TED2013
Dan Pallotta: The way we think about charity is dead wrong
Filmed:
Readability: 4.3
4,867,243 views
Activist and fundraiser Dan Pallotta calls out the double standard that drives our broken relationship to charities. Too many nonprofits, he says, are rewarded for how little they spend -- not for what they get done. Instead of equating frugality with morality, he asks us to start rewarding charities for their big goals and big accomplishments (even if that comes with big expenses). In this bold talk, he says: Let's change the way we think about changing the world.
Dan Pallotta - Author, speaker, reformer
We dream boldly in the dimension of our doing, but set the bar no higher than stability in our emotional lives. It’s time to dream in multiple dimensions at the same time, says AIDSRide Founder Dan Pallotta. He aims to transform the way society thinks about giving, and being. Full bio
We dream boldly in the dimension of our doing, but set the bar no higher than stability in our emotional lives. It’s time to dream in multiple dimensions at the same time, says AIDSRide Founder Dan Pallotta. He aims to transform the way society thinks about giving, and being. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:16
I want to talk about social innovation
0
989
3272
00:20
and social entrepreneurship.
1
4261
3348
00:23
I happen to have triplets.
2
7609
3164
00:26
They're little. They're five years old.
3
10773
2345
00:29
Sometimes I tell people I have triplets.
4
13118
1069
00:30
They say, "Really? How many?"
5
14187
3321
00:33
Here's a picture of the kids.
6
17508
1444
00:34
That's Sage and Annalisa and Rider.
7
18952
4045
00:38
Now, I also happen to be gay.
8
22997
4906
00:43
Being gay and fathering triplets is by far
9
27903
2490
00:46
the most socially innovative, socially entrepreneurial thing
10
30393
2576
00:48
I have ever done.
11
32969
2328
00:51
(Laughter) (Applause)
12
35297
4474
00:55
The real social innovation I want to talk about
13
39771
3038
00:58
involves charity.
14
42809
1492
01:00
I want to talk about how the things we've been taught to think
15
44301
3004
01:03
about giving and about charity
16
47305
2293
01:05
and about the nonprofit sector
17
49598
1960
01:07
are actually undermining the causes we love
18
51558
3664
01:11
and our profound yearning to change the world.
19
55222
4004
01:15
But before I do that, I want to ask if we even believe
20
59226
2413
01:17
that the nonprofit sector has any serious role to play
21
61639
3145
01:20
in changing the world.
22
64784
2383
01:23
A lot of people say now that business will lift up the developing economies,
23
67167
3458
01:26
and social business will take care of the rest.
24
70625
3039
01:29
And I do believe that business will move
25
73664
2438
01:32
the great mass of humanity forward.
26
76102
3161
01:35
But it always leaves behind that 10 percent or more
27
79263
4135
01:39
that is most disadvantaged or unlucky.
28
83398
4472
01:43
And social business needs markets,
29
87870
1529
01:45
and there are some issues for which you just can't develop
30
89399
2402
01:47
the kind of money measures that you need for a market.
31
91801
3333
01:51
I sit on the board of a center for the developmentally disabled,
32
95134
3341
01:54
and these people want laughter
33
98475
2235
01:56
and compassion and they want love.
34
100710
4058
02:00
How do you monetize that?
35
104768
3546
02:04
And that's where the nonprofit sector
36
108314
2246
02:06
and philanthropy come in.
37
110560
2344
02:08
Philanthropy is the market for love.
38
112904
3691
02:12
It is the market for all those people
39
116595
2421
02:14
for whom there is no other market coming.
40
119016
2840
02:17
And so if we really want, like Buckminster Fuller said,
41
121856
2731
02:20
a world that works for everyone,
42
124587
2389
02:22
with no one and nothing left out,
43
126976
2504
02:25
then the nonprofit sector has to be
44
129480
2162
02:27
a serious part of the conversation.
45
131642
2542
02:30
But it doesn't seem to be working.
46
134184
2704
02:32
Why have our breast cancer charities
47
136888
1629
02:34
not come close to finding a cure for breast cancer,
48
138517
2727
02:37
or our homeless charities not come close
49
141244
2068
02:39
to ending homelessness in any major city?
50
143312
2929
02:42
Why has poverty remained stuck at 12 percent
51
146241
3351
02:45
of the U.S. population for 40 years?
52
149592
3886
02:49
And the answer is, these social problems
53
153478
3122
02:52
are massive in scale,
54
156600
2214
02:54
our organizations are tiny up against them,
55
158814
2888
02:57
and we have a belief system that keeps them tiny.
56
161702
3563
03:01
We have two rulebooks.
57
165265
1320
03:02
We have one for the nonprofit sector
58
166585
1946
03:04
and one for the rest of the economic world.
59
168531
3015
03:07
It's an apartheid, and it discriminates
60
171546
2468
03:09
against the [nonprofit] sector in five different areas,
61
174014
2944
03:12
the first being compensation.
62
176958
2392
03:15
So in the for-profit sector, the more value you produce,
63
179350
2912
03:18
the more money you can make.
64
182262
1891
03:20
But we don't like nonprofits to use money
65
184153
1952
03:22
to incentivize people to produce more in social service.
66
186105
3870
03:25
We have a visceral reaction to the idea that anyone
67
189975
2800
03:28
would make very much money helping other people.
68
192775
3407
03:32
Interesting that we don't have a visceral reaction
69
196182
2003
03:34
to the notion that people would make a lot of money not helping other people.
70
198185
3759
03:37
You know, you want to make 50 million dollars
71
201944
2276
03:40
selling violent video games to kids, go for it.
72
204220
2330
03:42
We'll put you on the cover of Wired magazine.
73
206550
1988
03:44
But you want to make half a million dollars
74
208538
2007
03:46
trying to cure kids of malaria,
75
210545
1359
03:47
and you're considered a parasite yourself. (Applause)
76
211904
7917
03:55
And we think of this as our system of ethics,
77
219821
2960
03:58
but what we don't realize is that this system
78
222781
2137
04:00
has a powerful side effect, which is,
79
224918
3104
04:03
it gives a really stark, mutually exclusive choice
80
228022
3635
04:07
between doing very well for yourself and your family
81
231657
3372
04:10
or doing good for the world
82
235029
2673
04:13
to the brightest minds coming out of our best universities,
83
237702
2952
04:16
and sends tens of thousands of people
84
240654
2077
04:18
who could make a huge difference in the nonprofit sector
85
242731
2595
04:21
marching every year directly into the for-profit sector
86
245326
2647
04:23
because they're not willing to make that kind of lifelong economic sacrifice.
87
247973
4701
04:28
Businessweek did a survey, looked at the compensation packages
88
252674
3487
04:32
for MBAs 10 years of business school,
89
256161
3110
04:35
and the median compensation for a Stanford MBA,
90
259271
2893
04:38
with bonus, at the age of 38, was 400,000 dollars.
91
262164
4691
04:42
Meanwhile, for the same year, the average salary
92
266855
2048
04:44
for the CEO of a $5 million-plus medical charity in the U.S.
93
268903
3216
04:48
was 232,000 dollars, and for a hunger charity, 84,000 dollars.
94
272119
5318
04:53
Now, there's no way you're going to get a lot of people
95
277437
1864
04:55
with $400,000 talent to make a $316,000 sacrifice
96
279301
4202
04:59
every year to become the CEO of a hunger charity.
97
283503
4112
05:03
Some people say, "Well, that's just because those MBA types are greedy."
98
287615
3491
05:07
Not necessarily. They might be smart.
99
291106
2552
05:09
It's cheaper for that person to donate
100
293658
2384
05:11
100,000 dollars every year to the hunger charity,
101
296042
3688
05:15
save 50,000 dollars on their taxes,
102
299730
2084
05:17
so still be roughly 270,000 dollars a year ahead of the game,
103
301814
4319
05:22
now be called a philanthropist because they donated
104
306133
2615
05:24
100,000 dollars to charity,
105
308748
1839
05:26
probably sit on the board of the hunger charity,
106
310587
2025
05:28
indeed, probably supervise the poor SOB
107
312612
2177
05:30
who decided to become the CEO of the hunger charity,
108
314789
3514
05:34
and have a lifetime of this kind of power and influence
109
318303
3681
05:37
and popular praise still ahead of them.
110
321984
3634
05:41
The second area of discrimination is advertising and marketing.
111
325618
3710
05:45
So we tell the for-profit sector, "Spend, spend, spend on advertising
112
329328
3505
05:48
until the last dollar no longer produces a penny of value."
113
332833
3565
05:52
But we don't like to see our donations spent on advertising in charity.
114
336398
3539
05:55
Our attitude is, "Well, look, if you can get the advertising donated,
115
339937
3774
05:59
you know, at four o'clock in the morning, I'm okay with that.
116
343711
2806
06:02
But I don't want my donations spent on advertising.
117
346517
2551
06:04
I want it go to the needy."
118
349068
2248
06:07
As if the money invested in advertising
119
351316
1692
06:08
could not bring in dramatically greater sums of money
120
353008
2844
06:11
to serve the needy.
121
355852
1781
06:13
In the 1990s, my company created
122
357633
2335
06:15
the long distance AIDSRide bicycle journeys
123
359968
3104
06:18
and the 60-mile-long breast cancer three-day walks,
124
363072
4492
06:23
and over the course of nine years,
125
367564
3360
06:26
we had 182,000 ordinary heroes participate,
126
370924
5063
06:31
and they raised a total of 581 million dollars.
127
375987
4440
06:36
They raised more money more quickly for these causes
128
380427
4997
06:41
than any events in history,
129
385424
1814
06:43
all based on the idea that people are weary
130
387238
2818
06:45
of being asked to do the least they can possibly do.
131
390056
2826
06:48
People are yearning to measure
132
392882
2398
06:51
the full distance of their potential
133
395280
2192
06:53
on behalf of the causes that they care about deeply.
134
397472
3144
06:56
But they have to be asked.
135
400616
3176
06:59
We got that many people to participate
136
403792
1599
07:01
by buying full-page ads in The New York Times,
137
405391
2303
07:03
in The Boston Globe, in primetime radio and TV advertising.
138
407694
3429
07:07
Do you know how many people we would have gotten
139
411123
1802
07:08
if we put up flyers in the laundromat?
140
412925
3509
07:12
Charitable giving has remained stuck, in the U.S.,
141
416434
3202
07:15
at two percent of GDP ever since we started measuring it in the 1970s.
142
419636
4391
07:19
That's an important fact, because it tells us
143
424027
2300
07:22
that in 40 years, the nonprofit sector
144
426327
2504
07:24
has not been able to wrestle any market share
145
428831
3352
07:28
away from the for-profit sector.
146
432183
2712
07:30
And if you think about it, how could one sector
147
434895
2152
07:32
possibly take market share away from another sector
148
437047
3192
07:36
if it isn't really allowed to market?
149
440239
2985
07:39
And if we tell the consumer brands,
150
443224
1716
07:40
"You may advertise all the benefits of your product,"
151
444940
2819
07:43
but we tell charities, "You cannot advertise all the good that you do,"
152
447759
3174
07:46
where do we think the consumer dollars are going to flow?
153
450933
3626
07:50
The third area of discrimination is the taking of risk
154
454559
3297
07:53
in pursuit of new ideas for generating revenue.
155
457856
4272
07:58
So Disney can make a new $200 million movie that flops,
156
462128
3379
08:01
and nobody calls the attorney general.
157
465507
2848
08:04
But you do a little $1 million community fundraiser
158
468355
3320
08:07
for the poor, and it doesn't produce a 75 percent profit
159
471675
3108
08:10
to the cause in the first 12 months,
160
474783
1793
08:12
and your character is called into question.
161
476576
2820
08:15
So nonprofits are really reluctant to attempt any brave,
162
479396
2891
08:18
daring, giant-scale new fundraising endeavors
163
482287
3520
08:21
for fear that if the thing fails, their reputations
164
485807
1998
08:23
will be dragged through the mud.
165
487805
1905
08:25
Well, you and I know when you prohibit failure,
166
489710
1911
08:27
you kill innovation.
167
491621
1811
08:29
If you kill innovation in fundraising, you can't raise more revenue.
168
493432
2916
08:32
If you can't raise more revenue, you can't grow.
169
496348
2056
08:34
And if you can't grow, you can't possibly solve large social problems.
170
498404
4831
08:39
The fourth area is time.
171
503235
2709
08:41
So Amazon went for six years without returning any profit to investors,
172
505944
3979
08:45
and people had patience.
173
509923
1648
08:47
They knew that there was a long-term objective down the line
174
511571
2586
08:50
of building market dominance.
175
514157
1921
08:51
But if a nonprofit organization ever had a dream
176
516078
2826
08:54
of building magnificent scale that required that for six years,
177
518904
3875
08:58
no money was going to go to the needy,
178
522779
1880
09:00
it was all going to be invested in building this scale,
179
524659
2185
09:02
we would expect a crucifixion.
180
526844
3307
09:06
And the last area is profit itself.
181
530151
1921
09:07
So the for-profit sector can pay people profits
182
532072
2663
09:10
in order to attract their capital for their new ideas,
183
534735
2379
09:13
but you can't pay profits in a nonprofit sector,
184
537114
3357
09:16
so the for-profit sector has a lock on the multi-trillion-dollar capital markets,
185
540471
4501
09:20
and the nonprofit sector is starved for growth
186
544972
2376
09:23
and risk and idea capital.
187
547348
2968
09:26
Well, you put those five things together -- you can't use money
188
550316
3265
09:29
to lure talent away from the for-profit sector,
189
553581
2401
09:31
you can't advertise on anywhere near the scale
190
555982
1940
09:33
the for-profit sector does for new customers,
191
557922
2617
09:36
you can't take the kinds of risks in pursuit of those customers
192
560539
2769
09:39
that the for-profit sector takes,
193
563308
2140
09:41
you don't have the same amount of time to find them
194
565448
1756
09:43
as the for-profit sector,
195
567204
1418
09:44
and you don't have a stock market with which to fund any of this,
196
568622
2777
09:47
even if you could do it in the first place,
197
571399
2183
09:49
and you've just put the nonprofit sector
198
573582
1920
09:51
at an extreme disadvantage to the for-profit sector
199
575502
3155
09:54
on every level.
200
578657
2704
09:57
If we have any doubts about the effects of this separate rule book,
201
581361
3482
10:00
this statistic is sobering:
202
584843
1730
10:02
From 1970 to 2009,
203
586573
2590
10:05
the number of nonprofits that really grew,
204
589163
2271
10:07
that crossed the $50 million annual revenue barrier,
205
591434
3688
10:11
is 144.
206
595122
2152
10:13
In the same time, the number of for-profits that crossed it
207
597274
2205
10:15
is 46,136.
208
599479
3260
10:18
So we're dealing with social problems that are massive in scale,
209
602739
3432
10:22
and our organizations can't generate any scale.
210
606171
2442
10:24
All of the scale goes to Coca-Cola and Burger King.
211
608613
3975
10:28
So why do we think this way?
212
612588
2954
10:31
Well, like most fanatical dogma in America,
213
615542
4474
10:35
these ideas come from old Puritan beliefs.
214
620016
3119
10:39
The Puritans came here for religious reasons, or so they said,
215
623135
3350
10:42
but they also came here because they wanted to make a lot of money.
216
626485
3314
10:45
They were pious people but they were also
217
629799
2143
10:47
really aggressive capitalists,
218
631942
2457
10:50
and they were accused of extreme forms of profit-making tendencies
219
634399
3579
10:53
compared to the other colonists.
220
637978
2239
10:56
But at the same time, the Puritans were Calvinists,
221
640217
3056
10:59
so they were taught literally to hate themselves.
222
643273
2674
11:01
They were taught that self-interest was a raging sea
223
645947
3031
11:04
that was a sure path to eternal damnation.
224
648978
3361
11:08
Well, this created a real problem for these people, right?
225
652339
2272
11:10
Here they've come all the way across the Atlantic to make all this money.
226
654611
2736
11:13
Making all this money will get you sent directly to Hell.
227
657347
3756
11:17
What were they to do about this?
228
661103
1941
11:18
Well, charity became their answer.
229
663044
1952
11:20
It became this economic sanctuary
230
664996
2177
11:23
where they could do penance for their profit-making tendencies
231
667173
3429
11:26
at five cents on the dollar.
232
670602
3477
11:29
So of course, how could you make money in charity
233
674079
1757
11:31
if charity was your penance for making money?
234
675836
3117
11:34
Financial incentive was exiled from the realm of helping others
235
678953
4110
11:38
so that it could thrive in the area of making money for yourself,
236
683063
3096
11:42
and in 400 years, nothing has intervened
237
686159
3179
11:45
to say, "That's counterproductive and that's unfair."
238
689338
5277
11:50
Now this ideology gets policed by this one very dangerous question,
239
694615
4189
11:54
which is, "What percentage of my donation goes to the cause versus overhead?"
240
698804
4248
11:58
There are a lot of problems with this question.
241
703052
1881
12:00
I'm going to just focus on two.
242
704933
1847
12:02
First, it makes us think that overhead is a negative,
243
706780
4457
12:07
that it is somehow not part of the cause.
244
711237
3421
12:10
But it absolutely is, especially if it's being used for growth.
245
714658
4986
12:15
Now, this idea that overhead is somehow
246
719644
2761
12:18
an enemy of the cause
247
722405
1349
12:19
creates this second, much larger problem, which is,
248
723754
2938
12:22
it forces organizations to go without the overhead things
249
726692
3272
12:25
they really need to grow
250
729964
1780
12:27
in the interest of keeping overhead low.
251
731744
3150
12:30
So we've all been taught that charities should spend
252
734894
2215
12:33
as little as possible on overhead things like fundraising
253
737109
3146
12:36
under the theory that, well, the less money you spend on fundraising,
254
740255
3398
12:39
the more money there is available for the cause.
255
743653
3208
12:42
Well, that's true if it's a depressing world
256
746861
2841
12:45
in which this pie cannot be made any bigger.
257
749702
2945
12:48
But if it's a logical world in which investment in fundraising
258
752647
3862
12:52
actually raises more funds and makes the pie bigger,
259
756509
3298
12:55
then we have it precisely backwards,
260
759807
1970
12:57
and we should be investing more money, not less,
261
761777
2914
13:00
in fundraising, because fundraising is the one thing
262
764691
2374
13:02
that has the potential to multiply the amount of money
263
767065
2668
13:05
available for the cause that we care about so deeply.
264
769733
4497
13:10
I'll give you two examples. We launched the AIDSRides
265
774230
2386
13:12
with an initial investment of 50,000 dollars in risk capital.
266
776616
3809
13:16
Within nine years, we had multiplied that 1,982 times
267
780425
4724
13:21
into 108 million dollars after all expenses for AIDS services.
268
785149
5784
13:26
We launched the breast cancer three-days
269
790933
1811
13:28
with an initial investment of 350,000 dollars in risk capital.
270
792744
4105
13:32
Within just five years, we had multiplied that 554 times
271
796849
4341
13:37
into 194 million dollars after all expenses
272
801190
3605
13:40
for breast cancer research.
273
804795
1980
13:42
Now, if you were a philanthropist really interested in breast cancer,
274
806775
3252
13:45
what would make more sense:
275
810027
1346
13:47
go out and find the most innovative researcher in the world
276
811373
3900
13:51
and give her 350,000 dollars for research,
277
815273
3074
13:54
or give her fundraising department the 350,000 dollars
278
818347
3767
13:58
to multiply it into 194 million dollars for breast cancer research?
279
822114
5226
14:03
2002 was our most successful year ever.
280
827340
3225
14:06
We netted for breast cancer alone, that year alone,
281
830565
3442
14:09
71 million dollars after all expenses.
282
834007
3846
14:13
And then we went out of business,
283
837853
2344
14:16
suddenly and traumatically.
284
840197
3112
14:19
Why? Well, the short story is, our sponsor split on us.
285
843309
4703
14:23
They wanted to distance themselves from us
286
848012
1851
14:25
because we were being crucified in the media
287
849863
2971
14:28
for investing 40 percent of the gross in recruitment
288
852834
3210
14:31
and customer service and the magic of the experience
289
856044
3383
14:35
and there is no accounting terminology to describe
290
859427
3265
14:38
that kind of investment in growth and in the future,
291
862692
2802
14:41
other than this demonic label of overhead.
292
865494
4973
14:46
So on one day, all 350 of our great employees
293
870467
5356
14:51
lost their jobs
294
875823
4356
14:56
because they were labeled overhead.
295
880179
3639
14:59
Our sponsor went and tried the events on their own.
296
883818
2292
15:02
The overhead went up.
297
886110
1361
15:03
Net income for breast cancer research went down
298
887471
2517
15:05
by 84 percent, or 60 million dollars in one year.
299
889988
5996
15:11
This is what happens when we confuse
300
895984
2552
15:14
morality with frugality.
301
898536
4681
15:19
We've all been taught that the bake sale with five percent overhead
302
903217
3004
15:22
is morally superior to the professional fundraising enterprise with 40 percent overhead,
303
906221
4725
15:26
but we're missing the most important piece of information,
304
910946
2592
15:29
which is, what is the actual size of these pies?
305
913538
3969
15:33
Who cares if the bake sale only has five percent overhead if it's tiny?
306
917507
4806
15:38
What if the bake sale only netted 71 dollars for charity
307
922313
2856
15:41
because it made no investment in its scale
308
925169
2048
15:43
and the professional fundraising enterprise netted
309
927217
2251
15:45
71 million dollars because it did?
310
929468
2827
15:48
Now which pie would we prefer, and which pie
311
932295
2097
15:50
do we think people who are hungry would prefer?
312
934392
3855
15:54
Here's how all of this impacts the big picture.
313
938247
3744
15:57
I said that charitable giving is two percent of GDP in the United States.
314
941991
3336
16:01
That's about 300 billion dollars a year.
315
945327
2737
16:03
But only about 20 percent of that, or 60 billion dollars,
316
948064
3529
16:07
goes to health and human services causes.
317
951593
1951
16:09
The rest goes to religion and higher education and hospitals
318
953544
3676
16:13
and that 60 billion dollars is not nearly enough
319
957220
2922
16:16
to tackle these problems.
320
960142
2207
16:18
But if we could move charitable giving
321
962349
2144
16:20
from two percent of GDP up just one step
322
964493
5257
16:25
to three percent of GDP, by investing in that growth,
323
969750
3484
16:29
that would be an extra 150 billion dollars a year in contributions,
324
973234
3802
16:32
and if that money could go disproportionately
325
977036
2791
16:35
to health and human services charities,
326
979827
1700
16:37
because those were the ones we encouraged to invest in their growth,
327
981527
3181
16:40
that would represent a tripling of contributions to that sector.
328
984708
4605
16:45
Now we're talking scale.
329
989313
1363
16:46
Now we're talking the potential for real change.
330
990676
3603
16:50
But it's never going to happen by forcing
331
994279
2312
16:52
these organizations to lower their horizons
332
996591
2686
16:55
to the demoralizing objective of keeping their overhead low.
333
999277
5497
17:00
Our generation does not want its epitaph to read,
334
1004774
3523
17:04
"We kept charity overhead low."
335
1008297
2665
17:06
(Laughter) (Applause)
336
1010962
8086
17:14
We want it to read that we changed the world,
337
1019049
2230
17:17
and that part of the way we did that
338
1021279
1645
17:18
was by changing the way we think about these things.
339
1022924
3066
17:21
So the next time you're looking at a charity,
340
1025990
2045
17:23
don't ask about the rate of their overhead.
341
1028035
2241
17:26
Ask about the scale of their dreams,
342
1030276
2219
17:28
their Apple-, Google-, Amazon-scale dreams,
343
1032495
3911
17:32
how they measure their progress toward those dreams,
344
1036406
1899
17:34
and what resources they need to make them come true
345
1038305
2909
17:37
regardless of what the overhead is.
346
1041214
1850
17:38
Who cares what the overhead is if these problems are actually getting solved?
347
1043064
4818
17:43
If we can have that kind of generosity,
348
1047882
3449
17:47
a generosity of thought, then the non-profit sector can play
349
1051331
3720
17:50
a massive role in changing the world for all those citizens
350
1055051
4236
17:55
most desperately in need of it to change.
351
1059287
6134
18:01
And if that can be our generation's enduring legacy,
352
1065421
5064
18:06
that we took responsibility
353
1070485
2600
18:08
for the thinking that had been handed down to us,
354
1073085
2992
18:11
that we revisited it, we revised it,
355
1076077
2840
18:14
and we reinvented the whole way humanity thinks about changing things,
356
1078917
3799
18:18
forever, for everyone,
357
1082716
3601
18:22
well, I thought I would let the kids sum up what that would be.
358
1086317
4800
18:27
Annalisa Smith-Pallotta: That would be --
359
1091117
1420
18:28
Sage Smith-Pallotta: -- a real social --
360
1092537
2448
18:30
Rider Smith-Pallotta: -- innovation.
361
1094985
1901
18:32
Dan Pallotta: Thank you very much. Thank you.
362
1096886
3496
18:36
(Applause)
363
1100382
9136
18:45
Thank you. (Applause)
364
1109518
4000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Dan Pallotta - Author, speaker, reformerWe dream boldly in the dimension of our doing, but set the bar no higher than stability in our emotional lives. It’s time to dream in multiple dimensions at the same time, says AIDSRide Founder Dan Pallotta. He aims to transform the way society thinks about giving, and being.
Why you should listen
"The nonprofit sector is critical to our dream of changing the world. Yet there is no greater injustice than the double standard that exists between the for-profit and nonprofit sectors. One gets to feast on marketing, risk-taking, capital and financial incentive, the other is sentenced to begging,” Dan Pallotta says in discussing his book Charity Case. This economic starvation of our nonprofits is why he believes we are not moving the needle on great social problems. “My goal … is to fundamentally transform the way the public thinks about charity within 10 years.”
Pallotta is best known for creating the multi-day charitable event industry, and a new generation of philanthropists with the AIDS Rides and Breast Cancer 3-Day events, which raised $582 million in nine years. He is president of Advertising for Humanity, which helps foundations and philanthropists transform the growth potential of their favorite grantees. He is also the founder and President of the Charity Defense Council .
Dan Pallotta | Speaker | TED.com