
04:29
But we also have instincts that can steer us away,
96
257287
2999
04:32
like self-control, empathy, a sense of fairness,
97
260286
3492
04:35
what Abraham Lincoln called
98
263778
1276
04:37
the better angels of our nature.
99
265054
1589
04:38
RNG: So if human nature didn't change,
100
266643
2042
04:40
what invigorated those better angels?
101
268685
1999
04:42
SP: Well, among other things,
102
270684
1533
04:44
our circle of empathy expanded.
103
272217
2142
04:46
Years ago, our ancestors would feel the pain
104
274359
2447
04:48
only of their family and people in their village.
105
276806
2473
04:51
But with the expansion of literacy and travel,
106
279279
2802
04:54
people started to sympathize
107
282081
1926
04:56
with wider and wider circles,
108
284007
1665
04:57
the clan, the tribe, the nation, the race,
109
285672
2881
05:00
and perhaps eventually, all of humanity.
110
288553
2955
05:03
RNG: Can hard-headed scientists
111
291508
2206
05:05
really give so much credit to soft-hearted empathy?
112
293714
3021
05:08
SP: They can and do.
113
296735
1681
05:10
Neurophysiologists have found neurons in the brain
114
298416
2001
05:12
that respond to other people's actions
115
300417
2180
05:14
the same way they respond to our own.
116
302597
2067
05:16
Empathy emerges early in life,
117
304664
1727
05:18
perhaps before the age of one.
118
306391
1883
05:20
Books on empathy have become bestsellers,
119
308274
1643
05:21
like "The Empathic Civilization"
120
309917
2014
05:23
and "The Age of Empathy."
121
311931
2180
05:26
RNG: I'm all for empathy. I mean, who isn't?
122
314111
2698
05:28
But all on its own, it's a feeble instrument
123
316809
3668
05:32
for making moral progress.
124
320477
1870
05:34
For one thing, it's innately biased
125
322347
2187
05:36
toward blood relations, babies
126
324534
2126
05:38
and warm, fuzzy animals.
127
326660
1834
05:40
As far as empathy is concerned,
128
328494
2399
05:42
ugly outsiders can go to hell.
129
330893
3533
05:46
And even our best attempts to work up sympathy
130
334426
3403
05:49
for those who are unconnected with us
131
337829
1984
05:51
fall miserably short, a sad truth about human nature
132
339813
4199
05:56
that was pointed out by Adam Smith.
133
344012
2554
05:58
Adam Smith: Let us suppose that the great empire
134
346566
1781
06:00
of China was suddenly swallowed
up by an earthquake,
135
348347
2615
06:02
and let us consider how a
man of humanity in Europe
136
350962
2590
06:05
would react on receiving intelligence
137
353552
1702
06:07
of this dreadful calamity.
138
355254
2063
06:09
He would, I imagine, first of all express very strongly
139
357317
2217
06:11
his sorrow for the misfortune of that unhappy people.
140
359534
2660
06:14
He would make many melancholy reflections
141
362194
1877
06:16
upon the precariousness of human life,
142
364071
2190
06:18
and when all these humane sentiments
143
366261
2014
06:20
had been once fairly expressed,
144
368275
1843
06:22
he would pursue his business or his pleasure
145
370118
2252
06:24
with the same ease and tranquility
146
372370
2149
06:26
as if no such accident had happened.
147
374519
2092
06:28
If he was to lose his little finger tomorrow,
148
376611
2542
06:31
he would not sleep tonight,
149
379153
1537
06:32
but provided he never saw them,
150
380690
1742
06:34
he would snore with the most profound security
151
382432
2438
06:36
over the ruin of a hundred million of his brethren.
152
384870
2909
06:39
SP: But if empathy wasn't enough
to make us more humane,
153
387779
2903
06:42
what else was there?
154
390682
1560
06:44
RNG: Well, you didn't mention what might be
155
392242
2694
06:46
one of our most effective better angels: reason.
156
394936
3826
06:50
Reason has muscle.
157
398762
2568
06:53
It's reason that provides the push to widen
158
401330
3374
06:56
that circle of empathy.
159
404704
2145
06:58
Every one of the humanitarian developments
160
406849
2908
07:01
that you mentioned originated with thinkers
161
409757
2598
07:04
who gave reasons for why some practice
162
412355
2870
07:07
was indefensible.
163
415225
1958
07:09
They demonstrated that the way people treated
164
417183
2639
07:11
some particular group of others
165
419822
1947
07:13
was logically inconsistent
166
421769
1786
07:15
with the way they insisted
on being treated themselves.
167
423555
2572
07:18
SP: Are you saying that reason
168
426127
1694
07:19
can actually change people's minds?
169
427821
2306
07:22
Don't people just stick with whatever conviction
170
430127
1930
07:24
serves their interests
171
432057
1481
07:25
or conforms to the culture that they grew up in?
172
433538
2816
07:28
RNG: Here's a fascinating fact about us:
173
436354
3159
07:31
Contradictions bother us,
174
439513
2078
07:33
at least when we're forced to confront them,
175
441591
2135
07:35
which is just another way of saying
176
443726
1818
07:37
that we are susceptible to reason.
177
445544
2746
07:40
And if you look at the history of moral progress,
178
448290
2831
07:43
you can trace a direct pathway
from reasoned arguments
179
451121
3707
07:46
to changes in the way that we actually feel.
180
454828
3339
07:50
Time and again, a thinker would lay out an argument
181
458167
3581
07:53
as to why some practice was indefensible,
182
461748
3270
07:57
irrational, inconsistent with values already held.
183
465018
5049
08:02
Their essay would go viral,
184
470067
2068
08:04
get translated into many languages,
185
472135
2285
08:06
get debated at pubs and coffee houses and salons,
186
474420
3350
08:09
and at dinner parties,
187
477770
1607
08:11
and influence leaders, legislators,
188
479377
4053
08:15
popular opinion.
189
483430
1538
08:16
Eventually their conclusions get absorbed
190
484968
3253
08:20
into the common sense of decency,
191
488221
2327
08:22
erasing the tracks of the original argument
192
490548
2689
08:25
that had gotten us there.
193
493237
1808
08:27
Few of us today feel any need to put forth
194
495045
2797
08:29
a rigorous philosophical argument
195
497842
2108
08:31
as to why slavery is wrong
196
499950
2259
08:34
or public hangings or beating children.
197
502209
3558
08:37
By now, these things just feel wrong.
198
505767
2900
08:40
But just those arguments had to be made,
199
508667
2837
08:43
and they were, in centuries past.
200
511504
2749
08:46
SP: Are you saying that people needed
201
514253
1752
08:48
a step-by-step argument to grasp
202
516005
2048
08:50
why something might be a wee bit wrong
203
518053
2059
08:52
with burning heretics at the stake?
204
520112
1778
08:53
RNG: Oh, they did. Here's the French theologian
205
521890
2917
08:56
Sebastian Castellio making the case.
206
524807
2922
08:59
Sebastian Castellio: Calvin says that he's certain,
207
527729
2015
09:01
and other sects say that they are.
208
529744
1640
09:03
Who shall be judge?
209
531384
1273
09:04
If the matter is certain, to whom is it so? To Calvin?
210
532657
2438
09:07
But then, why does he write so
many books about manifest truth?
211
535095
3019
09:10
In view of the uncertainty, we must define heretics
212
538114
2536
09:12
simply as one with whom we disagree.
213
540650
1764
09:14
And if then we are going to kill heretics,
214
542414
1972
09:16
the logical outcome will be a war of extermination,
215
544386
2241
09:18
since each is sure of himself.
216
546627
1871
09:20
SP: Or with hideous punishments
217
548498
1549
09:22
like breaking on the wheel?
218
550047
1843
09:23
RNG: The prohibition in our constitution
219
551890
2508
09:26
of cruel and unusual punishments
220
554398
2032
09:28
was a response to a pamphlet circulated in 1764
221
556430
3581
09:32
by the Italian jurist Cesare Beccaria.
222
560011
3519
09:35
Cesare Beccaria: As punishments
become more cruel,
223
563530
2351
09:37
the minds of men, which like fluids
224
565881
2083
09:39
always adjust to the level of the objects
225
567964
1959
09:41
that surround them, become hardened,
226
569923
1879
09:43
and after a hundred years of cruel punishments,
227
571802
2845
09:46
breaking on the wheel causes no more fear
228
574647
2192
09:48
than imprisonment previously did.
229
576839
2144
09:50
For a punishment to achieve its objective,
230
578983
2047
09:53
it is only necessary that the harm that it inflicts
231
581030
2740
09:55
outweighs the benefit that derives from the crime,
232
583770
3059
09:58
and into this calculation ought to be factored
233
586829
2108
10:00
the certainty of punishment
234
588937
1666
10:02
and the loss of the good
235
590603
1138
10:03
that the commission of the crime will produce.
236
591741
2635
10:06
Everything beyond this is superfluous,
237
594376
1792
10:08
and therefore tyrannical.
238
596168
1951
10:10
SP: But surely antiwar movements depended
239
598119
2350
10:12
on mass demonstrations
240
600469
1529
10:13
and catchy tunes by folk singers
241
601998
2082
10:16
and wrenching photographs
of the human costs of war.
242
604080
2907
10:18
RNG: No doubt, but modern anti-war movements
243
606987
3178
10:22
reach back to a long chain of thinkers
244
610165
2693
10:24
who had argued as to why we ought to mobilize
245
612858
2588
10:27
our emotions against war,
246
615446
2239
10:29
such as the father of modernity, Erasmus.
247
617685
3127
10:32
Erasmus: The advantages derived from peace
248
620812
1857
10:34
diffuse themselves far and wide,
249
622669
1665
10:36
and reach great numbers,
250
624334
1899
10:38
while in war, if anything turns out happily,
251
626233
2001
10:40
the advantage redounds only to a few,
252
628234
2224
10:42
and those unworthy of reaping it.
253
630458
2011
10:44
One man's safety is owing
to the destruction of another.
254
632469
2877
10:47
One man's prize is derived
from the plunder of another.
255
635346
2669
10:50
The cause of rejoicings made by one side
256
638015
2167
10:52
is to the other a cause of mourning.
257
640182
2348
10:54
Whatever is unfortunate in war,
258
642530
1541
10:56
is severely so indeed,
259
644071
1660
10:57
and whatever, on the contrary,
260
645731
1402
10:59
is called good fortune,
261
647133
1289
11:00
is a savage and a cruel good fortune,
262
648422
1919
11:02
an ungenerous happiness deriving
its existence from another's woe.
263
650341
3637
11:05
SP: But everyone knows that the movement
264
653978
1857
11:07
to abolish slavery depended on faith and emotion.
265
655835
3218
11:11
It was a movement spearheaded by the Quakers,
266
659053
2250
11:13
and it only became popular when
Harriet Beecher Stowe's novel
267
661303
3335
11:16
"Uncle Tom's Cabin" became a bestseller.
268
664638
2284
11:18
RNG: But the ball got rolling a century before.
269
666922
2917
11:21
John Locke bucked the tide of millennia
270
669839
3238
11:25
that had regarded the practice as perfectly natural.
271
673077
3425
11:28
He argued that it was inconsistent
272
676502
2574
11:31
with the principles of rational government.
273
679076
1922
11:32
John Locke: Freedom of men under government
274
680998
1645
11:34
is to have a standing rule to live by
275
682643
2019
11:36
common to everyone of that society
276
684662
2053
11:38
and made by the legislative power erected in it,
277
686715
3072
11:41
a liberty to follow my own will in all things
278
689787
2184
11:43
where that rule prescribes not,
279
691971
1720
11:45
not to be subject to the inconstant,
280
693691
1911
11:47
uncertain, unknown, arbitrary will of another man,
281
695602
3407
11:51
as freedom of nature is to
be under no other restraint
282
699009
2599
11:53
but the law of nature.
283
701608
1950
11:55
SP: Those words sound familiar.
284
703558
1792
11:57
Where have I read them before? Ah, yes.
285
705350
2726
12:00
Mary Astell: If absolute sovereignty
be not necessary
286
708076
2743
12:02
in a state, how comes it to be so in a family?
287
710819
2612
12:05
Or if in a family, why not in a state?
288
713431
2980
12:08
Since no reason can be alleged for the one
289
716411
1868
12:10
that will not hold more strongly for the other,
290
718279
2108
12:12
if all men are born free,
291
720387
1433
12:13
how is it that all women are born slaves,
292
721820
2389
12:16
as they must be if being subjected
293
724209
2428
12:18
to the inconstant, uncertain,
294
726637
2038
12:20
unknown, arbitrary will of men
295
728675
2520
12:23
be the perfect condition of slavery?
296
731195
2900
12:26
RNG: That sort of co-option
297
734095
1933
12:28
is all in the job description of reason.
298
736028
2566
12:30
One movement for the expansion of rights
299
738594
2175
12:32
inspires another because the logic is the same,
300
740769
3890
12:36
and once that's hammered home,
301
744659
1899
12:38
it becomes increasingly uncomfortable
302
746558
2534
12:41
to ignore the inconsistency.
303
749092
2194
12:43
In the 1960s, the Civil Rights Movement
304
751286
2795
12:46
inspired the movements for women's rights,
305
754081
1918
12:47
children's rights, gay rights and even animal rights.
306
755999
3623
12:51
But fully two centuries before,
307
759622
2422
12:54
the Enlightenment thinker Jeremy Bentham
308
762044
2148
12:56
had exposed the indefensibility
309
764192
2702
12:58
of customary practices such as
310
766894
2442
13:01
the cruelty to animals.
311
769336
2103
13:03
Jeremy Bentham: The question
is not, can they reason,
312
771439
2380
13:05
nor can they talk, but can they suffer?
313
773819
3393
13:09
RNG: And the persecution of homosexuals.
314
777212
2844
13:12
JB: As to any primary mischief,
315
780056
1968
13:14
it's evident that it produces no pain in anyone.
316
782024
3257
13:17
On the contrary, it produces pleasure.
317
785281
2250
13:19
The partners are both willing.
318
787531
1530
13:21
If either of them be unwilling,
319
789061
1544
13:22
the act is an offense,
320
790605
1358
13:23
totally different in its nature of effects.
321
791963
2209
13:26
It's a personal injury. It's a kind of rape.
322
794172
2612
13:28
As to the any danger exclusive of pain,
323
796784
2244
13:31
the danger, if any, much consist
324
799028
1712
13:32
in the tendency of the example.
325
800740
1839
13:34
But what is the tendency of this example?
326
802579
3134
13:37
To dispose others to engage in the same practices.
327
805713
2272
13:39
But this practice produces not pain of any kind
328
807985
2694
13:42
to anyone.
329
810679
1634
13:44
SP: Still, in every case, it took at least a century
330
812313
2466
13:46
for the arguments of these great thinkers
331
814779
1859
13:48
to trickle down and infiltrate
the population as a whole.
332
816638
3405
13:52
It kind of makes you wonder about our own time.
333
820043
2479
13:54
Are there practices that we engage in
334
822522
1969
13:56
where the arguments against
them are there for all to see
335
824491
2795
13:59
but nonetheless we persist in them?
336
827286
2289
14:01
RNG: When our great grandchildren look back at us,
337
829575
2992
14:04
will they be as appalled by some of our practices
338
832567
3215
14:07
as we are by our slave-owning, heretic-burning,
339
835782
3659
14:11
wife-beating, gay-bashing ancestors?
340
839441
3088
14:14
SP: I'm sure everyone here
could think of an example.
341
842529
2792
14:17
RNG: I opt for the mistreatment of animals
342
845321
2030
14:19
in factory farms.
343
847351
1711
14:21
SP: The imprisonment of nonviolent drug offenders
344
849062
2230
14:23
and the toleration of rape in our nation's prisons.
345
851292
2702
14:25
RNG: Scrimping on donations to life-saving charities
346
853994
2725
14:28
in the developing world.
347
856719
1657
14:30
SP: The possession of nuclear weapons.
348
858376
2342
14:32
RNG: The appeal to religion to justify
349
860718
2377
14:35
the otherwise unjustifiable,
350
863095
1640
14:36
such as the ban on contraception.
351
864735
2512
14:39
SP: What about religious faith in general?
352
867247
1788
14:41
RNG: Eh, I'm not holding my breath.
353
869035
2181
14:43
SP: Still, I have become convinced
354
871216
2057
14:45
that reason is a better angel
355
873273
1711
14:46
that deserves the greatest credit
356
874984
1572
14:48
for the moral progress our species has enjoyed
357
876556
2654
14:51
and that holds out the greatest hope
358
879210
2115
14:53
for continuing moral progress in the future.
359
881325
2816
14:56
RNG: And if, our friends,
360
884141
1902
14:58
you detect a flaw in this argument,
361
886043
2680
15:00
just remember you'll be depending on reason
362
888723
3322
15:04
to point it out.
363
892045
1371
15:05
Thank you.
SP: Thank you.
364
893416
2714
15:08
(Applause)
365
896130
6995

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKERS
Rebecca Newberger Goldstein - Philosopher and writer
Rebecca Newberger Goldstein writes novels and nonfiction that explore questions of philosophy, morality and being.

Why you should listen

In her latest book, Plato at the Googleplex: Why Philosophy Won't Go Away, Rebecca Newberger Goldstein makes the case for the importance of philosophy -- even as neuroscience tells us more about our brains, and connective technologies teach us more about the world around us. It's written in the form of a Socratic dialog, a form that Goldstein is passionate about teaching and exploring.

Meanwhile, her novels, from The Mind-Body Problem (Contemporary American Fiction) to 2011's 36 Arguments for the Existence of God: A Work of Fiction (Vintage Contemporaries), use techniques of fiction to untangle philosophical questions, such as: How should we balance heart and mind? What should we have faith in?

In 1996 Goldstein became a MacArthur Fellow, receiving the prize popularly known as the “Genius Award.” She was designated Humanist of the Year 2011 by the American Humanist Association. She's also the author of Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity, a combination memoir and history.

More profile about the speaker
Rebecca Newberger Goldstein | Speaker | TED.com
Steven Pinker - Psychologist
Steven Pinker is a professor of cognitive science (the study of the human mind) who writes about language, mind and human nature.

Why you should listen

Steven Pinker grew up in the English-speaking community of Montreal but has spent his adult life bouncing back and forth between Harvard and MIT. He is interested in all aspects of human nature: how we see, hear, think, speak, remember, feel and interact.

To be specific: he developed the first comprehensive theory of language acquisition in children, used verb meaning as a window into cognition, probed the limits of neural networks and showed how the interaction between memory and computation shapes language. He has used evolution to illuminate innuendo, emotional expression and social coordination. He has documented historical declines in violence and explained them in terms of the ways that the violent and peaceable components of human nature interact in different eras. He has written books on the language instinct, how the mind works, the stuff of thought and the doctrine of the blank slate, together with a guide to stylish writing that is rooted in psychology.

In his latest book, Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress, he writes about progress -- why people are healthier, richer, safer, happier and better educated than ever. His other books include The Language InstinctHow the Mind Works, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human NatureThe Stuff of Thought, and The Better Angels of Our Nature.

More profile about the speaker
Steven Pinker | Speaker | TED.com