ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Daniel Kahneman - Behavioral economics founder
Widely regarded as the world's most influential living psychologist, Daniel Kahneman won the Nobel in Economics for his pioneering work in behavioral economics -- exploring the irrational ways we make decisions about risk.

Why you should listen

Daniel Kahneman is an eminence grise for the Freakonomics crowd. In the mid-1970s, with his collaborator Amos Tversky, he was among the first academics to pick apart exactly why we make "wrong" decisions. In their 1979 paper on prospect theory, Kahneman and Tversky examined a simple problem of economic risk. And rather than stating the optimal, rational answer, as an economist of the time might have, they quantified how most real people, consistently, make a less-rational choice. Their work treated economics not as a perfect or self-correcting machine, but as a system prey to quirks of human perception. The field of behavioral economics was born.

Kahneman was awarded the Nobel Memorial prize in 2002 for his work with Tversky, who died before the award was bestowed. In a lovely passage in his Nobel biography, Kahneman looks back on his deep collaboration with Tversky and calls for a new form of academic cooperation, marked not by turf battles but by "adversarial collaboration," a good-faith effort by unlike minds to conduct joint research, critiquing each other in the service of an ideal of truth to which both can contribute.

More profile about the speaker
Daniel Kahneman | Speaker | TED.com
TED2010

Daniel Kahneman: The riddle of experience vs. memory

丹尼尔·卡纳曼:经验与记忆之谜

Filmed:
6,094,013 views

通过使用休假和胃肠镜检查的例子,诺贝尔奖获得者及行为经济学创始者丹尼尔·卡纳曼向我们揭示了“经验自我”和“记忆自我”是如何使用不同角度来理解快乐。这一新见解将会对经济领域、公共政策领域以及我们的自我意识产生深远的影响。
- Behavioral economics founder
Widely regarded as the world's most influential living psychologist, Daniel Kahneman won the Nobel in Economics for his pioneering work in behavioral economics -- exploring the irrational ways we make decisions about risk. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
Everybody每个人 talks会谈 about happiness幸福 these days.
0
0
3000
最近大家都在谈论着快乐。
00:18
I had somebody count计数 the number of books图书
1
3000
3000
在过去的五年里,我请人数了近年来有多本书的
00:21
with "happiness幸福" in the title标题 published发表 in the last five years年份
2
6000
3000
书名中提到“快乐”,
00:24
and they gave up after about 40, and there were many许多 more.
3
9000
5000
他们数到大约有40本,而且还有更多没数到的。
00:29
There is a huge巨大 wave of interest利益 in happiness幸福,
4
14000
3000
现今越来越多研究者都开始对快乐
00:32
among其中 researchers研究人员.
5
17000
2000
这个议题产生兴趣。
00:34
There is a lot of happiness幸福 coaching教练.
6
19000
2000
而且还有很多的“快乐教练”授课。
00:36
Everybody每个人 would like to make people happier幸福.
7
21000
2000
让其他人更快乐是他们的宗旨。
00:38
But in spite尽管 of all this flood洪水 of work,
8
23000
4000
虽然此类工作多如牛毛,
00:42
there are several一些 cognitive认知 traps陷阱
9
27000
2000
但现仍存在几个认知上的陷阱,
00:44
that sort分类 of make it almost几乎 impossible不可能 to think straight直行
10
29000
3000
这些陷阱将会增加使人领悟
00:47
about happiness幸福.
11
32000
2000
快乐本质的难度。
00:49
And my talk today今天 will be mostly大多 about these cognitive认知 traps陷阱.
12
34000
3000
我今天将主要谈论这些认知陷阱。
00:52
This applies适用 to laypeople外行人 thinking思维 about their own拥有 happiness幸福,
13
37000
3000
这些陷阱既会影响到一般人对自身快乐的观感,
00:55
and it applies适用 to scholars学者 thinking思维 about happiness幸福,
14
40000
3000
而且也会影响到学者对快乐的判断,
00:58
because it turns out we're just as messed搞砸 up as anybody任何人 else其他 is.
15
43000
4000
因为人无完人,我们皆会出错。
01:02
The first of these traps陷阱
16
47000
2000
第一个陷阱是
01:04
is a reluctance不情愿 to admit承认 complexity复杂.
17
49000
3000
不愿意去承认快乐的复杂性。
01:07
It turns out that the word "happiness幸福"
18
52000
3000
事实证明快乐这个词
01:10
is just not a useful有用 word anymore,
19
55000
3000
已不再是常用词汇了,
01:13
because we apply应用 it to too many许多 different不同 things.
20
58000
3000
因为我们已用其来诠释太多的事物了。
01:16
I think there is one particular特定 meaning含义 to which哪一个 we might威力 restrict限制 it,
21
61000
3000
我想我们应该限定它的意思,
01:19
but by and large,
22
64000
2000
不过,一般而言,
01:21
this is something that we'll have to give up
23
66000
2000
我们得放弃这个想法
01:23
and we'll have to adopt采用 the more complicated复杂 view视图
24
68000
4000
并用更复杂的观点来看
01:27
of what well-being福利 is.
25
72000
2000
何谓快乐生活。
01:29
The second第二 trap陷阱 is a confusion混乱 between之间 experience经验 and memory记忆;
26
74000
4000
第二个陷阱是经验和记忆间的混淆:
01:33
basically基本上, it's between之间 being存在 happy快乐 in your life,
27
78000
3000
基本上这是在生活中体会快乐
01:36
and being存在 happy快乐 about your life
28
81000
2000
和觉得生活很快乐
01:38
or happy快乐 with your life.
29
83000
2000
以及对于你的生活满意之间的差别。
01:40
And those are two very different不同 concepts概念,
30
85000
2000
这两者的意义相距甚远,
01:42
and they're both lumped集总 in the notion概念 of happiness幸福.
31
87000
3000
且在论及快乐时会混为一谈。
01:45
And the third第三 is the focusing调焦 illusion错觉,
32
90000
3000
第三个陷阱则是聚焦错觉,
01:48
and it's the unfortunate不幸的 fact事实 that we can't think about any circumstance环境
33
93000
3000
令人遗憾的是,任何情况下,当我们想到一些
01:51
that affects影响 well-being福利
34
96000
2000
关于快乐生活的情景时,
01:53
without distorting扭曲 its importance重要性.
35
98000
2000
我们势必会觉得它特别重要。
01:55
I mean, this is a real真实 cognitive认知 trap陷阱.
36
100000
3000
我的意思是,这是一个真正的认知陷阱。
01:58
There's just no way of getting得到 it right.
37
103000
3000
它避无可避。
02:01
Now, I'd like to start开始 with an example
38
106000
2000
现在,我想以一个例子来开头,
02:03
of somebody who had a question-and-answer问题和答案 session会议
39
108000
5000
有个人上过我的课后
02:08
after one of my lectures讲座 reported报道 a story故事,
40
113000
4000
于答问之时向我讲述了一则故事。
02:12
and that was a story故事 --
41
117000
1000
[不清...]
02:13
He said he'd他会 been listening to a symphony交响乐,
42
118000
3000
他说他有次在听交响乐时
02:16
and it was absolutely绝对 glorious辉煌 music音乐
43
121000
3000
觉得音乐真是动听极了,
02:19
and at the very end结束 of the recording记录,
44
124000
3000
但在演奏快结束之时,
02:22
there was a dreadful可怕 screeching尖叫 sound声音.
45
127000
2000
却冒出了尖锐刺耳的声音。
02:24
And then he added添加, really quite相当 emotionally感情上,
46
129000
2000
接着他激动地表示
02:26
it ruined毁了 the whole整个 experience经验.
47
131000
4000
这就是一只老鼠坏了一锅粥。
02:30
But it hadn't有没有.
48
135000
2000
但事实并非如此。
02:32
What it had ruined毁了 were the memories回忆 of the experience经验.
49
137000
3000
所发生的糟糕印象仅仅是对这段经验的记忆。
02:35
He had had the experience经验.
50
140000
2000
他经历了这段经验。
02:37
He had had 20 minutes分钟 of glorious辉煌 music音乐.
51
142000
2000
他也经历了20分钟的听觉盛会。
02:39
They counted for nothing
52
144000
2000
但现在都已无足轻重了,
02:41
because he was left with a memory记忆;
53
146000
3000
因为他仅留下一段记忆;
02:44
the memory记忆 was ruined毁了,
54
149000
2000
就是那段糟糕的记忆,
02:46
and the memory记忆 was all that he had gotten得到 to keep.
55
151000
3000
而其它20分钟的盛会则被完全遗忘了。
02:49
What this is telling告诉 us, really,
56
154000
3000
这告诉我们,
02:52
is that we might威力 be thinking思维 of ourselves我们自己 and of other people
57
157000
2000
我们在思考自己和别人时,
02:54
in terms条款 of two selves自我.
58
159000
2000
用了两种自我。
02:56
There is an experiencing经历 self,
59
161000
3000
第一种则为经验自我,
02:59
who lives生活 in the present当下
60
164000
2000
这种自我活在当下,
03:01
and knows知道 the present当下,
61
166000
2000
洞察当下,
03:03
is capable of re-living重新生活 the past过去,
62
168000
2000
同时也能回味过往,
03:05
but basically基本上 it has only the present当下.
63
170000
3000
但基本上他只属于当下。
03:08
It's the experiencing经历 self that the doctor医生 approaches方法 --
64
173000
3000
一般医生接触的皆是经验自我--
03:11
you know, when the doctor医生 asks,
65
176000
1000
正如,当医生问你,
03:12
"Does it hurt伤害 now when I touch触摸 you here?"
66
177000
4000
“我碰你这里时会疼么?”
03:16
And then there is a remembering记忆 self,
67
181000
3000
另一个自我则是记忆自我,
03:19
and the remembering记忆 self is the one that keeps保持 score得分了,
68
184000
4000
他负责记录生活,
03:23
and maintains维持 the story故事 of our life,
69
188000
2000
抒写生活故事,
03:25
and it's the one that the doctor医生 approaches方法
70
190000
3000
医生要找他时
03:28
in asking the question,
71
193000
2000
会这么问,
03:30
"How have you been feeling感觉 lately最近?"
72
195000
3000
“最近感觉如何?”
03:33
or "How was your trip to Albania阿尔巴尼亚?" or something like that.
73
198000
3000
或“去阿尔巴尼亚好玩么?”等类似的问题。
03:36
Those are two very different不同 entities实体,
74
201000
3000
经验自我和记忆自我
03:39
the experiencing经历 self and the remembering记忆 self,
75
204000
3000
是截然不同的,
03:42
and getting得到 confused困惑 between之间 them is part部分 of the mess食堂
76
207000
4000
两者的混淆是导致我们不懂快乐的
03:46
about the notion概念 of happiness幸福.
77
211000
3000
部分原因。
03:49
Now, the remembering记忆 self
78
214000
3000
记忆自我
03:52
is a storyteller说故事的人.
79
217000
3000
负责讲述故事。
03:55
And that really starts启动 with a basic基本 response响应 of our memories回忆 --
80
220000
4000
故事从记忆中直接撷取--
03:59
it starts启动 immediately立即.
81
224000
2000
即时上传。
04:01
We don't only tell stories故事 when we set out to tell stories故事.
82
226000
3000
并不是我们在讲我们要讲的故事。
04:04
Our memory记忆 tells告诉 us stories故事,
83
229000
3000
是我们的记忆在讲故事,
04:07
that is, what we get to keep from our experiences经验
84
232000
2000
它是我们从经验中储存下来的
04:09
is a story故事.
85
234000
2000
故事。
04:11
And let me begin开始 with one example.
86
236000
5000
让我用一个例子开始。
04:16
This is an old study研究.
87
241000
2000
这是一个古老的研究。
04:18
Those are actual实际 patients耐心 undergoing经历 a painful痛苦 procedure程序.
88
243000
3000
一些真正的病人将会接受一种痛苦的治疗方法。
04:21
I won't惯于 go into detail详情. It's no longer painful痛苦 these days,
89
246000
3000
细节不再详述。现今的疗法已不再如此难受,
04:24
but it was painful痛苦 when this study研究 was run in the 1990s.
90
249000
4000
但在研究进行的九十年代时,这种方法令人痛不欲生。
04:28
They were asked to report报告 on their pain疼痛 every一切 60 seconds.
91
253000
3000
病人每隔六十秒则必须报告他们的痛苦指数。
04:31
Here are two patients耐心,
92
256000
3000
这边有两位病患。
04:34
those are their recordings录音.
93
259000
2000
这是他们的记录。
04:36
And you are asked, "Who of them suffered遭遇 more?"
94
261000
3000
我问你:“在他们之中谁最痛苦?”
04:39
And it's a very easy简单 question.
95
264000
2000
这个问题很简单。
04:41
Clearly明确地, Patient患者 B suffered遭遇 more --
96
266000
2000
显然,是病人B。
04:43
his colonoscopy结肠镜检查 was longer,
97
268000
2000
他的结肠镜检查时间较长,
04:45
and every一切 minute分钟 of pain疼痛 that Patient患者 A had,
98
270000
3000
病人A每分钟感觉的痛疼
04:48
Patient患者 B had, and more.
99
273000
3000
病人B也感觉到了,而且持续更久。
04:51
But now there is another另一个 question:
100
276000
3000
但现在还有另一个问题:
04:54
"How much did these patients耐心 think they suffered遭遇?"
101
279000
3000
这些患者认为他们受罪了吗?
04:57
And here is a surprise.
102
282000
2000
这里有个小意外:
04:59
The surprise is that Patient患者 A
103
284000
2000
令人惊讶的是病人A
05:01
had a much worse更差 memory记忆 of the colonoscopy结肠镜检查
104
286000
3000
对结肠镜检查的记忆比病人B
05:04
than Patient患者 B.
105
289000
2000
还糟糕。
05:06
The stories故事 of the colonoscopies结肠镜检查 were different不同,
106
291000
3000
两段结肠镜检查的故事不同,
05:09
and because a very critical危急 part部分 of the story故事 is how it ends结束.
107
294000
6000
这关键在于故事的结尾--
05:15
And neither也不 of these stories故事 is very inspiring鼓舞人心 or great --
108
300000
3000
两个故事都不怎么启迪智慧--
05:18
but one of them is this distinct不同 ... (Laughter笑声)
109
303000
4000
但两者显然是不同的...(笑声)
05:22
but one of them is distinctly历历 worse更差 than the other.
110
307000
3000
显然其中之一的感受比另一个还差。
05:25
And the one that is worse更差
111
310000
2000
感觉较糟的这一个
05:27
is the one where pain疼痛 was at its peak at the very end结束;
112
312000
3000
是在最后的时期里知晓什么是痛绝人寰。
05:30
it's a bad story故事.
113
315000
2000
这不是个好故事。
05:32
How do we know that?
114
317000
2000
我们是怎么知道的?
05:34
Because we asked these people after their colonoscopy结肠镜检查,
115
319000
3000
因为我们在检查结束后问他们,
05:37
and much later后来, too,
116
322000
1000
以及在很久之后再问一次他们,
05:38
"How bad was the whole整个 thing, in total?"
117
323000
2000
“你们对结肠镜检查的整体印象如何?”
05:40
And it was much worse更差 for A than for B, in memory记忆.
118
325000
4000
结果是A的记忆感觉明显要比B更糟糕。
05:44
Now this is a direct直接 conflict冲突
119
329000
2000
现在这是经验自我和记忆自我
05:46
between之间 the experiencing经历 self and the remembering记忆 self.
120
331000
3000
之间的直接冲突。
05:49
From the point of view视图 of the experiencing经历 self,
121
334000
3000
从经验自我的角度来看,
05:52
clearly明确地, B had a worse更差 time.
122
337000
2000
病人B显然是比较难受的。
05:54
Now, what you could do with Patient患者 A,
123
339000
3000
那么病人A的情况该如何解释,
05:57
and we actually其实 ran clinical临床 experiments实验,
124
342000
3000
我们实际做了一个临床试验,
06:00
and it has been doneDONE, and it does work --
125
345000
2000
当实验完成时,我们也得到了预期的结果,
06:02
you could actually其实 extend延伸 the colonoscopy结肠镜检查 of Patient患者 A
126
347000
5000
事实上我们可以延长病人A的检查时间
06:07
by just keeping保持 the tube in without jiggling轻摇 it too much.
127
352000
3000
从而减缓导管的震动程度。
06:10
That will cause原因 the patient患者
128
355000
3000
虽然病人还是会疼,
06:13
to suffer遭受, but just a little
129
358000
3000
但已减轻
06:16
and much less than before.
130
361000
2000
许多了。
06:18
And if you do that for a couple一对 of minutes分钟,
131
363000
2000
假如继续这样下去,
06:20
you have made制作 the experiencing经历 self
132
365000
2000
你将会使病人A的经验自我的
06:22
of Patient患者 A worse更差 off,
133
367000
2000
感觉更糟,
06:24
and you have the remembering记忆 self of Patient患者 A
134
369000
3000
但病人A的记忆自我
06:27
a lot better off,
135
372000
2000
则会感觉好多了,
06:29
because now you have endowed天赋 Patient患者 A
136
374000
2000
因为你给了病人A
06:31
with a better story故事
137
376000
2000
一个好一点的故事,
06:33
about his experience经验.
138
378000
3000
一个好一点记忆他病痛经历的故事。
06:36
What defines定义 a story故事?
139
381000
3000
怎样给故事定义好坏?
06:39
And that is true真正 of the stories故事
140
384000
2000
并且记忆告诉我们的故事
06:41
that memory记忆 delivers提供 for us,
141
386000
2000
是真实的,
06:43
and it's also true真正 of the stories故事 that we make up.
142
388000
3000
我们讲述的故事也是真的。
06:46
What defines定义 a story故事 are changes变化,
143
391000
4000
故事的好坏取决于高潮时分
06:50
significant重大 moments瞬间 and endings结局.
144
395000
3000
及结尾时刻。
06:53
Endings结局 are very, very important重要
145
398000
2000
结尾是非常重要的,
06:55
and, in this case案件, the ending结尾 dominated占主导地位.
146
400000
4000
上面的这个故事就是由结尾所主导的。
06:59
Now, the experiencing经历 self
147
404000
2000
现在,经验自我
07:01
lives生活 its life continuously一直.
148
406000
3000
延续这个生活经验。
07:04
It has moments瞬间 of experience经验, one after the other.
149
409000
3000
他也拥有片刻的经验,一个接一个。
07:07
And you can ask: What happens发生 to these moments瞬间?
150
412000
3000
你会问:“这些片刻怎么了?”
07:10
And the answer回答 is really straightforward直截了当:
151
415000
2000
答案很简单。
07:12
They are lost丢失 forever永远.
152
417000
2000
他们永远消失了。
07:14
I mean, most of the moments瞬间 of our life --
153
419000
2000
我们生活中的大多片刻--
07:16
and I calculated计算, you know, the psychological心理 present当下
154
421000
3000
我算了算--从心理学角度来说
07:19
is said to be about three seconds long;
155
424000
2000
仅仅只是三秒长。
07:21
that means手段 that, you know,
156
426000
2000
这意味着
07:23
in a life there are about 600 million百万 of them;
157
428000
2000
人一生中大约有六亿个片刻。
07:25
in a month, there are about 600,000 --
158
430000
3000
一个月里则大约有六十万个片刻。
07:28
most of them don't leave离开 a trace跟踪.
159
433000
4000
它们大多不留痕迹。
07:32
Most of them are completely全然 ignored忽视
160
437000
2000
大多数皆被记忆自我
07:34
by the remembering记忆 self.
161
439000
2000
全然忽视了。
07:36
And yet然而, somehow不知何故 you get the sense
162
441000
2000
然而,你现在亦应发现
07:38
that they should count计数,
163
443000
2000
一些感觉被储存,
07:40
that what happens发生 during these moments瞬间 of experience经验
164
445000
3000
因为我们经验中的每分每秒合在一起
07:43
is our life.
165
448000
2000
就构成了我们的人生。
07:45
It's the finite有限 resource资源 that we're spending开支
166
450000
2000
只要我们活着,
07:47
while we're on this earth地球.
167
452000
2000
我们就会消耗这些有限的资源。
07:49
And how to spend it
168
454000
2000
该如何使用它们,
07:51
would seem似乎 to be relevant相应,
169
456000
2000
似乎是很重要的,
07:53
but that is not the story故事
170
458000
2000
但这不是记忆自我
07:55
that the remembering记忆 self keeps保持 for us.
171
460000
2000
所留给我们的故事。
07:57
So we have the remembering记忆 self
172
462000
2000
因此记忆自我
07:59
and the experiencing经历 self,
173
464000
2000
和经验自我
08:01
and they're really quite相当 distinct不同.
174
466000
2000
是很好区别的。
08:03
The biggest最大 difference区别 between之间 them
175
468000
2000
他们之间的最大不同
08:05
is in the handling处理 of time.
176
470000
3000
是在于处理时间的方式。
08:08
From the point of view视图 of the experiencing经历 self,
177
473000
3000
就经验自我而言,
08:11
if you have a vacation假期,
178
476000
2000
如果你有一个假期,
08:13
and the second第二 week is just as good as the first,
179
478000
3000
第二周和第一周同等快乐,
08:16
then the two-week2周 vacation假期
180
481000
3000
那么两周下来
08:19
is twice两次 as good as the one-week一周 vacation假期.
181
484000
3000
快乐的分量是一周假期的两倍多。
08:22
That's not the way it works作品 at all for the remembering记忆 self.
182
487000
3000
然而记忆自我则不是这样算的。
08:25
For the remembering记忆 self, a two-week2周 vacation假期
183
490000
2000
对记忆自我来说,两周假期
08:27
is barely仅仅 better than the one-week一周 vacation假期
184
492000
3000
并不比一周假期多多少,
08:30
because there are no new memories回忆 added添加.
185
495000
2000
因为期间没有任何新记忆的加入。
08:32
You have not changed the story故事.
186
497000
3000
故事的剧情依然如旧。
08:35
And in this way,
187
500000
2000
因此
08:37
time is actually其实 the critical危急 variable变量
188
502000
3000
时间是区分
08:40
that distinguishes区分 a remembering记忆 self
189
505000
3000
记忆自我和经验自我的
08:43
from an experiencing经历 self;
190
508000
2000
关键因素。
08:45
time has very little impact碰撞 on the story故事.
191
510000
3000
时间对这个故事的影响不大。
08:49
Now, the remembering记忆 self does more
192
514000
3000
记忆自我所做的
08:52
than remember记得 and tell stories故事.
193
517000
2000
不仅是记忆和讲述故事。
08:54
It is actually其实 the one that makes品牌 decisions决定
194
519000
4000
它也是真正做决定的因素,
08:58
because, if you have a patient患者 who has had, say,
195
523000
2000
因为,假若你的病人已经历
09:00
two colonoscopies结肠镜检查 with two different不同 surgeons外科医生
196
525000
3000
过两位不同的外科医生来做胃肠镜检查,
09:03
and is deciding决定 which哪一个 of them to choose选择,
197
528000
3000
而现在决定从他们中选一位来再做检查时,
09:06
then the one that chooses
198
531000
3000
病人选的将会是
09:09
is the one that has the memory记忆 that is less bad,
199
534000
4000
记忆中感觉比较好的那位,
09:13
and that's the surgeon外科医生 that will be chosen选择.
200
538000
2000
这就是如何选定医生的。
09:15
The experiencing经历 self
201
540000
2000
经验自我
09:17
has no voice语音 in this choice选择.
202
542000
3000
在做选择是则无从置喙。
09:20
We actually其实 don't choose选择 between之间 experiences经验,
203
545000
3000
事实上,我们不会在两段经验中做选择。
09:23
we choose选择 between之间 memories回忆 of experiences经验.
204
548000
3000
我们是在两种不同经验的记忆中做出选择。
09:26
And even when we think about the future未来,
205
551000
3000
而且当我们设想未来时,
09:29
we don't think of our future未来 normally一般 as experiences经验.
206
554000
3000
一般我们不会以经验的形式去思考。
09:32
We think of our future未来
207
557000
2000
我们把未来
09:34
as anticipated预期 memories回忆.
208
559000
3000
以预想的记忆形式呈现。
09:37
And basically基本上 you can look at this,
209
562000
2000
大体上你可以看到,
09:39
you know, as a tyranny暴政 of the remembering记忆 self,
210
564000
3000
记忆自我是专制的,
09:42
and you can think of the remembering记忆 self
211
567000
2000
你可以想象记忆自我
09:44
sort分类 of dragging拖延 the experiencing经历 self
212
569000
2000
在拽着经验自我,
09:46
through通过 experiences经验 that
213
571000
2000
他是通过经验自我不要的经验
09:48
the experiencing经历 self doesn't need.
214
573000
2000
来拽着经验自我的。
09:50
I have that sense that
215
575000
2000
我有个想法,
09:52
when we go on vacations休假
216
577000
2000
当我们放假时
09:54
this is very frequently经常 the case案件;
217
579000
2000
往往
09:56
that is, we go on vacations休假,
218
581000
2000
之所以放假,
09:58
to a very large extent程度,
219
583000
2000
有很大一部分
10:00
in the service服务 of our remembering记忆 self.
220
585000
3000
是为了记忆自我。
10:03
And this is a bit hard to justify辩解 I think.
221
588000
3000
我想这有点难来辩证。
10:06
I mean, how much do we consume消耗 our memories回忆?
222
591000
3000
我们使用了多少的记忆?
10:09
That is one of the explanations说明
223
594000
2000
这可以解释
10:11
that is given特定 for the dominance霸主地位
224
596000
2000
记忆自我
10:13
of the remembering记忆 self.
225
598000
2000
为何能成为主导的自我。
10:15
And when I think about that, I think about a vacation假期
226
600000
2000
这让我想起一次假期,
10:17
we had in Antarctica南极洲 a few少数 years年份 ago,
227
602000
3000
几年前在南极度过的假期,
10:20
which哪一个 was clearly明确地 the best最好 vacation假期 I've ever had,
228
605000
3000
这可以说是我最棒的一个假期,
10:23
and I think of it relatively相对 often经常,
229
608000
2000
与其它假期相比,
10:25
relative相对的 to how much I think of other vacations休假.
230
610000
2000
我常常会想起这个假期。
10:27
And I probably大概 have consumed消费
231
612000
4000
这趟旅程大概让我用掉了
10:31
my memories回忆 of that three-week三个星期 trip, I would say,
232
616000
2000
三周的记忆量,
10:33
for about 25 minutes分钟 in the last four years年份.
233
618000
3000
大概仅在过去四年中占了约25分钟。
10:36
Now, if I had ever opened打开 the folder
234
621000
3000
现在,如我打开资料夹
10:39
with the 600 pictures图片 in it,
235
624000
3000
里面大概有600张相片,
10:42
I would have spent花费 another另一个 hour小时.
236
627000
2000
我可能要花一个小时来回忆。
10:44
Now, that is three weeks,
237
629000
2000
三周的旅程
10:46
and that is at most an hour小时 and a half.
238
631000
2000
最多只用一个半小时来回忆。
10:48
There seems似乎 to be a discrepancy差异.
239
633000
2000
这似乎不成比例啊。
10:50
Now, I may可能 be a bit extreme极端, you know,
240
635000
2000
这让我有点不满,
10:52
in how little appetite食欲 I have for consuming消费 memories回忆,
241
637000
3000
因为我记得真是太少了,
10:55
but even if you do more of this,
242
640000
3000
不过就算你记得再多
10:58
there is a genuine真正 question:
243
643000
3000
这里也会有个实际的问题。
11:01
Why do we put so much weight重量 on memory记忆
244
646000
4000
为什么我们用来记忆
11:05
relative相对的 to the weight重量 that we put on experiences经验?
245
650000
3000
比依赖经验还多?
11:08
So I want you to think
246
653000
2000
所以我希望你能思考
11:10
about a thought experiment实验.
247
655000
3000
一个有关思考的实验。
11:13
Imagine想像 that for your next下一个 vacation假期,
248
658000
2000
假使你的下一个假期,
11:15
you know that at the end结束 of the vacation假期
249
660000
3000
当你知道假期结束后
11:18
all your pictures图片 will be destroyed销毁,
250
663000
3000
假期中所有的相片将被销毁时,
11:21
and you'll你会 get an amnesic遗忘 drug药物
251
666000
2000
而你也会吞下一颗遗忘药
11:23
so that you won't惯于 remember记得 anything.
252
668000
2000
以使你遗忘一切。
11:25
Now, would you choose选择 the same相同 vacation假期? (Laughter笑声)
253
670000
4000
这样,你还会想过同样的假期么?(笑声)
11:29
And if you would choose选择 a different不同 vacation假期,
254
674000
5000
如果你选了个不同的假期,
11:34
there is a conflict冲突 between之间 your two selves自我,
255
679000
2000
你的两个自我之间将会产生冲突,
11:36
and you need to think about how to adjudicate裁定 that conflict冲突,
256
681000
3000
你得想法来裁决这场冲突,
11:39
and it's actually其实 not at all obvious明显, because
257
684000
3000
这并不怎么容易,
11:42
if you think in terms条款 of time,
258
687000
3000
因为假若你仅考虑时间
11:45
then you get one answer回答,
259
690000
3000
你会得到一个答案。
11:48
and if you think in terms条款 of memories回忆,
260
693000
3000
但若仅考虑记忆
11:51
you might威力 get another另一个 answer回答.
261
696000
2000
你会得到另外一个答案。
11:53
Why do we pick the vacations休假 we do
262
698000
3000
我们为什么要选此而非彼,
11:56
is a problem问题 that confronts面对 us
263
701000
3000
这个困扰我们的问题
11:59
with a choice选择 between之间 the two selves自我.
264
704000
2000
是需要在两个自我之间作出选择。
12:01
Now, the two selves自我
265
706000
3000
现在,两个自我
12:04
bring带来 up two notions概念 of happiness幸福.
266
709000
2000
带来对快乐的两种不同见解。
12:06
There are really two concepts概念 of happiness幸福
267
711000
2000
这两种对快乐的见解
12:08
that we can apply应用, one per self.
268
713000
3000
分别对应了两个自我。
12:11
So you can ask: How happy快乐 is the experiencing经历 self?
269
716000
5000
因此你会问:“经验自我是有多快乐?”
12:16
And then you would ask: How happy快乐 are the moments瞬间
270
721000
2000
接着你会问:“经验自我的每一刻
12:18
in the experiencing经历 self's自我的 life?
271
723000
3000
有多快乐?”
12:21
And they're all -- happiness幸福 for moments瞬间
272
726000
2000
这些快乐时刻的组成过程
12:23
is a fairly相当 complicated复杂 process处理.
273
728000
2000
是异常复杂的。
12:25
What are the emotions情绪 that can be measured测量?
274
730000
3000
情感该如何测量?
12:28
And, by the way, now we are capable
275
733000
2000
顺带一提,我们现在
12:30
of getting得到 a pretty漂亮 good idea理念
276
735000
2000
对于经验自我会随着时间而感受快乐
12:32
of the happiness幸福 of the experiencing经历 self over time.
277
737000
4000
已经有了一个粗浅的概念了。
12:38
If you ask for the happiness幸福 of the remembering记忆 self,
278
743000
3000
而记忆自我所指的快乐
12:41
it's a completely全然 different不同 thing.
279
746000
2000
则是完全两码事。
12:43
This is not about how happily高高兴兴 a person lives生活.
280
748000
3000
这并不是一个人生活多快乐的问题。
12:46
It is about how satisfied满意 or pleased满意 the person is
281
751000
3000
而是它对自己的人生
12:49
when that person thinks about her life.
282
754000
4000
有多满意和多喜欢的问题。
12:53
Very different不同 notion概念.
283
758000
2000
迥然不同的见解。
12:55
Anyone任何人 who doesn't distinguish区分 those notions概念
284
760000
3000
若不能分辨这两种见解
12:58
is going to mess食堂 up the study研究 of happiness幸福,
285
763000
2000
就无法参透快乐这门学问,
13:00
and I belong属于 to a crowd人群 of students学生们 of well-being福利,
286
765000
3000
我和其他活得好的学生一样,
13:03
who've谁一直 been messing搞乱 up the study研究 of happiness幸福 for a long time
287
768000
4000
一直以来都研究不透快乐,
13:07
in precisely恰恰 this way.
288
772000
2000
就是因为这个原因。
13:09
The distinction分别 between之间 the
289
774000
2000
近年来,
13:11
happiness幸福 of the experiencing经历 self
290
776000
2000
经验自我的快乐
13:13
and the satisfaction满意 of the remembering记忆 self
291
778000
3000
和记忆自我的满足的
13:16
has been recognized认可 in recent最近 years年份,
292
781000
2000
差异性已能分清,
13:18
and there are now efforts努力 to measure测量 the two separately分别.
293
783000
3000
目前正努力来分别测度两者,
13:21
The Gallup盖洛普 Organization组织 has a world世界 poll轮询
294
786000
3000
盖洛普公司最近在全世界举行了一场民意调查,
13:24
where more than half a million百万 people
295
789000
2000
其中逾五十万人
13:26
have been asked questions问题
296
791000
2000
都被问及一个类似的问题,
13:28
about what they think of their life
297
793000
2000
那就是他们如何看待他们的生活
13:30
and about their experiences经验,
298
795000
2000
和如何看待他们的经验。
13:32
and there have been other efforts努力 along沿 those lines线.
299
797000
3000
除了这个问题,这个公司还做了其它的调查。
13:35
So in recent最近 years年份, we have begun开始 to learn学习
300
800000
3000
近年来,我们逐渐得知
13:38
about the happiness幸福 of the two selves自我.
301
803000
3000
关于两种快乐见解的信息。
13:41
And the main主要 lesson I think that we have learned学到了
302
806000
3000
我认为我们主要学到的便是
13:44
is they are really different不同.
303
809000
2000
两者是天壤之别的。
13:46
You can know how satisfied满意 somebody is with their life,
304
811000
5000
虽然你可以得知一个人对生活是否满意,
13:51
and that really doesn't teach you much
305
816000
2000
但却无法告诉你
13:53
about how happily高高兴兴 they're living活的 their life,
306
818000
3000
他们平常活的有多快乐,
13:56
and vice versa反之亦然.
307
821000
2000
而反之亦然。
13:58
Just to give you a sense of the correlation相关,
308
823000
2000
只是为了让你对其中的关联性有个基本概念,
14:00
the correlation相关 is about .5.
309
825000
2000
它们之间大概只有50%关联。
14:02
What that means手段 is if you met会见 somebody,
310
827000
3000
意思是当你见到某个人时,
14:05
and you were told, "Oh his father父亲 is six feet tall,"
311
830000
4000
你被告知他的爸爸有六尺高,
14:09
how much would you know about his height高度?
312
834000
2000
你能知道这个人有多高么?
14:11
Well, you would know something about his height高度,
313
836000
2000
好吧,你可能有个基本概念,
14:13
but there's a lot of uncertainty不确定.
314
838000
2000
但非常不确定。
14:15
You have that much uncertainty不确定.
315
840000
2000
你无法下判定。
14:17
If I tell you that somebody ranked排名 their life eight on a scale规模 of ten,
316
842000
4000
若我说有人给自己的生活质量打分,他打8/10分,
14:21
you have a lot of uncertainty不确定
317
846000
2000
你也不能把握
14:23
about how happy快乐 they are
318
848000
2000
他们的经验自我
14:25
with their experiencing经历 self.
319
850000
2000
有多么快乐。
14:27
So the correlation相关 is low.
320
852000
2000
所以关联性很低。
14:29
We know something about what controls控制
321
854000
3000
我们知道什么能够
14:32
satisfaction满意 of the happiness幸福 self.
322
857000
2000
让人的快乐得到满足。
14:34
We know that money is very important重要,
323
859000
2000
我们知道钱是很重要的,
14:36
goals目标 are very important重要.
324
861000
2000
目标也非常重要。
14:38
We know that happiness幸福 is mainly主要
325
863000
4000
我们知道要快乐是需要通过
14:42
being存在 satisfied满意 with people that we like,
326
867000
3000
我们所喜爱的人来满足,
14:45
spending开支 time with people that we like.
327
870000
3000
是需要花时间和他们待在一起来满足。
14:48
There are other pleasures乐趣, but this is dominant优势.
328
873000
2000
虽然还有其它因素,但这是主要因素。
14:50
So if you want to maximize最大化 the happiness幸福 of the two selves自我,
329
875000
3000
所以假若你想让两个自我都快乐,
14:53
you are going to end结束 up
330
878000
2000
你必须抛弃旧习
14:55
doing very different不同 things.
331
880000
2000
且要做些与众不同的事。
14:57
The bottom底部 line线 of what I've said here
332
882000
2000
我说的是,我们至少
14:59
is that we really should not think of happiness幸福
333
884000
4000
不应把快乐当成活得好的
15:03
as a substitute替代 for well-being福利.
334
888000
2000
代名词。
15:05
It is a completely全然 different不同 notion概念.
335
890000
3000
这两者是天壤之别的。
15:08
Now, very quickly很快,
336
893000
3000
现在,很快地讨论下
15:11
another另一个 reason原因 we cannot不能 think straight直行 about happiness幸福
337
896000
4000
另一个我们不能理解快乐本质的原因,
15:15
is that we do not attend出席 to the same相同 things
338
900000
7000
那就是我们怎么看生活
15:22
when we think about life, and we actually其实 live生活.
339
907000
3000
和我们怎么过生活是不一样的。
15:25
So, if you ask the simple简单 question of how happy快乐 people are in California加州,
340
910000
5000
所以,当你问加州的人有多快乐时,
15:30
you are not going to get to the correct正确 answer回答.
341
915000
3000
你将无法得到正确答案。
15:33
When you ask that question,
342
918000
2000
因为当你这样问时,
15:35
you think people must必须 be happier幸福 in California加州
343
920000
2000
你认为加州人一定过得比较快乐,
15:37
if, say, you live生活 in Ohio俄亥俄州.
344
922000
2000
而你则住在俄亥俄州。
15:39
(Laughter笑声)
345
924000
2000
(笑声)
15:41
And what happens发生 is
346
926000
3000
当你在想
15:44
when you think about living活的 in California加州,
347
929000
4000
住在加州有多快乐时,
15:48
you are thinking思维 of the contrast对比
348
933000
2000
你会想到加州和其他州域
15:50
between之间 California加州 and other places地方,
349
935000
3000
之间的差异性,
15:53
and that contrast对比, say, is in climate气候.
350
938000
2000
譬如,气候。
15:55
Well, it turns out that climate气候
351
940000
2000
事实证明气候条件
15:57
is not very important重要 to the experiencing经历 self
352
942000
3000
对于经验自我并非很重要
16:00
and it's not even very important重要 to the reflective反光 self
353
945000
3000
而且对于思考自我
16:03
that decides决定 how happy快乐 people are.
354
948000
3000
衡量自己有多快乐也不太重要。
16:06
But now, because the reflective反光 self is in charge收费,
355
951000
4000
不过,既然现实由思考自我主导,
16:10
you may可能 end结束 up -- some people may可能 end结束 up
356
955000
2000
一些人可能会得到这样一种结论,
16:12
moving移动 to California加州.
357
957000
2000
那就是搬到加州。
16:14
And it's sort分类 of interesting有趣 to trace跟踪 what is going to happen发生
358
959000
3000
他们搬去加州是为了过上更快乐的生活,
16:17
to people who move移动 to California加州 in the hope希望 of getting得到 happier幸福.
359
962000
3000
是而追踪观看他们的后续发展,将会是一件相当有趣的事。
16:20
Well, their experiencing经历 self
360
965000
2000
他们的经验自我
16:22
is not going to get happier幸福.
361
967000
2000
是不会变得更快乐。
16:24
We know that.
362
969000
2000
这我们都知道。
16:27
But one thing will happen发生: They will think they are happier幸福,
363
972000
3000
不过当一件事发生后,他们会觉得自己快乐多了。
16:30
because, when they think about it,
364
975000
4000
因为在他们思考时,
16:34
they'll他们会 be reminded提醒 of how horrible可怕 the weather天气 was in Ohio俄亥俄州,
365
979000
4000
他们会回想起俄亥俄州的坏天气。
16:38
and they will feel they made制作 the right decision决定.
366
983000
3000
他们也因此觉得他们做出了正确的决定。
16:41
It is very difficult
367
986000
2000
要理解快乐生活
16:43
to think straight直行 about well-being福利,
368
988000
2000
实在很难,
16:45
and I hope希望 I have given特定 you a sense
369
990000
3000
我希望我已经让你们对此有个基本概念,
16:48
of how difficult it is.
370
993000
2000
并且明白这个过程到底有多难。
16:50
Thank you.
371
995000
2000
谢谢。
16:52
(Applause掌声)
372
997000
3000
(鼓掌)
16:55
Chris克里斯 Anderson安德森: Thank you. I've got a question for you.
373
1000000
3000
克里斯·安德森:谢谢您的演讲。我有个问题想请教您。
16:59
Thank you so much.
374
1004000
2000
非常感谢您的演说。
17:01
Now, when we were on the phone电话 a few少数 weeks ago,
375
1006000
4000
几星期前,我们有过一次电话通讯,
17:05
you mentioned提到 to me that there was quite相当 an interesting有趣 result结果
376
1010000
3000
当时您提到您从盖洛普的调查中
17:08
came来了 out of that Gallup盖洛普 survey调查.
377
1013000
2000
发现了一个有趣的现象。
17:10
Is that something you can share分享
378
1015000
2000
请问您可以跟我们分享一下吗?
17:12
since以来 you do have a few少数 moments瞬间 left now?
379
1017000
2000
我们还有几分钟的时间。
17:14
Daniel丹尼尔 Kahneman卡尼曼: Sure.
380
1019000
2000
丹尼尔·卡纳曼:没问题。
17:16
I think the most interesting有趣 result结果 that we found发现 in the Gallup盖洛普 survey调查
381
1021000
3000
我从盖洛普调查中发现了一个极有趣的数字,
17:19
is a number, which哪一个 we absolutely绝对 did not expect期望 to find.
382
1024000
3000
能发现它实属意外。
17:22
We found发现 that with respect尊重 to the happiness幸福
383
1027000
2000
我们发现一个关于
17:24
of the experiencing经历 self.
384
1029000
3000
经验自我的快乐的现象。
17:27
When we looked看着 at how feelings情怀,
385
1032000
5000
那就是人的感觉
17:32
vary变化 with income收入.
386
1037000
2000
会随收入的多少而变化。
17:34
And it turns out that, below下面 an income收入
387
1039000
3000
结果表明,对于年收入低于六万美元的
17:37
of 60,000 dollars美元 a year, for Americans美国人 --
388
1042000
3000
美国人而言,
17:40
and that's a very large sample样品 of Americans美国人, like 600,000,
389
1045000
3000
这占了样本中的很大一部分,
17:43
so it's a large representative代表 sample样品 --
390
1048000
2000
将近有六十万人,这些人是相当具有指标性的,
17:45
below下面 an income收入 of 600,000 dollars美元 a year...
391
1050000
2000
这些年收入低于六十万美元......
17:47
CACA: 60,000.
392
1052000
2000
安德森:是六万美元。
17:49
DKDK: 60,000.
393
1054000
2000
卡纳曼:六万美元。
17:51
(Laughter笑声)
394
1056000
2000
(笑声)
17:53
60,000 dollars美元 a year, people are unhappy不快乐,
395
1058000
4000
年收入六万美元的人是不快乐的,
17:57
and they get progressively逐步 unhappier不快乐 the poorer they get.
396
1062000
3000
而且收入越低,他们则逾不快乐。
18:00
Above以上 that, we get an absolutely绝对 flat平面 line线.
397
1065000
3000
而当收入逾六万时,我们则得到一条标准水平线。
18:03
I mean I've rarely很少 seen看到 lines线 so flat平面.
398
1068000
3000
难得看到这么平坦的线。
18:06
Clearly明确地, what is happening事件 is
399
1071000
2000
显然
18:08
money does not buy购买 you experiential体验 happiness幸福,
400
1073000
3000
金钱是无法买到经验自我的快乐,
18:11
but lack缺乏 of money certainly当然 buys购买 you misery苦难,
401
1076000
3000
但没钱却的确能给你带来悲郁的境况,
18:14
and we can measure测量 that misery苦难
402
1079000
2000
而且我们清楚地测到痛苦的程度,
18:16
very, very clearly明确地.
403
1081000
2000
非常清楚。
18:18
In terms条款 of the other self, the remembering记忆 self,
404
1083000
3000
对于另一个自我,记忆自我而言。
18:21
you get a different不同 story故事.
405
1086000
2000
你则有了一个大相迳庭的故事。
18:23
The more money you earn, the more satisfied满意 you are.
406
1088000
3000
你赚的越多,你就越满意。
18:26
That does not hold保持 for emotions情绪.
407
1091000
2000
这跟情感没有任何关联。
18:28
CACA: But Danny丹尼, the whole整个 American美国 endeavor努力 is about
408
1093000
3000
安德森:可是丹尼,生命、自由和追求快乐
18:31
life, liberty自由, the pursuit追求 of happiness幸福.
409
1096000
3000
是所有美国人奋斗的目标。
18:34
If people took seriously认真地 that finding发现,
410
1099000
4000
假若大家都认真对待这一发现,
18:38
I mean, it seems似乎 to turn upside上边 down
411
1103000
3000
那么,这将颠覆我们
18:41
everything we believe about, like for example,
412
1106000
2000
固有的观念,例如,
18:43
taxation税收 policy政策 and so forth向前.
413
1108000
2000
课税政策等。
18:45
Is there any chance机会 that politicians政治家, that the country国家 generally通常,
414
1110000
3000
这个国家的政治人物有没有可能
18:48
would take a finding发现 like that seriously认真地
415
1113000
3000
会正视这样的发现
18:51
and run public上市 policy政策 based基于 on it?
416
1116000
2000
并且依次施政?
18:53
DKDK: You know I think that there is recognition承认
417
1118000
2000
卡纳曼:我认为已有人认知到研究快乐
18:55
of the role角色 of happiness幸福 research研究 in public上市 policy政策.
418
1120000
3000
于谋划政策中的地位。
18:58
The recognition承认 is going to be slow in the United联合的 States状态,
419
1123000
2000
但这项认知于美国的传播速度颇慢,
19:00
no question about that,
420
1125000
2000
这是毋庸置疑的,
19:02
but in the U.K., it is happening事件,
421
1127000
2000
但在英国,它正持续发酵,
19:04
and in other countries国家 it is happening事件.
422
1129000
2000
其他国家亦然。
19:06
People are recognizing认识 that they ought应该
423
1131000
3000
一般人也开始认知到
19:09
to be thinking思维 of happiness幸福
424
1134000
2000
在谋划政策时
19:11
when they think of public上市 policy政策.
425
1136000
2000
亦应将快乐纳入考量指标。
19:13
It's going to take a while,
426
1138000
2000
虽然这将花些时间,
19:15
and people are going to debate辩论
427
1140000
3000
但人们也将开始思考。
19:18
whether是否 they want to study研究 experience经验 happiness幸福,
428
1143000
2000
他们要的是经验的快乐
19:20
or whether是否 they want to study研究 life evaluation评测,
429
1145000
2000
抑或是为生活打分,
19:22
so we need to have that debate辩论 fairly相当 soon不久.
430
1147000
3000
因此很快,我们将要理解这个问题。
19:25
How to enhance提高 happiness幸福
431
1150000
2000
如何增进快乐,
19:27
goes very different不同 ways方法 depending根据 on how you think,
432
1152000
3000
有好几种方式,但事关你是怎么想的,
19:30
and whether是否 you think of the remembering记忆 self
433
1155000
2000
你想的是记忆自我
19:32
or you think of the experiencing经历 self.
434
1157000
2000
还是在想经验自我。
19:34
This is going to influence影响 policy政策, I think, in years年份 to come.
435
1159000
3000
我想于几年之内,这将影响政策的实施。
19:37
In the United联合的 States状态, efforts努力 are being存在 made制作
436
1162000
3000
美国已经付出巨大的努力来衡量
19:40
to measure测量 the experience经验 happiness幸福 of the population人口.
437
1165000
3000
大众的经验的快乐。
19:43
This is going to be, I think, within the next下一个 decade or two,
438
1168000
3000
我想在十年或二十年内,
19:46
part部分 of national国民 statistics统计.
439
1171000
2000
这将会成为国家统计数据的一部分。
19:48
CACA: Well, it seems似乎 to me that this issue问题 will -- or at least最小 should be --
440
1173000
4000
安德森:这个议题对于我来说
19:52
the most interesting有趣 policy政策 discussion讨论 to track跟踪
441
1177000
2000
将会是未来几年里
19:54
over the next下一个 few少数 years年份.
442
1179000
2000
最有的一个政策讨论议题。
19:56
Thank you so much for inventing发明了 behavioral行为的 economics经济学.
443
1181000
2000
非常感谢您所创造的行为经济学。
19:58
Thank you, Danny丹尼 Kahneman卡尼曼.
444
1183000
2000
非常感谢丹尼尔·卡纳曼。
Translated by Chaoran Yu
Reviewed by Angelia King

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Daniel Kahneman - Behavioral economics founder
Widely regarded as the world's most influential living psychologist, Daniel Kahneman won the Nobel in Economics for his pioneering work in behavioral economics -- exploring the irrational ways we make decisions about risk.

Why you should listen

Daniel Kahneman is an eminence grise for the Freakonomics crowd. In the mid-1970s, with his collaborator Amos Tversky, he was among the first academics to pick apart exactly why we make "wrong" decisions. In their 1979 paper on prospect theory, Kahneman and Tversky examined a simple problem of economic risk. And rather than stating the optimal, rational answer, as an economist of the time might have, they quantified how most real people, consistently, make a less-rational choice. Their work treated economics not as a perfect or self-correcting machine, but as a system prey to quirks of human perception. The field of behavioral economics was born.

Kahneman was awarded the Nobel Memorial prize in 2002 for his work with Tversky, who died before the award was bestowed. In a lovely passage in his Nobel biography, Kahneman looks back on his deep collaboration with Tversky and calls for a new form of academic cooperation, marked not by turf battles but by "adversarial collaboration," a good-faith effort by unlike minds to conduct joint research, critiquing each other in the service of an ideal of truth to which both can contribute.

More profile about the speaker
Daniel Kahneman | Speaker | TED.com

Data provided by TED.

This site was created in May 2015 and the last update was on January 12, 2020. It will no longer be updated.

We are currently creating a new site called "eng.lish.video" and would be grateful if you could access it.

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to write comments in your language on the contact form.

Privacy Policy

Developer's Blog

Buy Me A Coffee