ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Michael Patrick Lynch - Philosopher
Michael Patrick Lynch examines truth, democracy, public discourse and the ethics of technology in the age of big data.

Why you should listen

What is truth and why does it matter? Does information technology help or hinder its pursuit? And how do we encourage more productive public discourse? These are some of the questions that animate Michael Lynch's work as a philosopher.  

Lynch is a writer and professor of philosophy at the University of Connecticut, where he directs the Humanities Institute. His work concerns truth, democracy, public discourse and the ethics of technology. Lynch is the author or editor of seven books, including The Internet of Us: Knowing More and Understanding Less in the Age of Big Data, In Praise of Reason: Why Rationality Matters for Democracy, Truth as One and Many and the New York Times Sunday Book Review Editor’s pick, True to Life.

The recipient of the Medal for Research Excellence from the University of Connecticut’s College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, he is The Principal Investigator for Humility & Conviction in Public Life, a $7 million project aimed at understanding and encouraging meaningful public discourse funded by the John Templeton Foundation and the University of Connecticut. He's a frequent contributor to the New York Times "The Stone" blog.

More profile about the speaker
Michael Patrick Lynch | Speaker | TED.com
TED2017

Michael Patrick Lynch: How to see past your own perspective and find truth

迈克尔·帕特里克·林奇: 如何超越自我观点並寻求真相

Filmed:
1,781,987 views

我们在网络上读的越多,看的越多,就越难区分信息的真假。如同哲学家迈克尔·帕特里克·林奇(Michael Patrick Lynch)所说:"我们似乎知道得愈多,却懂得愈少。"在这场演讲中,他鼓励我们采取行动,戳破过滤事实的泡泡,并参与到撑起一切的现实世界里。
- Philosopher
Michael Patrick Lynch examines truth, democracy, public discourse and the ethics of technology in the age of big data. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:12
So, imagine想像 that you had
your smartphone手机 miniaturized小型化
0
740
3679
想像你把智能手机缩小到
00:16
and hooked迷上 up directly to your brain.
1
4443
2360
可以直接安装进你脑袋里,
00:19
If you had this sort分类 of brain chip芯片,
2
7711
1893
如果你有这样的大脑晶片,
00:21
you'd be able能够 to upload上载
and download下载 to the internet互联网
3
9628
2531
你就能在网上
快速地下载和上传资料。
00:24
at the speed速度 of thought.
4
12183
1192
00:25
Accessing访问 social社会 media媒体 or Wikipedia维基百科
would be a lot like --
5
13986
3267
当你在使用社群媒体或查询维基百科时,
至少是从你脑内读取的,
00:29
well, from the inside at least最小 --
6
17277
1640
就像是在咨询你自己的记忆一样。
00:30
like consulting咨询 your own拥有 memory记忆.
7
18941
1750
跟你在思考时一样简单、直接。
00:33
It would be as easy简单
and as intimate亲密 as thinking思维.
8
21247
3198
00:37
But would it make it easier更轻松
for you to know what's true真正?
9
25579
3157
但这样做,能让你
更轻易地辨别出真相吗?
虽然这个方法可以让你
更快速地撷取信息,
00:40
Just because a way
of accessing访问 information信息 is faster更快
10
28760
2961
却不能代表这些信息
是更可靠的,当然,
00:43
it doesn't mean it's more
reliable可靠, of course课程,
11
31745
2245
也不代表我们每个人的
解读都会一致,
00:46
and it doesn't mean that we would all
interpret it the same相同 way.
12
34014
3231
更不代表,你比别人
更会判断信息的重要性。
00:49
And it doesn't mean that you would be
any better at evaluating评估 it.
13
37269
3594
实际上,搞不好更糟糕,
00:52
In fact事实, you might威力 even be worse更差,
14
40887
1657
因为信息愈多,你判断的时间愈少。
00:54
because, you know, more data数据,
less time for evaluation评测.
15
42568
2782
00:58
Something like this is already已经
happening事件 to us right now.
16
46378
3395
这样的事情现在正在发生。
全球的信息都唾手可得,
01:01
We already已经 carry携带 a world世界 of information信息
around in our pockets口袋,
17
49797
3858
但似乎我们在网上
接触、分享愈多的信息,
01:05
but it seems似乎 as if the more information信息
we share分享 and access访问 online线上,
18
53679
4229
就越难区分
01:09
the more difficult it can be for us
to tell the difference区别
19
57932
2802
信息的真伪。
01:12
between之间 what's real真实 and what's fake.
20
60758
2117
01:15
It's as if we know more
but understand理解 less.
21
63507
3938
我们变得知道越多,懂得却越少。
01:20
Now, it's a feature特征
of modern现代 life, I suppose假设,
22
68152
2937
我想,这就是现代生活的
其中一个特色吧,
一堆人活在孤立的信息泡泡里。
01:23
that large swaths大片 of the public上市
live生活 in isolated孤立 information信息 bubbles泡泡.
23
71113
3988
01:27
We're polarized偏振: not just over values,
but over the facts事实.
24
75849
4654
我们不仅对价值观有不一样的认知,
对事实的认知也是呈现对立的状况。
原因就是主导网路的"数据分析",
01:32
One reason原因 for that is, the data数据
analytics分析 that drive驾驶 the internet互联网
25
80527
3597
不仅给了我们更多的信息,
01:36
get us not just more information信息,
26
84148
2399
还超出了信息本身的范围。
01:38
but more of the information信息 that we want.
27
86571
2186
人们的网络生活是定制的;
01:40
Our online线上 life is personalized个性化;
28
88781
2390
我们所浏览的信息,广告,
01:43
everything from the ads广告 we read
29
91195
1730
到脸书塞给我们的新闻,
01:44
to the news新闻 that comes down
our FacebookFacebook的 feed饲料
30
92949
2590
都是为了满足我们的个人喜好
而经过修改的。
01:47
is tailored量身定制 to satisfy满足 our preferences优先.
31
95563
3006
在我们获取更多资讯的同时,
01:51
And so while we get more information信息,
32
99279
1806
不少信息到最后
会反映出我们自身,
01:53
a lot of that information信息 ends结束 up
reflecting反映 ourselves我们自己
33
101109
3230
如同反映整个现实一样。
01:56
as much as it does reality现实.
34
104363
2204
我想,到最后
01:59
It ends结束 up, I suppose假设,
35
107198
1639
02:01
inflating充气 our bubbles泡泡
rather than bursting爆破 them.
36
109691
2533
这些泡泡不但刺不破,
反而越来越大。
02:05
And so maybe it's no surprise
37
113331
2129
说我们是活在一个
似是而非的世界里,
一点也不令人讶异,
02:07
that we're in a situation情况,
a paradoxical自相矛盾 situation情况,
38
115484
2905
我们懂这么多知识,
02:10
of thinking思维 that we know so much more,
39
118413
2131
但到底懂什么,却看法不一。
02:12
and yet然而 not agreeing同意
on what it is we know.
40
120568
3010
02:17
So how are we going to solve解决
this problem问题 of knowledge知识 polarization极化?
41
125259
3572
那么要如何解决知识对立的问题?
其中一个很明显的策略是,
试着修复科技,
02:20
One obvious明显 tactic战术 is to try
to fix固定 our technology技术,
42
128855
4168
重新设计我们的数字平台,
02:25
to redesign重新设计 our digital数字 platforms平台,
43
133047
1909
以减少看法两极化的现象。
02:26
so as to make them less
susceptible易感 to polarization极化.
44
134980
3143
我很高兴向各位报告,
02:30
And I'm happy快乐 to report报告
45
138884
1199
02:32
that many许多 smart聪明 people at Google谷歌
and FacebookFacebook的 are working加工 on just that.
46
140107
4640
谷歌和脸书里优秀的人才
正朝此方向努力。
这些研究项目相当重要。
02:36
And these projects项目 are vital重要.
47
144771
1589
02:39
I think that fixing定影 technology技术
is obviously明显 really important重要,
48
147837
3130
我认为修复科技显然至关重要,
但我不认为光靠修复科技就能解决
02:42
but I don't think technology技术 alone单独,
fixing定影 it, is going to solve解决 the problem问题
49
150991
4622
知识对立的问题。
02:47
of knowledge知识 polarization极化.
50
155637
1354
我不这么认为,是因为到头来,
02:49
I don't think that because I don't think,
at the end结束 of the day,
51
157015
3075
终究不是科技的问题,
02:52
it is a technological技术性 problem问题.
52
160114
1629
而是人的问题,
02:53
I think it's a human人的 problem问题,
53
161767
1875
跟我们如何思考、
和重视的价值有关。
02:55
having to do with how we think
and what we value.
54
163666
3565
为了解决问题,
我们需要各方的协助,
03:00
In order订购 to solve解决 it, I think
we're going to need help.
55
168285
2615
需要心理学与政治科学的辅助。
03:02
We're going to need help
from psychology心理学 and political政治 science科学.
56
170924
3005
不过我认为,
我们也能从哲学当中获得帮助,
03:05
But we're also going to need help,
I think, from philosophy哲学.
57
173953
3250
03:10
Because to solve解决 the problem问题
of knowledge知识 polarization极化,
58
178663
3528
因为想要解决认知对立的问题,
03:15
we're going to need to reconnect重新连接
59
183522
1995
我们必须重新思考
03:18
with one fundamental基本的, philosophical哲学上 idea理念:
60
186455
3836
一个基本的哲学概念:
03:23
that we live生活 in a common共同 reality现实.
61
191219
2397
我们是活在同一个现实里的。
03:26
The idea理念 of a common共同 reality现实
is like, I suppose假设,
62
194671
4027
我觉得活在同一个现实的这个想法
与众多哲学概念类似:
03:30
a lot of philosophical哲学上 concepts概念:
63
198722
1563
说起来简单,
03:32
easy简单 to state
64
200309
1166
但做起来却相当困难。
03:33
but mysteriously神秘 difficult
to put into practice实践.
65
201499
2635
要面对这样的现实,
03:37
To really accept接受 it,
66
205003
1305
我们有三件事要做,
03:38
I think we need to do three things,
67
206332
2217
目前,每一项都很有挑战性。
03:40
each of which哪一个 is a challenge挑战 right now.
68
208573
2312
03:44
First, we need to believe in truth真相.
69
212749
2564
首先,我们需要相信真相。
大家可能也注意到,
03:48
You might威力 have noticed注意到
70
216267
1163
我们的文化对于这样的概念
03:49
that our culture文化 is having
something of a troubled苦恼 relationship关系
71
217454
3015
似乎不太认同。
03:52
with that concept概念 right now.
72
220493
1401
03:55
It seems似乎 as if we disagree不同意 so much that,
73
223061
3213
就像一位政治评论员不久前所说的,
我们越是不认同对方,
03:58
as one political政治 commentator评论员
put it not long ago,
74
226298
2809
事实就越似不存在一样。
04:01
it's as if there are no facts事实 anymore.
75
229131
2235
04:04
But that thought is actually其实 an expression表达
76
232986
4222
但这种想法实际上只是
一种充斥在我们身边、
引人注意的陈述方式而已。
04:09
of a sort分类 of seductive妖媚 line线
of argument论据 that's in the air空气.
77
237232
4009
04:13
It goes like this:
78
241668
1268
有点像是:
04:16
we just can't step outside
of our own拥有 perspectives观点;
79
244188
2851
我们就是跳脱不出个人的观点,
放不下个人的偏见。
04:19
we can't step outside of our biases偏见.
80
247063
2442
我们每次试着这么做,
04:21
Every一切 time we try,
81
249529
1473
只会从个人的观点
产生出更多的信息。
04:23
we just get more information信息
from our perspective透视.
82
251026
3585
04:27
So, this line线 of thought goes,
83
255536
2250
所以,这样的想法就变成:
04:31
we might威力 as well admit承认
that objective目的 truth真相 is an illusion错觉,
84
259016
3762
我们干脆承认,
客观的事实只是假象,
或者根本不重要,
04:34
or it doesn't matter,
85
262802
1154
因为,要么我们无知,
04:35
because either we'll never
know what it is,
86
263980
2146
04:39
or it doesn't exist存在 in the first place地点.
87
267039
2143
要么就是真相根本就不存在。
04:43
That's not a new philosophical哲学上 thought --
88
271173
2996
这不是一个崭兴的哲学思想——
真相怀疑论。
04:46
skepticism怀疑论 about truth真相.
89
274193
1848
04:49
During the end结束 of the last century世纪,
as some of you know,
90
277332
2881
在上世纪末,可能有人知道,
怀疑论在特定学术圈大受欢迎。
04:52
it was very popular流行 in certain某些
academic学术的 circles.
91
280237
2294
04:55
But it really goes back all the way
to the Greek希腊语 philosopher哲学家 Protagoras普罗塔戈纳斯,
92
283317
5133
但这要回朔到
希腊哲学家普罗泰戈拉,
应该是他最早提出的。
05:00
if not farther更远 back.
93
288474
1326
05:02
Protagoras普罗塔戈纳斯 said that objective目的
truth真相 was an illusion错觉
94
290252
2449
普罗泰戈拉认为,
客观的事实只是假象。
因为"人是丈量万物的准则"。
05:04
because "man is the measure测量
of all things."
95
292725
2907
人是丈量万物的准则。
05:07
Man is the measure测量 of all things.
96
295656
1940
05:10
That can seem似乎 like a bracing支撑 bit
of realpolitik现实政治 to people,
97
298169
2823
像是权力政治对人们
灌输的价值观,
深深地烙印在我们身上。
05:13
or liberating解放,
98
301016
1159
它会让每个人探索或
创造出属于自己的真相。
05:14
because it allows允许 each of us
to discover发现 or make our own拥有 truth真相.
99
302199
4538
05:20
But actually其实, I think it's a bit
of self-serving自顾自 rationalization合理化
100
308618
4162
但我觉得这其实
就是哲学上所说的——
"把个人的自私合理化"。
05:24
disguised伪装 as philosophy哲学.
101
312804
1867
05:27
It confuses混淆 the difficulty困难
of being存在 certain某些
102
315507
2808
它大大地降低了
确认真相的可能性。
05:30
with the impossibility不可能的事 of truth真相.
103
318339
2645
05:34
Look --
104
322223
1206
大家想想,
05:36
of course课程 it's difficult
to be certain某些 about anything;
105
324768
2940
要确认真相的确很困难;
05:40
we might威力 all be living活的 in "The Matrix矩阵."
106
328908
2313
我们可能都活在
《黑客帝国》的世界里。
05:44
You might威力 have a brain chip芯片 in your head
107
332018
1982
你的大脑被植入晶片,
错误的信息被灌输在你的大脑里。
05:46
feeding馈送 you all the wrong错误 information信息.
108
334024
1964
05:49
But in practice实践, we do agree同意
on all sorts排序 of facts事实.
109
337593
4179
但实际上,我们却认同
各式各样的事实。
我们认同子弹能杀人,
05:53
We agree同意 that bullets子弹 can kill people.
110
341796
3239
05:57
We agree同意 that you can't flap拍打
your arms武器 and fly.
111
345616
4383
我们认同人不能
挥挥手臂就飞起来,
我们认同--——或我们应该认同——
06:02
We agree同意 -- or we should --
112
350023
2109
06:05
that there is an external外部 reality现实
113
353018
2297
外面还有一个“现实世界",
若你视而不见的话,可能会受伤。
06:07
and ignoring无视 it can get you hurt伤害.
114
355339
2081
06:11
Nonetheless尽管如此, skepticism怀疑论
about truth真相 can be tempting诱人的,
115
359205
4149
但怀疑真相会令人着迷,
因为这样可以合理化我们的偏见。
06:15
because it allows允许 us to rationalize理顺
away our own拥有 biases偏见.
116
363378
3314
当我们这么做,就像电影中的男主角,
06:18
When we do that, we're sort分类 of like
the guy in the movie电影
117
366716
2987
知道他自己活在《黑客帝国》里,
06:21
who knew知道 he was living活的 in "The Matrix矩阵"
118
369727
2338
06:24
but decided决定 he liked喜欢 it there, anyway无论如何.
119
372793
2725
但最后却决定留在里面。
06:29
After all, getting得到 what you
want feels感觉 good.
120
377031
2658
毕竟,得到你想要的
会让你快乐。
06:32
Being存在 right all the time feels感觉 good.
121
380271
2696
老觉得自己是对的,让你感觉良好。
所以,对我们来说,
通常这样比较容易:
06:34
So, often经常 it's easier更轻松 for us
122
382991
2782
06:37
to wrap ourselves我们自己 in our cozy舒适
information信息 bubbles泡泡,
123
385797
3489
把自己浸泡在舒适的信息泡泡中,
活在错误的信仰中、
06:42
live生活 in bad faith信仰,
124
390049
1541
将这些泡泡当作衡量现实的标准。
06:43
and take those bubbles泡泡
as the measure测量 of reality现实.
125
391614
3751
06:48
An example, I think, of how
this bad faith信仰 gets得到 into our action行动
126
396595
5845
举个例子,我们对假新闻事件的反应,
会深深地影响我们的行为。
06:54
is our reaction反应
to the phenomenon现象 of fake news新闻.
127
402464
4785
06:59
The fake news新闻 that spread传播 on the internet互联网
128
407874
2930
在2016美国总统大选期间,
散布于网络上的假新闻
07:02
during the American美国
presidential总统 election选举 of 2016
129
410828
4654
就是被设计用来加深我们的偏见,
07:07
was designed设计 to feed饲料 into our biases偏见,
130
415506
2627
膨胀我们的泡泡的。
07:10
designed设计 to inflate膨胀 our bubbles泡泡.
131
418157
2114
但真正令人讶异的
07:12
But what was really striking引人注目 about it
132
420295
2051
不只是假新闻愚弄了许多人,
07:14
was not just that it fooled上当
so many许多 people.
133
422370
2614
07:17
What was really striking引人注目 to me
about fake news新闻,
134
425595
2841
真正令我讶异的是,
07:20
the phenomenon现象,
135
428460
1338
假新闻现象
很快地成为了认知对立的议题;
07:21
is how quickly很快 it itself本身 became成为
the subject学科 of knowledge知识 polarization极化;
136
429822
5055
07:27
so much so, that the very term术语 --
the very term术语 -- "fake news新闻"
137
435582
3679
结果,"假新闻"这个词,
现在却演变成:"我讨厌的新闻"。
07:31
now just means手段: "news新闻 story故事 I don't like."
138
439285
3404
07:35
That's an example of the bad faith信仰
towards the truth真相 that I'm talking about.
139
443367
4873
这就是我所说的对真相失去信仰的例子。
07:43
But the really, I think, dangerous危险 thing
140
451240
3474
不过我想更危险的是,
07:47
about skepticism怀疑论 with regard看待 to truth真相
141
455981
2578
对真相的怀疑
07:51
is that it leads引线 to despotism独裁.
142
459476
1907
会演变成"专制独裁"。
07:54
"Man is the measure测量 of all things"
143
462350
2923
"人是丈量万物的准则",
无可避免地会变成,
"那个人"就是丈量万物的准则,
07:57
inevitably必将 becomes "The Man
is the measure测量 of all things."
144
465297
3917
08:01
Just as "every一切 man for himself他自己"
145
469852
2650
像是"每个人都能生存",
会演变成"只有强者才能生存"。
08:04
always seems似乎 to turn out to be
"only the strong强大 survive生存."
146
472526
2995
08:08
At the end结束 of Orwell's奥威尔 "1984,"
147
476345
2489
在英国作家乔治·欧威尔的小说
《一九八四》的故事结尾,
08:12
the thought policeman警察 O'Brien奥布莱恩 is torturing折磨
the protagonist主角 Winston温斯顿 Smith工匠
148
480136
4259
思想警察欧布莱恩虐待主角史密斯,
让主角相信二加二等于五。
08:16
into believing相信 two plus two equals等于 five.
149
484419
3198
08:20
What O'Brien奥布莱恩 says is the point,
150
488571
2804
欧布莱恩所说的观点在于,
他想说服史密斯相信,
凡是党说的就真相,
08:25
is that he wants to convince说服 Smith工匠
that whatever随你 the party派对 says is the truth真相,
151
493486
4421
真相就是党说了算。
08:29
and the truth真相 is whatever随你 the party派对 says.
152
497931
2885
08:33
And what O'Brien奥布莱恩 knows知道
is that once一旦 this thought is accepted公认,
153
501484
3520
因为欧布莱恩知道,
一旦这个思想被接受了,
08:38
critical危急 dissent异议 is impossible不可能.
154
506387
2554
异议者就不可能存在。
08:41
You can't speak说话 truth真相 to power功率
155
509857
2188
如果当权者诠释了什么是真相,
你就不能跟当权者说,
什么才是真相。
08:44
if the power功率 speaks说话 truth真相 by definition定义.
156
512069
3155
08:48
I said that in order订购 to accept接受
that we really live生活 in a common共同 reality现实,
157
516880
4243
为了彻底接受我们活在现实里,
必须做三件事情。
08:53
we have to do three things.
158
521147
1287
第一就是相信真相,
08:54
The first thing is to believe in truth真相.
159
522458
1985
第二,则能用一句拉丁文总结,
08:56
The second第二 thing can be summed总结 up
160
524467
1670
康德视之为启蒙时期的座右铭,
08:58
by the Latin拉丁 phrase短语 that Kant康德 took
as the motto座右铭 for the Enlightenment启示:
161
526161
5086
"Sapere aude",
09:03
"Sapere萨佩雷 aude奥德,"
162
531271
1637
或是"勇于求知",
09:04
or "dare to know."
163
532932
1732
或如康德所说的,"勇于为自己求知"。
09:06
Or as Kant康德 wants,
"to dare to know for yourself你自己."
164
534688
2426
09:10
I think in the early days of the internet互联网,
165
538208
2042
在网络诞生的早期,
许多人认为
09:12
a lot of us thought
166
540274
1166
09:13
that information信息 technology技术
was always going to make it easier更轻松
167
541464
3810
信息技术能帮助我们
更了解自己。
09:17
for us to know for ourselves我们自己,
168
545298
1855
当然从很多方面来说,确实如此。
09:19
and of course课程 in many许多 ways方法, it has.
169
547177
2692
不过,当网络渐渐渗透人们的生活,
09:21
But as the internet互联网 has become成为
more and more a part部分 of our lives生活,
170
549893
3838
让人们更依赖网络,
09:25
our reliance依赖 on it, our use of it,
171
553755
1959
这会让人们更被动。
09:27
has become成为 often经常 more passive被动.
172
555738
2560
09:30
Much of what we know today今天 we Google-know谷歌知道.
173
558322
2365
众所周知,如今我们都
使用谷歌查询信息。
09:33
We download下载 prepackaged预包装 sets of facts事实
174
561299
3695
我们下载事先包装的事实,
并重新在社群媒体上分享。
09:37
and sort分类 of shuffle拖曳 them along沿
the assembly部件 line线 of social社会 media媒体.
175
565018
3812
09:41
Now, Google-knowing谷歌知道 is useful有用
176
569357
1430
没错,谷歌搜寻很有用,
这都要归功于谷歌收集了
很多外部的资源。
09:42
precisely恰恰 because it involves涉及
a sort分类 of intellectual知识分子 outsourcing外包.
177
570811
3196
我们投入很多精力在
别人的网络与算法当中。
09:46
We offload卸载 our effort功夫 onto a network网络
of others其他 and algorithms算法.
178
574031
5765
09:51
And that allows允许 us, of course课程,
to not clutter杂波 our minds头脑
179
579820
3007
当然,它能让我们的脑袋
不被各类事实所淹没。
09:54
with all sorts排序 of facts事实.
180
582851
1439
我们只有在需要这些信息时才会下载,
09:56
We can just download下载 them
when we need them.
181
584314
2287
这是很棒的事情。
09:58
And that's awesome真棒.
182
586625
1382
10:01
But there's a difference区别
between之间 downloading下载 a set of facts事实
183
589348
4781
但下载一整套的事实与
透彻辨析这些真相,
10:06
and really understanding理解 how or why
those facts事实 are as they are.
184
594809
4826
两者之间还是有差距的。
10:13
Understanding理解 why
a particular特定 disease疾病 spreads利差,
185
601237
4374
了解为何某个疾病会散播,
了解数学验证如何运作,
10:17
or how a mathematical数学的 proof证明 works作品,
186
605635
2059
或了解你的朋友为何忧郁,
10:19
or why your friend朋友 is depressed郁闷,
187
607718
2013
其意义都远超过单纯的下载动作。
10:21
involves涉及 more than just downloading下载.
188
609755
2465
10:25
It's going to require要求, most likely容易,
189
613396
2081
前者更需要
你自己也要下点功夫,
10:27
doing some work for yourself你自己:
190
615501
2102
10:30
having a little creative创作的 insight眼光;
191
618503
1840
多一点创造巧思、
运用想像力、
10:32
using运用 your imagination想像力;
192
620367
1266
亲身实践、
10:33
getting得到 out into the field领域;
193
621657
1318
做点小实验、
10:34
doing the experiment实验;
194
622999
1182
引经据典验证、
10:36
working加工 through通过 the proof证明;
195
624205
1271
与人聊聊。
10:37
talking to someone有人.
196
625500
1444
10:43
Now, I'm not saying, of course课程,
that we should stop Google-knowing谷歌知道.
197
631533
3544
当然我不是要大家停止谷歌搜寻,
10:48
I'm just saying
198
636402
1151
我是说,
我们不该太看重搜寻结果。
10:49
we shouldn't不能 overvalue过份尊重 it, either.
199
637577
1686
我们需设法鼓励更积极的求知方式,
10:51
We need to find ways方法 of encouraging鼓舞人心的
forms形式 of knowing会心 that are more active活性,
200
639287
4664
10:56
and don't always involve涉及 passing通过 off
our effort功夫 into our bubble泡沫.
201
644512
5049
别老是让自己待在信息泡泡里,
11:02
Because the thing about Google-knowing谷歌知道
is that too often经常 it ends结束 up
202
650242
3341
因为谷歌知识最后多半变成,
泡泡知识,
11:05
being存在 bubble-knowing气泡知.
203
653607
1364
11:07
And bubble-knowing气泡知 means手段
always being存在 right.
204
655581
2790
而泡泡知识总认为自己是对的。
11:11
But daring大胆 to know,
205
659183
2197
但是勇于求知,
勇于理解,
11:13
daring大胆 to understand理解,
206
661404
1570
11:16
means手段 risking冒着 the possibility可能性
that you could be wrong错误.
207
664151
3066
意味着你要冒可能搞错的风险,
11:19
It means手段 risking冒着 the possibility可能性
208
667921
2268
意味着到头来有可能,
你想知道的事和真相有出入。
11:22
that what you want and what's true真正
are different不同 things.
209
670213
4327
11:28
Which哪一个 brings带来 me to the third第三 thing
that I think we need to do
210
676070
2921
这就引出了如果我们想直面现实世界
11:31
if we want to accept接受 that we live生活
in a common共同 reality现实.
211
679854
3032
就必须要做的第三件事。
那就是谦卑一点,
11:34
That third第三 thing is:
have a little humility谦逊.
212
682910
2891
11:38
By humility谦逊 here, I mean
epistemic认识 humility谦逊,
213
686510
2122
我指的是知识上的谦卑。
也就是说,
11:40
which哪一个 means手段, in a sense,
214
688656
1989
11:43
knowing会心 that you don't know it all.
215
691701
2403
明白你其实不是万事通。
但这也进一步意味着,
11:46
But it also means手段 something
more than that.
216
694128
2053
借由佐证与他人交流的经验,
11:48
It means手段 seeing眼看 your worldview世界观
as open打开 to improvement起色
217
696205
4450
开启你的世界观,且精益求精。
11:52
by the evidence证据 and experience经验 of others其他.
218
700679
2131
借由佐证与他人交流的经验,
11:54
Seeing眼见 your worldview世界观
as open打开 to improvement起色
219
702834
2049
开启你的世界观,且精益求精。
11:56
by the evidence证据 and experience经验 of others其他.
220
704907
2123
这不只是打开心胸、拥抱改变,
12:00
That's more than just
being存在 open打开 to change更改.
221
708084
2039
也不只是打开心胸、自我进步,
12:02
It's more than just being存在 open打开
to self-improvement自我提升.
222
710147
2398
而是要明白你个人的知识,
12:04
It means手段 seeing眼看 your knowledge知识
as capable of enhancing提高
223
712569
4285
能透过他人的贡献而有所提升。
12:08
or being存在 enriched丰富
by what others其他 contribute有助于.
224
716878
2526
12:12
That's part部分 of what is involved参与
225
720224
2714
这就是认同现实世界存在
必须经历的一个过程,
12:14
in recognizing认识 there's a common共同 reality现实
226
722962
2133
12:18
that you, too, are responsible主管 to.
227
726116
1853
而你也要负起责任。
12:21
I don't think it's much
of a stretch伸展 to say
228
729633
2205
我认为说我们的社会
不擅于提高或鼓励这种谦卑
12:23
that our society社会 is not particularly尤其 great
at enhancing提高 or encouraging鼓舞人心的
229
731862
4955
其实毫不夸张。
12:28
that sort分类 of humility谦逊.
230
736841
1215
部分原因是由于,
12:30
That's partly部分地 because,
231
738080
1579
12:32
well, we tend趋向 to confuse迷惑
arrogance傲慢 and confidence置信度.
232
740810
2988
我们分不清自大与自信,
12:36
And it's partly部分地 because, well, you know,
233
744263
2441
有部分是因为,
12:39
arrogance傲慢 is just easier更轻松.
234
747341
1553
自大比自信来得容易。
认为自己是万事通可简单多了,
12:40
It's just easier更轻松 to think of yourself你自己
as knowing会心 it all.
235
748918
2677
认为自己能了解一切也简单多了。
12:43
It's just easier更轻松 to think of yourself你自己
as having it all figured想通 out.
236
751619
3697
12:48
But that's another另一个 example
of the bad faith信仰 towards the truth真相
237
756513
2933
但这是我刚才提到
对真相有错误信仰的另一个例子。
12:51
that I've been talking about.
238
759470
1538
12:55
So the concept概念 of a common共同 reality现实,
239
763391
2237
所以现实世界的概念
与很多哲学概念雷同,
12:57
like a lot of philosophical哲学上 concepts概念,
240
765652
2690
看起来很显眼,
13:00
can seem似乎 so obvious明显,
241
768366
1484
13:02
that we can look right past过去 it
242
770785
1842
但我们却视而不见,
13:05
and forget忘记 why it's important重要.
243
773945
1984
并忘掉其重要性。
13:09
Democracies民主 can't function功能
if their citizens公民 don't strive努力,
244
777394
4944
人民若不努力,民主就无法运作,
至少有时候是这样,
13:14
at least最小 some of the time,
245
782362
1370
如果人民不努力
13:15
to inhabit居住于 a common共同 space空间,
246
783756
1681
在共有的时空里交流意见,
13:17
a space空间 where they can pass通过
ideas思路 back and forth向前
247
785461
3456
13:22
when -- and especially特别 when --
248
790123
1786
尤其是,
当大家想法不一致时。
13:23
they disagree不同意.
249
791933
1405
13:25
But you can't strive努力 to inhabit居住于 that space空间
250
793749
2264
但如果你还没接受,
13:29
if you don't already已经 accept接受
that you live生活 in the same相同 reality现实.
251
797560
3586
大家是处在同一个现实里,
你就无法待在那个时空里。
13:35
To accept接受 that, we've我们已经 got
to believe in truth真相,
252
803144
2171
想要接受的话,
我们就必须相信真相,
我们必须鼓励更积极的求知方法,
13:37
we've我们已经 got to encourage鼓励
more active活性 ways方法 of knowing会心.
253
805339
3311
13:41
And we've我们已经 got to have the humility谦逊
254
809394
1738
我们同时也必须保持谦卑,
13:44
to realize实现 that we're not
the measure测量 of all things.
255
812271
2707
才能认识到我们不是丈量万物的准则。
13:49
We may可能 yet然而 one day realize实现 the vision视力
256
817049
3524
也许脑袋里配备网络的想法
会有实现的一天。
13:52
of having the internet互联网 in our brains大脑.
257
820597
2673
13:56
But if we want that to be liberating解放
and not terrifying可怕的,
258
824545
3919
但如果我们想要解放思想,
并无所惧地执行,
如果我们想扩展视野,
14:00
if we want it to expand扩大 our understanding理解
259
828488
2762
不只是被动地汲取知识,
14:03
and not just our passive被动 knowing会心,
260
831274
2403
14:06
we need to remember记得 that our perspectives观点,
261
834585
3639
我们就要记住,我们的观点
是如此奇妙、美丽,
14:10
as wondrous奇妙, as beautiful美丽 as they are,
262
838248
3151
14:14
are just that --
263
842171
1280
只要我们认同——
我们是活在同一个现实世界里。
14:15
perspectives观点 on one reality现实.
264
843475
2520
14:19
Thank you.
265
847096
1271
谢谢各位!
(掌声)
14:20
(Applause掌声)
266
848391
4826
Translated by Yi-Fan Yu
Reviewed by Xin Lin

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Michael Patrick Lynch - Philosopher
Michael Patrick Lynch examines truth, democracy, public discourse and the ethics of technology in the age of big data.

Why you should listen

What is truth and why does it matter? Does information technology help or hinder its pursuit? And how do we encourage more productive public discourse? These are some of the questions that animate Michael Lynch's work as a philosopher.  

Lynch is a writer and professor of philosophy at the University of Connecticut, where he directs the Humanities Institute. His work concerns truth, democracy, public discourse and the ethics of technology. Lynch is the author or editor of seven books, including The Internet of Us: Knowing More and Understanding Less in the Age of Big Data, In Praise of Reason: Why Rationality Matters for Democracy, Truth as One and Many and the New York Times Sunday Book Review Editor’s pick, True to Life.

The recipient of the Medal for Research Excellence from the University of Connecticut’s College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, he is The Principal Investigator for Humility & Conviction in Public Life, a $7 million project aimed at understanding and encouraging meaningful public discourse funded by the John Templeton Foundation and the University of Connecticut. He's a frequent contributor to the New York Times "The Stone" blog.

More profile about the speaker
Michael Patrick Lynch | Speaker | TED.com

Data provided by TED.

This site was created in May 2015 and the last update was on January 12, 2020. It will no longer be updated.

We are currently creating a new site called "eng.lish.video" and would be grateful if you could access it.

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to write comments in your language on the contact form.

Privacy Policy

Developer's Blog

Buy Me A Coffee