David R. Dow: Lessons from death row inmates
데이비드 도우(David R. Dow) : 사형수로부터 얻은 교훈
David R. Dow has defended over 100 death row inmates in 20 years. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
상의하고 있었습니다.
링컨은 수학 숙제를 하면서
집을 나가버렸기 때문이죠.
tried to kill him with a butcher knife.
어머니가 육류용 칼로 그를 죽이려 했던 것만 빼면 말입니다.
psychiatric hospital,
lived with his older brother
himself through the heart.
member to another,
he was essentially living on his own.
Katya and Lincoln, I looked at my son,
저는 제 아들을 보면서
오늘 제가 이야기하고자 하는 것은
저는 사형 선고 사건이 진행되는 과정에 대해
a story
complicated legal proceeding known as
변호사는 구명 탄원을 신청하거나,
litigation,
inmates more than 20 years ago,
to a lawyer in either the second
이 이야기의 두번째와 네번째 장에 모두 필요한
이 이야기의 세번째 장에서 필요한
guys on death row
훨씬 더 많았다는 점과,
already in chapter four --
cases that are most urgent;
그들은 의뢰인을 위해 새로운 재판을 진행했습니다.
the lives of their clients, sometimes by
sustained decline in the number of
큰 폭으로 혹은 점차적으로 줄어든 적이
from the time that the Texas execution
1990년대 중후반에
late-1990s,
the number of annual executions dipped
close to 40 people, and this number
지난 15년 전부터 올 여름까지
the last 15 years.
continue to execute
year,
to death
executions has remained high
has gone down.
사형선고가 줄어드는 게 아닙니다.
that graph has gone down.
more and more people to prison
possibility of parole,
execution chamber.
dissolution of popular support
사라졌기 때문이 아닙니다.
an all-time low.
means?
mid 1980s, when it was in
death sentences and the affinity for
사형 선고가 감소된 이유나
by an erosion of support for the death
선호하게 된 이유를 설명할 수는 없습니다.
death penalty.
shifted their focus
death penalty story.
chapter four.
late 1980s to chapter two in
1990년대 중반 두 번쨰 장으로
in the mid- to late-1990s,
the story.
death sentences and the increase in the
생명을 유지시키는 선고가 느는 것이
or a bad thing.
today.
reason that this has happened
이런 결과를 낳는 원인이
understood
case,
going to save your client's life.
of a death row inmate --
당신이 한 사형수의 이름을 내게 말해준다면
dysfunctional family that Will did.
비슷한 문제가 있는 가정 출신이기 때문입니다.
executed,
math problem
여러분이 그런 문제를 접했을 때
into smaller problems.
해답이 됩니다.
math and physics, even in social policy --
수학이나 물리, 사회 정책에서도요.
manageable problems.
penalty bigger.
everybody --
opponents --
science is really complicated
about now is really simple.
매우 간단하다고 말하는 것이죠.
death row
story.
of intervention,
nudged them off of the path that they were on
chapters:
school;
system -- during each of those five chapters,
이 다섯개의 장이 진행되는 동안
intervention, the way that society could intervene
다섯 개의 서로 다른
we want,
연계하여 결합시켜 본다면,
kids like Will
of intervention
every other state that isn't using them,
그리고 모든 주가
그 방법을 사용하지는 않는다는 것도 압니다.
legal system.
reserved for a room full of lawyers and judges.
변호사와 판사를 위해 보류하는 것이 최선일 겁니다.
modes of intervention
that will come about
doing
otherwise troubled kids,
off of the path that we're on.
우리가 가고 있는 길로 인도할 수도 있습니다.
both the high school level
disadvantaged kids, and particularly kids
저는 하나만 더 이야기하려고 하는데,
gonna be the only controversial thing
and threaten to kill them.
죽이려고 협박하기 전에 말이죠.
kids are going to fall through the cracks
어떤 아이들은 어디에서도 혜택받지 못하게 됩니다.
chapter before the murder story begins,
살인의 이야기가 시작되기 전 마지막 장에 다다를 것입니다.
justice system.
one at Yale and one at Maryland --
각각 예일대학교와 메릴랜드 대학교의 교수인데요,
to school from eight in the morning
그들은 학교 안에서 일하는 사람과
at the school and the prison authorities,
to invent a new curriculum because
새로운 커리큘럼을 개발할 필요가 있었다는 것입니다.
on a semester basis.
감옥에 들어오고 나가지는 않기 때문입니다.
is that they cost money.
old enough to remember
"자, 당신은 지금 돈을 낼 수도 있고,
that we spend intervening
otherwise disadvantaged kids
절약할 수 있다는 점입니다.
I had with Will.
마지막 대화에 관해 말씀드리고자 합니다.
who he hardly knew,
그가 거의 알지 못했던 아버지에
really
"하지만 나는 당신이 그 일을 진짜로 기억하는 것인지
몸을 앞으로 숙인채 말했습니다.
12 years, he still called me Professor.
그는 저를 안지 12년이 됐는데 여전히 저를 교수라고 불렀죠.
disrespect by this,
than you are,
screaming she's gonna kill you,
bathroom and lean against the door and
there,"
this morning and the time we break for lunch,
아침에 이 곳에 도착했을 때부터 점심먹을 때까지의 시간에
resources to punishing the people who
막대한 사회적 재원을
appropriate, because we should punish
나쁜 짓을 한 사람은
preventable.
earlier chapters,
first sentence
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
David R. Dow - Death penalty lawyerDavid R. Dow has defended over 100 death row inmates in 20 years.
Why you should listen
What does it feel like to know exactly the day and time you’re going to die -- because the state has decided for you? As a death penalty attorney in Texas, the state with the highest death penalty rate in the US, David R. Dow asks himself questions like this every day. In the past 20 years he has defended over 100 death row inmates, many of whom have died -- and most of whom were guilty. But according to an interview with Dow, “They should have been sentenced to life in prison instead of death at the hands of the state.” Dow is the Litigation Director at the Texas Defender Service and the Founder and Co-director of the Texas Innocence Network, an organization in which law students provide pro bono legal services to investigate claims of actual innocence brought by Texas prisoners. He writes on contract law, constitutional law and theory, and death penalty law, and has most recently published a book called The Autobiography of an Execution, partly a memoir and partly about the politics of capital punishment. Dow is a professor at the University of Houston Law Center.
David R. Dow | Speaker | TED.com