ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Lee - Innovation leader
UPS’s David Lee works to create platforms that make it easier for people to turn fuzzy ideas into concrete solutions.

Why you should listen

David Lee is the Vice President of Innovation and the Strategic Enterprise Fund for UPS. In that role, he develops programs that make it easier for smart, creative people to get together and explore ideas.  It's clear that great ideas can come from anywhere. His responsibility to help people turn their ideas into tangible, pragmatic solutions.  His team coordinates communities, programs, and contests that give people permission to chase down problems that they are personally inspired to address.  He is constantly amazed at what happens when thoughtful, passionate people are given room to run.

Lee's career has been filled with interesting opportunities to break down new barriers for large corporations.  He has been involved in the launch of dozens of new products, services and businesses within the framework of corporate processes and expectations. Some of those efforts flourished while others failed. Because of those lessons, he looks to create pathways which result in rapid impact and "good failures" whenever possible.

Prior to joining UPS, he led innovation at SunTrust Bank. Lee started his career at Bank of America, where he worked in advanced technology and asset management. There he helped to launch retirement services and a strategic venture capital group. He studied economics at the University of Virginia and went to business school at the University of Chicago.

More profile about the speaker
David Lee | Speaker | TED.com
TED@UPS

David Lee: Why jobs of the future won't feel like work

李大衛: 為什麼未來的工作感覺起來不像工作?

Filmed:
1,916,479 views

我們都聽過機器人將會接管我們的工作──那我們能怎麼辦?創新專家李大衛說,我們應該要開始設計新工作,能釋放出我們隱藏的才華和熱情的新工作,一些我們在週末才會做的工作,好讓我們在機器人時代仍能保有重要性。李說:「要開始問人們,他們想要解決什麼問題、他們想要帶什麼才能到工作上。」「當你邀請人們更上一層樓時,他們能做到的,會讓我們驚艷。」
- Innovation leader
UPS’s David Lee works to create platforms that make it easier for people to turn fuzzy ideas into concrete solutions. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:12
So there's a lot of valid有效
concern關心 these days
0
874
2152
近期有不少相當有根據的擔心,
00:15
that our technology技術 is getting得到 so smart聰明
1
3050
2205
擔心我們的科技變得太聰明,
00:17
that we've我們已經 put ourselves我們自己
on the path路徑 to a jobless失業 future未來.
2
5279
2748
會讓我們走向一個失業的未來。
00:21
And I think the example
of a self-driving自駕車 car汽車
3
9682
2152
我想,自動駕駛的汽車
00:23
is actually其實 the easiest最簡單的 one to see.
4
11858
1674
應該會是最早出現的例子。
00:25
So these are going to be fantastic奇妙
for all kinds of different不同 reasons原因.
5
13556
3328
基於各種理由,這些科技應該
對我們都很有幫助才對。
00:28
But did you know that "driver司機"
is actually其實 the most common共同 job工作
6
16908
3438
但各位是否知道,
美國 50 州當中有 29 州
「司機」這個工作
是最多人從事的工作?
00:32
in 29 of the 50 US states狀態?
7
20370
1789
00:35
What's going to happen發生 to these jobs工作
when we're no longer driving主動 our cars汽車
8
23042
3478
將來這些工作會變成怎樣?
如果我們不再開車了、
00:38
or cooking烹飪 our food餐飲
9
26544
1165
不再做菜了、
00:39
or even diagnosing診斷 our own擁有 diseases疾病?
10
27733
1959
甚至不用診斷自己的疾病了?
00:42
Well, a recent最近 study研究
from ForresterForrester公司 Research研究
11
30675
2377
近期,弗雷斯特研究公司
00:45
goes so far to predict預測
that 25 million百萬 jobs工作
12
33076
3163
有項研究指出,
預計在接下來的十年間,
00:48
might威力 disappear消失 over the next下一個 10 years年份.
13
36263
2162
有 2500 萬個工作會消失。
00:51
To put that in perspective透視,
14
39393
1489
更準確地說,
00:52
that's three times as many許多 jobs工作 lost丟失
in the aftermath後果 of the financial金融 crisis危機.
15
40906
4146
這個數字是金融危機失業數的三倍。
00:58
And it's not just blue-collar藍領 jobs工作
that are at risk風險.
16
46606
2472
不只藍領的工作有危機。
01:01
On Wall Street and across橫過 Silicon Valley,
we are seeing眼看 tremendous巨大 gains收益
17
49728
3427
在華爾街以及矽谷,
都能看到機器學習
在分析與決策的品質上
01:05
in the quality質量 of analysis分析
and decision-making做決定
18
53179
2182
已經幫助投資者獲得相當大的收益。
01:07
because of machine learning學習.
19
55385
1654
01:09
So even the smartest最聰明的, highest-paid薪酬最高 people
will be affected受影響 by this change更改.
20
57063
3524
即使是最聰明、高薪的人,
也會被這改變給影響到。
01:13
What's clear明確 is that no matter
what your job工作 is,
21
61714
2670
可以知道的是,
不論你的工作是什麼,
01:16
at least最小 some, if not all of your work,
22
64408
1972
在接下來幾年,
你的工作至少有一部份,
01:18
is going to be doneDONE by a robot機器人
or software軟件 in the next下一個 few少數 years年份.
23
66404
3392
甚至全部,將會由
機器人或軟體來接手。
01:22
And that's exactly究竟 why people
like Mark標記 Zuckerberg扎克伯格 and Bill法案 Gates蓋茨
24
70918
3071
這也是為什麼馬克祖克柏
和比爾蓋茲他們這些人,
01:26
are talking about the need for
government-funded政府資助 minimum最低限度 income收入 levels水平.
25
74013
3388
會談到需要有由政府發動資助
最低收入水平的政策。
01:29
But if our politicians政治家 can't agree同意
on things like health健康 care關心
26
77425
3342
但如果政客們都無法搞定
全民健保或甚至是營養午餐
01:32
or even school學校 lunches午餐,
27
80791
1279
這一類的小事,
01:34
I just don't see a path路徑
where they'll他們會 find consensus共識
28
82094
2430
那我實在看不出,
他們要如何在像是
01:36
on something as big and as expensive昂貴
as universal普遍 basic基本 life income收入.
29
84548
3326
全體基本生活收入這種
要花大錢的大事上取得共識。
01:40
Instead代替, I think the response響應
needs需求 to be led by us in industry行業.
30
88616
3645
我反而認為,應變方式
應該由產業界來帶頭領導才是。
01:44
We have to recognize認識
the change更改 that's ahead of us
31
92285
2524
我們得要認清將來要面對的改變,
01:46
and start開始 to design設計 the new kinds of jobs工作
32
94833
1975
並開始設計新類型的工作,
01:48
that will still be relevant相應
in the age年齡 of robotics機器人.
33
96832
2695
讓我們在機器人時代
仍有實質性的工作可做。
01:52
The good news新聞 is that we have
faced面對 down and recovered恢復
34
100899
2753
好消息是,我們以前就面臨並克服過
01:55
two mass extinctions滅絕 of jobs工作 before.
35
103676
2186
兩次重大的工作滅絕災難。
01:58
From 1870 to 1970,
36
106523
2210
從 1870 年到 1970 年,
02:00
the percent百分 of American美國 workers工人
based基於 on farms農場 fell下跌 by 90 percent百分,
37
108757
4408
美國以農田為基礎的
工人少了 90%,
02:05
and then again from 1950 to 2010,
38
113189
2545
然後,1950 年到 2010 年
又發生一次,
02:07
the percent百分 of Americans美國人
working加工 in factories工廠
39
115758
2143
在工廠工作的美國人
02:09
fell下跌 by 75 percent百分.
40
117925
1676
少了 75%。
02:12
The challenge挑戰 we face面對 this time,
however然而, is one of time.
41
120570
2954
然而,這次我們面對的挑戰,
是時間上的挑戰。
02:15
We had a hundred years年份
to move移動 from farms農場 to factories工廠,
42
123548
3014
我們從農業社會轉換到工業社會,
用了一百年的時間,
02:18
and then 60 years年份 to fully充分 build建立 out
a service服務 economy經濟.
43
126586
2575
然後用了六十年的時間,
才完整服務業經濟的轉型。
02:21
The rate of change更改 today今天
44
129678
1325
但這次的改變速度,
02:23
suggests提示 that we may可能 only have
10 or 15 years年份 to adjust調整,
45
131027
2974
我們可能只有十到
十五年的時間來調整,
02:26
and if we don't react應對 fast快速 enough足夠,
46
134025
1703
如果我們的反應不夠快,
02:27
that means手段 by the time
today's今天的 elementary-school小學學校 students學生們
47
135752
2756
也就是說,在現在的小學生
02:30
are college-aged大學生年齡,
48
138532
1885
上大學的時候,
02:32
we could be living活的
in a world世界 that's robotic機器人,
49
140441
2141
我們可能會居住在一個
02:34
largely大部分 unemployed失業的 and stuck卡住
in kind of un-great聯合國大 depression蕭條.
50
142606
3683
大量失業的機器人世界,
並卡在一種不怎麼大的蕭條經濟中。
02:39
But I don't think it has to be this way.
51
147797
1939
但我覺得並非得一定要走上這一步。
02:41
You see, I work in innovation革新,
52
149760
1700
我的工作是創新,
02:43
and part部分 of my job工作 is to shape形狀 how
large companies公司 apply應用 new technologies技術.
53
151484
4154
有一部分是在幫大公司
規劃如何應用新技術。
02:48
Certainly當然 some of these technologies技術
54
156265
1795
肯定有一些技術
02:50
are even specifically特別 designed設計
to replace更換 human人的 workers工人.
55
158084
2904
是特別設計來取代人類勞動者的。
02:53
But I believe that if we start開始
taking服用 steps腳步 right now
56
161615
2926
但我相信,如果我們現在就起步,
02:56
to change更改 the nature性質 of work,
57
164565
1821
來改變工作的本質,
02:58
we can not only create創建 environments環境
where people love coming未來 to work
58
166410
3886
我們不但能創造出讓人們
樂意去的工作環境,
03:02
but also generate生成
the innovation革新 that we need
59
170320
2118
也能產生出我們需要的創新,
03:04
to replace更換 the millions百萬 of jobs工作
that will be lost丟失 to technology技術.
60
172462
3173
來取代數百萬個
因科技而消失的工作。
03:08
I believe that the key
to preventing防止 our jobless失業 future未來
61
176532
3799
我相信,預防未來失業的關鍵在於
03:12
is to rediscover重新發現 what makes品牌 us human人的,
62
180355
2346
要重新找到「人類」的價值,
03:14
and to create創建 a new generation
of human-centered以人為本 jobs工作
63
182725
2958
並創造出以人類為
中心的新一代工作,
03:17
that allow允許 us to unlock開鎖
the hidden talents人才 and passions激情
64
185707
2606
讓我們能夠將每天帶在身上的
03:20
that we carry攜帶 with us every一切 day.
65
188337
1653
潛藏天賦與熱情展現出來。
03:24
But first, I think
it's important重要 to recognize認識
66
192151
2143
但,首先,很重要的是要知道,
03:26
that we brought this problem問題 on ourselves我們自己.
67
194318
2152
是我們自己造成這個問題的。
03:28
And it's not just because, you know,
we are the one building建造 the robots機器人.
68
196494
3457
原因並不只是因為
我們建造了機器人。
03:32
But even though雖然 most jobs工作
left the factory decades幾十年 ago,
69
200507
3184
雖然數十年前大部份的工作
已經在工廠消失,
03:35
we still hold保持 on to this factory mindset心態
70
203715
1937
我們仍然有著工廠心態:
03:37
of standardization標準化 and de-skilling非技術.
71
205676
1959
標準化和降低技術難度。
03:40
We still define確定 jobs工作
around procedural程序 tasks任務
72
208525
2351
我們仍然以程序性任務來定義工作,
03:42
and then pay工資 people for the number
of hours小時 that they perform演出 these tasks任務.
73
210900
3488
然後根據人們花在這些
任務上的時數來支付薪水。
03:46
We've我們已經 created創建 narrow狹窄 job工作 definitions定義
74
214412
1756
我們對工作的定義很狹隘,
03:48
like cashier出納員, loan貸款 processor處理器
or taxi出租車 driver司機
75
216192
3240
如出納員、貸款程序員、
計程車司機,
03:51
and then asked people
to form形成 entire整個 careers職業生涯
76
219456
2483
然後要求人們用這些單一任務來
03:53
around these singular單數 tasks任務.
77
221963
1630
規劃他們的人生職涯。
03:56
These choices選擇 have left us with
actually其實 two dangerous危險 side effects效果.
78
224251
3533
這些選擇其實
會帶給我們兩個副作用。
03:59
The first is that these
narrowly險些 defined定義 jobs工作
79
227808
2750
第一,這些定義狹隘的工作
04:02
will be the first
to be displaced流離失所 by robots機器人,
80
230582
2423
會是最先被機器人取代的工作,
04:05
because single-task單任務 robots機器人
are just the easiest最簡單的 kinds to build建立.
81
233029
2985
因為處理單一任務的
機器人最容易做。
04:08
But second第二, we have accidentally偶然 made製作 it
82
236781
2393
第二,我們已經不小心
04:11
so that millions百萬 of workers工人
around the world世界
83
239198
2128
讓全世界數百萬勞工的
工作生活變得無聊死了。
04:13
have unbelievably令人難以置信 boring無聊 working加工 lives生活.
84
241350
2310
04:16
(Laughter笑聲)
85
244057
1871
(笑聲)
04:18
Let's take the example
of a call center中央 agent代理人.
86
246427
2402
就以電話客服中心為例。
04:20
Over the last few少數 decades幾十年,
we brag吹牛 about lower降低 operating操作 costs成本
87
248853
3003
在過去幾十年,
我們吹噓著要壓低營運成本,
04:23
because we've我們已經 taken採取 most
of the need for brainpower腦力
88
251880
2427
因為我們把大部份需要腦力的工作,
04:26
out of the person
and put it into the system系統.
89
254331
2144
從人身上轉到了系統上。
04:28
For most of their day,
they click點擊 on screens屏幕,
90
256499
2521
這些人大部份的工作時間
是在點選螢幕、
04:31
they read scripts腳本.
91
259044
1201
閱讀操作指示。
04:33
They act法案 more like machines than humans人類.
92
261487
2653
他們的行為比較像機器而非人類。
04:37
And unfortunately不幸,
over the next下一個 few少數 years年份,
93
265278
2116
不幸的是,在接下來幾年,
04:39
as our technology技術 gets得到 more advanced高級,
94
267418
1859
隨著我們的科技更進步,
04:41
they, along沿 with people
like clerks文員 and bookkeepers簿記,
95
269301
2584
他們以及像是辦事員、記帳員等等,
04:43
will see the vast廣大 majority多數
of their work disappear消失.
96
271909
2412
將要面臨工作機會大量消失的現象。
04:47
To counteract抵消 this,
we have to start開始 creating創建 new jobs工作
97
275495
2704
要對抗這現象,
就得要開始創造新工作,
04:50
that are less centered中心
on the tasks任務 that a person does
98
278223
2539
不要著重在「工作」,
04:52
and more focused重點 on the skills技能
that a person brings帶來 to work.
99
280786
2866
要比較著重在人會的「技能」上。
04:56
For example, robots機器人 are great
at repetitive重複 and constrained受限 work,
100
284389
3387
比如,機器人很擅長
重覆性和受限制的工作,
04:59
but human人的 beings眾生 have an amazing驚人 ability能力
101
287800
1949
但人類有很了不起的能力,
05:01
to bring帶來 together一起
capability能力 with creativity創造力
102
289773
2279
能夠在面對以前從未見過的問題時,
05:04
when faced面對 with problems問題
that we've我們已經 never seen看到 before.
103
292076
2700
將才能與創意結合在一起。
05:07
It's when every一切 day
brings帶來 a little bit of a surprise
104
295122
2980
當每天都能夠帶來一點點驚奇時,
05:10
that we have designed設計 work for humans人類
105
298126
2004
就表示我們是在為「人」設計工作,
05:12
and not for robots機器人.
106
300154
1269
而非為「機器人」設計工作。
05:14
Our entrepreneurs企業家 and engineers工程師
already已經 live生活 in this world世界,
107
302130
2898
我們的企業家和工程師
已經活在這種世界裡,
05:17
but so do our nurses護士 and our plumbers管道工
108
305052
2592
我們的護士、水電工、
05:19
and our therapists治療師.
109
307668
1463
和治療師也是。
05:21
You know, it's the nature性質
of too many許多 companies公司 and organizations組織
110
309749
3057
太多公司和組織的本質,
05:24
to just ask people to come to work
and do your job工作.
111
312830
3690
就是要求人們來上班、做你的工作。
05:28
But if you work is better doneDONE by a robot機器人,
112
316544
2186
但若機器人能把你的工作做更好,
05:30
or your decisions決定 better made製作 by an AIAI,
113
318754
2797
或是人工智慧能比你
更能做出好的決策,
05:33
what are you supposed應該 to be doing?
114
321575
1712
那你該做什麼事?
05:36
Well, I think for the manager經理,
115
324013
2484
我想,對經理人而言,
05:38
we need to realistically現實 think about
the tasks任務 that will be disappearing消失
116
326521
3397
我們需要很實際地去思考
在接下來幾年會消失的工作任務,
05:41
over the next下一個 few少數 years年份
117
329942
1151
並開始規劃比較有意義、
有價值的工作來取代。
05:43
and start開始 planning規劃 for more meaningful富有意義的,
more valuable有價值 work that should replace更換 it.
118
331117
3872
05:47
We need to create創建 environments環境
119
335013
1429
我們需要創造出能讓
05:48
where both human人的 beings眾生 and robots機器人 thrive興旺.
120
336466
2239
人類和機器人都雙贏的環境。
05:50
I say, let's give more work to the robots機器人,
121
338729
2536
我說,就給機器人更多工作吧,
05:53
and let's start開始 with the work
that we absolutely絕對 hate討厭 doing.
122
341289
2903
先把我們最討厭
做的工作丟給它們做。
05:57
Here, robot機器人,
123
345428
1164
機器人,給你,
05:58
process處理 this painfully痛苦 idiotic report報告.
124
346616
1851
你來處理這惱人又愚蠢的報告。
06:00
(Laughter笑聲)
125
348491
1423
(笑聲)
06:01
And move移動 this box. Thank you.
126
349938
1425
順便移開這箱子,謝謝。
06:03
(Laughter笑聲)
127
351387
1699
(笑聲)
06:05
And for the human人的 beings眾生,
128
353110
1529
對人類而言,
06:06
we should follow跟隨 the advice忠告 from Harry掠奪
Davis戴維斯 at the University大學 of Chicago芝加哥.
129
354663
3554
我們應該要採納芝加哥大學
哈利戴維斯的建議。
06:10
He says we have to make it so that people
don't leave離開 too much of themselves他們自己
130
358241
3649
他說,我們得要做到
不要讓人們覺得
自己沒有完全發揮才能。
06:13
in the trunk樹幹 of their car汽車.
131
361914
1331
06:15
I mean, human人的 beings眾生
are amazing驚人 on weekends週末.
132
363269
2889
人類在週末的時候是很令人驚奇的。
06:18
Think about the people that you know
and what they do on Saturdays星期六.
133
366182
3144
想想看你認識的人
在星期六會做什麼。
06:21
They're artists藝術家, carpenters木匠,
chefs廚師 and athletes運動員.
134
369350
2976
他們會變成藝術家、
木工、主廚、運動員。
06:25
But on Monday星期一, they're back
to being存在 Junior初級 HRHR Specialist專家
135
373086
3896
但星期一,他們回去當
低階的人力資源專員、
06:29
and Systems系統 Analyst分析人士 3.
136
377006
2099
三號系統分析員。
06:31
(Laughter笑聲)
137
379129
3781
(笑聲)
06:34
You know, these narrow狹窄 job工作 titles標題
not only sound聲音 boring無聊,
138
382934
3318
這些狹隘的工作職稱
不僅是聽起來很無聊,
06:38
but they're actually其實
a subtle微妙 encouragement鼓勵
139
386276
2096
實際上,它們在不知不覺間
06:40
for people to make narrow狹窄
and boring無聊 job工作 contributions捐款.
140
388396
3040
鼓勵人們去做
狹隘且無聊的工作貢獻。
06:43
But I've seen看到 firsthand第一手
that when you invite邀請 people to be more,
141
391460
3116
但我親眼見過,當你
邀請人們更上一層樓時,
06:46
they can amaze驚奇 us
with how much more they can be.
142
394600
2390
他們能做到的,會讓我們驚艷。
06:50
A few少數 years年份 ago,
I was working加工 at a large bank銀行
143
398327
2233
幾年前,我在一間大型銀行工作,
06:52
that was trying to bring帶來 more innovation革新
into its company公司 culture文化.
144
400584
3096
該銀行試圖想要在
公司文化中加入更多創新。
06:55
So my team球隊 and I designed設計
a prototyping原型 contest比賽
145
403704
2341
我和我的團隊設計了
一個原型製作競賽,
06:58
that invited邀請 anyone任何人 to build建立
anything that they wanted.
146
406069
2970
邀請所有人建造他們想要的東西。
07:01
We were actually其實 trying to figure數字 out
147
409704
1833
我們其實是在試圖了解,
07:03
whether是否 or not
the primary limiter限制器 to innovation革新
148
411561
2268
限制了創新的主要因子是不是
07:05
was a lack缺乏 of ideas思路 or a lack缺乏 of talent天賦,
149
413853
2490
缺乏點子或是缺乏才華,
07:08
and it turns out it was neither也不 one.
150
416367
1861
結果兩者都不是。
07:10
It was an empowerment權力 problem問題.
151
418252
1755
問題是在於賦權使能。
07:12
And the results結果
of the program程序 were amazing驚人.
152
420698
2242
那個專案計畫的結果很驚人。
07:16
We started開始 by inviting誘人的
people to reenvisionreenvision
153
424378
2377
我們一開始是邀請人們來重新想像
07:18
what it is they could bring帶來 to a team球隊.
154
426779
2115
他們能帶給團隊什麼。
07:20
This contest比賽 was not only a chance機會
to build建立 anything that you wanted
155
428918
3738
這個競賽並不只是個機會
讓他們建造任何想建造的東西,
07:24
but also be anything that you wanted.
156
432680
2336
也是個機會讓你
成為任何想成為的人。
07:27
And when people were no longer
limited有限 by their day-to-day日復一日 job工作 titles標題,
157
435040
3286
當人們不再受到平常職稱的限制時,
他們感到能自由地運用
所有不同的技能和才華,
07:30
they felt free自由 to bring帶來 all kinds
of different不同 skills技能 and talents人才
158
438350
3147
07:33
to the problems問題
that they were trying to solve解決.
159
441521
2486
用在他們試圖解決的問題上。
07:36
We saw technology技術 people being存在 designers設計師,
marketing營銷 people being存在 architects建築師,
160
444031
3910
我們看過科技人員變成設計師、
行銷人員變成建築師,
07:39
and even finance金融 people showing展示 off
their ability能力 to write jokes笑話.
161
447965
3365
甚至財務人員都會炫耀
他們寫笑話的能力。
07:43
(Laughter笑聲)
162
451607
1150
(笑聲)
07:44
We ran this program程序 twice兩次,
163
452781
1405
這個專案計畫做了兩次,
07:46
and each time more than 400 people
brought their unexpected意外 talents人才 to work
164
454210
3796
每次都有超過四百人,
把他們未被預期的才華帶進工作中,
07:50
and solved解決了 problems問題 that they had been
wanting希望 to solve解決 for years年份.
165
458030
3139
解決他們多年來一直想解決的問題。
07:53
Collectively, they created創建
millions百萬 of dollars美元 of value,
166
461490
3019
他們一起創造出了數百萬元的價值,
07:56
building建造 things like a better
touch-tone按鍵音 system系統 for call centers中心,
167
464533
4565
像是為客服中心建造
更好用的按鍵式系統、
為分行建造更好用的桌面工具、
08:01
easier更輕鬆 desktop桌面 tools工具 for branches分支機構
168
469122
1668
08:02
and even a thank you card system系統
169
470814
1525
甚至還有感謝卡系統,
08:04
that has become成為 a cornerstone基石
of the employee僱員 working加工 experience經驗.
170
472363
3314
成為員工工作情感上的基石。
08:07
Over the course課程 of the eight weeks,
171
475701
1803
在八週的期間,
08:09
people flexed彎曲 muscles肌肉 that they never
dreamed夢見 of using運用 at work.
172
477528
3533
大家捲起袖子,拿出了從未夢想過
能夠在工作上使用到的能力。
08:14
People learned學到了 new skills技能,
173
482353
1577
人們學習新技能,
08:15
they met會見 new people,
174
483954
2368
他們去認識新的人,
08:18
and at the end結束, somebody
pulled me aside在旁邊 and said,
175
486346
2793
最後,有個人把我拉到一旁,說:
08:21
"I have to tell you,
176
489163
1569
「我得告訴你,
08:22
the last few少數 weeks has been
one of the most intense激烈,
177
490756
2776
過去幾週是我一生中
08:25
hardest最難 working加工 experiences經驗
of my entire整個 life,
178
493556
3279
最熱情最賣力的工作經驗,
08:28
but not one second第二 of it felt like work."
179
496859
2041
沒有一秒鐘感覺像是在工作。」
08:32
And that's the key.
180
500080
1298
那就是關鍵。
08:33
For those few少數 weeks, people
got to be creators創作者 and innovators創新.
181
501402
3710
在那幾週,人們得以
成為創作者、創新者。
08:38
They had been dreaming做夢 of solutions解決方案
182
506811
1667
他們一直夢想著去解決
08:40
to problems問題 that had been
bugging竊聽 them for years年份,
183
508502
2484
那些讓他們困擾多年的問題,
08:43
and this was a chance機會 to turn
those dreams into a reality現實.
184
511010
2854
這是個讓那些夢想成真的機會。
08:46
And that dreaming做夢 is an important重要 part部分
of what separates中隔離 us from machines.
185
514669
4442
我們和機器之所以不同,
很重要的一點就是夢想。
08:51
For now, our machines
do not get frustrated受挫,
186
519135
3018
我們的機器不會感到挫折,
08:54
they do not get annoyed懊惱,
187
522177
1407
它們不會被惹惱,
08:55
and they certainly當然 don't imagine想像.
188
523608
2260
它們肯定也不會想像。
08:57
But we, as human人的 beings眾生 --
189
525892
1699
但我們,身為人類──
08:59
we feel pain疼痛,
190
527615
1207
我們能感受痛苦,
09:00
we get frustrated受挫.
191
528846
1400
我們會受到挫折,
09:02
And it's when we're most annoyed懊惱
and most curious好奇
192
530270
3116
在我們最惱怒、最好奇的時候,
09:05
that we're motivated動機 to dig
into a problem問題 and create創建 change更改.
193
533410
3263
我們就會有動力去
探究問題並創造改變。
09:09
Our imaginations想像 are the birthplace出生地
of new products製品, new services服務,
194
537546
3910
我們的想像力是新產品、新服務、
09:13
and even new industries行業.
195
541480
1233
甚至是新產業的孕育之地。
09:15
I believe that the jobs工作 of the future未來
196
543476
1802
我相信,未來的工作
09:17
will come from the minds頭腦 of people
197
545302
1713
會來自現今被我們稱為
09:19
who today今天 we call
analysts分析師 and specialists專家,
198
547039
2716
分析師和專員的那些人的想法,
09:21
but only if we give them the freedom自由
and protection保護 that they need to grow增長
199
549779
3478
但前提是我們要給予
他們成長為探索家
09:25
into becoming變得 explorers探險 and inventors發明家.
200
553281
2469
和發明家所需要的自由和保護。
09:28
If we really want to robot-proof機器人防 our jobs工作,
201
556714
2143
若想確保飯碗不被機器人搶走,
09:30
we, as leaders領導者, need
to get out of the mindset心態
202
558881
2235
身為領導者的我們,就應該要擺脫
09:33
of telling告訴 people what to do
203
561140
1830
告訴人們該做什麼的心態,
09:34
and instead代替 start開始 asking them
what problems問題 they're inspired啟發 to solve解決
204
562994
3821
反之,要開始問他們,
他們想要解決什麼問題、
09:38
and what talents人才
they want to bring帶來 to work.
205
566839
2365
他們想要貢獻什麼才能到工作中。
09:41
Because when you can bring帶來
your Saturday星期六 self to work on Wednesdays星期三,
206
569681
3443
因為當你能在星期三
把星期六的你帶進工作時,
09:45
you'll你會 look forward前鋒 to Mondays星期一 more,
207
573148
1994
你就會更期待星期一的到來,
09:47
and those feelings情懷
that we have about Mondays星期一
208
575166
2682
讓我們對星期一的感受
09:49
are part部分 of what makes品牌 us human人的.
209
577872
1758
成為身為人類的一部份。
09:52
And as we redesign重新設計 work
for an era時代 of intelligent智能 machines,
210
580467
3008
我們正在為智慧機器時代
重新設計工作,
09:55
I invite邀請 you all to work alongside並肩 me
211
583499
2216
我邀請各位與我同行,
09:57
to bring帶來 more humanity人性
to our working加工 lives生活.
212
585739
2642
把更多人性帶到
我們的工作生活當中。
10:00
Thank you.
213
588405
1151
謝謝。
10:01
(Applause掌聲)
214
589580
3401
(掌聲)
Translated by Lilian Chiu
Reviewed by Yi-Fan Yu

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David Lee - Innovation leader
UPS’s David Lee works to create platforms that make it easier for people to turn fuzzy ideas into concrete solutions.

Why you should listen

David Lee is the Vice President of Innovation and the Strategic Enterprise Fund for UPS. In that role, he develops programs that make it easier for smart, creative people to get together and explore ideas.  It's clear that great ideas can come from anywhere. His responsibility to help people turn their ideas into tangible, pragmatic solutions.  His team coordinates communities, programs, and contests that give people permission to chase down problems that they are personally inspired to address.  He is constantly amazed at what happens when thoughtful, passionate people are given room to run.

Lee's career has been filled with interesting opportunities to break down new barriers for large corporations.  He has been involved in the launch of dozens of new products, services and businesses within the framework of corporate processes and expectations. Some of those efforts flourished while others failed. Because of those lessons, he looks to create pathways which result in rapid impact and "good failures" whenever possible.

Prior to joining UPS, he led innovation at SunTrust Bank. Lee started his career at Bank of America, where he worked in advanced technology and asset management. There he helped to launch retirement services and a strategic venture capital group. He studied economics at the University of Virginia and went to business school at the University of Chicago.

More profile about the speaker
David Lee | Speaker | TED.com