TED2004
Martin Seligman: The new era of positive psychology
Filmed:
Readability: 4.2
5,504,461 views
Martin Seligman talks about psychology -- as a field of study and as it works one-on-one with each patient and each practitioner. As it moves beyond a focus on disease, what can modern psychology help us to become?
Martin Seligman - Psychologist
Martin Seligman is the founder of positive psychology, a field of study that examines healthy states, such as happiness, strength of character and optimism. Full bio
Martin Seligman is the founder of positive psychology, a field of study that examines healthy states, such as happiness, strength of character and optimism. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:12
When I was president of the American Psychological Association,
0
0
3000
00:15
they tried to media-train me,
1
3000
2000
00:17
and an encounter I had with CNN
2
5000
4000
00:21
summarizes what I'm going to be talking about today,
3
9000
3000
00:24
which is the eleventh reason to be optimistic.
4
12000
4000
00:28
The editor of Discover told us 10 of them,
5
16000
5000
00:34
I'm going to give you the eleventh.
6
22000
2000
00:36
So they came to me -- CNN -- and they said, "Professor Seligman,
7
24000
4000
00:40
would you tell us about the state of psychology today?
8
28000
5000
00:45
We'd like to interview you about that." And I said, "Great."
9
33000
3000
00:48
And she said, "But this is CNN, so you only get a sound bite."
10
36000
5000
00:53
So I said, "Well, how many words do I get?"
11
41000
3000
00:56
And she said, "Well, one."
12
44000
2000
00:58
(Laughter)
13
46000
1000
00:59
And cameras rolled, and she said, "Professor Seligman,
14
47000
4000
01:03
what is the state of psychology today?"
15
51000
4000
01:07
"Good."
16
55000
2000
01:09
(Laughter)
17
57000
2000
01:11
"Cut. Cut. That won't do.
18
59000
3000
01:14
We'd really better give you a longer sound bite."
19
62000
4000
01:18
"Well, how many words do I get this time?" "I think, well, you get two.
20
66000
4000
01:22
Doctor Seligman, what is the state of psychology today?"
21
70000
6000
01:28
"Not good."
22
76000
2000
01:30
(Laughter)
23
78000
9000
01:39
"Look, Doctor Seligman,
24
87000
2000
01:41
we can see you're really not comfortable in this medium.
25
89000
3000
01:44
We'd better give you a real sound bite.
26
92000
3000
01:47
This time you can have three words.
27
95000
3000
01:50
Professor Seligman, what is the state of psychology today?"
28
98000
5000
01:55
"Not good enough." And that's what I'm going to be talking about.
29
103000
5000
02:00
I want to say why psychology was good, why it was not good
30
108000
4000
02:04
and how it may become, in the next 10 years, good enough.
31
112000
4000
02:08
And by parallel summary, I want to say the same thing about technology,
32
116000
5000
02:13
about entertainment and design, because I think the issues are very similar.
33
121000
4000
02:17
So, why was psychology good?
34
125000
3000
02:20
Well, for more than 60 years, psychology worked within the disease model.
35
128000
5000
02:25
Ten years ago, when I was on an airplane
36
133000
2000
02:27
and I introduced myself to my seatmate, and told them what I did,
37
135000
4000
02:31
they'd move away from me.
38
139000
2000
02:33
And because, quite rightly, they were saying
39
141000
3000
02:36
psychology is about finding what's wrong with you. Spot the loony.
40
144000
4000
02:40
And now, when I tell people what I do, they move toward me.
41
148000
5000
02:45
And what was good about psychology,
42
153000
3000
02:48
about the 30 billion dollar investment NIMH made,
43
156000
4000
02:52
about working in the disease model,
44
160000
2000
02:54
about what you mean by psychology,
45
162000
2000
02:56
is that, 60 years ago, none of the disorders were treatable --
46
164000
5000
03:01
it was entirely smoke and mirrors.
47
169000
2000
03:03
And now, 14 of the disorders are treatable,
48
171000
2000
03:05
two of them actually curable.
49
173000
2000
03:07
And the other thing that happened is that a science developed,
50
175000
5000
03:12
a science of mental illness.
51
180000
2000
03:14
That we found out that we could take fuzzy concepts -- like depression, alcoholism --
52
182000
8000
03:22
and measure them with rigor.
53
190000
2000
03:24
That we could create a classification of the mental illnesses.
54
192000
4000
03:28
That we could understand the causality of the mental illnesses.
55
196000
5000
03:33
We could look across time at the same people --
56
201000
4000
03:37
people, for example, who were genetically vulnerable to schizophrenia --
57
205000
4000
03:41
and ask what the contribution of mothering, of genetics are,
58
209000
4000
03:45
and we could isolate third variables
59
213000
3000
03:48
by doing experiments on the mental illnesses.
60
216000
3000
03:51
And best of all, we were able, in the last 50 years,
61
219000
4000
03:55
to invent drug treatments and psychological treatments.
62
223000
4000
03:59
And then we were able to test them rigorously,
63
227000
4000
04:03
in random assignment, placebo controlled designs,
64
231000
3000
04:06
throw out the things that didn't work, keep the things that actively did.
65
234000
4000
04:10
And the conclusion of that is that psychology and psychiatry, over the last 60 years,
66
238000
7000
04:17
can actually claim that we can make miserable people less miserable.
67
245000
6000
04:23
And I think that's terrific. I'm proud of it.
68
251000
5000
04:30
But what was not good, the consequences of that were three things.
69
258000
5000
04:35
The first was moral,
70
263000
2000
04:37
that psychologists and psychiatrists became victimologists, pathologizers,
71
265000
4000
04:41
that our view of human nature was that if you were in trouble, bricks fell on you.
72
269000
5000
04:46
And we forgot that people made choices and decisions.
73
274000
3000
04:49
We forgot responsibility. That was the first cost.
74
277000
4000
04:53
The second cost was that we forgot about you people.
75
281000
4000
04:57
We forgot about improving normal lives.
76
285000
4000
05:01
We forgot about a mission to make relatively untroubled people happier,
77
289000
6000
05:07
more fulfilled, more productive. And "genius," "high-talent," became a dirty word.
78
295000
6000
05:13
No one works on that.
79
301000
2000
05:15
And the third problem about the disease model is,
80
303000
4000
05:19
in our rush to do something about people in trouble,
81
307000
3000
05:22
in our rush to do something about repairing damage,
82
310000
5000
05:27
it never occurred to us to develop interventions
83
315000
3000
05:30
to make people happier, positive interventions.
84
318000
4000
05:34
So that was not good.
85
322000
2000
05:36
And so, that's what led people like Nancy Etcoff, Dan Gilbert,
86
324000
5000
05:41
Mike Csikszentmihalyi and myself to work in something I call positive psychology,
87
329000
4000
05:45
which has three aims.
88
333000
2000
05:47
The first is that psychology should be just as concerned
89
335000
5000
05:52
with human strength as it is with weakness.
90
340000
4000
05:56
It should be just as concerned with building strength as with repairing damage.
91
344000
7000
06:03
It should be interested in the best things in life.
92
351000
2000
06:05
And it should be just as concerned with making the lives of normal people fulfilling,
93
353000
6000
06:11
and with genius, with nurturing high talent.
94
359000
5000
06:16
So in the last 10 years and the hope for the future,
95
364000
4000
06:20
we've seen the beginnings of a science of positive psychology,
96
368000
4000
06:24
a science of what makes life worth living.
97
372000
3000
06:27
It turns out that we can measure different forms of happiness.
98
375000
4000
06:31
And any of you, for free, can go to that website
99
379000
4000
06:35
and take the entire panoply of tests of happiness.
100
383000
3000
06:38
You can ask, how do you stack up for positive emotion, for meaning,
101
386000
5000
06:43
for flow, against literally tens of thousands of other people?
102
391000
4000
06:47
We created the opposite of the diagnostic manual of the insanities:
103
395000
6000
06:53
a classification of the strengths and virtues that looks at the sex ratio,
104
401000
5000
06:58
how they're defined, how to diagnose them,
105
406000
2000
07:00
what builds them and what gets in their way.
106
408000
4000
07:05
We found that we could discover the causation of the positive states,
107
413000
4000
07:09
the relationship between left hemispheric activity
108
417000
4000
07:13
and right hemispheric activity as a cause of happiness.
109
421000
6000
07:20
I've spent my life working on extremely miserable people,
110
428000
3000
07:23
and I've asked the question,
111
431000
2000
07:25
how do extremely miserable people differ from the rest of you?
112
433000
3000
07:28
And starting about six years ago, we asked about extremely happy people.
113
436000
5000
07:33
And how do they differ from the rest of us?
114
441000
2000
07:35
And it turns out there's one way.
115
443000
3000
07:39
They're not more religious, they're not in better shape,
116
447000
2000
07:41
they don't have more money, they're not better looking,
117
449000
3000
07:44
they don't have more good events and fewer bad events.
118
452000
3000
07:47
The one way in which they differ: they're extremely social.
119
455000
5000
07:52
They don't sit in seminars on Saturday morning.
120
460000
3000
07:55
(Laughter)
121
463000
4000
07:59
They don't spend time alone.
122
467000
2000
08:01
Each of them is in a romantic relationship
123
469000
2000
08:03
and each has a rich repertoire of friends.
124
471000
3000
08:06
But watch out here. This is merely correlational data, not causal,
125
474000
5000
08:11
and it's about happiness in the first Hollywood sense I'm going to talk about:
126
479000
5000
08:16
happiness of ebullience and giggling and good cheer.
127
484000
4000
08:20
And I'm going to suggest to you that's not nearly enough, in just a moment.
128
488000
4000
08:24
We found we could begin to look at interventions over the centuries,
129
492000
5000
08:29
from the Buddha to Tony Robbins.
130
497000
2000
08:31
About 120 interventions have been proposed
131
499000
3000
08:34
that allegedly make people happy.
132
502000
3000
08:37
And we find that we've been able to manualize many of them,
133
505000
5000
08:42
and we actually carry out random assignment
134
510000
3000
08:45
efficacy and effectiveness studies.
135
513000
2000
08:47
That is, which ones actually make people lastingly happier?
136
515000
4000
08:51
In a couple of minutes, I'll tell you about some of those results.
137
519000
3000
08:54
But the upshot of this is that the mission I want psychology to have,
138
522000
7000
09:01
in addition to its mission of curing the mentally ill,
139
529000
4000
09:05
and in addition to its mission of making miserable people less miserable,
140
533000
4000
09:09
is can psychology actually make people happier?
141
537000
4000
09:13
And to ask that question -- happy is not a word I use very much --
142
541000
4000
09:17
we've had to break it down into what I think is askable about happy.
143
545000
4000
09:21
And I believe there are three different --
144
549000
3000
09:24
and I call them different because different interventions build them,
145
552000
4000
09:28
it's possible to have one rather than the other --
146
556000
3000
09:31
three different happy lives.
147
559000
2000
09:33
The first happy life is the pleasant life.
148
561000
3000
09:36
This is a life in which you have as much positive emotion as you possibly can,
149
564000
5000
09:41
and the skills to amplify it.
150
569000
2000
09:43
The second is a life of engagement --
151
571000
2000
09:45
a life in your work, your parenting, your love, your leisure, time stops for you.
152
573000
7000
09:53
That's what Aristotle was talking about.
153
581000
2000
09:55
And third, the meaningful life.
154
583000
2000
09:57
So I want to say a little bit about each of those lives
155
585000
3000
10:00
and what we know about them.
156
588000
2000
10:02
The first life is the pleasant life and it's simply, as best we can find it,
157
590000
5000
10:07
it's having as many of the pleasures as you can,
158
595000
2000
10:09
as much positive emotion as you can,
159
597000
3000
10:12
and learning the skills -- savoring, mindfulness -- that amplify them,
160
600000
6000
10:18
that stretch them over time and space.
161
606000
3000
10:21
But the pleasant life has three drawbacks,
162
609000
4000
10:25
and it's why positive psychology is not happy-ology and why it doesn't end here.
163
613000
6000
10:31
The first drawback is that it turns out the pleasant life,
164
619000
3000
10:34
your experience of positive emotion, is heritable,
165
622000
5000
10:39
about 50 percent heritable, and, in fact, not very modifiable.
166
627000
6000
10:45
So the different tricks that Matthieu [Ricard] and I and others know
167
633000
4000
10:49
about increasing the amount of positive emotion in your life
168
637000
4000
10:53
are 15 to 20 percent tricks, getting more of it.
169
641000
4000
10:57
Second is that positive emotion habituates. It habituates rapidly, indeed.
170
645000
8000
11:05
It's all like French vanilla ice cream, the first taste is a 100 percent;
171
653000
5000
11:10
by the time you're down to the sixth taste, it's gone.
172
658000
4000
11:15
And, as I said, it's not particularly malleable.
173
663000
4000
11:19
And this leads to the second life.
174
667000
3000
11:22
And I have to tell you about my friend, Len,
175
670000
2000
11:24
to talk about why positive psychology is more than positive emotion,
176
672000
6000
11:30
more than building pleasure.
177
678000
2000
11:32
In two of the three great arenas of life, by the time Len was 30,
178
680000
4000
11:36
Len was enormously successful. The first arena was work.
179
684000
6000
11:42
By the time he was 20, he was an options trader.
180
690000
2000
11:44
By the time he was 25, he was a multimillionaire
181
692000
3000
11:47
and the head of an options trading company.
182
695000
3000
11:50
Second, in play -- he's a national champion bridge player.
183
698000
5000
11:56
But in the third great arena of life, love, Len is an abysmal failure.
184
704000
6000
12:02
And the reason he was, was that Len is a cold fish.
185
710000
6000
12:08
(Laughter)
186
716000
1000
12:10
Len is an introvert.
187
718000
3000
12:14
American women said to Len, when he dated them,
188
722000
4000
12:18
"You're no fun. You don't have positive emotion. Get lost."
189
726000
4000
12:22
And Len was wealthy enough to be able to afford a Park Avenue psychoanalyst,
190
730000
6000
12:28
who for five years tried to find the sexual trauma
191
736000
4000
12:32
that had somehow locked positive emotion inside of him.
192
740000
3000
12:35
But it turned out there wasn't any sexual trauma.
193
743000
4000
12:39
It turned out that -- Len grew up in Long Island
194
747000
4000
12:43
and he played football and watched football, and played bridge --
195
751000
6000
12:49
Len is in the bottom five percent of what we call positive affectivities.
196
757000
5000
12:54
The question is, is Len unhappy? And I want to say not.
197
762000
4000
12:58
Contrary to what psychology told us about the bottom 50 percent
198
766000
4000
13:02
of the human race in positive affectivity,
199
770000
3000
13:05
I think Len is one of the happiest people I know.
200
773000
3000
13:08
He's not consigned to the hell of unhappiness
201
776000
3000
13:11
and that's because Len, like most of you, is enormously capable of flow.
202
779000
6000
13:17
When he walks onto the floor of the American Exchange at 9:30 in the morning,
203
785000
5000
13:22
time stops for him. And it stops till the closing bell.
204
790000
3000
13:25
When the first card is played,
205
793000
2000
13:27
until 10 days later, the tournament is over, time stops for Len.
206
795000
4000
13:31
And this is indeed what Mike Csikszentmihalyi has been talking about,
207
799000
4000
13:35
about flow. And it's distinct from pleasure in a very important way.
208
803000
5000
13:40
Pleasure has raw feels: you know it's happening. It's thought and feeling.
209
808000
5000
13:45
But what Mike told you yesterday -- during flow, you can't feel anything.
210
813000
8000
13:54
You're one with the music. Time stops.
211
822000
4000
13:58
You have intense concentration.
212
826000
2000
14:00
And this is indeed the characteristic of what we think of as the good life.
213
828000
5000
14:05
And we think there's a recipe for it,
214
833000
3000
14:08
and it's knowing what your highest strengths are.
215
836000
2000
14:10
And again, there's a valid test
216
838000
2000
14:12
of what your five highest strengths are.
217
840000
3000
14:15
And then re-crafting your life to use them as much as you possibly can.
218
843000
6000
14:21
Re-crafting your work, your love,
219
849000
3000
14:24
your play, your friendship, your parenting.
220
852000
3000
14:27
Just one example. One person I worked with was a bagger at Genuardi's.
221
855000
5000
14:32
Hated the job.
222
860000
2000
14:34
She's working her way through college.
223
862000
2000
14:37
Her highest strength was social intelligence,
224
865000
3000
14:40
so she re-crafted bagging to make the encounter with her
225
868000
5000
14:45
the social highlight of every customer's day.
226
873000
2000
14:47
Now obviously she failed.
227
875000
3000
14:50
But what she did was to take her highest strengths,
228
878000
3000
14:53
and re-craft work to use them as much as possible.
229
881000
4000
14:57
What you get out of that is not smiley-ness.
230
885000
2000
14:59
You don't look like Debbie Reynolds.
231
887000
2000
15:01
You don't giggle a lot. What you get is more absorption.
232
889000
5000
15:06
So, that's the second path. The first path, positive emotion.
233
894000
4000
15:10
The second path is eudaimonian flow.
234
898000
4000
15:14
And the third path is meaning.
235
902000
2000
15:16
This is the most venerable of the happinesses, traditionally.
236
904000
4000
15:20
And meaning, in this view, consists of -- very parallel to eudaimonia --
237
908000
6000
15:26
it consists of knowing what your highest strengths are, and using them
238
914000
6000
15:32
to belong to and in the service of something larger than you are.
239
920000
6000
15:39
I mentioned that for all three kinds of lives, the pleasant life,
240
927000
5000
15:44
the good life, the meaningful life, people are now hard at work on the question,
241
932000
5000
15:49
are there things that lastingly change those lives?
242
937000
4000
15:53
And the answer seems to be yes. And I'll just give you some samples of it.
243
941000
6000
15:59
It's being done in a rigorous manner.
244
947000
2000
16:01
It's being done in the same way that we test drugs to see what really works.
245
949000
5000
16:06
So we do random assignment, placebo controlled,
246
954000
5000
16:11
long-term studies of different interventions.
247
959000
3000
16:14
And just to sample the kind of interventions that we find have an effect,
248
962000
4000
16:18
when we teach people about the pleasant life,
249
966000
4000
16:22
how to have more pleasure in your life,
250
970000
2000
16:24
one of your assignments is to take the mindfulness skills, the savoring skills,
251
972000
6000
16:30
and you're assigned to design a beautiful day.
252
978000
4000
16:34
Next Saturday, set a day aside, design yourself a beautiful day,
253
982000
5000
16:39
and use savoring and mindfulness to enhance those pleasures.
254
987000
4000
16:43
And we can show in that way that the pleasant life is enhanced.
255
991000
6000
16:50
Gratitude visit. I want you all to do this with me now, if you would.
256
998000
6000
16:56
Close your eyes.
257
1004000
2000
16:58
I'd like you to remember someone who did something enormously important
258
1006000
8000
17:06
that changed your life in a good direction,
259
1014000
4000
17:10
and who you never properly thanked.
260
1018000
3000
17:13
The person has to be alive. OK.
261
1021000
3000
17:16
Now, OK, you can open your eyes.
262
1024000
2000
17:18
I hope all of you have such a person.
263
1026000
2000
17:20
Your assignment, when you're learning the gratitude visit,
264
1028000
4000
17:24
is to write a 300-word testimonial to that person,
265
1032000
4000
17:28
call them on the phone in Phoenix,
266
1036000
3000
17:31
ask if you can visit, don't tell them why, show up at their door,
267
1039000
5000
17:36
you read the testimonial -- everyone weeps when this happens.
268
1044000
6000
17:42
And what happens is when we test people one week later, a month later,
269
1050000
4000
17:46
three months later, they're both happier and less depressed.
270
1054000
5000
17:52
Another example is a strength date, in which we get couples
271
1060000
4000
17:56
to identify their highest strengths on the strengths test,
272
1064000
3000
17:59
and then to design an evening in which they both use their strengths,
273
1067000
6000
18:05
and we find this is a strengthener of relationships.
274
1073000
3000
18:08
And fun versus philanthropy.
275
1076000
2000
18:10
But it's so heartening to be in a group like this,
276
1078000
3000
18:13
in which so many of you have turned your lives to philanthropy.
277
1081000
4000
18:17
Well, my undergraduates and the people I work with haven't discovered this,
278
1085000
3000
18:20
so we actually have people do something altruistic
279
1088000
4000
18:24
and do something fun, and to contrast it.
280
1092000
3000
18:27
And what you find is when you do something fun,
281
1095000
3000
18:30
it has a square wave walk set.
282
1098000
2000
18:32
When you do something philanthropic to help another person, it lasts and it lasts.
283
1100000
6000
18:38
So those are examples of positive interventions.
284
1106000
4000
18:42
So, the next to last thing I want to say is
285
1110000
5000
18:47
we're interested in how much life satisfaction people have.
286
1115000
3000
18:50
And this is really what you're about. And that's our target variable.
287
1118000
4000
18:54
And we ask the question as a function of the three different lives,
288
1122000
4000
18:58
how much life satisfaction do you get?
289
1126000
2000
19:00
So we ask -- and we've done this in 15 replications involving thousands of people --
290
1128000
6000
19:06
to what extent does the pursuit of pleasure,
291
1134000
2000
19:08
the pursuit of positive emotion, the pleasant life,
292
1136000
4000
19:12
the pursuit of engagement, time stopping for you,
293
1140000
3000
19:15
and the pursuit of meaning contribute to life satisfaction?
294
1143000
4000
19:19
And our results surprised us, but they were backward of what we thought.
295
1147000
4000
19:23
It turns out the pursuit of pleasure has almost no contribution to life satisfaction.
296
1151000
5000
19:28
The pursuit of meaning is the strongest.
297
1156000
3000
19:31
The pursuit of engagement is also very strong.
298
1159000
4000
19:35
Where pleasure matters is if you have both engagement
299
1163000
4000
19:39
and you have meaning, then pleasure's the whipped cream and the cherry.
300
1167000
4000
19:43
Which is to say, the full life -- the sum is greater than the parts, if you've got all three.
301
1171000
8000
19:51
Conversely, if you have none of the three,
302
1179000
3000
19:54
the empty life, the sum is less than the parts.
303
1182000
2000
19:56
And what we're asking now is
304
1184000
2000
19:58
does the very same relationship, physical health, morbidity,
305
1186000
4000
20:02
how long you live and productivity, follow the same relationship?
306
1190000
5000
20:07
That is, in a corporation,
307
1195000
2000
20:09
is productivity a function of positive emotion, engagement and meaning?
308
1197000
6000
20:16
Is health a function of positive engagement,
309
1204000
3000
20:19
of pleasure, and of meaning in life?
310
1207000
2000
20:21
And there is reason to think the answer to both of those may well be yes.
311
1209000
5000
20:28
So, Chris said that the last speaker had a chance to try to integrate what he heard,
312
1216000
7000
20:35
and so this was amazing for me. I've never been in a gathering like this.
313
1223000
5000
20:41
I've never seen speakers stretch beyond themselves so much,
314
1229000
3000
20:44
which was one of the remarkable things.
315
1232000
3000
20:47
But I found that the problems of psychology seemed to be parallel
316
1235000
4000
20:51
to the problems of technology, entertainment and design in the following way.
317
1239000
5000
20:56
We all know that technology, entertainment and design
318
1244000
4000
21:00
have been and can be used for destructive purposes.
319
1248000
6000
21:06
We also know that technology, entertainment and design
320
1254000
4000
21:10
can be used to relieve misery.
321
1258000
3000
21:13
And by the way, the distinction between relieving misery
322
1261000
4000
21:17
and building happiness is extremely important.
323
1265000
3000
21:20
I thought, when I first became a therapist 30 years ago,
324
1268000
3000
21:23
that if I was good enough to make someone not depressed,
325
1271000
6000
21:29
not anxious, not angry, that I'd make them happy.
326
1277000
6000
21:35
And I never found that. I found the best you could ever do was to get to zero.
327
1283000
5000
21:40
But they were empty.
328
1288000
2000
21:42
And it turns out the skills of happiness, the skills of the pleasant life,
329
1290000
5000
21:47
the skills of engagement, the skills of meaning,
330
1295000
3000
21:50
are different from the skills of relieving misery.
331
1298000
4000
21:54
And so, the parallel thing holds
332
1302000
3000
21:57
with technology, entertainment and design, I believe.
333
1305000
4000
22:01
That is, it is possible for these three drivers of our world
334
1309000
7000
22:08
to increase happiness, to increase positive emotion,
335
1316000
6000
22:14
and that's typically how they've been used.
336
1322000
2000
22:16
But once you fractionate happiness the way I do --
337
1324000
3000
22:19
not just positive emotion, that's not nearly enough --
338
1327000
3000
22:22
there's flow in life, and there's meaning in life.
339
1330000
3000
22:25
As Laura Lee told us,
340
1333000
2000
22:27
design, and, I believe, entertainment and technology,
341
1335000
4000
22:31
can be used to increase meaning engagement in life as well.
342
1339000
4000
22:35
So in conclusion, the eleventh reason for optimism,
343
1343000
4000
22:39
in addition to the space elevator,
344
1347000
4000
22:43
is that I think with technology, entertainment and design,
345
1351000
5000
22:48
we can actually increase the amount of tonnage
346
1356000
4000
22:52
of human happiness on the planet.
347
1360000
2000
22:54
And if technology can, in the next decade or two, increase the pleasant life,
348
1362000
6000
23:00
the good life and the meaningful life, it will be good enough.
349
1368000
4000
23:04
If entertainment can be diverted to also increase positive emotion,
350
1372000
6000
23:10
meaning, eudaimonia, it will be good enough.
351
1378000
4000
23:14
And if design can increase positive emotion,
352
1382000
6000
23:20
eudaimonia, and flow and meaning,
353
1388000
3000
23:23
what we're all doing together will become good enough. Thank you.
354
1391000
5000
23:28
(Applause)
355
1396000
8000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Martin Seligman - PsychologistMartin Seligman is the founder of positive psychology, a field of study that examines healthy states, such as happiness, strength of character and optimism.
Why you should listen
Martin Seligman founded the field of positive psychology in 2000, and has devoted his career since then to furthering the study of positive emotion, positive character traits, and positive institutions. It's a fascinating field of study that had few empirical, scientific measures -- traditional clinical psychology focusing more on the repair of unhappy states than the propagation and nurturing of happy ones. In his pioneering work, Seligman directs the Positive Psychology Center at the University of Pennsylvania, developing clinical tools and training the next generation of positive psychologists.
His earlier work focused on perhaps the opposite state: learned helplessness, in which a person feels he or she is powerless to change a situation that is, in fact, changeable. Seligman is an often-cited authority in this field as well -- in fact, his is the 13th most likely name to pop up in a general psych textbook. He was the leading consultant on a Consumer Reports study on long-term psychotherapy, and has developed several common pre-employment tests, including the Seligman Attributional Style Questionnaire (SASQ).
Martin Seligman | Speaker | TED.com