TEDxHousesOfParliament
Onora O'Neill: What we don't understand about trust
Filmed:
Readability: 3.5
1,700,340 views
Trust is on the decline, and we need to rebuild it. That's a commonly heard suggestion for making a better world ... but, says philosopher Onora O'Neill, we don't really understand what we're suggesting. She flips the question, showing us that our three most common ideas about trust are actually misdirected.
Onora O'Neill - Philosopher
Baroness Onora O'Neill is a philosopher who focuses on international justice and the roles of trust and accountability in public life. Full bio
Baroness Onora O'Neill is a philosopher who focuses on international justice and the roles of trust and accountability in public life. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:12
So I'm going to talk about trust,
0
120
2095
00:14
and I'm going to start by reminding you
1
2215
2280
00:16
of the standard views that people have about trust.
2
4495
4081
00:20
I think these are so commonplace,
3
8576
2239
00:22
they've become clichés of our society.
4
10815
2288
00:25
And I think there are three.
5
13103
2026
00:27
One's a claim: there has been a great decline in trust,
6
15129
4832
00:31
very widely believed.
7
19961
1908
00:33
The second is an aim: we should have more trust.
8
21869
4507
00:38
And the third is a task: we should rebuild trust.
9
26376
5490
00:43
I think that the claim, the aim and the task
10
31866
4338
00:48
are all misconceived.
11
36204
2170
00:50
So what I'm going to try to tell you today
12
38374
1649
00:52
is a different story about a claim, an aim and a task
13
40023
4690
00:56
which I think give one quite a lot better purchase on the matter.
14
44713
4627
01:01
First the claim: Why do people think trust has declined?
15
49340
4766
01:06
And if I really think about it on the basis of my own evidence,
16
54106
3801
01:09
I don't know the answer.
17
57907
1774
01:11
I'm inclined to think it may have declined
18
59681
3809
01:15
in some activities or some institutions
19
63490
3506
01:18
and it might have grown in others.
20
66996
1804
01:20
I don't have an overview.
21
68800
1944
01:22
But, of course, I can look at the opinion polls,
22
70744
4337
01:27
and the opinion polls are supposedly
23
75081
2368
01:29
the source of a belief that trust has declined.
24
77449
3952
01:33
When you actually look at opinion polls across time,
25
81401
3857
01:37
there's not much evidence for that.
26
85258
1798
01:39
That's to say, the people who were mistrusted
27
87056
2590
01:41
20 years ago,
28
89646
1611
01:43
principally journalists and politicians, are still mistrusted.
29
91257
4553
01:47
And the people who were highly trusted 20 years ago
30
95810
3370
01:51
are still rather highly trusted: judges, nurses.
31
99180
3445
01:54
The rest of us are in between,
32
102625
1904
01:56
and by the way, the average person in the street
33
104529
3070
01:59
is almost exactly midway.
34
107599
2024
02:01
But is that good evidence?
35
109623
2233
02:03
What opinion polls record is, of course, opinions.
36
111856
4156
02:08
What else can they record?
37
116012
1567
02:09
So they're looking at the generic attitudes
38
117579
3541
02:13
that people report when you ask them certain questions.
39
121120
3539
02:16
Do you trust politicians? Do you trust teachers?
40
124659
3930
02:20
Now if somebody said to you, "Do you trust greengrocers?
41
128589
3632
02:24
Do you trust fishmongers?
42
132221
1897
02:26
Do you trust elementary school teachers?"
43
134118
2632
02:28
you would probably begin by saying, "To do what?"
44
136750
3591
02:32
And that would be a perfectly sensible response.
45
140341
3214
02:35
And you might say, when you understood the answer to that,
46
143555
5125
02:40
"Well, I trust some of them, but not others."
47
148680
3440
02:44
That's a perfectly rational thing.
48
152120
1918
02:46
In short, in our real lives,
49
154038
3122
02:49
we seek to place trust in a differentiated way.
50
157160
3650
02:52
We don't make an assumption that the level of trust
51
160810
3576
02:56
that we will have in every instance of a certain type
52
164386
3496
02:59
of official or office-holder or type of person
53
167882
3915
03:03
is going to be uniform.
54
171797
1945
03:05
I might, for example, say that I certainly trust
55
173742
3723
03:09
a certain elementary school teacher I know
56
177465
2445
03:11
to teach the reception class to read,
57
179910
2626
03:14
but in no way to drive the school minibus.
58
182536
3648
03:18
I might, after all, know that she wasn't a good driver.
59
186184
3101
03:21
I might trust my most loquacious friend
60
189285
3277
03:24
to keep a conversation going
61
192562
2092
03:26
but not -- but perhaps not to keep a secret.
62
194654
9659
03:36
Simple.
63
204313
1249
03:37
So if we've got those evidence in our ordinary lives
64
205562
4906
03:42
of the way that trust is differentiated,
65
210468
2116
03:44
why do we sort of drop all that intelligence
66
212584
3251
03:47
when we think about trust more abstractly?
67
215835
3623
03:51
I think the polls are very bad guides
68
219458
2744
03:54
to the level of trust that actually exists,
69
222202
3057
03:57
because they try to obliterate the good judgment
70
225259
3572
04:00
that goes into placing trust.
71
228831
3407
04:04
Secondly, what about the aim?
72
232238
2192
04:06
The aim is to have more trust.
73
234430
2620
04:09
Well frankly, I think that's a stupid aim.
74
237050
3329
04:12
It's not what I would aim at.
75
240379
1947
04:14
I would aim to have more trust in the trustworthy
76
242326
3463
04:17
but not in the untrustworthy.
77
245789
3017
04:20
In fact, I aim positively to try not to trust the untrustworthy.
78
248806
6542
04:27
And I think, of those people who, for example,
79
255348
3612
04:30
placed their savings with the very aptly named Mr. Madoff,
80
258960
4701
04:35
who then made off with them,
81
263661
2639
04:38
and I think of them, and I think, well, yes,
82
266300
2330
04:40
too much trust.
83
268630
1863
04:42
More trust is not an intelligent aim in this life.
84
270493
3857
04:46
Intelligently placed and intelligently refused trust
85
274350
3994
04:50
is the proper aim.
86
278344
2467
04:52
Well once one says that, one says, yeah, okay,
87
280811
3463
04:56
that means that what matters in the first place
88
284274
3144
04:59
is not trust but trustworthiness.
89
287418
3141
05:02
It's judging how trustworthy people are
90
290559
2918
05:05
in particular respects.
91
293477
1929
05:07
And I think that judgment requires us to look at three things.
92
295406
3348
05:10
Are they competent? Are they honest? Are they reliable?
93
298754
5212
05:15
And if we find that a person is competent
94
303966
2072
05:18
in the relevant matters,
95
306038
1736
05:19
and reliable and honest,
96
307774
1921
05:21
we'll have a pretty good reason to trust them,
97
309695
2294
05:23
because they'll be trustworthy.
98
311989
2211
05:26
But if, on the other hand, they're unreliable, we might not.
99
314200
3666
05:29
I have friends who are competent and honest,
100
317866
2244
05:32
but I would not trust them to post a letter,
101
320110
1787
05:33
because they're forgetful.
102
321897
2572
05:36
I have friends who are very confident
103
324469
2672
05:39
they can do certain things,
104
327141
1963
05:41
but I realize that they overestimate their own competence.
105
329104
4408
05:45
And I'm very glad to say, I don't think I have many friends
106
333512
2655
05:48
who are competent and reliable but extremely dishonest.
107
336167
3634
05:51
(Laughter)
108
339801
840
05:52
If so, I haven't yet spotted it.
109
340641
3387
05:56
But that's what we're looking for:
110
344028
2294
05:58
trustworthiness before trust.
111
346322
2198
06:00
Trust is the response.
112
348520
1908
06:02
Trustworthiness is what we have to judge.
113
350428
2340
06:04
And, of course, it's difficult.
114
352768
1731
06:06
Across the last few decades, we've tried to construct
115
354499
3349
06:09
systems of accountability for all sorts of institutions
116
357848
3273
06:13
and professionals and officials and so on
117
361121
2096
06:15
that will make it easier for us to judge their trustworthiness.
118
363217
4606
06:19
A lot of these systems have the converse effect.
119
367823
3272
06:23
They don't work as they're supposed to.
120
371095
1876
06:24
I remember I was talking with a midwife who said,
121
372971
4415
06:29
"Well, you see, the problem is it takes longer
122
377386
2332
06:31
to do the paperwork than to deliver the baby."
123
379718
3501
06:35
And all over our public life, our institutional life,
124
383219
3771
06:38
we find that problem,
125
386990
1850
06:40
that the system of accountability
126
388840
2413
06:43
that is meant to secure trustworthiness
127
391253
2329
06:45
and evidence of trustworthiness
128
393582
2750
06:48
is actually doing the opposite.
129
396332
1864
06:50
It is distracting people who have to do difficult tasks,
130
398196
4637
06:54
like midwives, from doing them
131
402833
2313
06:57
by requiring them to tick the boxes, as we say.
132
405146
2958
07:00
You can all give your own examples there.
133
408104
2734
07:02
So so much for the aim.
134
410838
1910
07:04
The aim, I think, is more trustworthiness,
135
412748
2890
07:07
and that is going to be different
136
415638
2159
07:09
if we are trying to be trustworthy
137
417797
1949
07:11
and communicate our trustworthiness to other people,
138
419746
3026
07:14
and if we are trying to judge whether other people
139
422772
2904
07:17
or office-holders or politicians are trustworthy.
140
425676
3172
07:20
It's not easy. It is judgment, and simple reaction,
141
428848
4374
07:25
attitudes, don't do adequately here.
142
433222
4862
07:30
Now thirdly, the task.
143
438084
3565
07:33
Calling the task rebuilding trust, I think,
144
441649
3572
07:37
also gets things backwards.
145
445221
1739
07:38
It suggests that you and I should rebuild trust.
146
446960
4855
07:43
Well, we can do that for ourselves.
147
451815
2453
07:46
We can rebuild a bit of trustworthiness.
148
454268
2398
07:48
We can do it two people together trying to improve trust.
149
456666
3632
07:52
But trust, in the end, is distinctive
150
460298
3204
07:55
because it's given by other people.
151
463502
2760
07:58
You can't rebuild what other people give you.
152
466262
3177
08:01
You have to give them the basis
153
469439
2727
08:04
for giving you their trust.
154
472166
3183
08:07
So you have to, I think, be trustworthy.
155
475349
3192
08:10
And that, of course, is because you can't fool
156
478541
2384
08:12
all of the people all of the time, usually.
157
480925
3586
08:16
But you also have to provide usable evidence
158
484511
4646
08:21
that you are trustworthy.
159
489157
1554
08:22
How to do it?
160
490711
1542
08:24
Well every day, all over the place, it's being done
161
492253
3210
08:27
by ordinary people, by officials, by institutions,
162
495463
3014
08:30
quite effectively.
163
498477
1840
08:32
Let me give you a simple commercial example.
164
500317
3513
08:35
The shop where I buy my socks says I may take them back,
165
503830
3890
08:39
and they don't ask any questions.
166
507720
2252
08:41
They take them back and give me the money
167
509972
1761
08:43
or give me the pair of socks of the color I wanted.
168
511733
2632
08:46
That's super. I trust them
169
514365
2189
08:48
because they have made themselves vulnerable to me.
170
516554
3331
08:51
I think there's a big lesson in that.
171
519885
1993
08:53
If you make yourself vulnerable to the other party,
172
521878
3054
08:56
then that is very good evidence that you are trustworthy
173
524932
3903
09:00
and you have confidence in what you are saying.
174
528835
3018
09:03
So in the end, I think what we are aiming for
175
531853
2172
09:06
is not very difficult to discern.
176
534025
3540
09:09
It is relationships in which people are trustworthy
177
537565
4205
09:13
and can judge when and how the other person
178
541770
3875
09:17
is trustworthy.
179
545645
1288
09:18
So the moral of all this is,
180
546933
3858
09:22
we need to think much less about trust,
181
550791
3154
09:25
let alone about attitudes of trust
182
553945
3535
09:29
detected or mis-detected by opinion polls,
183
557480
3686
09:33
much more about being trustworthy,
184
561166
2614
09:35
and how you give people adequate, useful
185
563780
3905
09:39
and simple evidence that you're trustworthy.
186
567685
2744
09:42
Thanks.
187
570429
1061
09:43
(Applause)
188
571490
2344
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Onora O'Neill - PhilosopherBaroness Onora O'Neill is a philosopher who focuses on international justice and the roles of trust and accountability in public life.
Why you should listen
Philosopher Baroness Onora O'Neill thinks we are perverting trust. Considering how much stock we put into trust and assessing trusting attitudes, it's something we don't really understand, argues O'Neill. What we really need, she says, is not trust -- but trustworthiness. In addition to her study of how we (wrongly) approach trust and accountability in civic life, O'Neill also focuses on bioethics and international justice.
O'Neill's most recent book, co-written with Neil Manson is Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics, published in 2007. She was Principal of Newnham College, a college of the University of Cambridge, from 1992 to 2006, and President of the British Academy from 2005 to 2009. In early 2013 O'Neill was confirmed as the new Chair of England's Equality and Human Rights Commission. She is a crossbench member of the House of Lords.
Onora O'Neill | Speaker | TED.com