TED2010
Daniel Kahneman: The riddle of experience vs. memory
Filmed:
Readability: 3.5
6,094,013 views
Using examples from vacations to colonoscopies, Nobel laureate and founder of behavioral economics Daniel Kahneman reveals how our "experiencing selves" and our "remembering selves" perceive happiness differently. This new insight has profound implications for economics, public policy -- and our own self-awareness.
Daniel Kahneman - Behavioral economics founder
Widely regarded as the world's most influential living psychologist, Daniel Kahneman won the Nobel in Economics for his pioneering work in behavioral economics -- exploring the irrational ways we make decisions about risk. Full bio
Widely regarded as the world's most influential living psychologist, Daniel Kahneman won the Nobel in Economics for his pioneering work in behavioral economics -- exploring the irrational ways we make decisions about risk. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
Everybody talks about happiness these days.
0
0
3000
00:18
I had somebody count the number of books
1
3000
3000
00:21
with "happiness" in the title published in the last five years
2
6000
3000
00:24
and they gave up after about 40, and there were many more.
3
9000
5000
00:29
There is a huge wave of interest in happiness,
4
14000
3000
00:32
among researchers.
5
17000
2000
00:34
There is a lot of happiness coaching.
6
19000
2000
00:36
Everybody would like to make people happier.
7
21000
2000
00:38
But in spite of all this flood of work,
8
23000
4000
00:42
there are several cognitive traps
9
27000
2000
00:44
that sort of make it almost impossible to think straight
10
29000
3000
00:47
about happiness.
11
32000
2000
00:49
And my talk today will be mostly about these cognitive traps.
12
34000
3000
00:52
This applies to laypeople thinking about their own happiness,
13
37000
3000
00:55
and it applies to scholars thinking about happiness,
14
40000
3000
00:58
because it turns out we're just as messed up as anybody else is.
15
43000
4000
01:02
The first of these traps
16
47000
2000
01:04
is a reluctance to admit complexity.
17
49000
3000
01:07
It turns out that the word "happiness"
18
52000
3000
01:10
is just not a useful word anymore,
19
55000
3000
01:13
because we apply it to too many different things.
20
58000
3000
01:16
I think there is one particular meaning to which we might restrict it,
21
61000
3000
01:19
but by and large,
22
64000
2000
01:21
this is something that we'll have to give up
23
66000
2000
01:23
and we'll have to adopt the more complicated view
24
68000
4000
01:27
of what well-being is.
25
72000
2000
01:29
The second trap is a confusion between experience and memory;
26
74000
4000
01:33
basically, it's between being happy in your life,
27
78000
3000
01:36
and being happy about your life
28
81000
2000
01:38
or happy with your life.
29
83000
2000
01:40
And those are two very different concepts,
30
85000
2000
01:42
and they're both lumped in the notion of happiness.
31
87000
3000
01:45
And the third is the focusing illusion,
32
90000
3000
01:48
and it's the unfortunate fact that we can't think about any circumstance
33
93000
3000
01:51
that affects well-being
34
96000
2000
01:53
without distorting its importance.
35
98000
2000
01:55
I mean, this is a real cognitive trap.
36
100000
3000
01:58
There's just no way of getting it right.
37
103000
3000
02:01
Now, I'd like to start with an example
38
106000
2000
02:03
of somebody who had a question-and-answer session
39
108000
5000
02:08
after one of my lectures reported a story,
40
113000
4000
02:12
and that was a story --
41
117000
1000
02:13
He said he'd been listening to a symphony,
42
118000
3000
02:16
and it was absolutely glorious music
43
121000
3000
02:19
and at the very end of the recording,
44
124000
3000
02:22
there was a dreadful screeching sound.
45
127000
2000
02:24
And then he added, really quite emotionally,
46
129000
2000
02:26
it ruined the whole experience.
47
131000
4000
02:30
But it hadn't.
48
135000
2000
02:32
What it had ruined were the memories of the experience.
49
137000
3000
02:35
He had had the experience.
50
140000
2000
02:37
He had had 20 minutes of glorious music.
51
142000
2000
02:39
They counted for nothing
52
144000
2000
02:41
because he was left with a memory;
53
146000
3000
02:44
the memory was ruined,
54
149000
2000
02:46
and the memory was all that he had gotten to keep.
55
151000
3000
02:49
What this is telling us, really,
56
154000
3000
02:52
is that we might be thinking of ourselves and of other people
57
157000
2000
02:54
in terms of two selves.
58
159000
2000
02:56
There is an experiencing self,
59
161000
3000
02:59
who lives in the present
60
164000
2000
03:01
and knows the present,
61
166000
2000
03:03
is capable of re-living the past,
62
168000
2000
03:05
but basically it has only the present.
63
170000
3000
03:08
It's the experiencing self that the doctor approaches --
64
173000
3000
03:11
you know, when the doctor asks,
65
176000
1000
03:12
"Does it hurt now when I touch you here?"
66
177000
4000
03:16
And then there is a remembering self,
67
181000
3000
03:19
and the remembering self is the one that keeps score,
68
184000
4000
03:23
and maintains the story of our life,
69
188000
2000
03:25
and it's the one that the doctor approaches
70
190000
3000
03:28
in asking the question,
71
193000
2000
03:30
"How have you been feeling lately?"
72
195000
3000
03:33
or "How was your trip to Albania?" or something like that.
73
198000
3000
03:36
Those are two very different entities,
74
201000
3000
03:39
the experiencing self and the remembering self,
75
204000
3000
03:42
and getting confused between them is part of the mess
76
207000
4000
03:46
about the notion of happiness.
77
211000
3000
03:49
Now, the remembering self
78
214000
3000
03:52
is a storyteller.
79
217000
3000
03:55
And that really starts with a basic response of our memories --
80
220000
4000
03:59
it starts immediately.
81
224000
2000
04:01
We don't only tell stories when we set out to tell stories.
82
226000
3000
04:04
Our memory tells us stories,
83
229000
3000
04:07
that is, what we get to keep from our experiences
84
232000
2000
04:09
is a story.
85
234000
2000
04:11
And let me begin with one example.
86
236000
5000
04:16
This is an old study.
87
241000
2000
04:18
Those are actual patients undergoing a painful procedure.
88
243000
3000
04:21
I won't go into detail. It's no longer painful these days,
89
246000
3000
04:24
but it was painful when this study was run in the 1990s.
90
249000
4000
04:28
They were asked to report on their pain every 60 seconds.
91
253000
3000
04:31
Here are two patients,
92
256000
3000
04:34
those are their recordings.
93
259000
2000
04:36
And you are asked, "Who of them suffered more?"
94
261000
3000
04:39
And it's a very easy question.
95
264000
2000
04:41
Clearly, Patient B suffered more --
96
266000
2000
04:43
his colonoscopy was longer,
97
268000
2000
04:45
and every minute of pain that Patient A had,
98
270000
3000
04:48
Patient B had, and more.
99
273000
3000
04:51
But now there is another question:
100
276000
3000
04:54
"How much did these patients think they suffered?"
101
279000
3000
04:57
And here is a surprise.
102
282000
2000
04:59
The surprise is that Patient A
103
284000
2000
05:01
had a much worse memory of the colonoscopy
104
286000
3000
05:04
than Patient B.
105
289000
2000
05:06
The stories of the colonoscopies were different,
106
291000
3000
05:09
and because a very critical part of the story is how it ends.
107
294000
6000
05:15
And neither of these stories is very inspiring or great --
108
300000
3000
05:18
but one of them is this distinct ... (Laughter)
109
303000
4000
05:22
but one of them is distinctly worse than the other.
110
307000
3000
05:25
And the one that is worse
111
310000
2000
05:27
is the one where pain was at its peak at the very end;
112
312000
3000
05:30
it's a bad story.
113
315000
2000
05:32
How do we know that?
114
317000
2000
05:34
Because we asked these people after their colonoscopy,
115
319000
3000
05:37
and much later, too,
116
322000
1000
05:38
"How bad was the whole thing, in total?"
117
323000
2000
05:40
And it was much worse for A than for B, in memory.
118
325000
4000
05:44
Now this is a direct conflict
119
329000
2000
05:46
between the experiencing self and the remembering self.
120
331000
3000
05:49
From the point of view of the experiencing self,
121
334000
3000
05:52
clearly, B had a worse time.
122
337000
2000
05:54
Now, what you could do with Patient A,
123
339000
3000
05:57
and we actually ran clinical experiments,
124
342000
3000
06:00
and it has been done, and it does work --
125
345000
2000
06:02
you could actually extend the colonoscopy of Patient A
126
347000
5000
06:07
by just keeping the tube in without jiggling it too much.
127
352000
3000
06:10
That will cause the patient
128
355000
3000
06:13
to suffer, but just a little
129
358000
3000
06:16
and much less than before.
130
361000
2000
06:18
And if you do that for a couple of minutes,
131
363000
2000
06:20
you have made the experiencing self
132
365000
2000
06:22
of Patient A worse off,
133
367000
2000
06:24
and you have the remembering self of Patient A
134
369000
3000
06:27
a lot better off,
135
372000
2000
06:29
because now you have endowed Patient A
136
374000
2000
06:31
with a better story
137
376000
2000
06:33
about his experience.
138
378000
3000
06:36
What defines a story?
139
381000
3000
06:39
And that is true of the stories
140
384000
2000
06:41
that memory delivers for us,
141
386000
2000
06:43
and it's also true of the stories that we make up.
142
388000
3000
06:46
What defines a story are changes,
143
391000
4000
06:50
significant moments and endings.
144
395000
3000
06:53
Endings are very, very important
145
398000
2000
06:55
and, in this case, the ending dominated.
146
400000
4000
06:59
Now, the experiencing self
147
404000
2000
07:01
lives its life continuously.
148
406000
3000
07:04
It has moments of experience, one after the other.
149
409000
3000
07:07
And you can ask: What happens to these moments?
150
412000
3000
07:10
And the answer is really straightforward:
151
415000
2000
07:12
They are lost forever.
152
417000
2000
07:14
I mean, most of the moments of our life --
153
419000
2000
07:16
and I calculated, you know, the psychological present
154
421000
3000
07:19
is said to be about three seconds long;
155
424000
2000
07:21
that means that, you know,
156
426000
2000
07:23
in a life there are about 600 million of them;
157
428000
2000
07:25
in a month, there are about 600,000 --
158
430000
3000
07:28
most of them don't leave a trace.
159
433000
4000
07:32
Most of them are completely ignored
160
437000
2000
07:34
by the remembering self.
161
439000
2000
07:36
And yet, somehow you get the sense
162
441000
2000
07:38
that they should count,
163
443000
2000
07:40
that what happens during these moments of experience
164
445000
3000
07:43
is our life.
165
448000
2000
07:45
It's the finite resource that we're spending
166
450000
2000
07:47
while we're on this earth.
167
452000
2000
07:49
And how to spend it
168
454000
2000
07:51
would seem to be relevant,
169
456000
2000
07:53
but that is not the story
170
458000
2000
07:55
that the remembering self keeps for us.
171
460000
2000
07:57
So we have the remembering self
172
462000
2000
07:59
and the experiencing self,
173
464000
2000
08:01
and they're really quite distinct.
174
466000
2000
08:03
The biggest difference between them
175
468000
2000
08:05
is in the handling of time.
176
470000
3000
08:08
From the point of view of the experiencing self,
177
473000
3000
08:11
if you have a vacation,
178
476000
2000
08:13
and the second week is just as good as the first,
179
478000
3000
08:16
then the two-week vacation
180
481000
3000
08:19
is twice as good as the one-week vacation.
181
484000
3000
08:22
That's not the way it works at all for the remembering self.
182
487000
3000
08:25
For the remembering self, a two-week vacation
183
490000
2000
08:27
is barely better than the one-week vacation
184
492000
3000
08:30
because there are no new memories added.
185
495000
2000
08:32
You have not changed the story.
186
497000
3000
08:35
And in this way,
187
500000
2000
08:37
time is actually the critical variable
188
502000
3000
08:40
that distinguishes a remembering self
189
505000
3000
08:43
from an experiencing self;
190
508000
2000
08:45
time has very little impact on the story.
191
510000
3000
08:49
Now, the remembering self does more
192
514000
3000
08:52
than remember and tell stories.
193
517000
2000
08:54
It is actually the one that makes decisions
194
519000
4000
08:58
because, if you have a patient who has had, say,
195
523000
2000
09:00
two colonoscopies with two different surgeons
196
525000
3000
09:03
and is deciding which of them to choose,
197
528000
3000
09:06
then the one that chooses
198
531000
3000
09:09
is the one that has the memory that is less bad,
199
534000
4000
09:13
and that's the surgeon that will be chosen.
200
538000
2000
09:15
The experiencing self
201
540000
2000
09:17
has no voice in this choice.
202
542000
3000
09:20
We actually don't choose between experiences,
203
545000
3000
09:23
we choose between memories of experiences.
204
548000
3000
09:26
And even when we think about the future,
205
551000
3000
09:29
we don't think of our future normally as experiences.
206
554000
3000
09:32
We think of our future
207
557000
2000
09:34
as anticipated memories.
208
559000
3000
09:37
And basically you can look at this,
209
562000
2000
09:39
you know, as a tyranny of the remembering self,
210
564000
3000
09:42
and you can think of the remembering self
211
567000
2000
09:44
sort of dragging the experiencing self
212
569000
2000
09:46
through experiences that
213
571000
2000
09:48
the experiencing self doesn't need.
214
573000
2000
09:50
I have that sense that
215
575000
2000
09:52
when we go on vacations
216
577000
2000
09:54
this is very frequently the case;
217
579000
2000
09:56
that is, we go on vacations,
218
581000
2000
09:58
to a very large extent,
219
583000
2000
10:00
in the service of our remembering self.
220
585000
3000
10:03
And this is a bit hard to justify I think.
221
588000
3000
10:06
I mean, how much do we consume our memories?
222
591000
3000
10:09
That is one of the explanations
223
594000
2000
10:11
that is given for the dominance
224
596000
2000
10:13
of the remembering self.
225
598000
2000
10:15
And when I think about that, I think about a vacation
226
600000
2000
10:17
we had in Antarctica a few years ago,
227
602000
3000
10:20
which was clearly the best vacation I've ever had,
228
605000
3000
10:23
and I think of it relatively often,
229
608000
2000
10:25
relative to how much I think of other vacations.
230
610000
2000
10:27
And I probably have consumed
231
612000
4000
10:31
my memories of that three-week trip, I would say,
232
616000
2000
10:33
for about 25 minutes in the last four years.
233
618000
3000
10:36
Now, if I had ever opened the folder
234
621000
3000
10:39
with the 600 pictures in it,
235
624000
3000
10:42
I would have spent another hour.
236
627000
2000
10:44
Now, that is three weeks,
237
629000
2000
10:46
and that is at most an hour and a half.
238
631000
2000
10:48
There seems to be a discrepancy.
239
633000
2000
10:50
Now, I may be a bit extreme, you know,
240
635000
2000
10:52
in how little appetite I have for consuming memories,
241
637000
3000
10:55
but even if you do more of this,
242
640000
3000
10:58
there is a genuine question:
243
643000
3000
11:01
Why do we put so much weight on memory
244
646000
4000
11:05
relative to the weight that we put on experiences?
245
650000
3000
11:08
So I want you to think
246
653000
2000
11:10
about a thought experiment.
247
655000
3000
11:13
Imagine that for your next vacation,
248
658000
2000
11:15
you know that at the end of the vacation
249
660000
3000
11:18
all your pictures will be destroyed,
250
663000
3000
11:21
and you'll get an amnesic drug
251
666000
2000
11:23
so that you won't remember anything.
252
668000
2000
11:25
Now, would you choose the same vacation? (Laughter)
253
670000
4000
11:29
And if you would choose a different vacation,
254
674000
5000
11:34
there is a conflict between your two selves,
255
679000
2000
11:36
and you need to think about how to adjudicate that conflict,
256
681000
3000
11:39
and it's actually not at all obvious, because
257
684000
3000
11:42
if you think in terms of time,
258
687000
3000
11:45
then you get one answer,
259
690000
3000
11:48
and if you think in terms of memories,
260
693000
3000
11:51
you might get another answer.
261
696000
2000
11:53
Why do we pick the vacations we do
262
698000
3000
11:56
is a problem that confronts us
263
701000
3000
11:59
with a choice between the two selves.
264
704000
2000
12:01
Now, the two selves
265
706000
3000
12:04
bring up two notions of happiness.
266
709000
2000
12:06
There are really two concepts of happiness
267
711000
2000
12:08
that we can apply, one per self.
268
713000
3000
12:11
So you can ask: How happy is the experiencing self?
269
716000
5000
12:16
And then you would ask: How happy are the moments
270
721000
2000
12:18
in the experiencing self's life?
271
723000
3000
12:21
And they're all -- happiness for moments
272
726000
2000
12:23
is a fairly complicated process.
273
728000
2000
12:25
What are the emotions that can be measured?
274
730000
3000
12:28
And, by the way, now we are capable
275
733000
2000
12:30
of getting a pretty good idea
276
735000
2000
12:32
of the happiness of the experiencing self over time.
277
737000
4000
12:38
If you ask for the happiness of the remembering self,
278
743000
3000
12:41
it's a completely different thing.
279
746000
2000
12:43
This is not about how happily a person lives.
280
748000
3000
12:46
It is about how satisfied or pleased the person is
281
751000
3000
12:49
when that person thinks about her life.
282
754000
4000
12:53
Very different notion.
283
758000
2000
12:55
Anyone who doesn't distinguish those notions
284
760000
3000
12:58
is going to mess up the study of happiness,
285
763000
2000
13:00
and I belong to a crowd of students of well-being,
286
765000
3000
13:03
who've been messing up the study of happiness for a long time
287
768000
4000
13:07
in precisely this way.
288
772000
2000
13:09
The distinction between the
289
774000
2000
13:11
happiness of the experiencing self
290
776000
2000
13:13
and the satisfaction of the remembering self
291
778000
3000
13:16
has been recognized in recent years,
292
781000
2000
13:18
and there are now efforts to measure the two separately.
293
783000
3000
13:21
The Gallup Organization has a world poll
294
786000
3000
13:24
where more than half a million people
295
789000
2000
13:26
have been asked questions
296
791000
2000
13:28
about what they think of their life
297
793000
2000
13:30
and about their experiences,
298
795000
2000
13:32
and there have been other efforts along those lines.
299
797000
3000
13:35
So in recent years, we have begun to learn
300
800000
3000
13:38
about the happiness of the two selves.
301
803000
3000
13:41
And the main lesson I think that we have learned
302
806000
3000
13:44
is they are really different.
303
809000
2000
13:46
You can know how satisfied somebody is with their life,
304
811000
5000
13:51
and that really doesn't teach you much
305
816000
2000
13:53
about how happily they're living their life,
306
818000
3000
13:56
and vice versa.
307
821000
2000
13:58
Just to give you a sense of the correlation,
308
823000
2000
14:00
the correlation is about .5.
309
825000
2000
14:02
What that means is if you met somebody,
310
827000
3000
14:05
and you were told, "Oh his father is six feet tall,"
311
830000
4000
14:09
how much would you know about his height?
312
834000
2000
14:11
Well, you would know something about his height,
313
836000
2000
14:13
but there's a lot of uncertainty.
314
838000
2000
14:15
You have that much uncertainty.
315
840000
2000
14:17
If I tell you that somebody ranked their life eight on a scale of ten,
316
842000
4000
14:21
you have a lot of uncertainty
317
846000
2000
14:23
about how happy they are
318
848000
2000
14:25
with their experiencing self.
319
850000
2000
14:27
So the correlation is low.
320
852000
2000
14:29
We know something about what controls
321
854000
3000
14:32
satisfaction of the happiness self.
322
857000
2000
14:34
We know that money is very important,
323
859000
2000
14:36
goals are very important.
324
861000
2000
14:38
We know that happiness is mainly
325
863000
4000
14:42
being satisfied with people that we like,
326
867000
3000
14:45
spending time with people that we like.
327
870000
3000
14:48
There are other pleasures, but this is dominant.
328
873000
2000
14:50
So if you want to maximize the happiness of the two selves,
329
875000
3000
14:53
you are going to end up
330
878000
2000
14:55
doing very different things.
331
880000
2000
14:57
The bottom line of what I've said here
332
882000
2000
14:59
is that we really should not think of happiness
333
884000
4000
15:03
as a substitute for well-being.
334
888000
2000
15:05
It is a completely different notion.
335
890000
3000
15:08
Now, very quickly,
336
893000
3000
15:11
another reason we cannot think straight about happiness
337
896000
4000
15:15
is that we do not attend to the same things
338
900000
7000
15:22
when we think about life, and we actually live.
339
907000
3000
15:25
So, if you ask the simple question of how happy people are in California,
340
910000
5000
15:30
you are not going to get to the correct answer.
341
915000
3000
15:33
When you ask that question,
342
918000
2000
15:35
you think people must be happier in California
343
920000
2000
15:37
if, say, you live in Ohio.
344
922000
2000
15:39
(Laughter)
345
924000
2000
15:41
And what happens is
346
926000
3000
15:44
when you think about living in California,
347
929000
4000
15:48
you are thinking of the contrast
348
933000
2000
15:50
between California and other places,
349
935000
3000
15:53
and that contrast, say, is in climate.
350
938000
2000
15:55
Well, it turns out that climate
351
940000
2000
15:57
is not very important to the experiencing self
352
942000
3000
16:00
and it's not even very important to the reflective self
353
945000
3000
16:03
that decides how happy people are.
354
948000
3000
16:06
But now, because the reflective self is in charge,
355
951000
4000
16:10
you may end up -- some people may end up
356
955000
2000
16:12
moving to California.
357
957000
2000
16:14
And it's sort of interesting to trace what is going to happen
358
959000
3000
16:17
to people who move to California in the hope of getting happier.
359
962000
3000
16:20
Well, their experiencing self
360
965000
2000
16:22
is not going to get happier.
361
967000
2000
16:24
We know that.
362
969000
2000
16:27
But one thing will happen: They will think they are happier,
363
972000
3000
16:30
because, when they think about it,
364
975000
4000
16:34
they'll be reminded of how horrible the weather was in Ohio,
365
979000
4000
16:38
and they will feel they made the right decision.
366
983000
3000
16:41
It is very difficult
367
986000
2000
16:43
to think straight about well-being,
368
988000
2000
16:45
and I hope I have given you a sense
369
990000
3000
16:48
of how difficult it is.
370
993000
2000
16:50
Thank you.
371
995000
2000
16:52
(Applause)
372
997000
3000
16:55
Chris Anderson: Thank you. I've got a question for you.
373
1000000
3000
16:59
Thank you so much.
374
1004000
2000
17:01
Now, when we were on the phone a few weeks ago,
375
1006000
4000
17:05
you mentioned to me that there was quite an interesting result
376
1010000
3000
17:08
came out of that Gallup survey.
377
1013000
2000
17:10
Is that something you can share
378
1015000
2000
17:12
since you do have a few moments left now?
379
1017000
2000
17:14
Daniel Kahneman: Sure.
380
1019000
2000
17:16
I think the most interesting result that we found in the Gallup survey
381
1021000
3000
17:19
is a number, which we absolutely did not expect to find.
382
1024000
3000
17:22
We found that with respect to the happiness
383
1027000
2000
17:24
of the experiencing self.
384
1029000
3000
17:27
When we looked at how feelings,
385
1032000
5000
17:32
vary with income.
386
1037000
2000
17:34
And it turns out that, below an income
387
1039000
3000
17:37
of 60,000 dollars a year, for Americans --
388
1042000
3000
17:40
and that's a very large sample of Americans, like 600,000,
389
1045000
3000
17:43
so it's a large representative sample --
390
1048000
2000
17:45
below an income of 600,000 dollars a year...
391
1050000
2000
17:47
CA: 60,000.
392
1052000
2000
17:49
DK: 60,000.
393
1054000
2000
17:51
(Laughter)
394
1056000
2000
17:53
60,000 dollars a year, people are unhappy,
395
1058000
4000
17:57
and they get progressively unhappier the poorer they get.
396
1062000
3000
18:00
Above that, we get an absolutely flat line.
397
1065000
3000
18:03
I mean I've rarely seen lines so flat.
398
1068000
3000
18:06
Clearly, what is happening is
399
1071000
2000
18:08
money does not buy you experiential happiness,
400
1073000
3000
18:11
but lack of money certainly buys you misery,
401
1076000
3000
18:14
and we can measure that misery
402
1079000
2000
18:16
very, very clearly.
403
1081000
2000
18:18
In terms of the other self, the remembering self,
404
1083000
3000
18:21
you get a different story.
405
1086000
2000
18:23
The more money you earn, the more satisfied you are.
406
1088000
3000
18:26
That does not hold for emotions.
407
1091000
2000
18:28
CA: But Danny, the whole American endeavor is about
408
1093000
3000
18:31
life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness.
409
1096000
3000
18:34
If people took seriously that finding,
410
1099000
4000
18:38
I mean, it seems to turn upside down
411
1103000
3000
18:41
everything we believe about, like for example,
412
1106000
2000
18:43
taxation policy and so forth.
413
1108000
2000
18:45
Is there any chance that politicians, that the country generally,
414
1110000
3000
18:48
would take a finding like that seriously
415
1113000
3000
18:51
and run public policy based on it?
416
1116000
2000
18:53
DK: You know I think that there is recognition
417
1118000
2000
18:55
of the role of happiness research in public policy.
418
1120000
3000
18:58
The recognition is going to be slow in the United States,
419
1123000
2000
19:00
no question about that,
420
1125000
2000
19:02
but in the U.K., it is happening,
421
1127000
2000
19:04
and in other countries it is happening.
422
1129000
2000
19:06
People are recognizing that they ought
423
1131000
3000
19:09
to be thinking of happiness
424
1134000
2000
19:11
when they think of public policy.
425
1136000
2000
19:13
It's going to take a while,
426
1138000
2000
19:15
and people are going to debate
427
1140000
3000
19:18
whether they want to study experience happiness,
428
1143000
2000
19:20
or whether they want to study life evaluation,
429
1145000
2000
19:22
so we need to have that debate fairly soon.
430
1147000
3000
19:25
How to enhance happiness
431
1150000
2000
19:27
goes very different ways depending on how you think,
432
1152000
3000
19:30
and whether you think of the remembering self
433
1155000
2000
19:32
or you think of the experiencing self.
434
1157000
2000
19:34
This is going to influence policy, I think, in years to come.
435
1159000
3000
19:37
In the United States, efforts are being made
436
1162000
3000
19:40
to measure the experience happiness of the population.
437
1165000
3000
19:43
This is going to be, I think, within the next decade or two,
438
1168000
3000
19:46
part of national statistics.
439
1171000
2000
19:48
CA: Well, it seems to me that this issue will -- or at least should be --
440
1173000
4000
19:52
the most interesting policy discussion to track
441
1177000
2000
19:54
over the next few years.
442
1179000
2000
19:56
Thank you so much for inventing behavioral economics.
443
1181000
2000
19:58
Thank you, Danny Kahneman.
444
1183000
2000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Daniel Kahneman - Behavioral economics founderWidely regarded as the world's most influential living psychologist, Daniel Kahneman won the Nobel in Economics for his pioneering work in behavioral economics -- exploring the irrational ways we make decisions about risk.
Why you should listen
Daniel Kahneman is an eminence grise for the Freakonomics crowd. In the mid-1970s, with his collaborator Amos Tversky, he was among the first academics to pick apart exactly why we make "wrong" decisions. In their 1979 paper on prospect theory, Kahneman and Tversky examined a simple problem of economic risk. And rather than stating the optimal, rational answer, as an economist of the time might have, they quantified how most real people, consistently, make a less-rational choice. Their work treated economics not as a perfect or self-correcting machine, but as a system prey to quirks of human perception. The field of behavioral economics was born.
Kahneman was awarded the Nobel Memorial prize in 2002 for his work with Tversky, who died before the award was bestowed. In a lovely passage in his Nobel biography, Kahneman looks back on his deep collaboration with Tversky and calls for a new form of academic cooperation, marked not by turf battles but by "adversarial collaboration," a good-faith effort by unlike minds to conduct joint research, critiquing each other in the service of an ideal of truth to which both can contribute.
Daniel Kahneman | Speaker | TED.com