TEDxUSC
Johanna Blakley: Lessons from fashion's free culture
Filmed:
Readability: 4.2
1,253,227 views
Copyright law's grip on film, music and software barely touches the fashion industry ... and fashion benefits in both innovation and sales, says Johanna Blakley. In her talk, she talks about what all creative industries can learn from fashion's free culture.
Johanna Blakley - Media maven
Johanna Blakley studies the impact of mass media and entertainment on our world. Full bio
Johanna Blakley studies the impact of mass media and entertainment on our world. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:16
I heard this amazing story about Miuccia Prada.
0
1000
2000
00:18
She's an Italian fashion designer.
1
3000
2000
00:20
She goes to this vintage store in Paris
2
5000
2000
00:22
with a friend of hers.
3
7000
2000
00:24
She's rooting around, she finds this one jacket by Balenciaga --
4
9000
3000
00:28
she loves it.
5
13000
2000
00:30
She's turning it inside out.
6
15000
2000
00:32
She's looking at the seams. She's looking at the construction.
7
17000
3000
00:35
Her friend says, "Buy it already."
8
20000
2000
00:37
She said, "I'll buy it, but I'm also going to replicate it."
9
22000
3000
00:42
Now, the academics in this audience may think,
10
27000
3000
00:45
"Well, that sounds like plagiarism."
11
30000
2000
00:47
But to a fashionista, what it really is
12
32000
2000
00:49
is a sign of Prada's genius:
13
34000
2000
00:51
that she can root through the history of fashion
14
36000
2000
00:53
and pick the one jacket
15
38000
2000
00:55
that doesn't need to be changed by one iota,
16
40000
2000
00:57
and to be current and to be now.
17
42000
3000
01:00
You might also be asking whether it's possible
18
45000
3000
01:03
that this is illegal for her to do this.
19
48000
3000
01:06
Well, it turns out that it's actually not illegal.
20
51000
3000
01:09
In the fashion industry, there's very little
21
54000
2000
01:11
intellectual property protection.
22
56000
3000
01:14
They have trademark protection,
23
59000
2000
01:16
but no copyright protection
24
61000
2000
01:18
and no patent protection to speak of.
25
63000
3000
01:21
All they have, really, is trademark protection,
26
66000
2000
01:23
and so it means that anybody
27
68000
2000
01:25
could copy any garment
28
70000
2000
01:27
on any person in this room
29
72000
2000
01:29
and sell it as their own design.
30
74000
2000
01:31
The only thing that they can't copy
31
76000
2000
01:33
is the actual trademark label
32
78000
2000
01:35
within that piece of apparel.
33
80000
2000
01:37
That's one reason that you see logos
34
82000
2000
01:39
splattered all over these products.
35
84000
2000
01:41
It's because it's a lot harder for knock-off artists
36
86000
2000
01:43
to knock off these designs
37
88000
2000
01:45
because they can't knock off the logo.
38
90000
3000
01:48
But if you go to Santee Alley, yeah.
39
93000
3000
01:51
(Laughter) Well, yeah.
40
96000
2000
01:53
Canal Street, I know.
41
98000
2000
01:55
And sometimes these are fun, right?
42
100000
2000
01:57
Now, the reason for this, the reason that the fashion industry
43
102000
3000
02:00
doesn't have any copyright protection
44
105000
2000
02:02
is because the courts decided long ago
45
107000
3000
02:05
that apparel is too utilitarian
46
110000
2000
02:07
to qualify for copyright protection.
47
112000
2000
02:09
They didn't want a handful of designers
48
114000
2000
02:11
owning the seminal building blocks of our clothing.
49
116000
3000
02:14
And then everybody else would have to license this cuff or this sleeve
50
119000
3000
02:17
because Joe Blow owns it.
51
122000
3000
02:21
But too utilitarian? I mean is that the way you think of fashion?
52
126000
3000
02:24
This is Vivienne Westwood. No!
53
129000
3000
02:27
We think of it as maybe too silly,
54
132000
2000
02:29
too unnecessary.
55
134000
2000
02:31
Now, those of you who are familiar with the logic
56
136000
2000
02:33
behind copyright protection --
57
138000
2000
02:35
which is that without ownership, there is no incentive to innovate --
58
140000
3000
02:38
might be really surprised
59
143000
2000
02:40
by both the critical success of the fashion industry
60
145000
3000
02:43
and the economic success of this industry.
61
148000
3000
02:46
What I'm going to argue today is that
62
151000
2000
02:48
because there's no copyright protection
63
153000
2000
02:50
in the fashion industry,
64
155000
2000
02:52
fashion designers have actually been able to elevate
65
157000
3000
02:55
utilitarian design,
66
160000
2000
02:57
things to cover our naked bodies,
67
162000
2000
02:59
into something that we consider art.
68
164000
2000
03:01
Because there's no copyright protection
69
166000
2000
03:03
in this industry,
70
168000
2000
03:05
there's a very open and creative
71
170000
2000
03:07
ecology of creativity.
72
172000
2000
03:09
Unlike their creative brothers and sisters,
73
174000
2000
03:11
who are sculptors or photographers
74
176000
3000
03:14
or filmmakers or musicians,
75
179000
3000
03:17
fashion designers can sample
76
182000
2000
03:19
from all their peers' designs.
77
184000
2000
03:21
They can take any element from any garment
78
186000
2000
03:23
from the history of fashion
79
188000
2000
03:25
and incorporate it into their own design.
80
190000
2000
03:27
They're also notorious for riffing off of the zeitgeist.
81
192000
3000
03:30
And here, I suspect,
82
195000
2000
03:32
they were influenced by the costumes in Avatar.
83
197000
3000
03:35
Maybe just a little.
84
200000
2000
03:37
Can't copyright a costume either.
85
202000
2000
03:39
Now, fashion designers have
86
204000
2000
03:41
the broadest palette imaginable
87
206000
2000
03:43
in this creative industry.
88
208000
2000
03:45
This wedding dress here
89
210000
2000
03:47
is actually made of sporks,
90
212000
3000
03:50
and this dress is actually made of aluminum.
91
215000
3000
03:53
I've heard this dress actually sort of sounds like wind chimes
92
218000
2000
03:55
as they walk through.
93
220000
2000
03:57
So, one of the magical side effects
94
222000
2000
03:59
of having a culture of copying,
95
224000
2000
04:01
which is really what it is,
96
226000
2000
04:03
is the establishment of trends.
97
228000
2000
04:05
People think this is a magical thing. How does it happen?
98
230000
2000
04:07
Well, it's because it's legal for people to copy one another.
99
232000
3000
04:10
Some people believe that
100
235000
2000
04:12
there are a few people at the top of the fashion food chain
101
237000
3000
04:15
who sort of dictate to us what we're all going to wear,
102
240000
3000
04:18
but if you talk to any designer at any level,
103
243000
2000
04:20
including these high-end designers,
104
245000
2000
04:22
they always say
105
247000
2000
04:24
their main inspiration comes from the street:
106
249000
2000
04:26
where people like you and me remix and match
107
251000
2000
04:28
our own fashion looks.
108
253000
2000
04:30
And that's where they really get a lot of their
109
255000
2000
04:32
creative inspiration,
110
257000
3000
04:35
so it's both a top-down and a bottom-up kind of industry.
111
260000
3000
04:39
Now, the fast fashion giants have
112
264000
2000
04:41
probably benefited the most
113
266000
2000
04:43
from the lack of copyright protection in the fashion industry.
114
268000
3000
04:46
They are notorious for knocking off high-end designs
115
271000
3000
04:49
and selling them at very low prices.
116
274000
2000
04:51
And they've been faced with a lot of lawsuits,
117
276000
3000
04:54
but those lawsuits are usually not won by fashion designers.
118
279000
3000
04:57
The courts have said over and over again, "You don't need
119
282000
2000
04:59
any more intellectual property protection."
120
284000
3000
05:02
When you look at copies like this,
121
287000
3000
05:05
you wonder: How do the luxury high-end brands
122
290000
2000
05:07
remain in business?
123
292000
2000
05:09
If you can get it for 200 bucks, why pay a thousand?
124
294000
3000
05:12
Well, that's one reason we had a conference here at USC a few years ago.
125
297000
3000
05:15
We invited Tom Ford to come --
126
300000
2000
05:17
the conference was called, "Ready to Share:
127
302000
2000
05:19
Fashion and the Ownership of Creativity" --
128
304000
3000
05:22
and we asked him exactly this question.
129
307000
2000
05:24
Here's what he had to say.
130
309000
2000
05:26
He had just come off a successful stint as the lead designer at Gucci,
131
311000
3000
05:29
in case you didn't know.
132
314000
2000
05:31
Tom Ford: And we found after much research
133
316000
3000
05:34
that -- actually not much research, quite simple research --
134
319000
2000
05:36
that the counterfeit customer was not our customer.
135
321000
3000
05:39
Johanna Blakley: Imagine that.
136
324000
2000
05:41
The people on Santee Alley
137
326000
2000
05:43
are not the ones who shop at Gucci.
138
328000
2000
05:45
(Laughter)
139
330000
3000
05:48
This is a very different demographic.
140
333000
3000
05:52
And, you know, a knock-off is never the same
141
337000
3000
05:55
as an original high-end design,
142
340000
3000
05:58
at least in terms of the materials; they're always made of cheaper materials.
143
343000
3000
06:01
But even sometimes a cheaper version
144
346000
3000
06:04
can actually have some charming aspects,
145
349000
2000
06:06
can breathe a little extra life into a dying trend.
146
351000
3000
06:10
There's lots of virtues of copying.
147
355000
2000
06:12
One that a lot of cultural critics have pointed to
148
357000
3000
06:15
is that we now have
149
360000
2000
06:17
a much broader palette
150
362000
2000
06:19
of design choices to choose from than we ever have before,
151
364000
3000
06:22
and this is mainly because of the fast fashion industry, actually.
152
367000
3000
06:25
And this is a good thing. We need lots of options.
153
370000
2000
06:27
Fashion, whether you like it or not,
154
372000
2000
06:29
helps you project who you are to the world.
155
374000
3000
06:33
Because of fast fashion,
156
378000
2000
06:35
global trends actually get established much more quickly than they used to.
157
380000
3000
06:38
And this, actually, is good news to trendsetters;
158
383000
3000
06:41
they want trends to be set
159
386000
2000
06:43
so that they can move product.
160
388000
3000
06:46
For fashionistas,
161
391000
2000
06:48
they want to stay ahead of the curve.
162
393000
2000
06:50
They don't want to be wearing what everybody else is wearing.
163
395000
3000
06:53
And so, they want to move on to the next trend
164
398000
3000
06:56
as soon as possible.
165
401000
2000
06:58
I tell you, there is no rest for the fashionable.
166
403000
3000
07:01
Every season, these designers have to struggle
167
406000
2000
07:03
to come up with the new fabulous idea that everybody's going to love.
168
408000
3000
07:06
And this, let me tell you,
169
411000
2000
07:08
is very good for the bottom line.
170
413000
3000
07:11
Now of course, there's a bunch of effects
171
416000
2000
07:13
that this culture of copying has
172
418000
2000
07:15
on the creative process.
173
420000
2000
07:17
And Stuart Weitzman is a very successful shoe designer.
174
422000
2000
07:19
He has complained a lot about people copying him,
175
424000
3000
07:22
but in one interview I read,
176
427000
2000
07:24
he said it has really forced him to up his game.
177
429000
3000
07:27
He had to come up with new ideas,
178
432000
2000
07:29
new things that would be hard to copy.
179
434000
2000
07:31
He came up with this Bowden-wedge heel
180
436000
3000
07:34
that has to be made out of steel or titanium;
181
439000
2000
07:36
if you make it from some sort of cheaper material,
182
441000
2000
07:38
it'll actually crack in two.
183
443000
2000
07:40
It forced him to be a little more innovative. (Music)
184
445000
3000
07:43
And that actually reminded me
185
448000
2000
07:45
of jazz great, Charlie Parker.
186
450000
2000
07:47
I don't know if you've heard this anecdote, but I have.
187
452000
3000
07:50
He said that one of the reasons he invented bebop
188
455000
3000
07:53
was that he was pretty sure
189
458000
2000
07:55
that white musicians wouldn't be able to replicate the sound. (Laughter)
190
460000
3000
08:01
He wanted to make it too difficult to copy,
191
466000
3000
08:05
and that's what fashion designers are doing all the time.
192
470000
2000
08:07
They're trying to put together
193
472000
2000
08:09
a signature look, an aesthetic
194
474000
2000
08:11
that reflects who they are.
195
476000
2000
08:13
When people knock it off, everybody knows
196
478000
3000
08:16
because they've put that look out on the runway,
197
481000
2000
08:18
and it's a coherent aesthetic.
198
483000
3000
08:22
I love these Gallianos.
199
487000
2000
08:24
Okay, we'll move on. (Laughter)
200
489000
2000
08:26
This is not unlike the world of comedy.
201
491000
3000
08:29
I don't know if you know that jokes
202
494000
2000
08:31
also can't be copyright protected.
203
496000
2000
08:33
So when one-liners were really popular,
204
498000
3000
08:36
everybody stole them from one another.
205
501000
2000
08:38
But now, we have a different kind of comic.
206
503000
2000
08:40
They develop a persona,
207
505000
2000
08:42
a signature style, much like fashion designers.
208
507000
3000
08:45
And their jokes,
209
510000
2000
08:47
much like the fashion designs by a fashion designer,
210
512000
2000
08:49
really only work within that aesthetic.
211
514000
2000
08:51
If somebody steals a joke
212
516000
2000
08:53
from Larry David, for instance,
213
518000
2000
08:55
it's not as funny.
214
520000
2000
08:57
Now, the other thing that fashion designers have done
215
522000
2000
08:59
to survive in this culture of copying
216
524000
2000
09:01
is they've learned how to copy themselves.
217
526000
2000
09:03
They knock themselves off.
218
528000
2000
09:05
They make deals with the fast fashion giants
219
530000
3000
09:08
and they come up with a way to sell their product
220
533000
2000
09:10
to a whole new demographic:
221
535000
2000
09:12
the Santee Alley demographic.
222
537000
2000
09:14
Now, some fashion designers will say,
223
539000
3000
09:17
"It's only in the United States that we don't have any respect.
224
542000
3000
09:20
In other countries there is protection
225
545000
2000
09:22
for our artful designs."
226
547000
3000
09:25
But if you take a look at the two other biggest markets in the world,
227
550000
2000
09:27
it turns out that the protection that's offered
228
552000
3000
09:30
is really ineffectual.
229
555000
2000
09:32
In Japan, for instance, which I think is the third largest market,
230
557000
3000
09:35
they have a design law; it protects apparel,
231
560000
3000
09:38
but the novelty standard is so high,
232
563000
2000
09:40
you have to prove that your garment has never existed before,
233
565000
3000
09:43
it's totally unique.
234
568000
2000
09:45
And that's sort of like
235
570000
2000
09:47
the novelty standard for a U.S. patent,
236
572000
2000
09:49
which fashion designers never get --
237
574000
2000
09:51
rarely get here in the states.
238
576000
2000
09:53
In the European Union, they went in the other direction.
239
578000
3000
09:56
Very low novelty standard,
240
581000
2000
09:58
anybody can register anything.
241
583000
2000
10:00
But even though it's the home of the fast fashion industry
242
585000
2000
10:02
and you have a lot of luxury designers there,
243
587000
2000
10:04
they don't register their garments, generally,
244
589000
3000
10:07
and there's not a lot of litigation.
245
592000
2000
10:09
It turns out it's because the novelty standard is too low.
246
594000
3000
10:12
A person can come in and take somebody else's gown,
247
597000
3000
10:15
cut off three inches from the bottom,
248
600000
3000
10:18
go to the E.U. and register it as a new, original design.
249
603000
3000
10:21
So, that does not stop the knock-off artists.
250
606000
2000
10:23
If you look at the registry, actually,
251
608000
2000
10:25
a lot of the registered things in the E.U.
252
610000
2000
10:27
are Nike T-shirts
253
612000
2000
10:29
that are almost identical to one another.
254
614000
3000
10:32
But this has not stopped Diane von Furstenberg.
255
617000
2000
10:34
She is the head of
256
619000
2000
10:36
the Council of Fashion Designers of America,
257
621000
3000
10:39
and she has told her constituency that
258
624000
2000
10:41
she is going to get copyright protection
259
626000
3000
10:44
for fashion designs.
260
629000
2000
10:46
The retailers have kind of quashed this notion though.
261
631000
2000
10:48
I don't think the legislation is going anywhere,
262
633000
2000
10:50
because they realized it is so hard
263
635000
3000
10:53
to tell the difference between a pirated design
264
638000
2000
10:55
and something that's just part of a global trend.
265
640000
3000
10:58
Who owns a look?
266
643000
2000
11:00
That is a very difficult question to answer.
267
645000
2000
11:02
It takes lots of lawyers and lots of court time,
268
647000
3000
11:05
and the retailers decided that would be way too expensive.
269
650000
3000
11:10
You know, it's not just the fashion industry
270
655000
2000
11:12
that doesn't have copyright protection.
271
657000
2000
11:14
There's a bunch of other industries that don't have copyright protection,
272
659000
3000
11:17
including the food industry.
273
662000
2000
11:19
You cannot copyright a recipe
274
664000
2000
11:21
because it's a set of instructions, it's fact,
275
666000
3000
11:24
and you cannot copyright the look and feel
276
669000
2000
11:26
of even the most unique dish.
277
671000
3000
11:29
Same with automobiles.
278
674000
2000
11:31
It doesn't matter how wacky they look or how cool they look,
279
676000
3000
11:34
you cannot copyright the sculptural design.
280
679000
3000
11:37
It's a utilitarian article, that's why.
281
682000
3000
11:40
Same with furniture,
282
685000
2000
11:42
it's too utilitarian.
283
687000
3000
11:45
Magic tricks, I think they're instructions, sort of like recipes:
284
690000
3000
11:48
no copyright protection.
285
693000
2000
11:50
Hairdos, no copyright protection.
286
695000
2000
11:52
Open source software, these guys decided
287
697000
2000
11:54
they didn't want copyright protection.
288
699000
2000
11:56
They thought it'd be more innovative without it.
289
701000
3000
11:59
It's really hard to get copyright for databases.
290
704000
3000
12:02
Tattoo artists, they don't want it; it's not cool.
291
707000
3000
12:05
They share their designs.
292
710000
3000
12:08
Jokes, no copyright protection.
293
713000
2000
12:10
Fireworks displays,
294
715000
2000
12:12
the rules of games,
295
717000
2000
12:14
the smell of perfume: no.
296
719000
3000
12:17
And some of these industries may seem
297
722000
2000
12:19
sort of marginal to you,
298
724000
2000
12:21
but these are the gross sales
299
726000
3000
12:24
for low I.P. industries,
300
729000
2000
12:26
industries with very little copyright protection,
301
731000
2000
12:28
and there's the gross sales of
302
733000
2000
12:30
films and books.
303
735000
2000
12:32
(Applause)
304
737000
3000
12:35
It ain't pretty.
305
740000
2000
12:37
(Applause)
306
742000
2000
12:39
So you talk to people in the fashion industry
307
744000
2000
12:41
and they're like, "Shhh!
308
746000
2000
12:43
Don't tell anybody
309
748000
2000
12:45
we can actually steal from each other's designs.
310
750000
2000
12:47
It's embarrassing."
311
752000
2000
12:49
But you know what? It's revolutionary,
312
754000
2000
12:51
and it's a model that a lot of other industries --
313
756000
3000
12:54
like the ones we just saw with the really small bars --
314
759000
3000
12:57
they might have to think about this.
315
762000
2000
12:59
Because right now, those industries with a lot of copyright protection
316
764000
3000
13:02
are operating in an atmosphere
317
767000
2000
13:04
where it's as if they don't have any protection,
318
769000
3000
13:07
and they don't know what to do.
319
772000
3000
13:11
When I found out that there are a whole bunch of industries
320
776000
3000
13:14
that didn't have copyright protection,
321
779000
2000
13:16
I thought, "What exactly is the underlying logic?
322
781000
3000
13:19
I want a picture." And the lawyers do not provide a picture,
323
784000
3000
13:22
so I made one.
324
787000
2000
13:24
These are the two main
325
789000
3000
13:27
sort of binary oppositions within the logic of copyright law.
326
792000
3000
13:30
It is more complex than this, but this will do.
327
795000
3000
13:33
First: Is something an artistic object?
328
798000
3000
13:36
Then it deserves protection.
329
801000
2000
13:38
Is it a utilitarian object?
330
803000
2000
13:40
Then no, it does not deserve protection.
331
805000
2000
13:42
This is a difficult, unstable binary.
332
807000
3000
13:45
The other one is: Is it an idea?
333
810000
3000
13:48
Is it something that needs to
334
813000
2000
13:50
freely circulate in a free society?
335
815000
2000
13:52
No protection.
336
817000
2000
13:54
Or is it a physically fixed
337
819000
2000
13:56
expression of an idea:
338
821000
2000
13:58
something that somebody made
339
823000
2000
14:00
and they deserve to own it for a while and make money from it?
340
825000
3000
14:03
The problem is that digital technology
341
828000
2000
14:05
has completely subverted the logic
342
830000
2000
14:07
of this physically fixed, expression
343
832000
2000
14:09
versus idea concept.
344
834000
3000
14:12
Nowadays,
345
837000
2000
14:14
we don't really recognize a book
346
839000
2000
14:16
as something that sits on our shelf
347
841000
2000
14:18
or music as something that is
348
843000
2000
14:20
a physical object that we can hold.
349
845000
2000
14:22
It's a digital file.
350
847000
2000
14:24
It is barely tethered to any sort of
351
849000
2000
14:26
physical reality in our minds.
352
851000
2000
14:28
And these things, because we can copy and transmit them so easily,
353
853000
3000
14:31
actually circulate within our culture
354
856000
3000
14:34
a lot more like ideas
355
859000
2000
14:36
than like physically instantiated objects.
356
861000
3000
14:39
Now, the conceptual issues are truly profound
357
864000
3000
14:42
when you talk about creativity
358
867000
2000
14:44
and ownership
359
869000
2000
14:46
and, let me tell you, we don't want to leave this just to lawyers to figure out.
360
871000
3000
14:49
They're smart.
361
874000
2000
14:51
I'm with one. He's my boyfriend, he's okay.
362
876000
3000
14:54
He's smart, he's smart.
363
879000
2000
14:56
But you want an interdisciplinary team of people
364
881000
2000
14:58
hashing this out,
365
883000
2000
15:00
trying to figure out: What is the kind of ownership model,
366
885000
3000
15:03
in a digital world,
367
888000
2000
15:05
that's going to lead to the most innovation?
368
890000
2000
15:07
And my suggestion is that
369
892000
2000
15:09
fashion might be a really good place
370
894000
2000
15:11
to start looking for a model
371
896000
2000
15:13
for creative industries in the future.
372
898000
3000
15:16
If you want more information about this research project,
373
901000
3000
15:19
please visit our website: it's ReadyToShare.org.
374
904000
3000
15:23
And I really want to thank Veronica Jauriqui
375
908000
2000
15:25
for making this very fashionable presentation.
376
910000
2000
15:27
Thank you so much. (Applause)
377
912000
2000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Johanna Blakley - Media mavenJohanna Blakley studies the impact of mass media and entertainment on our world.
Why you should listen
As the Deputy Director of the Norman Lear Center (a media-focused think tank at the University of Southern California) Johanna Blakley spends much of her time exploring how our entertainment interacts with our political, commercial and social habits. She is especially interested in the surprising impact of intellectual property rights on innovation, organizing conferences around the lack of creative ownership in fashion as well as technology and the ownership of creative content.
Blakley has worked across a huge variety of media platforms -- producing for the web on a large scale, conducting gaming research, coordinating events for film festivals and executing consumer research on entertainment and politics. Drawing on this vast body of experience, she also lectures at USC and helped develop their masters program in Public Diplomacy.
Johanna Blakley | Speaker | TED.com