ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Annette Heuser - Rating agency reformer
Annette Heuser proposes critical reforms to loosen the iron grip of rating agencies on national credit scores.

Why you should listen

Credit rating agencies, with their power to downgrade credit ratings for entire nations, have come under intense scrutiny and recent events have put their acceptance and transparency into question. What if there was an alternative, free from the limitations and weakened legitimacy that encumbers the big three agencies?

Annette Heuser, executive director of the Washington branch of the German Bertelsmann Foundation, has created a blueprint for a new, non-profit solution to loosen the agencies’ iron grip. The International Nonprofit Credit Rating Agency (INCRA) would conduct unsolicited foreign-risk assessments, redefining sovereign ratings as a public good, and could dramatically shift the financial futures of the world.

More profile about the speaker
Annette Heuser | Speaker | TED.com
TEDGlobal 2013

Annette Heuser: The 3 agencies with the power to make or break economies

Filmed:
1,237,713 views

The way we rate national economies is all wrong, says rating agency reformer Annette Heuser. With mysterious and obscure methods, three private US-based credit rating agencies wield immense power over national economies across the globe, and the outcomes can be catastrophic. But what if there was another way? In this bold talk, Heuser shares her vision for a nonprofit agency that would bring more equality and justice into the mix.
- Rating agency reformer
Annette Heuser proposes critical reforms to loosen the iron grip of rating agencies on national credit scores. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:12
Almost two years ago,
0
577
1855
00:14
I was driving in my car in Germany,
1
2432
2391
00:16
and I turned on the radio.
2
4823
2516
00:19
Europe at the time was in the middle
3
7339
2207
00:21
of the Euro crisis,
4
9546
1443
00:22
and all the headlines were about European countries
5
10989
4246
00:27
getting downgraded by rating agencies
6
15235
2841
00:30
in the United States.
7
18076
1854
00:31
I listened and thought to myself,
8
19930
2109
00:34
"What are these rating agencies,
9
22039
2072
00:36
and why is everybody so upset about their work?"
10
24111
3453
00:39
Well, if you were sitting
11
27564
2052
00:41
next to me in the car that day
12
29616
1761
00:43
and would have told me that I would devote
13
31377
2562
00:45
the next years to trying to reform them,
14
33939
3244
00:49
obviously I would have called you crazy.
15
37183
3948
00:53
But guess what's really crazy:
16
41131
1902
00:55
the way these rating agencies are run.
17
43033
3029
00:58
And I would like to explain to you
18
46062
1643
00:59
not only why it's time to change this,
19
47705
2101
01:01
but also how we can do it.
20
49806
3178
01:04
So let me tell you a little bit
21
52984
1654
01:06
about what rating agencies really do.
22
54638
3578
01:10
As you would read a car magazine
23
58216
2384
01:12
before purchasing a new car
24
60600
1802
01:14
or taking a look at a product review
25
62402
2092
01:16
before deciding which kind of tablet or phone to get,
26
64494
3877
01:20
investors are reading ratings
27
68371
2200
01:22
before they decide in which kind of product
28
70571
3313
01:25
they are investing their money.
29
73884
2088
01:27
A rating can range from a so-called AAA,
30
75972
2811
01:30
which means it's a top-performing product,
31
78783
2943
01:33
and it can go down to the level
32
81726
2527
01:36
of the so-called BBB-,
33
84253
3014
01:39
which means it's a fairly risky investment.
34
87267
3425
01:42
Rating agencies are rating companies.
35
90692
2561
01:45
They are rating banks.
36
93253
1250
01:46
They are rating even financial products
37
94503
2364
01:48
like the infamous mortgage-backed securities.
38
96867
3075
01:51
But they can also rate countries,
39
99942
2077
01:54
and these ratings are called sovereign ratings,
40
102019
2748
01:56
and I would like to focus in particular
41
104767
2357
01:59
on these sovereign ratings.
42
107124
2626
02:01
And I can tell, as you're listening to me right now,
43
109750
2406
02:04
you're thinking,
44
112156
1459
02:05
so why should I really care about this, right?
45
113615
2608
02:08
Be honest.
46
116223
1585
02:09
Well, ratings affect you.
47
117808
2289
02:12
They affect all of us.
48
120097
2162
02:14
If a rating agency rates a country,
49
122259
3305
02:17
it basically assesses and evaluates
50
125564
3275
02:20
a country's debt
51
128839
1401
02:22
and the ability and willingness of a country
52
130240
2349
02:24
to repay its debt.
53
132589
2341
02:26
So if a country gets downgraded by a rating agency,
54
134930
2933
02:29
the country has to pay more
55
137863
2077
02:31
in order to borrow money
56
139940
1607
02:33
on the international markets.
57
141547
1561
02:35
So it affects you as a citizen and as a taxpayer,
58
143108
2801
02:37
because you and your fellow countrymen
59
145909
2363
02:40
have to pony up more in order to borrow.
60
148272
3790
02:44
But what if a country can't afford to pay more
61
152062
2816
02:46
because it's maybe too expensive?
62
154878
2837
02:49
Well, then the country has less available
63
157715
2935
02:52
for other services, like roads, schools, healthcare.
64
160650
3662
02:56
And this is the reason why you should care,
65
164312
2439
02:58
because sovereign ratings affect everyone.
66
166751
3046
03:01
And that is the reason why I believe
67
169797
1661
03:03
they should be defined as public goods.
68
171458
2956
03:06
They should be transparent, accessible,
69
174414
2811
03:09
and available to everyone at no cost.
70
177226
4581
03:13
But here's the situation:
71
181807
2046
03:15
the rating agency market is dominated
72
183853
2144
03:17
by three players and three players only --
73
185997
2973
03:20
Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch --
74
188970
2779
03:23
and we know whenever there
is a market concentration,
75
191749
2957
03:26
there is really no competition.
76
194706
1799
03:28
There is no incentive to improve
77
196505
2277
03:30
the quality of your product.
78
198782
2317
03:33
And let's face it, the credit rating
agencies have contributed,
79
201099
4249
03:37
putting the global economy on the brink,
80
205348
2845
03:40
and yet they have to change the way they operate.
81
208193
3785
03:43
The second point,
82
211978
1873
03:45
would you really buy a car
83
213851
2022
03:47
just based on the advice of the dealer?
84
215873
3486
03:51
Obviously not, right? That would be irresponsible.
85
219359
3013
03:54
But that's actually what's going on
86
222372
2593
03:56
in the rating agency sector every single day.
87
224965
3878
04:00
The customers of these rating agencies,
88
228843
2749
04:03
like countries or companies,
89
231592
2487
04:06
they are paying for their own ratings,
90
234079
2426
04:08
and obviously this is creating
91
236505
1998
04:10
a conflict of interest.
92
238503
2871
04:13
The third point is,
93
241374
2516
04:15
the rating agencies are not really telling us
94
243890
2915
04:18
how they are coming up with their ratings,
95
246805
2638
04:21
but in this day and age,
96
249443
1840
04:23
you can't even sell a candy bar
97
251283
1876
04:25
without listing everything that's inside.
98
253159
3048
04:28
But for ratings, a crucial element of our economy,
99
256207
3684
04:31
we really do not know
100
259891
1669
04:33
what all the different ingredients are.
101
261560
2482
04:36
We are allowing the rating agencies
102
264042
1946
04:37
to be intransparent about their work,
103
265988
2702
04:40
and we need to change this.
104
268690
2062
04:42
I think there is no doubt that the sector
105
270752
2480
04:45
needs a complete overhaul,
106
273232
1717
04:46
not just a trimming at the margins.
107
274949
2510
04:49
I think it's time for a bold move.
108
277459
2223
04:51
I think it's time to upgrade the system.
109
279682
3116
04:54
And this is why we at the Bertelsmann Foundation
110
282798
2562
04:57
have invested a lot of time and effort
111
285360
2822
05:00
thinking about an alternative for the sector.
112
288182
3731
05:03
And we have developed the first model
113
291913
2599
05:06
for a nonprofit rating agency for sovereign risk,
114
294512
5158
05:11
and we call it by its acronym, INCRA.
115
299670
4456
05:16
INCRA would make a difference
116
304126
1398
05:17
to the current system
117
305524
2427
05:19
by adding another nonprofit player to the mix.
118
307951
4202
05:24
It would be based on a nonprofit model
119
312153
3449
05:27
that would be based on a sustainable endowment.
120
315602
3644
05:31
The endowment would create income
121
319246
2124
05:33
that would allow us to run the operation,
122
321370
2417
05:35
to run the rating agency,
123
323787
1702
05:37
and it would also allow us
124
325489
2050
05:39
to make our ratings publicly available.
125
327539
3685
05:43
But this is not enough to make a difference, right?
126
331224
2703
05:45
INCRA would also be based on
127
333927
1873
05:47
a very, very clear governance structure
128
335800
2578
05:50
that would avoid any conflict of interest,
129
338378
2922
05:53
and it would include many stakeholders from society.
130
341300
4869
05:58
INCRA would not only be a European
131
346169
2549
06:00
or an American rating agency,
132
348718
2131
06:02
it would be a truly international one,
133
350849
2364
06:05
in which, in particular, the emerging economies
134
353213
3117
06:08
would have an equal interest,
voice and representation.
135
356330
5124
06:13
The second big difference that INCRA would make is
136
361454
3430
06:16
that would it base its sovereign risk assessment
137
364884
2978
06:19
on a broader set of indicators.
138
367862
2696
06:22
Think about it that way.
139
370558
1901
06:24
If we conduct a sovereign rating,
140
372459
1844
06:26
we basically take a look at
141
374303
1617
06:27
the economic soil of a country,
142
375920
2667
06:30
its macroeconomic fundamentals.
143
378587
2585
06:33
But we also have to ask the question,
144
381172
2178
06:35
who is cultivating the economic soil
145
383350
2901
06:38
of a country, right?
146
386266
1920
06:40
Well, a country has many gardeners,
147
388186
2160
06:42
and one of them is the government,
148
390346
1818
06:44
so we have to ask the question,
149
392164
2045
06:46
how is a country governed?
150
394209
1314
06:47
How is it managed?
151
395523
1586
06:49
And this is the reason why we have developed
152
397109
2170
06:51
what we call forward-looking indicators.
153
399279
3091
06:54
These are indicators that give you
154
402370
1667
06:56
a much better read about
155
404037
1507
06:57
the socioeconomic development of a country.
156
405544
3551
07:01
I hope you would agree it's important for you to know
157
409095
2758
07:03
if your government is willing to invest
in renewable energy and education.
158
411853
7168
07:11
It's important for you to know
159
419034
1725
07:12
if the government of your country
160
420759
2003
07:14
is able to manage a crisis,
161
422762
1962
07:16
if the government is finally able to implement
162
424724
2981
07:19
the reforms that it's promised.
163
427705
3728
07:23
For example, if INCRA would rate
164
431433
1867
07:25
South Africa right now,
165
433300
1954
07:27
of course we would take a very, very close look
166
435254
3457
07:30
at the youth unemployment of the country,
167
438711
2300
07:33
the highest in the world.
168
441011
2538
07:35
If over 70 percent of a country's population
169
443549
3444
07:38
under the age of 35 is unemployed,
170
446993
3591
07:42
of course this has a huge impact on the economy
171
450584
3096
07:45
today and even more so in the future.
172
453680
4294
07:49
Well, our friends at Moody's,
173
457974
2275
07:52
Standard & Poor's, and Fitch will tell us
174
460249
2323
07:54
we would take this into account as well.
175
462572
3033
07:57
But guess what? We do not know
176
465605
1949
07:59
exactly how they will take this into account.
177
467554
3017
08:02
And this leads me to the third big difference
178
470571
2351
08:04
that INCRA would make.
179
472922
1704
08:06
INCRA would not only release its ratings
180
474626
2794
08:09
but it would also release its indicators
181
477420
2971
08:12
and methodology.
182
480391
1662
08:14
So in contrast to the current system,
183
482053
2563
08:16
INCRA would be fully transparent.
184
484616
3515
08:20
So in a nutshell,
185
488131
1839
08:21
INCRA would offer an alternative
186
489970
2202
08:24
to the current system of
the big three rating agencies
187
492172
3426
08:27
by adding a new, nonprofit player to the mix
188
495598
3965
08:31
that would increase the competition,
189
499563
2404
08:33
it would increase the transparency of the sector,
190
501967
2563
08:36
and it would also increase the quality.
191
504530
2805
08:39
I can tell that sovereign ratings
192
507335
1968
08:41
may still look to you like this very small piece
193
509303
3224
08:44
of this very complex global financial world,
194
512527
4275
08:48
but I tell you it's a very important one,
195
516802
2440
08:51
and a very important one to fix,
196
519242
2442
08:53
because sovereign ratings affect all of us,
197
521684
3143
08:56
and they should be addressed and should be defined
198
524827
3538
09:00
as public goods.
199
528365
1460
09:01
And this is why we are testing our model right now,
200
529825
2884
09:04
and why we are trying to find out if it can
201
532709
2927
09:07
bring together a group of able and willing actors
202
535636
3203
09:10
to bring INCRA to life.
203
538839
2650
09:13
I truly believe building up INCRA
204
541489
2611
09:16
is in everyone's interest,
205
544100
2391
09:18
and that we have the unique opportunity right now
206
546491
3570
09:22
to turn INCRA into a cornerstone
207
550061
2569
09:24
of a new, more inclusive financial system.
208
552630
4395
09:29
Because for way too long,
209
557025
2568
09:31
we have left the big financial players on their own.
210
559593
3692
09:35
It's time to give them some company.
211
563285
2796
09:38
Thank you.
212
566081
2034
09:40
(Applause)
213
568115
4000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Annette Heuser - Rating agency reformer
Annette Heuser proposes critical reforms to loosen the iron grip of rating agencies on national credit scores.

Why you should listen

Credit rating agencies, with their power to downgrade credit ratings for entire nations, have come under intense scrutiny and recent events have put their acceptance and transparency into question. What if there was an alternative, free from the limitations and weakened legitimacy that encumbers the big three agencies?

Annette Heuser, executive director of the Washington branch of the German Bertelsmann Foundation, has created a blueprint for a new, non-profit solution to loosen the agencies’ iron grip. The International Nonprofit Credit Rating Agency (INCRA) would conduct unsolicited foreign-risk assessments, redefining sovereign ratings as a public good, and could dramatically shift the financial futures of the world.

More profile about the speaker
Annette Heuser | Speaker | TED.com

Data provided by TED.

This site was created in May 2015 and the last update was on January 12, 2020. It will no longer be updated.

We are currently creating a new site called "eng.lish.video" and would be grateful if you could access it.

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to write comments in your language on the contact form.

Privacy Policy

Developer's Blog

Buy Me A Coffee