TEDxRC2
Jonas Gahr Støre: In defense of dialogue
为对话而辩
Filmed:
Readability: 4.1
401,365 views
在政治中，与暴力团体、激进主义者、恐怖分子和支持恐怖主义的国家对话，是违反原则的。但是挪威外交部长Jonas Gahr Støre提出，为了更加安全，即便价值观迥然不同也应展开对话。
Jonas Gahr Støre - Foreign Minister of Norway
Jonas Gahr Støre is the Norwegian Foreign Minister, charged with working for Norway's interests internationally. Full bio
Jonas Gahr Støre is the Norwegian Foreign Minister, charged with working for Norway's interests internationally. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
Amongst all the troubling deficits we struggle with today --
0
0
3000
当今我们与之斗争的所有不足中
00:18
we think of financial and economic primarily --
1
3000
3000
大家认为经济和金融缺陷是最紧要的
00:21
the ones that concern me most
2
6000
2000
但最使我担忧的
00:23
is the deficit of political dialogue --
3
8000
2000
是政治对话的不足 -
00:25
our ability to address modern conflicts
4
10000
2000
包括我们处理实际上的
00:27
as they are,
5
12000
2000
现代冲突的能力，
00:29
to go to the source of what they're all about
6
14000
3000
追溯到这些冲突问题本源的能力，
00:32
and to understand the key players
7
17000
2000
以及理解关键人物，
00:34
and to deal with them.
8
19000
2000
并与他们沟通的能力。
00:36
We who are diplomats,
9
21000
2000
作为外交家
00:38
we are trained to deal with conflicts between states and issues between states.
10
23000
3000
我们专门处理国家之间的冲突和争议。
00:41
And I can tell you, our agenda is full.
11
26000
3000
我可以告诉大家，我们的日程非常紧张
00:44
There is trade, there is disarmament,
12
29000
2000
包括贸易，武装解除，
00:46
there is cross-border relations.
13
31000
3000
还有跨界关系。
00:49
But the picture is changing,
14
34000
2000
但是情况在发生变化，
00:51
and we are seeing that there are new key players
15
36000
3000
我们看到新的关键人物们
00:54
coming onto the scene.
16
39000
2000
正在参与进来。
00:56
We loosely call them "groups."
17
41000
3000
我们广泛地称他们为“团体”，
00:59
They may represent social, religious,
18
44000
3000
他们可能代表着社会、宗教、
01:02
political, economic, military realities.
19
47000
3000
政治、经济、军事实体。
01:05
And we struggle with how to deal with them.
20
50000
2000
我们在苦苦奋斗着学习怎样和他们打交道。
01:07
The rules of engagement:
21
52000
2000
交涉时特别要注意：
01:09
how to talk, when to talk,
22
54000
2000
怎样交谈，何时交谈
01:11
and how to deal with them.
23
56000
3000
和怎样应对他们。
01:14
Let me show you a slide here
24
59000
2000
让我在这里展示一张幻灯片
01:16
which illustrates the character of conflicts
25
61000
2000
它阐述了从1946年至今
01:18
since 1946 until today.
26
63000
2000
所发生的冲突的类型。
01:20
You see the green
27
65000
2000
你们看到的绿色部分
01:22
is a traditional interstate conflict,
28
67000
3000
是传统的国与国之间的冲突
01:25
the ones we used to read about.
29
70000
3000
我们以前读到的那种。
01:28
The red is modern conflict,
30
73000
2000
红色部分是现代冲突，
01:30
conflicts within states.
31
75000
3000
属于国家内部的冲突。
01:33
These are quite different,
32
78000
2000
它和传统的冲突有很大的不同
01:35
and they are outside the grasp
33
80000
3000
而且并非现代外交手段
01:38
of modern diplomacy.
34
83000
3000
所能掌控。
01:41
And the core of these key actors
35
86000
2000
其参与者中的核心
01:43
are groups
36
88000
2000
是团体
01:45
who represent different interests
37
90000
2000
这些团体代表着国内的
01:47
inside countries.
38
92000
2000
不同利益。
01:49
And the way they deal with their conflicts rapidly spreads to other countries.
39
94000
3000
而且他们处理冲突的不同方式，会迅速影响到其他国家。
01:52
So in a way, it is everybody's business.
40
97000
3000
所以在某种程度上，这与每个人都息息相关。
01:56
Another acknowledgment we've seen during these years,
41
101000
2000
这些年来，我们所学到的另一个教训就是，
01:58
recent years,
42
103000
2000
近年来，
02:00
is that very few
43
105000
2000
很少有
02:02
of these domestic interstate, intrastate conflicts
44
107000
4000
国家内部的冲突
02:06
can be solved militarily.
45
111000
2000
能够通过军事解决。
02:08
They may have to be dealt with with military means,
46
113000
2000
军事手段有时是必须的，
02:10
but they cannot be solved by military means.
47
115000
3000
但却治标不治本。
02:13
They need political solutions.
48
118000
2000
它们需要政治方案的介入。
02:15
And we, therefore, have a problem,
49
120000
2000
所以这里我们有个难题，
02:17
because they escape traditional diplomacy.
50
122000
3000
那就是这些团体脱离了传统外交的范畴。
02:20
And we have among states
51
125000
2000
而且各个国家
02:22
a reluctance in dealing with them.
52
127000
2000
普遍不愿意和他们打交道。
02:24
Plus, during the last decade,
53
129000
2000
再加上，在过去的十年中，
02:26
we've been in the mode
54
131000
2000
我们一直处于紧张状态
02:28
where dealing with groups
55
133000
2000
在和一些概念上和政治上
02:30
was conceptually and politically dangerous.
56
135000
3000
的恐怖团体打交道。
02:33
After 9/11,
57
138000
2000
9·11后，
02:35
either you were with us or against us.
58
140000
2000
非友即敌。
02:37
It was black or white.
59
142000
2000
黑白分明。
02:39
And groups are very often
60
144000
2000
一些团体常常
02:41
immediately label terrorists.
61
146000
2000
被武断地贴上恐怖分子的标签。
02:43
And who would talk to terrorists?
62
148000
3000
而谁愿意和恐怖分子谈？
02:46
The West, as I would see it,
63
151000
2000
如我所知，西方国家
02:48
comes out of that decade weakened,
64
153000
2000
在近十年大大衰弱，
02:50
because we didn't understand the group.
65
155000
3000
有很大的原因是因为我们不了解这些团体。
02:53
So we've spent more time
66
158000
2000
我们花了大量时间
02:55
on focusing on why we should not talk to others
67
160000
3000
研究我们为什么不和他们对话
02:58
than finding out how we talk to others.
68
163000
2000
而不是怎样和他们对话。
03:00
Now I'm not naive.
69
165000
3000
当然，我也不天真。
03:03
You cannot talk to everybody all the time.
70
168000
2000
在对话中你不能一直和人谈。
03:05
And there are times you should walk.
71
170000
3000
有时你应该起身离开。
03:08
And sometimes military intervention is necessary.
72
173000
2000
并有时军事干预是必要的。
03:10
I happen to believe that Libya was necessary
73
175000
3000
我认为对利比亚军事干预是必要的
03:13
and that military intervention in Afghanistan was also necessary.
74
178000
3000
而且对阿富汗的军事干预也是必要的。
03:16
And my country relies on its security
75
181000
3000
我的国家通过军事联盟
03:19
through military alliance, that's clear.
76
184000
3000
保障了安全，这显而易见。
03:22
But still we have a large deficit
77
187000
3000
但是我们在理解解决现代冲突方面
03:25
in dealing with and understanding modern conflict.
78
190000
2000
仍有很多不足。
03:27
Let us turn to Afghanistan.
79
192000
3000
让我们看看阿富汗。
03:30
10 years after that military intervention,
80
195000
2000
那次军事干预的十年后，
03:32
that country is far from secure.
81
197000
2000
这个国家依旧动荡不安。
03:34
The situation, to be honest, is very serious.
82
199000
3000
说实话，那里的情况非常严峻，
03:37
Now again, the military is necessary,
83
202000
3000
需要再一次的军事干预，
03:40
but the military is no problem-solver.
84
205000
3000
但是军事并不能解决问题。
03:43
When I first came to Afghanistan in 2005 as a foreign minister,
85
208000
3000
2005年，当我以外交部长的身份去过阿富汗，
03:46
I met the commander of ISAF,
86
211000
2000
我见到了ISAF(国际安全援助部队)
03:48
the international troops.
87
213000
2000
的总指挥。
03:50
And he told me that, "This can be won militarily, minister.
88
215000
3000
他告诉我,"军事手段可以克敌制胜，部长。“
03:53
We just have to persevere."
89
218000
3000
“我们只不过需要坚持一下。"
03:56
Now four COM ISAF's later,
90
221000
2000
现在，在更换了四位总指挥后，
03:58
we hear a different message:
91
223000
2000
我们听到了不同意见：
04:00
"This cannot be won militarily.
92
225000
2000
”单靠军事无法胜利。
04:02
We need military presence,
93
227000
2000
我们需要军事干预，
04:04
but we need to move to politics.
94
229000
2000
但也需求助于政治活动。
04:06
We can only solve this through a political solution.
95
231000
3000
我们只有通过政治方案才能彻底解决问题。
04:09
And it is not us who will solve it;
96
234000
3000
而且解铃还须系铃人；
04:12
Afghans have to solve it."
97
237000
2000
阿富汗人必须自己解决。“
04:14
But then they need a different political process
98
239000
2000
但是他们需要一个不同于2011,2002年
04:16
than the one they were given in 2001, 2002.
99
241000
4000
的政治进程。
04:20
They need an inclusive process
100
245000
3000
他们需要一个包容的进程
04:23
where the real fabric of this very complicated society
101
248000
3000
一个能使这个复杂社会的基层群众
04:26
can deal with their issues.
102
251000
2000
解决他们的问题的进程。
04:28
Everybody seems to agree with that.
103
253000
2000
每个人都好像同意这个观点。
04:30
It was very controversial to say three, four, five years ago.
104
255000
3000
三、四、五年前，这个观点还非常有争议。
04:33
Now everybody agrees.
105
258000
2000
现在每个人都同意了。
04:35
But now, as we prepare to talk,
106
260000
3000
但是现在，当我们准备对话时，
04:38
we understand how little we know.
107
263000
2000
我们发现自己所知甚少。
04:40
Because we didn't talk.
108
265000
2000
因为我们太久不对话了。
04:42
We didn't grasp what was going on.
109
267000
3000
我们之前没有意识到它的重要性。
04:45
The International Committee of the Red Cross, the ICRC,
110
270000
3000
国际红十字会（ICRC）
04:48
is talking to everyone,
111
273000
2000
与每个人都对话，
04:50
and it is doing so because it is neutral.
112
275000
3000
它这样做是因为它是中立机构。
04:53
And that's one reason why
113
278000
2000
这也是为什么
04:55
that organization probably
114
280000
2000
红十字会可能是
04:57
is the best informed key player
115
282000
2000
国际冲突中
04:59
to understand modern conflict --
116
284000
2000
最消息灵通的角色
05:01
because they talk.
117
286000
2000
因为他们敢于去对话。
05:03
My point is that you don't have to be neutral to talk.
118
288000
4000
我的观点是中立并非对话的必要条件。
05:07
And you don't have to agree
119
292000
2000
并且，当你坐下来对话时
05:09
when you sit down with the other side.
120
294000
2000
你不必同意对方的观点。
05:11
And you can always walk.
121
296000
3000
你随时可以走开。
05:14
But if you don't talk,
122
299000
2000
但如果你不谈
05:16
you can't engage the other side.
123
301000
2000
你将无法与对方交流。
05:18
And the other side which you're going to engage
124
303000
2000
而你准备与之交流的对方
05:20
is the one with whom you profoundly disagree.
125
305000
3000
却恰恰有着你最不认同的观点。
05:23
Prime Minister Rabin said when he engaged the Oslo process,
126
308000
3000
以色利前总理拉宾在参与奥斯陆协议时，曾说过，
05:26
"You don't make peace with your friends,
127
311000
2000
“你无法与朋友共创和平，
05:28
you make peace with your enemies."
128
313000
2000
只能与敌人握手言和。“
05:30
It's hard, but it is necessary.
129
315000
3000
这很艰难，但却非常必要。
05:33
Let me go one step further.
130
318000
2000
让我们再进一步看。
05:35
This is Tahrir Square.
131
320000
2000
这是里尔广场。
05:37
There's a revolution going on.
132
322000
2000
这里正在进行一场革命。
05:39
The Arab Spring is heading into fall
133
324000
2000
阿拉伯之春进入秋季
05:41
and is moving into winter.
134
326000
2000
并走向寒冬。
05:43
It will last for a long, long time.
135
328000
3000
这将持续很长很长一段时间。
05:46
And who knows what it will be called in the end.
136
331000
3000
又有谁能预知结果。
05:49
That's not the point.
137
334000
2000
这不是重点。
05:51
The point is that we are probably seeing,
138
336000
3000
重点是我们可能在见证，
05:54
for the first time in the history of the Arab world,
139
339000
2000
阿拉伯世界在有史以来
05:56
a revolution bottom-up --
140
341000
2000
第一次爆发由下而上的革命；
05:58
people's revolution.
141
343000
2000
人民的革命。
06:00
Social groups are taking to the streets.
142
345000
3000
社会团体纷纷走上街头。
06:03
And we find out in the West
143
348000
2000
然而西方国家却发现
06:05
that we know very little about what's happening.
144
350000
3000
我们对这些知之甚少。
06:08
Because we never talk to the people in these countries.
145
353000
4000
因为我们从不与这些国家的人民们对话。
06:12
Most governments followed
146
357000
2000
大多数西方政府服从
06:14
the dictate of the authoritarian leaders
147
359000
2000
权威领导的指示，
06:16
to stay away from these different groups,
148
361000
2000
把这些不同的团体当做恐怖分子，
06:18
because they were terrorists.
149
363000
4000
和他们保持距离。
06:22
So now that they are emerging in the street
150
367000
2000
所以现在当他们走上街头时
06:24
and we salute the democratic revolution,
151
369000
3000
我们除了向民主革命致敬外爱莫能助，
06:27
we find out how little we know.
152
372000
2000
因为我们所知甚少。
06:29
Right now, the discussion goes,
153
374000
2000
现在，讨论变成了，
06:31
"Should we talk to the Muslim Brotherhood?
154
376000
3000
“我们真的应该与穆斯林兄弟会对话吗？
06:34
Should we talk to Hamas?
155
379000
2000
与哈马斯对话？
06:36
If we talk to them, we may legitimize them."
156
381000
3000
如果对话，我们可能使其合法化。“
06:39
I think that is wrong.
157
384000
2000
我认为这是错误观点
06:41
If you talk in the right way, you make it very clear
158
386000
2000
如果你以正确的方式对话，你将明白
06:43
that talking is not agreeing.
159
388000
3000
对话并不等同于赞成。
06:46
And how can we tell the Muslim Brotherhood,
160
391000
2000
穆斯林兄弟会可能是多数派
06:48
as we should,
161
393000
2000
如果我们不和他们谈判
06:50
that they must respect minority rights,
162
395000
4000
就是不尊重多数人的权利，
06:54
if we don't accept majority rights?
163
399000
3000
那我们有义务，但又有什么脸面去告诉穆斯林兄弟会，
06:57
Because they may turn out to be a majority.
164
402000
3000
他们必须尊重少数人的权利？
07:00
How can we escape [having] a double-standard,
165
405000
3000
我们又怎能只许州官放火，不许百姓点灯，
07:03
if we at the same time preach democracy
166
408000
3000
一边宣扬民主，
07:06
and at the same time
167
411000
2000
一边
07:08
don't want to deal with the groups that are representative?
168
413000
2000
不愿和有代表性的团体打交道？
07:10
How will we ever be interlocutors?
169
415000
3000
我们又怎能做好对话者？
07:13
Now my diplomats are instructed
170
418000
2000
现在我的外交官们被指示
07:15
to talk to all these groups.
171
420000
2000
必须与这些团体对话。
07:17
But talking can be done in different ways.
172
422000
3000
但是对话可以采取不同的形式。
07:20
We make a distinction between talking from a diplomatic level
173
425000
3000
我们把对话区分为外交层面的
07:23
and talking at the political level.
174
428000
3000
和政治层面的
07:26
Now talking can be accompanied with aid or not with aid.
175
431000
3000
对话既可以伴随着援助，也可以无援助
07:29
Talking can be accompanied with inclusion or not inclusion.
176
434000
3000
对话可以达成协议，也可以不达成协议
07:32
There's a big array
177
437000
2000
处理对话
07:34
of the ways of dealing with this.
178
439000
2000
有很多种方式。
07:36
So if we refuse
179
441000
2000
但如果我们拒绝
07:38
to talk to these new groups
180
443000
3000
与即将登上舞台的新兴团体
07:41
that are going to be dominating the news in years to come,
181
446000
3000
展开对话，
07:44
we will further radicalization,
182
449000
2000
我们将日趋偏激，
07:46
I believe.
183
451000
2000
我认为如此。
07:48
We will make the road from violent activities into politics
184
453000
3000
我们将使暴力运动一发不可收拾
07:51
harder to travel.
185
456000
2000
政治公平更难践行
07:53
And if we cannot demonstrate to these groups
186
458000
3000
我们将很难向这些团体展示
07:56
that if you move towards democracy,
187
461000
2000
如果你们为民主而努力，
07:58
if you move towards taking part
188
463000
3000
共同参与
08:01
in civilized and normal standards among states,
189
466000
3000
建立文明的合理的国家制度，
08:04
there are some rewards on the other side.
190
469000
3000
你们将另有收获。
08:07
The paradox here
191
472000
2000
然而
08:09
is that the last decade probably was a lost decade
192
474000
3000
过去的十年，我们在这一方面
08:12
for making progress on this.
193
477000
2000
做得十分失败
08:14
And the paradox is that the decade before the last decade was so promising --
194
479000
4000
可是，这失败的十年之前的十年里，世界因为一个原因
08:18
and for one reason primarily.
195
483000
3000
而充满了希望
08:21
And the reason is what happened in South Africa:
196
486000
2000
这个原因发生于南非：
08:23
Nelson Mandela.
197
488000
2000
纳尔逊·曼德拉身上。
08:25
When Mandela came out of prison
198
490000
2000
当曼德拉在被关押27年后
08:27
after 27 years of captivity,
199
492000
3000
出狱时，
08:30
if he had told his people,
200
495000
2000
如果他告诉人们，
08:32
"It's time to take up the arms,
201
497000
2000
“是时候拿起武器了，
08:34
it's time to fight,"
202
499000
2000
是时候起来反抗了。”
08:36
he would have been followed.
203
501000
2000
那将振臂一呼，应者云集。
08:38
And I think the international community
204
503000
2000
我想国际社会也会说
08:40
would have said, "Fair enough.
205
505000
2000
“很公平，
08:42
It's their right to fight."
206
507000
2000
他们有反抗的权利。”
08:44
Now as you know, Mandela didn't do that.
207
509000
3000
如你所知，曼德拉并没有那么做。
08:47
In his memoirs, "Long Road to Freedom,"
208
512000
3000
在他的回忆录《漫漫自由路》里
08:50
he wrote that he survived
209
515000
2000
他写道他之所以
08:52
during those years of captivity
210
517000
3000
能够在多年监禁中存活下来
08:55
because he always decided to look upon his oppressor
211
520000
3000
是因为他一直把他的压迫者也看作
08:58
as also being a human being,
212
523000
3000
同是人类的一份子。
09:01
also being a human being.
213
526000
3000
同是人类的一份子。
09:04
So he engaged a political process of dialogue,
214
529000
5000
然后他促成了政治对话
09:09
not as a strategy of the weak,
215
534000
3000
这并非软弱
09:12
but as a strategy of the strong.
216
537000
3000
而是另一种勇敢
09:15
And he engaged talking profoundly
217
540000
3000
他进行了深刻的对话
09:18
by settling some of the most tricky issues
218
543000
2000
通过与参与者
09:20
through a truth and reconciliation process
219
545000
3000
真诚而和谐的对话
09:23
where people came and talked.
220
548000
2000
解决了最棘手的问题
09:25
Now South African friends will know
221
550000
2000
南非朋友们应该知道
09:27
that was very painful.
222
552000
2000
这有多么艰难
09:29
So what can we learn from all of this?
223
554000
3000
那么，我们可以从中学到什么？
09:32
Dialogue is not easy --
224
557000
2000
对话并不简单
09:34
not between individuals, not between groups, not between governments --
225
559000
3000
个体之间，团体之间，政府之间的对话都很难
09:37
but it is very necessary.
226
562000
3000
但却十分必要
09:40
If we're going to deal with political conflict-solving of conflicts,
227
565000
4000
如果我们想通过政治手段解决冲突，
09:44
if we're going to understand these new groups
228
569000
3000
如果我们想了解这些新团体
09:47
which are coming from bottom-up,
229
572000
3000
这些自下而上的团体，
09:50
supported by technology, which is available to all,
230
575000
3000
拜科技所赐，这并非难事，
09:53
we diplomats cannot be sitting back in the banquets
231
578000
3000
我们外交家不能流连于高级宴会中
09:56
believing that we are doing interstate relations.
232
581000
3000
自欺欺人地以为自己在处理国际关系。
09:59
We have to connect
233
584000
2000
我们必须接触
10:01
with these profound changes.
234
586000
2000
这些深刻的变化。
10:03
And what is dialogue really about?
235
588000
2000
对话的本质究竟是什么？
10:05
When I enter into dialogue,
236
590000
2000
当我进行对话时，
10:07
I really hope that the other side
237
592000
2000
我由衷希望对方
10:09
would pick up my points of view,
238
594000
2000
能够认同我的观点，
10:11
that I would impress upon them
239
596000
2000
我要用自己的观点和价值观
10:13
my opinions and my values.
240
598000
2000
打动他们
10:15
I cannot do that
241
600000
2000
除非我对对方的观点表现出
10:17
unless I send the signals that I will be open
242
602000
2000
倾听的态度
10:19
to listen to the other side's signals.
243
604000
3000
否则，我将无法达成目的。
10:22
We need a lot more training on how to do that
244
607000
3000
我们需要大量的训练和实践
10:25
and a lot more practice
245
610000
2000
来学习怎样达成上述目标
10:27
on how that can take problem-solving forward.
246
612000
3000
和怎样促成问题的解决。
10:30
We know from our personal experiences
247
615000
2000
从个人经历出发
10:32
that it's easy sometimes
248
617000
2000
我们知道谈判中
10:34
just to walk,
249
619000
2000
有时需要起身离开，
10:36
and sometimes you may need to fight.
250
621000
3000
有时需要据理力争。
10:39
And I wouldn't say that is the wrong thing in all circumstances.
251
624000
3000
我不会一概地否定这些策略。
10:42
Sometimes you have to.
252
627000
2000
有时你必须如此。
10:44
But that strategy seldom takes you very far.
253
629000
3000
但这些策略帮助不大。
10:47
The alternative is a strategy
254
632000
2000
真正有用的策略是
10:49
of engagement and principled dialogue.
255
634000
2000
使对话更加有原则有保障。
10:51
And I believe we need to strengthen this approach
256
636000
3000
我认为在现代外交中
10:54
in modern diplomacy,
257
639000
2000
要加强这一方面，
10:56
not only between states,
258
641000
2000
无论是国家之间，
10:58
but also within states.
259
643000
2000
还是在国家内部。
11:00
We are seeing some new signs.
260
645000
2000
我们看到了许多新的迹象。
11:02
We could never have done
261
647000
2000
如果文明社会
11:04
the convention against anti-personnel landmines
262
649000
2000
不采取新的外交手段
11:06
and the convention that is banning cluster munitions
263
651000
4000
我们永远都
11:10
unless we had done diplomacy differently,
264
655000
3000
无法看到反地雷运动
11:13
by engaging with civil society.
265
658000
2000
无法达成《集束弹药公约》
11:15
All of a sudden,
266
660000
2000
突然之间，
11:17
NGOs were not only standing in the streets, crying their slogans,
267
662000
3000
非政府组织不再仅仅站在街头，高呼口号，
11:20
but they were taking [them] into the negotiations,
268
665000
3000
而是投入到沟通交流中，
11:23
partly because they represented the victims of these weapons.
269
668000
4000
因为他们代表了这些武器的受害者。
11:27
And they brought their knowledge.
270
672000
2000
而且他们利用了自己的知识。
11:29
And there was an interaction
271
674000
2000
在外交和底层力量之间
11:31
between diplomacy and the power coming bottom-up.
272
676000
3000
有一个互动。
11:34
This is perhaps a first element
273
679000
2000
这也许是变革发生的
11:36
of a change.
274
681000
2000
第一要素。
11:38
In the future, I believe,
275
683000
2000
我认为，在未来
11:40
we should draw examples from these different illustrations,
276
685000
3000
我们将从这些例子中学到更多，
11:43
not to have diplomacy
277
688000
2000
拥有不再脱离人民和社会的
11:45
which is disconnected from people and civil society.
278
690000
3000
崭新外交。
11:48
And we have to go also
279
693000
3000
在面对当今时代
11:51
beyond traditional diplomacy
280
696000
2000
人类生死攸关的议题
11:53
to the survival issue of our times,
281
698000
2000
——气候变化时，
11:55
climate change.
282
700000
2000
我们也要超越传统外交。
11:57
How are we going to solve climate change through negotiations,
283
702000
3000
如果我们相互推
12:00
unless we are able to make civil society and people,
284
705000
3000
而不承担自己应尽的义务，
12:03
not part of the problem, but part of the solution?
285
708000
3000
又怎能通过交流解决气候问题？
12:06
It is going to demand an inclusive process of diplomacy
286
711000
3000
在进行新的，更艰难的气候谈判时
12:09
very different from the one we are practicing today
287
714000
3000
我们需要不同于现在践行的
12:12
as we are heading to new rounds of difficult climate negotiations,
288
717000
3000
更加包容的外交程序
12:15
but when we move toward something
289
720000
2000
此时我们需要动员
12:17
which has to be much more
290
722000
2000
更广泛的力量
12:19
along a broad mobilization.
291
724000
2000
去达成某个目标。
12:21
It's crucial to understand, I believe,
292
726000
3000
我认为，理解至关重要。
12:24
because of technology and because of globalization,
293
729000
2000
因为科技，因为全球化
12:26
societies from bottom-up.
294
731000
2000
和由下而上的社会团体的力量。
12:28
We as diplomats
295
733000
2000
作为外交家
12:30
need to know the social capital
296
735000
2000
我们需要了解社会团体
12:32
of communities.
297
737000
2000
的社会资本。
12:34
What is it that makes people trust each other,
298
739000
3000
究竟是什么让国与国之间，
12:37
not only between states,
299
742000
2000
以及国内的人们之间，
12:39
but also within states?
300
744000
2000
彼此信任？
12:41
What is the legitimacy of diplomacy,
301
746000
3000
如果外交家设计的解决方案
12:44
of the the solution we devise as diplomats
302
749000
3000
不能被更广泛的社会力量
12:47
if they cannot be reflected and understood
303
752000
3000
也就是我们泛称的”组织“
12:50
by also these broader forces of societies
304
755000
3000
所理解和认同，
12:53
that we now very loosely call groups?
305
758000
4000
我们又怎能使外交更加合理？
12:58
The good thing is that we are not powerless.
306
763000
2000
好在我们并非无能为力。
13:00
We have never had
307
765000
2000
我们有着前所未有的
13:02
as many means of communication,
308
767000
2000
交流方式、
13:04
means of being connected, means of reaching out,
309
769000
3000
联系手段、沟通途径、
13:07
means of including.
310
772000
2000
和包容方式。
13:09
The diplomatic toolbox
311
774000
2000
"外交工具箱"中
13:11
is actually full of different tools we can use
312
776000
3000
放满了可用的工具
13:14
to strengthen our communication.
313
779000
2000
来加强我们的交流。
13:16
But the problem is that we are coming out of a decade
314
781000
3000
但问题在于，9·11后近十年来
13:19
where we had a fear of touching it.
315
784000
2000
我们对沟通充满恐惧
13:21
Now, I hope, in the coming years,
316
786000
3000
现在，我希望接下来的日子里
13:24
that we are able to demonstrate through some concrete examples
317
789000
3000
我们能通过实际行动显示
13:27
that fear is receding
318
792000
3000
恐惧已离我们而去
13:30
and that we can take courage
319
795000
2000
而我们能够从各个国家
13:32
from that alliance
320
797000
2000
从文明社会
13:34
with civil society
321
799000
2000
的联盟中
13:36
in different countries
322
801000
2000
汲取勇气
13:38
to support their problem-solving,
323
803000
2000
来支持各国解决冲突
13:40
among the Afghans,
324
805000
2000
让阿富汗人内部，
13:42
inside the Palestinian population,
325
807000
3000
巴勒斯坦人内部，
13:45
between the peoples of Palestine and Israel.
326
810000
2000
和以色列与巴勒斯坦之间，都能化干戈为玉帛。
13:47
And as we try to understand this broad movement
327
812000
3000
当我们试图理解阿拉伯世界
13:50
across the Arab world,
328
815000
2000
的大变迁时，
13:52
we are not powerless.
329
817000
2000
我们并非无能为力。
13:54
We need to improve the necessary skills,
330
819000
2000
我们需要改善交流技巧，
13:56
and we need the courage to use them.
331
821000
2000
更需要对话的勇气。
13:58
In my country,
332
823000
2000
在我的国家，
14:00
I have seen how the council of Islamist groups
333
825000
5000
我曾见过伊斯兰教团体
14:05
and Christian groups
334
830000
2000
和基督教团体
14:07
came together, not as a government initiative,
335
832000
3000
走到一起，并非政府促成，
14:10
but they came together on their own initiative
336
835000
2000
而是出于自发行为，
14:12
to establish contact and dialogue
337
837000
2000
在稍有摩擦时，
14:14
in times where things were pretty low-key tension.
338
839000
4000
他们就主动通过对话达成一致。
14:18
And when tension increased,
339
843000
2000
当冲突升级时，
14:20
they already had that dialogue,
340
845000
3000
他们已有之前的对话，
14:23
and that was a strength to deal with different issues.
341
848000
3000
这成为了重要的协调力量。
14:26
Our modern Western societies
342
851000
2000
我们现代的西方社会
14:28
are more complex than before,
343
853000
2000
因为移民热潮
14:30
in this time of migration.
344
855000
2000
而变得更加复杂多元
14:32
How are we going to settle and build a bigger "We"
345
857000
3000
如果不改善交流技巧我们又怎能
14:35
to deal with our issues
346
860000
2000
建立一个和谐包容的“大家庭”
14:37
if we don't improve our skills of communication?
347
862000
2000
去解决争议？
14:39
So there are many reasons,
348
864000
2000
以上是我们进行对话的原因
14:41
and for all of these reasons,
349
866000
2000
也正是这些原因
14:43
this is time and this is why we must talk.
350
868000
3000
使对话毋庸置疑，刻不容缓。
14:46
Thank you for your attention.
351
871000
2000
谢谢大家的关注
14:48
(Applause)
352
873000
4000
掌声
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Jonas Gahr Støre - Foreign Minister of NorwayJonas Gahr Støre is the Norwegian Foreign Minister, charged with working for Norway's interests internationally.
Why you should listen
Norway sits on the edge of the strategically important North Atlantic and is blessed with oil, gas and marine resources. Its economy is open and busy, its social programs generous. As Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jonas Gahr Støre's job is to represent Norway in the international community and work to preserve the nation's peace and stability -- and to help create a modern multicultural society that welcomes immigrants and new traditions. This is not an abstract question after the shocking violence of 2011's terrorist attack on Norway.
Støre's approach to this task: We must talk.
He is a former executive director at the World Health Organization, and was also the Executive Chairman of the Norwegian think-tank ECON Analyse. Before becoming Foreign Minister he served as Secretary General of the Norwegian Red Cross from 2003 to 2005.
Jonas Gahr Støre | Speaker | TED.com