TEDGlobal 2010
Conrad Wolfram: Teaching kids real math with computers
Filmed:
Readability: 3.8
1,742,493 views
From rockets to stock markets, many of humanity's most thrilling creations are powered by math. So why do kids lose interest in it? Conrad Wolfram says the part of math we teach -- calculation by hand -- isn't just tedious, it's mostly irrelevant to real mathematics and the real world. He presents his radical idea: teaching kids math through computer programming.
Conrad Wolfram - Mathematician
Conrad Wolfram runs the worldwide arm of Wolfram Research, the mathematical lab behind the cutting-edge knowledge engine Wolfram Alpha. Full bio
Conrad Wolfram runs the worldwide arm of Wolfram Research, the mathematical lab behind the cutting-edge knowledge engine Wolfram Alpha. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
We've got a real problem with math education right now.
0
0
4000
00:19
Basically, no one's very happy.
1
4000
3000
00:22
Those learning it
2
7000
2000
00:24
think it's disconnected,
3
9000
2000
00:26
uninteresting and hard.
4
11000
2000
00:28
Those trying to employ them
5
13000
2000
00:30
think they don't know enough.
6
15000
2000
00:32
Governments realize that it's a big deal for our economies,
7
17000
3000
00:35
but don't know how to fix it.
8
20000
3000
00:38
And teachers are also frustrated.
9
23000
2000
00:40
Yet math is more important to the world
10
25000
3000
00:43
than at any point in human history.
11
28000
2000
00:45
So at one end we've got falling interest
12
30000
2000
00:47
in education in math,
13
32000
2000
00:49
and at the other end we've got a more mathematical world,
14
34000
3000
00:52
a more quantitative world than we ever have had.
15
37000
3000
00:56
So what's the problem, why has this chasm opened up,
16
41000
2000
00:58
and what can we do to fix it?
17
43000
3000
01:01
Well actually, I think the answer
18
46000
2000
01:03
is staring us right in the face:
19
48000
2000
01:05
Use computers.
20
50000
2000
01:07
I believe
21
52000
2000
01:09
that correctly using computers
22
54000
2000
01:11
is the silver bullet
23
56000
2000
01:13
for making math education work.
24
58000
3000
01:16
So to explain that,
25
61000
2000
01:18
let me first talk a bit about what math looks like in the real world
26
63000
3000
01:21
and what it looks like in education.
27
66000
2000
01:23
See, in the real world
28
68000
2000
01:25
math isn't necessarily done by mathematicians.
29
70000
3000
01:28
It's done by geologists,
30
73000
2000
01:30
engineers, biologists,
31
75000
2000
01:32
all sorts of different people --
32
77000
2000
01:34
modeling and simulation.
33
79000
2000
01:36
It's actually very popular.
34
81000
2000
01:38
But in education it looks very different --
35
83000
3000
01:41
dumbed-down problems, lots of calculating,
36
86000
2000
01:43
mostly by hand.
37
88000
2000
01:46
Lots of things that seem simple
38
91000
2000
01:48
and not difficult like in the real world,
39
93000
2000
01:50
except if you're learning it.
40
95000
2000
01:53
And another thing about math:
41
98000
2000
01:55
math sometimes looks like math --
42
100000
2000
01:57
like in this example here --
43
102000
3000
02:00
and sometimes it doesn't --
44
105000
2000
02:02
like "Am I drunk?"
45
107000
3000
02:07
And then you get an answer that's quantitative in the modern world.
46
112000
3000
02:10
You wouldn't have expected that a few years back.
47
115000
3000
02:13
But now you can find out all about --
48
118000
3000
02:16
unfortunately, my weight is a little higher than that, but --
49
121000
3000
02:19
all about what happens.
50
124000
2000
02:21
So let's zoom out a bit and ask,
51
126000
2000
02:23
why are we teaching people math?
52
128000
2000
02:25
What's the point of teaching people math?
53
130000
3000
02:28
And in particular, why are we teaching them math in general?
54
133000
3000
02:31
Why is it such an important part of education
55
136000
3000
02:34
as a sort of compulsory subject?
56
139000
2000
02:36
Well, I think there are about three reasons:
57
141000
3000
02:39
technical jobs
58
144000
2000
02:41
so critical to the development of our economies,
59
146000
3000
02:44
what I call "everyday living" --
60
149000
3000
02:48
to function in the world today,
61
153000
2000
02:50
you've got to be pretty quantitative,
62
155000
2000
02:52
much more so than a few years ago:
63
157000
2000
02:54
figure out your mortgages,
64
159000
2000
02:56
being skeptical of government statistics, those kinds of things --
65
161000
3000
03:00
and thirdly, what I would call something like
66
165000
3000
03:03
logical mind training, logical thinking.
67
168000
3000
03:06
Over the years
68
171000
2000
03:08
we've put so much in society
69
173000
2000
03:10
into being able to process and think logically. It's part of human society.
70
175000
3000
03:13
It's very important to learn that
71
178000
2000
03:15
math is a great way to do that.
72
180000
2000
03:17
So let's ask another question.
73
182000
2000
03:19
What is math?
74
184000
2000
03:21
What do we mean when we say we're doing math,
75
186000
2000
03:23
or educating people to do math?
76
188000
2000
03:25
Well, I think it's about four steps, roughly speaking,
77
190000
3000
03:28
starting with posing the right question.
78
193000
2000
03:30
What is it that we want to ask? What is it we're trying to find out here?
79
195000
3000
03:33
And this is the thing most screwed up in the outside world,
80
198000
2000
03:35
beyond virtually any other part of doing math.
81
200000
3000
03:38
People ask the wrong question,
82
203000
2000
03:40
and surprisingly enough, they get the wrong answer,
83
205000
2000
03:42
for that reason, if not for others.
84
207000
2000
03:44
So the next thing is take that problem
85
209000
2000
03:46
and turn it from a real world problem
86
211000
2000
03:48
into a math problem.
87
213000
2000
03:50
That's stage two.
88
215000
2000
03:52
Once you've done that, then there's the computation step.
89
217000
3000
03:55
Turn it from that into some answer
90
220000
2000
03:57
in a mathematical form.
91
222000
3000
04:00
And of course, math is very powerful at doing that.
92
225000
2000
04:02
And then finally, turn it back to the real world.
93
227000
2000
04:04
Did it answer the question?
94
229000
2000
04:06
And also verify it -- crucial step.
95
231000
3000
04:10
Now here's the crazy thing right now.
96
235000
2000
04:12
In math education,
97
237000
2000
04:14
we're spending about perhaps 80 percent of the time
98
239000
3000
04:17
teaching people to do step three by hand.
99
242000
3000
04:20
Yet, that's the one step computers can do
100
245000
2000
04:22
better than any human after years of practice.
101
247000
3000
04:25
Instead, we ought to be using computers
102
250000
3000
04:28
to do step three
103
253000
2000
04:30
and using the students to spend much more effort
104
255000
3000
04:33
on learning how to do steps one, two and four --
105
258000
2000
04:35
conceptualizing problems, applying them,
106
260000
3000
04:38
getting the teacher to run them through how to do that.
107
263000
3000
04:41
See, crucial point here:
108
266000
2000
04:43
math is not equal to calculating.
109
268000
2000
04:45
Math is a much broader subject than calculating.
110
270000
3000
04:48
Now it's understandable that this has all got intertwined
111
273000
3000
04:51
over hundreds of years.
112
276000
2000
04:53
There was only one way to do calculating and that was by hand.
113
278000
3000
04:56
But in the last few decades
114
281000
2000
04:58
that has totally changed.
115
283000
2000
05:00
We've had the biggest transformation of any ancient subject
116
285000
3000
05:03
that I could ever imagine with computers.
117
288000
3000
05:07
Calculating was typically the limiting step,
118
292000
2000
05:09
and now often it isn't.
119
294000
2000
05:11
So I think in terms of the fact that math
120
296000
2000
05:13
has been liberated from calculating.
121
298000
3000
05:16
But that math liberation didn't get into education yet.
122
301000
3000
05:19
See, I think of calculating, in a sense,
123
304000
2000
05:21
as the machinery of math.
124
306000
2000
05:23
It's the chore.
125
308000
2000
05:25
It's the thing you'd like to avoid if you can, like to get a machine to do.
126
310000
3000
05:29
It's a means to an end, not an end in itself,
127
314000
3000
05:34
and automation allows us
128
319000
2000
05:36
to have that machinery.
129
321000
2000
05:38
Computers allow us to do that --
130
323000
2000
05:40
and this is not a small problem by any means.
131
325000
3000
05:43
I estimated that, just today, across the world,
132
328000
3000
05:46
we spent about 106 average world lifetimes
133
331000
3000
05:49
teaching people how to calculate by hand.
134
334000
3000
05:52
That's an amazing amount of human endeavor.
135
337000
3000
05:55
So we better be damn sure --
136
340000
2000
05:57
and by the way, they didn't even have fun doing it, most of them --
137
342000
3000
06:00
so we better be damn sure
138
345000
2000
06:02
that we know why we're doing that
139
347000
2000
06:04
and it has a real purpose.
140
349000
2000
06:06
I think we should be assuming computers
141
351000
2000
06:08
for doing the calculating
142
353000
2000
06:10
and only doing hand calculations where it really makes sense to teach people that.
143
355000
3000
06:13
And I think there are some cases.
144
358000
2000
06:15
For example: mental arithmetic.
145
360000
2000
06:17
I still do a lot of that, mainly for estimating.
146
362000
3000
06:20
People say, "Is such and such true?"
147
365000
2000
06:22
And I'll say, "Hmm, not sure." I'll think about it roughly.
148
367000
2000
06:24
It's still quicker to do that and more practical.
149
369000
2000
06:26
So I think practicality is one case
150
371000
2000
06:28
where it's worth teaching people by hand.
151
373000
2000
06:30
And then there are certain conceptual things
152
375000
2000
06:32
that can also benefit from hand calculating,
153
377000
2000
06:34
but I think they're relatively small in number.
154
379000
2000
06:36
One thing I often ask about
155
381000
2000
06:38
is ancient Greek and how this relates.
156
383000
3000
06:41
See, the thing we're doing right now
157
386000
2000
06:43
is we're forcing people to learn mathematics.
158
388000
2000
06:45
It's a major subject.
159
390000
2000
06:47
I'm not for one minute suggesting that, if people are interested in hand calculating
160
392000
3000
06:50
or in following their own interests
161
395000
2000
06:52
in any subject however bizarre --
162
397000
2000
06:54
they should do that.
163
399000
2000
06:56
That's absolutely the right thing,
164
401000
2000
06:58
for people to follow their self-interest.
165
403000
2000
07:00
I was somewhat interested in ancient Greek,
166
405000
2000
07:02
but I don't think that we should force the entire population
167
407000
3000
07:05
to learn a subject like ancient Greek.
168
410000
2000
07:07
I don't think it's warranted.
169
412000
2000
07:09
So I have this distinction between what we're making people do
170
414000
3000
07:12
and the subject that's sort of mainstream
171
417000
2000
07:14
and the subject that, in a sense, people might follow with their own interest
172
419000
3000
07:17
and perhaps even be spiked into doing that.
173
422000
2000
07:19
So what are the issues people bring up with this?
174
424000
3000
07:22
Well one of them is, they say, you need to get the basics first.
175
427000
3000
07:25
You shouldn't use the machine
176
430000
2000
07:27
until you get the basics of the subject.
177
432000
2000
07:29
So my usual question is, what do you mean by "basics?"
178
434000
3000
07:32
Basics of what?
179
437000
2000
07:34
Are the basics of driving a car
180
439000
2000
07:36
learning how to service it, or design it for that matter?
181
441000
3000
07:39
Are the basics of writing learning how to sharpen a quill?
182
444000
3000
07:43
I don't think so.
183
448000
2000
07:45
I think you need to separate the basics of what you're trying to do
184
450000
3000
07:48
from how it gets done
185
453000
2000
07:50
and the machinery of how it gets done
186
455000
3000
07:54
and automation allows you to make that separation.
187
459000
3000
07:57
A hundred years ago, it's certainly true that to drive a car
188
462000
3000
08:00
you kind of needed to know a lot about the mechanics of the car
189
465000
2000
08:02
and how the ignition timing worked and all sorts of things.
190
467000
3000
08:06
But automation in cars
191
471000
2000
08:08
allowed that to separate,
192
473000
2000
08:10
so driving is now a quite separate subject, so to speak,
193
475000
3000
08:13
from engineering of the car
194
478000
3000
08:16
or learning how to service it.
195
481000
3000
08:20
So automation allows this separation
196
485000
2000
08:22
and also allows -- in the case of driving,
197
487000
2000
08:24
and I believe also in the future case of maths --
198
489000
2000
08:26
a democratized way of doing that.
199
491000
2000
08:28
It can be spread across a much larger number of people
200
493000
2000
08:30
who can really work with that.
201
495000
3000
08:33
So there's another thing that comes up with basics.
202
498000
2000
08:35
People confuse, in my view,
203
500000
2000
08:37
the order of the invention of the tools
204
502000
3000
08:40
with the order in which they should use them for teaching.
205
505000
3000
08:43
So just because paper was invented before computers,
206
508000
3000
08:46
it doesn't necessarily mean you get more to the basics of the subject
207
511000
3000
08:49
by using paper instead of a computer
208
514000
2000
08:51
to teach mathematics.
209
516000
2000
08:55
My daughter gave me a rather nice anecdote on this.
210
520000
3000
08:58
She enjoys making what she calls "paper laptops."
211
523000
3000
09:01
(Laughter)
212
526000
2000
09:03
So I asked her one day, "You know, when I was your age,
213
528000
2000
09:05
I didn't make these.
214
530000
2000
09:07
Why do you think that was?"
215
532000
2000
09:09
And after a second or two, carefully reflecting,
216
534000
2000
09:11
she said, "No paper?"
217
536000
2000
09:13
(Laughter)
218
538000
5000
09:19
If you were born after computers and paper,
219
544000
2000
09:21
it doesn't really matter which order you're taught with them in,
220
546000
3000
09:24
you just want to have the best tool.
221
549000
2000
09:26
So another one that comes up is "Computers dumb math down."
222
551000
3000
09:29
That somehow, if you use a computer,
223
554000
2000
09:31
it's all mindless button-pushing,
224
556000
2000
09:33
but if you do it by hand,
225
558000
2000
09:35
it's all intellectual.
226
560000
2000
09:37
This one kind of annoys me, I must say.
227
562000
3000
09:40
Do we really believe
228
565000
2000
09:42
that the math that most people are doing in school
229
567000
2000
09:44
practically today
230
569000
2000
09:46
is more than applying procedures
231
571000
2000
09:48
to problems they don't really understand, for reasons they don't get?
232
573000
3000
09:51
I don't think so.
233
576000
2000
09:53
And what's worse, what they're learning there isn't even practically useful anymore.
234
578000
3000
09:56
Might have been 50 years ago, but it isn't anymore.
235
581000
3000
09:59
When they're out of education, they do it on a computer.
236
584000
3000
10:02
Just to be clear, I think computers can really help with this problem,
237
587000
3000
10:05
actually make it more conceptual.
238
590000
2000
10:07
Now, of course, like any great tool,
239
592000
2000
10:09
they can be used completely mindlessly,
240
594000
2000
10:11
like turning everything into a multimedia show,
241
596000
3000
10:14
like the example I was shown of solving an equation by hand,
242
599000
3000
10:17
where the computer was the teacher --
243
602000
2000
10:19
show the student how to manipulate and solve it by hand.
244
604000
3000
10:22
This is just nuts.
245
607000
2000
10:24
Why are we using computers to show a student how to solve a problem by hand
246
609000
3000
10:27
that the computer should be doing anyway?
247
612000
2000
10:29
All backwards.
248
614000
2000
10:31
Let me show you
249
616000
2000
10:33
that you can also make problems harder to calculate.
250
618000
3000
10:36
See, normally in school,
251
621000
2000
10:38
you do things like solve quadratic equations.
252
623000
3000
10:41
But you see, when you're using a computer,
253
626000
3000
10:44
you can just substitute.
254
629000
4000
10:48
You can make it a quartic equation. Make it kind of harder, calculating-wise.
255
633000
2000
10:50
Same principles applied --
256
635000
2000
10:52
calculations, harder.
257
637000
2000
10:54
And problems in the real world
258
639000
2000
10:56
look nutty and horrible like this.
259
641000
2000
10:58
They've got hair all over them.
260
643000
2000
11:00
They're not just simple, dumbed-down things that we see in school math.
261
645000
3000
11:04
And think of the outside world.
262
649000
2000
11:06
Do we really believe that engineering and biology
263
651000
2000
11:08
and all of these other things
264
653000
2000
11:10
that have so benefited from computers and maths
265
655000
2000
11:12
have somehow conceptually gotten reduced by using computers?
266
657000
3000
11:15
I don't think so -- quite the opposite.
267
660000
3000
11:18
So the problem we've really got in math education
268
663000
3000
11:21
is not that computers might dumb it down,
269
666000
3000
11:24
but that we have dumbed-down problems right now.
270
669000
3000
11:27
Well, another issue people bring up
271
672000
2000
11:29
is somehow that hand calculating procedures
272
674000
2000
11:31
teach understanding.
273
676000
2000
11:33
So if you go through lots of examples,
274
678000
2000
11:35
you can get the answer,
275
680000
2000
11:37
you can understand how the basics of the system work better.
276
682000
3000
11:40
I think there is one thing that I think very valid here,
277
685000
3000
11:43
which is that I think understanding procedures and processes is important.
278
688000
3000
11:47
But there's a fantastic way to do that in the modern world.
279
692000
3000
11:50
It's called programming.
280
695000
3000
11:53
Programming is how most procedures and processes
281
698000
2000
11:55
get written down these days,
282
700000
2000
11:57
and it's also a great way
283
702000
2000
11:59
to engage students much more
284
704000
2000
12:01
and to check they really understand.
285
706000
2000
12:03
If you really want to check you understand math
286
708000
2000
12:05
then write a program to do it.
287
710000
3000
12:08
So programming is the way I think we should be doing that.
288
713000
3000
12:11
So to be clear, what I really am suggesting here
289
716000
2000
12:13
is we have a unique opportunity
290
718000
2000
12:15
to make maths both more practical
291
720000
2000
12:17
and more conceptual, simultaneously.
292
722000
3000
12:20
I can't think of any other subject where that's recently been possible.
293
725000
3000
12:23
It's usually some kind of choice
294
728000
2000
12:25
between the vocational and the intellectual.
295
730000
2000
12:27
But I think we can do both at the same time here.
296
732000
3000
12:32
And we open up so many more possibilities.
297
737000
3000
12:35
You can do so many more problems.
298
740000
2000
12:37
What I really think we gain from this
299
742000
2000
12:39
is students getting intuition and experience
300
744000
3000
12:42
in far greater quantities than they've ever got before.
301
747000
3000
12:45
And experience of harder problems --
302
750000
2000
12:47
being able to play with the math, interact with it,
303
752000
2000
12:49
feel it.
304
754000
2000
12:51
We want people who can feel the math instinctively.
305
756000
3000
12:54
That's what computers allow us to do.
306
759000
3000
12:57
Another thing it allows us to do is reorder the curriculum.
307
762000
3000
13:00
Traditionally it's been by how difficult it is to calculate,
308
765000
2000
13:02
but now we can reorder it
309
767000
2000
13:04
by how difficult it is to understand the concepts,
310
769000
2000
13:06
however hard the calculating.
311
771000
2000
13:08
So calculus has traditionally been taught very late.
312
773000
3000
13:11
Why is this?
313
776000
2000
13:13
Well, it's damn hard doing the calculations, that's the problem.
314
778000
3000
13:17
But actually many of the concepts
315
782000
2000
13:19
are amenable to a much younger age group.
316
784000
3000
13:22
This was an example I built for my daughter.
317
787000
3000
13:25
And very, very simple.
318
790000
2000
13:28
We were talking about what happens
319
793000
2000
13:30
when you increase the number of sides of a polygon
320
795000
2000
13:32
to a very large number.
321
797000
2000
13:36
And of course, it turns into a circle.
322
801000
2000
13:38
And by the way, she was also very insistent
323
803000
2000
13:40
on being able to change the color,
324
805000
2000
13:42
an important feature for this demonstration.
325
807000
3000
13:46
You can see that this is a very early step
326
811000
3000
13:49
into limits and differential calculus
327
814000
2000
13:51
and what happens when you take things to an extreme --
328
816000
3000
13:54
and very small sides and a very large number of sides.
329
819000
2000
13:56
Very simple example.
330
821000
2000
13:58
That's a view of the world
331
823000
2000
14:00
that we don't usually give people for many, many years after this.
332
825000
3000
14:03
And yet, that's a really important practical view of the world.
333
828000
3000
14:06
So one of the roadblocks we have
334
831000
3000
14:09
in moving this agenda forward
335
834000
3000
14:12
is exams.
336
837000
2000
14:14
In the end, if we test everyone by hand in exams,
337
839000
3000
14:17
it's kind of hard to get the curricula changed
338
842000
3000
14:20
to a point where they can use computers
339
845000
2000
14:22
during the semesters.
340
847000
3000
14:25
And one of the reasons it's so important --
341
850000
2000
14:27
so it's very important to get computers in exams.
342
852000
3000
14:30
And then we can ask questions, real questions,
343
855000
3000
14:33
questions like, what's the best life insurance policy to get? --
344
858000
3000
14:36
real questions that people have in their everyday lives.
345
861000
3000
14:40
And you see, this isn't some dumbed-down model here.
346
865000
2000
14:42
This is an actual model where we can be asked to optimize what happens.
347
867000
3000
14:45
How many years of protection do I need?
348
870000
2000
14:47
What does that do to the payments
349
872000
2000
14:49
and to the interest rates and so forth?
350
874000
3000
14:52
Now I'm not for one minute suggesting it's the only kind of question
351
877000
3000
14:55
that should be asked in exams,
352
880000
2000
14:57
but I think it's a very important type
353
882000
2000
14:59
that right now just gets completely ignored
354
884000
3000
15:02
and is critical for people's real understanding.
355
887000
3000
15:05
So I believe [there is] critical reform
356
890000
3000
15:08
we have to do in computer-based math.
357
893000
2000
15:10
We have got to make sure
358
895000
2000
15:12
that we can move our economies forward,
359
897000
3000
15:15
and also our societies,
360
900000
2000
15:17
based on the idea that people can really feel mathematics.
361
902000
3000
15:22
This isn't some optional extra.
362
907000
3000
15:25
And the country that does this first
363
910000
2000
15:27
will, in my view, leapfrog others
364
912000
3000
15:30
in achieving a new economy even,
365
915000
3000
15:33
an improved economy,
366
918000
2000
15:35
an improved outlook.
367
920000
2000
15:37
In fact, I even talk about us moving
368
922000
2000
15:39
from what we often call now the "knowledge economy"
369
924000
3000
15:42
to what we might call a "computational knowledge economy,"
370
927000
3000
15:45
where high-level math is integral to what everyone does
371
930000
3000
15:48
in the way that knowledge currently is.
372
933000
2000
15:50
We can engage so many more students with this,
373
935000
3000
15:53
and they can have a better time doing it.
374
938000
3000
15:56
And let's understand:
375
941000
2000
15:58
this is not an incremental sort of change.
376
943000
3000
16:02
We're trying to cross the chasm here
377
947000
2000
16:04
between school math and the real-world math.
378
949000
2000
16:06
And you know if you walk across a chasm,
379
951000
2000
16:08
you end up making it worse than if you didn't start at all --
380
953000
3000
16:11
bigger disaster.
381
956000
2000
16:13
No, what I'm suggesting
382
958000
2000
16:15
is that we should leap off,
383
960000
2000
16:17
we should increase our velocity
384
962000
2000
16:19
so it's high,
385
964000
2000
16:21
and we should leap off one side and go the other --
386
966000
3000
16:24
of course, having calculated our differential equation very carefully.
387
969000
3000
16:27
(Laughter)
388
972000
2000
16:29
So I want to see
389
974000
2000
16:31
a completely renewed, changed math curriculum
390
976000
2000
16:33
built from the ground up,
391
978000
2000
16:35
based on computers being there,
392
980000
2000
16:37
computers that are now ubiquitous almost.
393
982000
2000
16:39
Calculating machines are everywhere
394
984000
2000
16:41
and will be completely everywhere in a small number of years.
395
986000
3000
16:44
Now I'm not even sure if we should brand the subject as math,
396
989000
4000
16:48
but what I am sure is
397
993000
2000
16:50
it's the mainstream subject of the future.
398
995000
2000
16:53
Let's go for it,
399
998000
3000
16:56
and while we're about it,
400
1001000
2000
16:58
let's have a bit of fun,
401
1003000
2000
17:00
for us, for the students and for TED here.
402
1005000
3000
17:03
Thanks.
403
1008000
2000
17:05
(Applause)
404
1010000
7000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Conrad Wolfram - MathematicianConrad Wolfram runs the worldwide arm of Wolfram Research, the mathematical lab behind the cutting-edge knowledge engine Wolfram Alpha.
Why you should listen
Conrad Wolfram is the strategic director of Wolfram Research, where his job, in a nutshell, is understanding and finding new uses for the Mathematica technology. Wolfram is especially passionate about finding uses for Mathematica outside of pure computation, using it as a development platform for products that help communicate big ideas. The Demonstrations tool, for instance, makes a compelling case for never writing out another equation -- instead displaying data in interactive, graphical form.
Wolfram's work points up the changing nature of math in the past 30 years, as we've moved from adding machines to calculators to sophisticated math software, allowing us to achieve ever more complex computational feats. But, Wolfram says, many schools are still focused on hand-calculating; using automation, such as a piece of software, to do math is sometimes seen as cheating. This keeps schools from spending the time they need on the new tools of science and mathematics. As they gain significance for everyday living, he suggests, we need to learn to take advantage of these tools and learn to use them young. Learn more at computerbasedmath.org.
Conrad Wolfram | Speaker | TED.com