TEDxCaltech
Leonard Susskind: My friend Richard Feynman
Filmed:
Readability: 3.5
1,213,939 views
What's it like to be pals with a genius? Physicist Leonard Susskind spins a few stories about his friendship with the legendary Richard Feynman, discussing his unconventional approach to problems both serious and ... less so.
Leonard Susskind - Physicist
Leonard Susskind works on string theory, quantum field theory, quantum statistical mechanics and quantum cosmology at Stanford. Full bio
Leonard Susskind works on string theory, quantum field theory, quantum statistical mechanics and quantum cosmology at Stanford. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
I decided when I was asked to do this
0
0
2000
00:17
that what I really wanted to talk about
1
2000
2000
00:19
was my friend Richard Feynman.
2
4000
2000
00:21
I was one of the fortunate few
3
6000
2000
00:23
that really did get to know him
4
8000
2000
00:25
and enjoyed his presence.
5
10000
2000
00:27
And I'm going to tell you the Richard Feynman that I knew.
6
12000
3000
00:30
I'm sure there are other people here
7
15000
2000
00:32
who could tell you about the Richard Feynman they knew,
8
17000
2000
00:34
and it would probably be a different Richard Feynman.
9
19000
2000
00:36
Richard Feynman was a very complex man.
10
21000
3000
00:39
He was a man of many, many parts.
11
24000
2000
00:41
He was, of course, foremost,
12
26000
2000
00:43
a very, very, very great scientist.
13
28000
3000
00:46
He was an actor. You saw him act.
14
31000
3000
00:49
I also had the good fortune to be in those lectures,
15
34000
3000
00:52
up in the balcony.
16
37000
2000
00:54
They were fantastic.
17
39000
2000
00:56
He was a philosopher;
18
41000
2000
00:58
he was a drum player;
19
43000
2000
01:00
he was a teacher par excellence.
20
45000
3000
01:03
Richard Feynman was also a showman,
21
48000
2000
01:05
an enormous showman.
22
50000
2000
01:07
He was brash, irreverent --
23
52000
4000
01:11
he was full of macho,
24
56000
2000
01:13
a kind of macho one-upmanship.
25
58000
3000
01:16
He loved intellectual battle.
26
61000
4000
01:20
He had a gargantuan ego.
27
65000
4000
01:24
But the man had somehow
28
69000
3000
01:27
a lot of room at the bottom.
29
72000
2000
01:29
And what I mean by that
30
74000
2000
01:31
is a lot of room, in my case --
31
76000
3000
01:34
I can't speak for anybody else --
32
79000
2000
01:36
but in my case,
33
81000
2000
01:38
a lot of room for another big ego.
34
83000
3000
01:41
Well, not as big as his,
35
86000
2000
01:43
but fairly big.
36
88000
2000
01:45
I always felt good with Dick Feynman.
37
90000
3000
01:48
It was always fun to be with him.
38
93000
2000
01:50
He always made me feel smart.
39
95000
2000
01:52
How can somebody like that make you feel smart?
40
97000
2000
01:54
Somehow he did.
41
99000
2000
01:56
He made me feel smart. He made me feel he was smart.
42
101000
2000
01:58
He made me feel we were both smart,
43
103000
2000
02:00
and the two of us could solve any problem whatever.
44
105000
4000
02:04
And in fact, we did sometimes do physics together.
45
109000
3000
02:07
We never published a paper together,
46
112000
2000
02:09
but we did have a lot of fun.
47
114000
3000
02:13
He loved to win.
48
118000
2000
02:15
With these little macho games we would sometimes play --
49
120000
3000
02:18
and he didn't only play them with me, he played them with all sorts of people --
50
123000
3000
02:21
he would almost always win.
51
126000
2000
02:23
But when he didn't win, when he lost,
52
128000
3000
02:26
he would laugh and seem to have just as much fun
53
131000
3000
02:29
as if he had won.
54
134000
2000
02:31
I remember once he told me a story
55
136000
2000
02:33
about a joke that the students played on him.
56
138000
3000
02:36
They took him -- I think it was for his birthday --
57
141000
2000
02:38
they took him for lunch.
58
143000
2000
02:40
They took him for lunch
59
145000
2000
02:42
to a sandwich place in Pasadena.
60
147000
2000
02:44
It may still exist; I don't know.
61
149000
2000
02:46
Celebrity sandwiches was their thing.
62
151000
3000
02:49
You could get a Marilyn Monroe sandwich.
63
154000
2000
02:51
You could get a Humphrey Bogart sandwich.
64
156000
3000
02:54
The students went there in advance,
65
159000
2000
02:56
and they arranged that they would all order Feynman sandwiches.
66
161000
3000
02:59
One after another, they came in and ordered Feynman sandwiches.
67
164000
3000
03:02
Feynman loved this story.
68
167000
2000
03:04
He told me this story, and he was really happy and laughing.
69
169000
4000
03:08
When he finished the story, I said to him,
70
173000
3000
03:11
"Dick, I wonder what would be the difference
71
176000
2000
03:13
between a Feynman sandwich and a Susskind sandwich."
72
178000
4000
03:17
And without skipping a beat at all,
73
182000
2000
03:19
he said, "Well, they'd be about the same.
74
184000
3000
03:22
The only difference is a Susskind sandwich would have a lot more ham,"
75
187000
3000
03:25
ham, as in bad actor.
76
190000
2000
03:27
(Laughter)
77
192000
2000
03:29
Well, I happened to have been very quick that day,
78
194000
3000
03:32
and I said, "Yeah, but a lot less baloney."
79
197000
3000
03:35
(Laughter)
80
200000
3000
03:38
The truth of the matter
81
203000
4000
03:42
is that a Feynman sandwich
82
207000
2000
03:44
had a load of ham,
83
209000
2000
03:46
but absolutely no baloney.
84
211000
3000
03:50
What Feynman hated worse than anything else
85
215000
2000
03:52
was intellectual pretense --
86
217000
2000
03:54
phoniness,
87
219000
2000
03:56
false sophistication, jargon.
88
221000
3000
03:59
I remember sometime during the '80s,
89
224000
3000
04:02
the mid-'80s,
90
227000
2000
04:04
Dick and I and Sidney Coleman
91
229000
2000
04:06
would meet a couple of times
92
231000
2000
04:08
up in San Francisco at some very rich guy's house --
93
233000
3000
04:11
up in San Francisco for dinner.
94
236000
2000
04:13
And the last time the rich guy invited us,
95
238000
3000
04:16
he also invited a couple of philosophers.
96
241000
2000
04:18
These guys were philosophers of mind.
97
243000
3000
04:21
Their specialty was the philosophy of consciousness.
98
246000
3000
04:24
And they were full of all kinds of jargon.
99
249000
2000
04:26
I'm trying to remember the words --
100
251000
3000
04:29
"monism," "dualism," categories all over the place.
101
254000
3000
04:32
I didn't know what those things meant, neither did Dick --
102
257000
2000
04:34
neither did Sydney for that matter.
103
259000
2000
04:36
And what did we talk about?
104
261000
2000
04:38
Well, what do you talk about when you talk about minds?
105
263000
3000
04:41
One thing, there's one obvious thing to talk about --
106
266000
2000
04:43
can a machine become a mind?
107
268000
2000
04:45
Can you build a machine
108
270000
2000
04:47
that thinks like a human being,
109
272000
2000
04:49
that is conscious?
110
274000
2000
04:51
We sat around and we talked about this -- we of course never resolved it.
111
276000
3000
04:54
But the trouble with the philosophers
112
279000
2000
04:56
is that they were philosophizing
113
281000
2000
04:58
when they should have been science-iphizing.
114
283000
2000
05:00
It's a scientific question after all.
115
285000
3000
05:03
And this was a very, very dangerous thing to do
116
288000
2000
05:05
around Dick Feynman.
117
290000
3000
05:10
Feynman let them have it -- both barrels, right between the eyes.
118
295000
3000
05:13
It was brutal; it was funny -- ooh, it was funny.
119
298000
3000
05:16
But it was really brutal.
120
301000
2000
05:18
He really popped their balloon.
121
303000
2000
05:20
But the amazing thing was --
122
305000
2000
05:22
Feynman had to leave a little early.
123
307000
2000
05:24
He wasn't feeling too well, so he left a little bit early.
124
309000
3000
05:27
And Sidney and I were left there with the two philosophers.
125
312000
3000
05:30
And the amazing thing is these guys were flying.
126
315000
3000
05:33
They were so happy.
127
318000
2000
05:35
They had met the great man;
128
320000
3000
05:38
they had been instructed by the great man;
129
323000
2000
05:40
they had an enormous amount of fun
130
325000
2000
05:42
having their faces shoved in the mud,
131
327000
3000
05:45
and it was something special.
132
330000
3000
05:48
I realized there was something just extraordinary about Feynman,
133
333000
3000
05:51
even when he did what he did.
134
336000
3000
05:58
Dick, he was my friend. I did call him Dick.
135
343000
3000
06:01
Dick and I had a certain, a little bit of a rapport.
136
346000
2000
06:03
I think it may have been a special rapport that he and I had.
137
348000
3000
06:06
We liked each other; we liked the same kind of things.
138
351000
3000
06:09
I also liked the kind of intellectual macho games.
139
354000
4000
06:13
Sometimes I would win, mostly he would win,
140
358000
2000
06:15
but we both enjoyed them.
141
360000
2000
06:17
And Dick became convinced at some point
142
362000
2000
06:19
that he and I had some kind of similarity of personality.
143
364000
4000
06:23
I don't think he was right.
144
368000
2000
06:25
I think the only point of similarity between us
145
370000
2000
06:27
is we both like to talk about ourselves.
146
372000
3000
06:30
But he was convinced of this.
147
375000
2000
06:32
And he was curious.
148
377000
2000
06:34
The man was incredibly curious.
149
379000
2000
06:36
And he wanted to understand what it was and why it was
150
381000
3000
06:39
that there was this funny connection.
151
384000
4000
06:43
And one day we were walking. We were in France.
152
388000
2000
06:45
We were in La Zouche.
153
390000
2000
06:47
We were up in the mountains, 1976.
154
392000
2000
06:49
We were up in the mountains, and Feynman said to me,
155
394000
3000
06:52
he said, "Leonardo."
156
397000
2000
06:54
The reason he called me Leonardo
157
399000
2000
06:56
is because we were in Europe
158
401000
2000
06:58
and he was practicing his French.
159
403000
3000
07:01
And he said, "Leonardo,
160
406000
3000
07:04
were you closer to your mother or to you father
161
409000
3000
07:07
when you were a kid?"
162
412000
2000
07:09
And I said, "Well, my real hero was my father.
163
414000
3000
07:12
He was a working man,
164
417000
2000
07:14
had a fifth grade education.
165
419000
3000
07:17
He was a master mechanic, and he taught me how to use tools.
166
422000
3000
07:20
He taught me all sorts of things about mechanical things.
167
425000
4000
07:24
He even taught me the Pythagorean theorem.
168
429000
2000
07:26
He didn't call it the hypotenuse,
169
431000
2000
07:28
he called it the shortcut distance."
170
433000
3000
07:31
And Feynman's eyes just opened up.
171
436000
2000
07:33
He went off like a light bulb.
172
438000
2000
07:35
And he said he had had
173
440000
3000
07:38
basically exactly the same relationship
174
443000
2000
07:40
with his father.
175
445000
2000
07:42
In fact, he had been convinced at one time
176
447000
3000
07:45
that, to be a good physicist,
177
450000
3000
07:48
that it was very important
178
453000
2000
07:50
to have had that kind of relationship with your father.
179
455000
3000
07:53
I apologize for the sexist conversation here,
180
458000
3000
07:56
but this is the way it really happened.
181
461000
2000
07:58
He said that he had been absolutely convinced that this was necessary --
182
463000
4000
08:02
the necessary part of the growing up of a young physicist.
183
467000
4000
08:06
Being Dick, he, of course, wanted to check this.
184
471000
3000
08:09
He wanted to go out and do an experiment.
185
474000
2000
08:11
So, well he did.
186
476000
2000
08:13
He went out and did an experiment.
187
478000
2000
08:15
He asked all his friends that he thought were good physicists,
188
480000
3000
08:18
"Was it your mom or your pop that influenced you?"
189
483000
3000
08:21
And to a man -- they were all men --
190
486000
2000
08:23
to a man, every single one of them
191
488000
2000
08:25
said, "My mother."
192
490000
2000
08:27
(Laughter)
193
492000
3000
08:30
There went that theory down the trashcan of history.
194
495000
4000
08:35
But he was very excited that he had finally met somebody
195
500000
3000
08:38
who had the same experience with my father
196
503000
3000
08:41
as he had with his father.
197
506000
2000
08:43
And for some time, he was convinced
198
508000
2000
08:45
this was the reason we got along so well.
199
510000
2000
08:47
I don't know. Maybe. Who knows?
200
512000
2000
08:49
But let me tell you a little bit
201
514000
2000
08:51
about Feynman the physicist.
202
516000
3000
08:55
Feynman's style --
203
520000
2000
08:57
no, style is not the right word.
204
522000
2000
08:59
Style makes you think of the bow tie he might have worn
205
524000
2000
09:01
or the suit he was wearing.
206
526000
2000
09:03
There's something much deeper than that,
207
528000
2000
09:05
but I can't think of another word for it.
208
530000
2000
09:07
Feynman's scientific style
209
532000
3000
09:10
was always to look for the simplest,
210
535000
2000
09:12
most elementary solution to a problem that was possible.
211
537000
5000
09:17
If it wasn't possible, you had to use something fancier.
212
542000
3000
09:20
But no doubt part of this
213
545000
3000
09:23
was his great joy and pleasure
214
548000
3000
09:26
in showing people that he could think more simply than they could.
215
551000
4000
09:30
But he also deeply believed, he truly believed,
216
555000
3000
09:33
that if you couldn't explain something simply
217
558000
2000
09:35
you didn't understand it.
218
560000
3000
09:38
In the 1950s, people were trying to figure out
219
563000
3000
09:41
how superfluid helium worked.
220
566000
2000
09:43
There was a theory.
221
568000
2000
09:45
It was due to a Russian mathematical physicist,
222
570000
2000
09:47
and it was a complicated theory.
223
572000
2000
09:49
I'll tell you what that theory was soon enough.
224
574000
2000
09:51
It was a terribly complicated theory
225
576000
2000
09:53
full of very difficult integrals and formulas
226
578000
3000
09:56
and mathematics and so forth.
227
581000
2000
09:58
And it sort of worked, but it didn't work very well.
228
583000
3000
10:01
The only way it worked
229
586000
2000
10:03
is when the helium atoms were very, very far apart.
230
588000
3000
10:06
The helium atoms had to be very far apart.
231
591000
2000
10:08
And unfortunately, the helium atoms in liquid helium
232
593000
2000
10:10
are right on top of each other.
233
595000
2000
10:12
Feynman decided, as a sort of amateur helium physicist,
234
597000
3000
10:15
that he would try to figure it out.
235
600000
3000
10:18
He had an idea, a very clear idea.
236
603000
2000
10:20
He would try to figure out
237
605000
2000
10:22
what the quantum wave function
238
607000
2000
10:24
of this huge number of atoms looked like.
239
609000
2000
10:26
He would try to visualize it,
240
611000
2000
10:28
guided by a small number of simple principles.
241
613000
3000
10:31
The small number of simple principles were very, very simple.
242
616000
3000
10:34
The first one was
243
619000
2000
10:36
that when helium atoms touch each other, they repel.
244
621000
3000
10:39
The implication of that is that the wave function has to go to zero,
245
624000
3000
10:42
it has to vanish when the helium atoms touch each other.
246
627000
3000
10:45
The other fact
247
630000
2000
10:47
is that the ground state, the lowest energy state of a quantum system,
248
632000
3000
10:50
the wave function is always very smooth --
249
635000
4000
10:54
has the minimum number of wiggles.
250
639000
2000
10:56
So he sat down --
251
641000
2000
10:58
and I imagine he had nothing more
252
643000
2000
11:00
than a simple piece of paper and a pencil --
253
645000
2000
11:02
and he tried to write down, and did write down,
254
647000
2000
11:04
the simplest function that he could think of
255
649000
3000
11:07
which had the boundary conditions
256
652000
2000
11:09
that the wave function vanish when things touch
257
654000
2000
11:11
and is smooth in between.
258
656000
2000
11:13
He wrote down a simple thing.
259
658000
2000
11:15
It was so simple, in fact,
260
660000
2000
11:17
that I suspect a really smart high school student,
261
662000
2000
11:19
who didn't even have calculus,
262
664000
2000
11:21
could understand what he wrote down.
263
666000
3000
11:24
The thing was that that simple thing that he wrote down
264
669000
3000
11:27
explained everything that was known at the time about liquid helium
265
672000
3000
11:30
and then some.
266
675000
2000
11:32
I've always wondered
267
677000
2000
11:34
whether the professionals, the real professional helium physicists,
268
679000
3000
11:37
were just a little bit embarrassed by this.
269
682000
3000
11:40
They had their super-powerful technique,
270
685000
2000
11:42
and they couldn't do as well.
271
687000
2000
11:44
Incidentally, I'll tell you what that super-powerful technique was.
272
689000
4000
11:48
It was the technique of Feynman diagrams.
273
693000
3000
11:51
(Laughter)
274
696000
2000
11:53
He did it again in 1968.
275
698000
3000
11:56
In 1968, in my own university --
276
701000
2000
11:58
I wasn't there at the time -- but in 1968,
277
703000
3000
12:01
they were exploring the structure of the proton.
278
706000
3000
12:04
The proton is obviously made
279
709000
2000
12:06
of a whole bunch of little particles.
280
711000
2000
12:08
This was more or less known.
281
713000
2000
12:10
And the way to analyze it was, of course, Feynman diagrams.
282
715000
3000
12:13
That's what Feynman diagrams were constructed for --
283
718000
3000
12:16
to understand particles.
284
721000
2000
12:18
The experiments that were going on were very simple.
285
723000
2000
12:20
You simply take the proton,
286
725000
2000
12:22
and you hit it really sharply with an electron.
287
727000
2000
12:24
This was the thing the Feynman diagrams were for.
288
729000
3000
12:27
The only problem
289
732000
2000
12:29
was that Feynman diagrams are complicated.
290
734000
2000
12:31
They're difficult integrals.
291
736000
2000
12:33
If you could do all of them, you would have a very precise theory.
292
738000
3000
12:36
But you couldn't; they were just too complicated.
293
741000
3000
12:39
People were trying to do them.
294
744000
2000
12:41
You could do a one loop diagram. Don't worry about one loop.
295
746000
3000
12:44
One loop, two loops -- maybe you could do a three loop diagram,
296
749000
3000
12:47
but beyond that, you couldn't do anything.
297
752000
2000
12:49
Feynman said, "Forget all of that.
298
754000
2000
12:51
Just think of the proton
299
756000
2000
12:53
as an assemblage of little particles --
300
758000
2000
12:55
a swarm of little particles."
301
760000
2000
12:57
He called them partons. He called them partons.
302
762000
3000
13:00
He said, "Just think of it as a swarm of partons
303
765000
2000
13:02
moving real fast."
304
767000
2000
13:04
Because they're moving real fast,
305
769000
4000
13:08
relativity says the internal motions go very slow.
306
773000
4000
13:12
The electron hits it suddenly.
307
777000
2000
13:14
It's like taking a very sudden snapshot of the proton.
308
779000
3000
13:17
What do you see?
309
782000
2000
13:19
You see a frozen bunch of partons.
310
784000
5000
13:24
They don't move, and because they don't move
311
789000
2000
13:26
during the course of the experiment,
312
791000
2000
13:28
you don't have to worry about how they're moving.
313
793000
2000
13:30
You don't have to worry about the forces between them.
314
795000
2000
13:32
You just get to think of it
315
797000
2000
13:34
as a population
316
799000
2000
13:36
of frozen partons.
317
801000
3000
13:39
This was the key to analyzing these experiments.
318
804000
3000
13:42
Extremely effective, it really did --
319
807000
3000
13:45
somebody said the word revolution is a bad word.
320
810000
2000
13:47
I suppose it is, so I won't say revolution --
321
812000
3000
13:50
but it certainly evolved very, very deeply
322
815000
3000
13:53
our understanding of the proton,
323
818000
3000
13:56
and of particles beyond that.
324
821000
2000
13:58
Well, I had some more that I was going to tell you
325
823000
2000
14:00
about my connection with Feynman,
326
825000
2000
14:02
what he was like,
327
827000
2000
14:04
but I see I have exactly half a minute.
328
829000
2000
14:06
So I think I'll just finish up
329
831000
2000
14:08
by saying I actually don't think Feynman would have liked this event.
330
833000
4000
14:12
I think he would have said,
331
837000
3000
14:15
"I don't need this."
332
840000
3000
14:18
But how should we honor Feynman?
333
843000
3000
14:21
How should we really honor Feynman?
334
846000
2000
14:23
I think the answer is we should honor Feynman
335
848000
3000
14:26
by getting as much baloney
336
851000
2000
14:28
out of our own sandwiches as we can.
337
853000
3000
14:31
Thank you.
338
856000
2000
14:33
(Applause)
339
858000
3000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Leonard Susskind - PhysicistLeonard Susskind works on string theory, quantum field theory, quantum statistical mechanics and quantum cosmology at Stanford.
Why you should listen
Leonard Susskind is the Felix Bloch Professor of Physics at Stanford University. His research interests include string theory, quantum field theory, quantum statistical mechanics, and quantum cosmology. He received the Pregel Award from the New York Academy of Science (1975), and the J. J. Sakurai Prize of the American Physical Society (1998) "for his pioneering contributions to hadronic string models, lattice gauge theories, quantum chromodynamics, and dynamical symmetry breaking." He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and, since 2009, has been serving as Director of the Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics.
He is a recent recipient of the Los Angeles Times Book Award in Science and Technology for The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics.
Leonard Susskind | Speaker | TED.com