TEDxBerlin
Peter Eigen: How to expose the corrupt
Filmed:
Readability: 5
844,612 views
Some of the world's most baffling social problems, says Peter Eigen, can be traced to systematic, pervasive government corruption, hand-in-glove with global companies. In his talk, Eigen describes the thrilling counter-attack led by his organization, Transparency International.
Peter Eigen - Founder, Transparency International
As a director of the World Bank in Nairobi, Peter Eigen saw firsthand how devastating corruption can be. He's founder of Transparency International, an NGO that works to persuade international companies not to bribe. Full bio
As a director of the World Bank in Nairobi, Peter Eigen saw firsthand how devastating corruption can be. He's founder of Transparency International, an NGO that works to persuade international companies not to bribe. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
I am going to speak about corruption,
0
0
2000
00:17
but I would like to juxtapose
1
2000
3000
00:20
two different things.
2
5000
2000
00:22
One is the large global economy,
3
7000
5000
00:27
the large globalized economy,
4
12000
3000
00:30
and the other one is the small, and very limited,
5
15000
3000
00:33
capacity of our traditional governments
6
18000
4000
00:37
and their international institutions
7
22000
2000
00:39
to govern, to shape, this economy.
8
24000
4000
00:43
Because there is this asymmetry,
9
28000
5000
00:48
which creates, basically,
10
33000
3000
00:51
failing governance.
11
36000
2000
00:53
Failing governance in many areas:
12
38000
2000
00:55
in the area of corruption and the area of destruction of the environment,
13
40000
4000
00:59
in the area of exploitation of women and children,
14
44000
3000
01:02
in the area of climate change,
15
47000
4000
01:06
in all the areas in which we really need
16
51000
3000
01:09
a capacity to reintroduce
17
54000
5000
01:14
the primacy of politics
18
59000
3000
01:17
into the economy,
19
62000
2000
01:19
which is operating in a worldwide arena.
20
64000
4000
01:24
And I think corruption,
21
69000
2000
01:26
and the fight against corruption,
22
71000
2000
01:28
and the impact of corruption,
23
73000
2000
01:30
is probably one of the most interesting ways
24
75000
2000
01:32
to illustrate what I mean
25
77000
2000
01:34
with this failure of governance.
26
79000
3000
01:37
Let me talk about my own experience.
27
82000
4000
01:41
I used to work as the director
28
86000
3000
01:44
of the World Bank office in Nairobi
29
89000
3000
01:47
for East Africa.
30
92000
2000
01:49
At that time, I noticed
31
94000
2000
01:51
that corruption, that grand corruption,
32
96000
3000
01:54
that systematic corruption,
33
99000
2000
01:56
was undermining everything we were trying to do.
34
101000
4000
02:00
And therefore, I began
35
105000
2000
02:02
to not only try to protect
36
107000
3000
02:05
the work of the World Bank,
37
110000
2000
02:07
our own projects, our own programs
38
112000
2000
02:09
against corruption,
39
114000
2000
02:11
but in general, I thought, "We need a system
40
116000
3000
02:14
to protect the people
41
119000
2000
02:16
in this part of the world
42
121000
2000
02:18
from the ravages of corruption."
43
123000
3000
02:21
And as soon as I started this work,
44
126000
3000
02:24
I received a memorandum from the World Bank,
45
129000
3000
02:27
from the legal department first,
46
132000
2000
02:29
in which they said, "You are not allowed to do this.
47
134000
2000
02:31
You are meddling in the internal affairs of our partner countries.
48
136000
4000
02:35
This is forbidden by the charter of the World Bank,
49
140000
3000
02:38
so I want you to stop your doings."
50
143000
3000
02:41
In the meantime, I was chairing
51
146000
2000
02:43
donor meetings, for instance,
52
148000
2000
02:45
in which the various donors,
53
150000
2000
02:47
and many of them like to be in Nairobi --
54
152000
3000
02:50
it is true, it is one of the
55
155000
2000
02:52
unsafest cities of the world,
56
157000
2000
02:54
but they like to be there because the other cities
57
159000
2000
02:56
are even less comfortable.
58
161000
3000
02:59
And in these donor meetings, I noticed
59
164000
2000
03:01
that many of the worst projects --
60
166000
2000
03:03
which were put forward
61
168000
2000
03:05
by our clients, by the governments,
62
170000
2000
03:07
by promoters,
63
172000
2000
03:09
many of them representing
64
174000
2000
03:11
suppliers from the North --
65
176000
2000
03:13
that the worst projects
66
178000
2000
03:15
were realized first.
67
180000
2000
03:17
Let me give you an example:
68
182000
2000
03:19
a huge power project,
69
184000
2000
03:21
300 million dollars,
70
186000
3000
03:24
to be built smack into
71
189000
2000
03:26
one of the most vulnerable, and one of the most beautiful,
72
191000
3000
03:29
areas of western Kenya.
73
194000
3000
03:32
And we all noticed immediately
74
197000
2000
03:34
that this project had no economic benefits:
75
199000
3000
03:37
It had no clients, nobody would buy the electricity there,
76
202000
4000
03:41
nobody was interested in irrigation projects.
77
206000
2000
03:43
To the contrary, we knew that this project
78
208000
3000
03:46
would destroy the environment:
79
211000
2000
03:48
It would destroy riparian forests,
80
213000
2000
03:50
which were the basis for
81
215000
2000
03:52
the survival of nomadic groups,
82
217000
2000
03:54
the Samburu and the Turkana in this area.
83
219000
4000
03:58
So everybody knew this is a, not a useless project,
84
223000
3000
04:01
this is an absolute damaging, a terrible project --
85
226000
3000
04:04
not to speak about the future indebtedness of the country
86
229000
4000
04:08
for these hundreds of millions of dollars,
87
233000
2000
04:10
and the siphoning off
88
235000
3000
04:13
of the scarce resources of the economy
89
238000
2000
04:15
from much more important activities
90
240000
3000
04:18
like schools, like hospitals and so on.
91
243000
2000
04:20
And yet, we all rejected this project,
92
245000
3000
04:23
none of the donors was willing
93
248000
2000
04:25
to have their name connected with it,
94
250000
3000
04:28
and it was the first project to be implemented.
95
253000
2000
04:30
The good projects, which we as a donor community
96
255000
3000
04:33
would take under our wings,
97
258000
2000
04:35
they took years, you know,
98
260000
2000
04:37
you had too many studies,
99
262000
2000
04:39
and very often they didn't succeed.
100
264000
2000
04:41
But these bad projects,
101
266000
2000
04:43
which were absolutely damaging -- for the economy
102
268000
2000
04:45
for many generations, for the environment,
103
270000
3000
04:48
for thousands of families who had to be resettled --
104
273000
3000
04:51
they were suddenly put together
105
276000
2000
04:53
by consortia of banks,
106
278000
3000
04:56
of supplier agencies,
107
281000
2000
04:58
of insurance agencies --
108
283000
2000
05:00
like in Germany, Hermes, and so on --
109
285000
3000
05:03
and they came back very, very quickly,
110
288000
2000
05:05
driven by an unholy alliance
111
290000
2000
05:07
between the powerful elites
112
292000
4000
05:11
in the countries there
113
296000
2000
05:13
and the suppliers from the North.
114
298000
2000
05:15
Now, these suppliers
115
300000
2000
05:17
were our big companies.
116
302000
2000
05:19
They were the actors of this global market,
117
304000
3000
05:22
which I mentioned in the beginning.
118
307000
2000
05:24
They were the Siemenses of this world,
119
309000
3000
05:27
coming from France, from the UK, from Japan,
120
312000
2000
05:29
from Canada, from Germany,
121
314000
2000
05:31
and they were systematically driven
122
316000
3000
05:34
by systematic, large-scale corruption.
123
319000
3000
05:37
We are not talking about
124
322000
2000
05:39
50,000 dollars here,
125
324000
2000
05:41
or 100,000 dollars there, or one million dollars there.
126
326000
3000
05:44
No, we are talking about 10 million, 20 million dollars
127
329000
3000
05:47
on the Swiss bank accounts,
128
332000
2000
05:49
on the bank accounts of Liechtenstein,
129
334000
2000
05:51
of the president's ministers,
130
336000
4000
05:55
the high officials in the para-statal sectors.
131
340000
3000
05:58
This was the reality which I saw,
132
343000
2000
06:00
and not only one project like that:
133
345000
2000
06:02
I saw, I would say,
134
347000
2000
06:04
over the years I worked in Africa,
135
349000
2000
06:06
I saw hundreds of projects like this.
136
351000
2000
06:08
And so, I became convinced
137
353000
3000
06:11
that it is this systematic corruption
138
356000
3000
06:14
which is perverting economic policy-making in these countries,
139
359000
3000
06:17
which is the main reason
140
362000
3000
06:20
for the misery, for the poverty,
141
365000
3000
06:23
for the conflicts, for the violence,
142
368000
2000
06:25
for the desperation
143
370000
2000
06:27
in many of these countries.
144
372000
2000
06:29
That we have today
145
374000
2000
06:31
more than a billion people below the absolute poverty line,
146
376000
3000
06:34
that we have more than a billion people
147
379000
3000
06:37
without proper drinking water in the world,
148
382000
2000
06:39
twice that number,
149
384000
2000
06:41
more than two billion people
150
386000
2000
06:43
without sanitation and so on,
151
388000
2000
06:45
and the consequent illnesses
152
390000
2000
06:47
of mothers and children,
153
392000
3000
06:50
still, child mortality of more than
154
395000
3000
06:53
10 million people every year,
155
398000
2000
06:55
children dying before they are five years old:
156
400000
2000
06:57
The cause of this is, to a large extent,
157
402000
3000
07:00
grand corruption.
158
405000
2000
07:02
Now, why did the World Bank
159
407000
3000
07:05
not let me do this work?
160
410000
3000
07:08
I found out afterwards,
161
413000
3000
07:11
after I left, under a big fight, the World Bank.
162
416000
3000
07:14
The reason was that the members of the World Bank
163
419000
3000
07:17
thought that foreign bribery was okay,
164
422000
3000
07:20
including Germany.
165
425000
2000
07:22
In Germany, foreign bribery was allowed.
166
427000
2000
07:24
It was even tax-deductible.
167
429000
3000
07:27
No wonder that most of the most important
168
432000
2000
07:29
international operators in Germany,
169
434000
3000
07:32
but also in France and the UK
170
437000
2000
07:34
and Scandinavia, everywhere, systematically bribed.
171
439000
2000
07:36
Not all of them, but most of them.
172
441000
3000
07:39
And this is the phenomenon
173
444000
2000
07:41
which I call failing governance,
174
446000
3000
07:44
because when I then came to Germany
175
449000
2000
07:46
and started this little NGO
176
451000
2000
07:48
here in Berlin, at the Villa Borsig,
177
453000
4000
07:52
we were told, "You cannot stop
178
457000
3000
07:55
our German exporters from bribing,
179
460000
2000
07:57
because we will lose our contracts.
180
462000
3000
08:00
We will lose to the French,
181
465000
2000
08:02
we will lose to the Swedes, we'll lose to the Japanese."
182
467000
3000
08:05
And therefore, there was a indeed a prisoner's dilemma,
183
470000
3000
08:08
which made it very difficult
184
473000
2000
08:10
for an individual company,
185
475000
2000
08:12
an individual exporting country
186
477000
3000
08:15
to say, "We are not going to
187
480000
2000
08:17
continue this deadly, disastrous
188
482000
3000
08:20
habit of large companies to bribe."
189
485000
4000
08:24
So this is what I mean
190
489000
2000
08:26
with a failing governance structure,
191
491000
3000
08:29
because even the powerful government,
192
494000
2000
08:31
which we have in Germany, comparatively,
193
496000
3000
08:34
was not able to say,
194
499000
2000
08:36
"We will not allow our companies to bribe abroad."
195
501000
3000
08:39
They needed help,
196
504000
2000
08:41
and the large companies themselves
197
506000
2000
08:43
have this dilemma.
198
508000
2000
08:45
Many of them didn't want to bribe.
199
510000
2000
08:47
Many of the German companies, for instance,
200
512000
2000
08:49
believe that they are really
201
514000
2000
08:51
producing a high-quality product
202
516000
2000
08:53
at a good price, so they are very competitive.
203
518000
3000
08:56
They are not as good at bribing
204
521000
3000
08:59
as many of their international competitors are,
205
524000
2000
09:01
but they were not allowed
206
526000
2000
09:03
to show their strengths,
207
528000
2000
09:05
because the world was eaten up
208
530000
3000
09:08
by grand corruption.
209
533000
2000
09:10
And this is why I'm telling you this:
210
535000
4000
09:14
Civil society rose to the occasion.
211
539000
4000
09:18
We had this small NGO,
212
543000
2000
09:20
Transparency International.
213
545000
2000
09:22
They began to think of
214
547000
2000
09:24
an escape route from this prisoner's dilemma,
215
549000
3000
09:27
and we developed concepts
216
552000
4000
09:31
of collective action,
217
556000
2000
09:33
basically trying to bring various competitors
218
558000
2000
09:35
together around the table,
219
560000
2000
09:37
explaining to all of them
220
562000
2000
09:39
how much it would be in their interests
221
564000
2000
09:41
if they simultaneously would stop bribing,
222
566000
2000
09:43
and to make a long story short,
223
568000
3000
09:46
we managed to eventually
224
571000
2000
09:48
get Germany to sign
225
573000
2000
09:50
together with the other OECD countries
226
575000
2000
09:52
and a few other exporters.
227
577000
2000
09:54
In 1997, a convention,
228
579000
3000
09:57
under the auspices of the OECD,
229
582000
2000
09:59
which obliged everybody
230
584000
2000
10:01
to change their laws
231
586000
2000
10:03
and criminalize foreign bribery.
232
588000
2000
10:05
(Applause)
233
590000
4000
10:09
Well, thank you. I mean, it's interesting,
234
594000
2000
10:11
in doing this,
235
596000
2000
10:13
we had to sit together with the companies.
236
598000
3000
10:16
We had here in Berlin, at the Aspen Institute on the Wannsee,
237
601000
3000
10:19
we had sessions with about
238
604000
2000
10:21
20 captains of industry,
239
606000
2000
10:23
and we discussed with them
240
608000
2000
10:25
what to do about international bribery.
241
610000
2000
10:27
In the first session -- we had three sessions
242
612000
2000
10:29
over the course of two years.
243
614000
2000
10:31
And President von Weizsäcker, by the way,
244
616000
3000
10:34
chaired one of the sessions, the first one,
245
619000
2000
10:36
to take the fear away
246
621000
2000
10:38
from the entrepreneurs,
247
623000
3000
10:41
who were not used to deal
248
626000
2000
10:43
with non-governmental organizations.
249
628000
2000
10:45
And in the first session, they all said,
250
630000
3000
10:48
"This is not bribery, what we are doing." This is customary there.
251
633000
3000
10:51
This is what these other cultures demand.
252
636000
3000
10:54
They even applaud it.
253
639000
2000
10:56
In fact, [unclear]
254
641000
2000
10:58
still says this today.
255
643000
2000
11:00
And so there are still a lot of people
256
645000
2000
11:02
who are not convinced that you have to stop bribing.
257
647000
3000
11:05
But in the second session,
258
650000
2000
11:07
they admitted already that they would never do this,
259
652000
2000
11:09
what they are doing in these other countries,
260
654000
3000
11:12
here in Germany, or in the U.K., and so on.
261
657000
2000
11:14
Cabinet ministers would admit this.
262
659000
3000
11:17
And in the final session, at the Aspen Institute,
263
662000
3000
11:20
we had them all sign an open letter
264
665000
3000
11:23
to the Kohl government, at the time,
265
668000
2000
11:25
requesting that they
266
670000
2000
11:27
participate in the OECD convention.
267
672000
2000
11:29
And this is, in my opinion,
268
674000
3000
11:32
an example of soft power,
269
677000
2000
11:34
because we were able to convince them
270
679000
2000
11:36
that they had to go with us.
271
681000
2000
11:38
We had a longer-term time perspective.
272
683000
3000
11:41
We had a broader,
273
686000
2000
11:43
geographically much wider,
274
688000
2000
11:45
constituency we were trying to defend.
275
690000
2000
11:47
And that's why the law has changed.
276
692000
2000
11:49
That's why Siemens is now in the trouble they are in
277
694000
3000
11:52
and that's why MIN is in the trouble they are in.
278
697000
3000
11:55
In some other countries, the OECD convention
279
700000
3000
11:58
is not yet properly enforced.
280
703000
2000
12:00
And, again, civil societies
281
705000
2000
12:02
breathing down the neck of the establishment.
282
707000
3000
12:05
In London, for instance,
283
710000
2000
12:07
where the BAE got away
284
712000
2000
12:09
with a huge corruption case,
285
714000
2000
12:11
which the Serious Fraud Office tried to prosecute,
286
716000
4000
12:15
100 million British pounds,
287
720000
2000
12:17
every year for ten years,
288
722000
2000
12:19
to one particular official of one particular friendly country,
289
724000
3000
12:22
who then bought for
290
727000
2000
12:24
44 billion pounds of military equipment.
291
729000
4000
12:28
This case, they are not prosecuting in the UK.
292
733000
2000
12:30
Why? Because they consider this
293
735000
2000
12:32
as contrary to the security interest
294
737000
3000
12:35
of the people of Great Britain.
295
740000
2000
12:37
Civil society is pushing, civil society
296
742000
2000
12:39
is trying to get a solution to this problem,
297
744000
3000
12:42
also in the U.K.,
298
747000
2000
12:44
and also in Japan, which is not properly enforcing,
299
749000
2000
12:46
and so on.
300
751000
2000
12:48
In Germany, we are pushing
301
753000
2000
12:50
the ratification of the UN convention,
302
755000
2000
12:52
which is a subsequent convention.
303
757000
2000
12:54
We are, Germany, is not ratifying.
304
759000
2000
12:56
Why? Because it would make it necessary
305
761000
3000
12:59
to criminalize the corruption
306
764000
3000
13:02
of deputies.
307
767000
2000
13:04
In Germany, we have a system where
308
769000
2000
13:06
you are not allowed to bribe a civil servant,
309
771000
3000
13:09
but you are allowed to bribe a deputy.
310
774000
3000
13:12
This is, under German law, allowed,
311
777000
3000
13:15
and the members of our parliament don't want to change this,
312
780000
2000
13:17
and this is why they can't sign
313
782000
2000
13:19
the U.N. convention against foreign bribery --
314
784000
3000
13:22
one of they very, very few countries
315
787000
2000
13:24
which is preaching honesty and good governance everywhere in the world,
316
789000
3000
13:27
but not able to ratify the convention,
317
792000
2000
13:29
which we managed to get on the books
318
794000
3000
13:32
with about 160 countries all over the world.
319
797000
3000
13:35
I see my time is ticking.
320
800000
2000
13:37
Let me just try to
321
802000
2000
13:39
draw some conclusions from what has happened.
322
804000
3000
13:42
I believe that what we managed to achieve
323
807000
4000
13:46
in fighting corruption,
324
811000
3000
13:49
one can also achieve
325
814000
2000
13:51
in other areas of failing governance.
326
816000
2000
13:53
By now, the United Nations
327
818000
2000
13:55
is totally on our side.
328
820000
2000
13:57
The World Bank has turned from Saulus to Paulus; under Wolfensohn,
329
822000
4000
14:01
they became, I would say, the strongest
330
826000
3000
14:04
anti-corruption agency in the world.
331
829000
2000
14:06
Most of the large companies
332
831000
2000
14:08
are now totally convinced
333
833000
2000
14:10
that they have to put in place
334
835000
2000
14:12
very strong policies
335
837000
2000
14:14
against bribery and so on.
336
839000
2000
14:16
And this is possible because civil society
337
841000
3000
14:19
joined the companies
338
844000
2000
14:21
and joined the government
339
846000
2000
14:23
in the analysis of the problem,
340
848000
2000
14:25
in the development of remedies,
341
850000
2000
14:27
in the implementation of reforms,
342
852000
3000
14:30
and then later, in the monitoring of reforms.
343
855000
3000
14:33
Of course, if civil society organizations
344
858000
3000
14:36
want to play that role,
345
861000
2000
14:38
they have to grow into this responsibility.
346
863000
4000
14:42
Not all civil society organizations are good.
347
867000
3000
14:45
The Ku Klux Klan is an NGO.
348
870000
3000
14:48
So, we must be aware
349
873000
2000
14:50
that civil society
350
875000
2000
14:52
has to shape up itself.
351
877000
2000
14:54
They have to have a much more
352
879000
2000
14:56
transparent financial governance.
353
881000
2000
14:58
They have to have a much more participatory governance
354
883000
3000
15:01
in many civil society organizations.
355
886000
3000
15:04
We also need much more competence of civil society leaders.
356
889000
3000
15:07
This is why we have set up the governance school
357
892000
3000
15:10
and the Center for Civil Society here in Berlin,
358
895000
2000
15:12
because we believe most of our educational
359
897000
3000
15:15
and research institutions in Germany
360
900000
2000
15:17
and continental Europe in general,
361
902000
2000
15:19
do not focus enough, yet,
362
904000
2000
15:21
on empowering civil society
363
906000
2000
15:23
and training the leadership of civil society.
364
908000
3000
15:26
But what I'm saying from my very practical experience:
365
911000
3000
15:29
If civil society does it right
366
914000
3000
15:32
and joins the other actors --
367
917000
3000
15:35
in particular, governments,
368
920000
2000
15:37
governments and their international institutions,
369
922000
3000
15:40
but also large international actors,
370
925000
3000
15:43
in particular those which have committed themselves
371
928000
2000
15:45
to corporate social responsibility --
372
930000
2000
15:47
then in this magical triangle
373
932000
3000
15:50
between civil society,
374
935000
2000
15:52
government and private sector,
375
937000
2000
15:54
there is a tremendous chance
376
939000
2000
15:56
for all of us to create a better world.
377
941000
4000
16:00
Thank you.
378
945000
2000
16:02
(Applause)
379
947000
2000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Peter Eigen - Founder, Transparency InternationalAs a director of the World Bank in Nairobi, Peter Eigen saw firsthand how devastating corruption can be. He's founder of Transparency International, an NGO that works to persuade international companies not to bribe.
Why you should listen
From the website of Transparency International comes this elegant definition: What is corruption? Corruption is the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. It hurts everyone whose life, livelihood or happiness depends on the integrity of people in a position of authority.
Peter Eigen knows this. He worked in economic development for 25 years, mainly as a World Bank manager of programs in Africa and Latin America. Among his assignments, he served as director of the regional mission for Eastern Africa from 1988 to 1991. Stunned by the depth and pervasiveness -- and sheer destructiveness -- of the corruption he encountered, he formed the group Transparency International to take on some of the main players in deals with corrupt officials: multinational corporations.
Eigen believes that the best way to root out corruption is to make it known. Thus, Transparency International works to raises awareness of corruption, and takes practical action to address it, including public hearings.
Peter Eigen | Speaker | TED.com