ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Abraham Verghese - Physician and author
In our era of the patient-as-data-point, Abraham Verghese believes in the old-fashioned physical exam, the bedside chat, the power of informed observation.

Why you should listen

Before he finished medical school, Abraham Verghese spent a year on the other end of the medical pecking order, as a hospital orderly. Moving unseen through the wards, he saw the patients with new eyes, as human beings rather than collections of illnesses. The experience has informed his work as a doctor -- and as a writer. "Imagining the Patient’s Experience" was the motto of the Center for Medical Humanities & Ethics, which he founded at the University of Texas San Antonio, where he brought a deep-seated empathy. He’s now a professor for the Theory and Practice of Medicine at Stanford, where his old-fashioned weekly rounds have inspired a new initiative, the Stanford 25, teaching 25 fundamental physical exam skills and their diagnostic benefits to interns.

He’s also a best-selling writer, with two memoirs and a novel, Cutting for Stone, a moving story of two Ethiopian brothers bound by medicine and betrayal.

He says: “I still find the best way to understand a hospitalized patient is not by staring at the computer screen but by going to see the patient; it's only at the bedside that I can figure out what is important.”

In 2011, Verghese was elected to the Institute of Medicine, which advises the government and private institutions on medicine and health on a national level.

More profile about the speaker
Abraham Verghese | Speaker | TED.com
TEDGlobal 2011

Abraham Verghese: A doctor's touch

Filmed:
1,719,216 views

Modern medicine is in danger of losing a powerful, old-fashioned tool: human touch. Physician and writer Abraham Verghese describes our strange new world where patients are merely data points, and calls for a return to the traditional one-on-one physical exam.
- Physician and author
In our era of the patient-as-data-point, Abraham Verghese believes in the old-fashioned physical exam, the bedside chat, the power of informed observation. Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
A few months ago,
0
0
2000
00:17
a 40 year-old woman came to an emergency room
1
2000
3000
00:20
in a hospital close to where I live,
2
5000
2000
00:22
and she was brought in confused.
3
7000
2000
00:24
Her blood pressure was an alarming
4
9000
2000
00:26
230 over 170.
5
11000
3000
00:29
Within a few minutes, she went into cardiac collapse.
6
14000
3000
00:32
She was resuscitated, stabilized,
7
17000
3000
00:35
whisked over to a CAT scan suite
8
20000
2000
00:37
right next to the emergency room,
9
22000
2000
00:39
because they were concerned about blood clots in the lung.
10
24000
3000
00:42
And the CAT scan revealed
11
27000
2000
00:44
no blood clots in the lung,
12
29000
2000
00:46
but it showed bilateral, visible, palpable breast masses,
13
31000
5000
00:51
breast tumors,
14
36000
2000
00:53
that had metastasized widely
15
38000
2000
00:55
all over the body.
16
40000
2000
00:57
And the real tragedy was, if you look through her records,
17
42000
3000
01:00
she had been seen
18
45000
2000
01:02
in four or five other health care institutions
19
47000
2000
01:04
in the preceding two years.
20
49000
2000
01:06
Four or five opportunities
21
51000
2000
01:08
to see the breast masses, touch the breast mass,
22
53000
2000
01:10
intervene at a much earlier stage
23
55000
3000
01:13
than when we saw her.
24
58000
2000
01:15
Ladies and gentlemen,
25
60000
2000
01:17
that is not an unusual story.
26
62000
2000
01:19
Unfortunately, it happens all the time.
27
64000
3000
01:22
I joke, but I only half joke,
28
67000
2000
01:24
that if you come to one of our hospitals missing a limb,
29
69000
3000
01:27
no one will believe you till they get a CAT scan, MRI
30
72000
3000
01:30
or orthopedic consult.
31
75000
2000
01:32
I am not a Luddite.
32
77000
2000
01:34
I teach at Stanford.
33
79000
2000
01:36
I'm a physician practicing with cutting-edge technology.
34
81000
2000
01:38
But I'd like to make the case to you
35
83000
2000
01:40
in the next 17 minutes
36
85000
2000
01:42
that when we shortcut the physical exam,
37
87000
4000
01:46
when we lean towards ordering tests
38
91000
2000
01:48
instead of talking to and examining the patient,
39
93000
3000
01:51
we not only overlook simple diagnoses
40
96000
3000
01:54
that can be diagnosed at a treatable, early stage,
41
99000
3000
01:57
but we're losing much more than that.
42
102000
2000
01:59
We're losing a ritual.
43
104000
2000
02:01
We're losing a ritual that I believe is transformative, transcendent,
44
106000
3000
02:04
and is at the heart
45
109000
2000
02:06
of the patient-physician relationship.
46
111000
2000
02:08
This may actually be heresy to say this at TED,
47
113000
3000
02:11
but I'd like to introduce you
48
116000
2000
02:13
to the most important innovation,
49
118000
2000
02:15
I think, in medicine
50
120000
2000
02:17
to come in the next 10 years,
51
122000
2000
02:19
and that is the power of the human hand --
52
124000
2000
02:21
to touch, to comfort, to diagnose
53
126000
3000
02:24
and to bring about treatment.
54
129000
2000
02:26
I'd like to introduce you first to this person
55
131000
3000
02:29
whose image you may or may not recognize.
56
134000
2000
02:31
This is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
57
136000
2000
02:33
Since we're in Edinburgh, I'm a big fan of Conan Doyle.
58
138000
3000
02:36
You might not know that Conan Doyle went to medical school
59
141000
2000
02:38
here in Edinburgh,
60
143000
2000
02:40
and his character, Sherlock Holmes,
61
145000
2000
02:42
was inspired by Sir Joseph Bell.
62
147000
3000
02:45
Joseph Bell was an extraordinary teacher by all accounts.
63
150000
3000
02:48
And Conan Doyle, writing about Bell,
64
153000
3000
02:51
described the following exchange
65
156000
2000
02:53
between Bell and his students.
66
158000
2000
02:55
So picture Bell sitting in the outpatient department,
67
160000
3000
02:58
students all around him,
68
163000
2000
03:00
patients signing up in the emergency room
69
165000
2000
03:02
and being registered and being brought in.
70
167000
3000
03:05
And a woman comes in with a child,
71
170000
2000
03:07
and Conan Doyle describes the following exchange.
72
172000
3000
03:10
The woman says, "Good Morning."
73
175000
4000
03:14
Bell says, "What sort of crossing did you have
74
179000
3000
03:17
on the ferry from Burntisland?"
75
182000
3000
03:20
She says, "It was good."
76
185000
2000
03:22
And he says, "What did you do with the other child?"
77
187000
3000
03:25
She says, "I left him with my sister at Leith."
78
190000
3000
03:28
And he says,
79
193000
2000
03:30
"And did you take the shortcut down Inverleith Row
80
195000
2000
03:32
to get here to the infirmary?"
81
197000
2000
03:34
She says, "I did."
82
199000
2000
03:36
And he says, "Would you still be working at the linoleum factory?"
83
201000
4000
03:40
And she says, "I am."
84
205000
2000
03:42
And Bell then goes on to explain to the students.
85
207000
2000
03:44
He says, "You see, when she said, 'Good morning,'
86
209000
3000
03:47
I picked up her Fife accent.
87
212000
2000
03:49
And the nearest ferry crossing from Fife is from Burntisland.
88
214000
3000
03:52
And so she must have taken the ferry over.
89
217000
3000
03:55
You notice that the coat she's carrying
90
220000
2000
03:57
is too small for the child who is with her,
91
222000
3000
04:00
and therefore, she started out the journey with two children,
92
225000
3000
04:03
but dropped one off along the way.
93
228000
3000
04:06
You notice the clay on the soles of her feet.
94
231000
2000
04:08
Such red clay is not found within a hundred miles of Edinburgh,
95
233000
4000
04:12
except in the botanical gardens.
96
237000
2000
04:14
And therefore, she took a short cut down Inverleith Row
97
239000
3000
04:17
to arrive here.
98
242000
2000
04:19
And finally, she has a dermatitis
99
244000
2000
04:21
on the fingers of her right hand,
100
246000
2000
04:23
a dermatitis that is unique
101
248000
2000
04:25
to the linoleum factory workers in Burntisland."
102
250000
3000
04:28
And when Bell actually strips the patient,
103
253000
2000
04:30
begins to examine the patient,
104
255000
2000
04:32
you can only imagine how much more he would discern.
105
257000
3000
04:35
And as a teacher of medicine, as a student myself,
106
260000
3000
04:38
I was so inspired by that story.
107
263000
2000
04:40
But you might not realize
108
265000
2000
04:42
that our ability to look into the body
109
267000
2000
04:44
in this simple way, using our senses,
110
269000
2000
04:46
is quite recent.
111
271000
2000
04:48
The picture I'm showing you is of Leopold Auenbrugger
112
273000
3000
04:51
who, in the late 1700s,
113
276000
2000
04:53
discovered percussion.
114
278000
2000
04:55
And the story is that Leopold Auenbrugger
115
280000
3000
04:58
was the son of an innkeeper.
116
283000
3000
05:01
And his father used to go down into the basement
117
286000
3000
05:04
to tap on the sides of casks of wine
118
289000
2000
05:06
to determine how much wine was left
119
291000
2000
05:08
and whether to reorder.
120
293000
2000
05:10
And so when Auenbrugger became a physician,
121
295000
2000
05:12
he began to do the same thing.
122
297000
2000
05:14
He began to tap on the chests of his patients,
123
299000
3000
05:17
on their abdomens.
124
302000
2000
05:19
And basically everything we know about percussion,
125
304000
2000
05:21
which you can think of as an ultrasound of its day --
126
306000
4000
05:25
organ enlargement, fluid around the heart, fluid in the lungs,
127
310000
3000
05:28
abdominal changes --
128
313000
2000
05:30
all of this he described in this wonderful manuscript
129
315000
2000
05:32
"Inventum Novum," "New Invention,"
130
317000
3000
05:35
which would have disappeared into obscurity,
131
320000
2000
05:37
except for the fact that this physician, Corvisart,
132
322000
3000
05:40
a famous French physician --
133
325000
2000
05:42
famous only because he was physician to this gentleman --
134
327000
3000
05:45
Corvisart repopularized and reintroduced the work.
135
330000
4000
05:49
And it was followed a year or two later
136
334000
2000
05:51
by Laennec discovering the stethoscope.
137
336000
3000
05:54
Laennec, it is said, was walking in the streets of Paris
138
339000
3000
05:57
and saw two children playing with a stick.
139
342000
2000
05:59
One was scratching at the end of the stick,
140
344000
3000
06:02
another child listened at the other end.
141
347000
2000
06:04
And Laennec thought this would be a wonderful way
142
349000
2000
06:06
to listen to the chest or listen to the abdomen
143
351000
2000
06:08
using what he called "the cylinder."
144
353000
2000
06:10
Later he renamed it the stethoscope.
145
355000
2000
06:12
And that is how stethoscope and auscultation was born.
146
357000
4000
06:16
So within a few years,
147
361000
2000
06:18
in the late 1800s, early 1900s,
148
363000
2000
06:20
all of a sudden,
149
365000
2000
06:22
the barber surgeon had given way
150
367000
3000
06:25
to the physician who was trying to make a diagnosis.
151
370000
3000
06:28
If you'll recall, prior to that time,
152
373000
2000
06:30
no matter what ailed you, you went to see the barber surgeon
153
375000
3000
06:33
who wound up cupping you,
154
378000
2000
06:35
bleeding you, purging you.
155
380000
2000
06:37
And, oh yes, if you wanted,
156
382000
2000
06:39
he would give you a haircut -- short on the sides, long in the back --
157
384000
3000
06:42
and pull your tooth while he was at it.
158
387000
2000
06:44
He made no attempt at diagnosis.
159
389000
2000
06:46
In fact, some of you might well know
160
391000
2000
06:48
that the barber pole, the red and white stripes,
161
393000
3000
06:51
represents the blood bandages of the barber surgeon,
162
396000
3000
06:54
and the receptacles on either end
163
399000
2000
06:56
represent the pots in which the blood was collected.
164
401000
3000
06:59
But the arrival of auscultation and percussion
165
404000
3000
07:02
represented a sea change,
166
407000
2000
07:04
a moment when physicians were beginning to look inside the body.
167
409000
3000
07:07
And this particular painting, I think,
168
412000
3000
07:10
represents the pinnacle, the peak, of that clinical era.
169
415000
3000
07:13
This is a very famous painting:
170
418000
2000
07:15
"The Doctor" by Luke Fildes.
171
420000
3000
07:18
Luke Fildes was commissioned to paint this by Tate,
172
423000
3000
07:21
who then established the Tate Gallery.
173
426000
2000
07:23
And Tate asked Fildes to paint a painting
174
428000
2000
07:25
of social importance.
175
430000
2000
07:27
And it's interesting that Fildes picked this topic.
176
432000
3000
07:30
Fildes' oldest son, Philip,
177
435000
3000
07:33
died at the age of nine on Christmas Eve
178
438000
3000
07:36
after a brief illness.
179
441000
2000
07:38
And Fildes was so taken by the physician
180
443000
3000
07:41
who held vigil at the bedside for two, three nights,
181
446000
4000
07:45
that he decided that he would try and depict
182
450000
2000
07:47
the physician in our time --
183
452000
2000
07:49
almost a tribute to this physician.
184
454000
2000
07:51
And hence the painting "The Doctor," a very famous painting.
185
456000
3000
07:54
It's been on calendars, postage stamps in many different countries.
186
459000
3000
07:57
I've often wondered, what would Fildes have done
187
462000
3000
08:00
had he been asked to paint this painting
188
465000
2000
08:02
in the modern era,
189
467000
2000
08:04
in the year 2011?
190
469000
3000
08:07
Would he have substituted a computer screen
191
472000
4000
08:11
for where he had the patient?
192
476000
2000
08:13
I've gotten into some trouble in Silicon Valley
193
478000
2000
08:15
for saying that the patient in the bed
194
480000
2000
08:17
has almost become an icon
195
482000
3000
08:20
for the real patient who's in the computer.
196
485000
3000
08:23
I've actually coined a term for that entity in the computer.
197
488000
3000
08:26
I call it the iPatient.
198
491000
2000
08:28
The iPatient is getting wonderful care all across America.
199
493000
3000
08:31
The real patient often wonders,
200
496000
2000
08:33
where is everyone?
201
498000
2000
08:35
When are they going to come by and explain things to me?
202
500000
3000
08:38
Who's in charge?
203
503000
2000
08:40
There's a real disjunction between the patient's perception
204
505000
3000
08:43
and our own perceptions as physicians of the best medical care.
205
508000
3000
08:46
I want to show you a picture
206
511000
2000
08:48
of what rounds looked like
207
513000
2000
08:50
when I was in training.
208
515000
2000
08:52
The focus was around the patient.
209
517000
2000
08:54
We went from bed to bed. The attending physician was in charge.
210
519000
3000
08:57
Too often these days,
211
522000
2000
08:59
rounds look very much like this,
212
524000
2000
09:01
where the discussion is taking place
213
526000
2000
09:03
in a room far away from the patient.
214
528000
3000
09:06
The discussion is all about images on the computer, data.
215
531000
3000
09:09
And the one critical piece missing
216
534000
2000
09:11
is that of the patient.
217
536000
2000
09:13
Now I've been influenced in this thinking
218
538000
3000
09:16
by two anecdotes that I want to share with you.
219
541000
3000
09:19
One had to do with a friend of mine who had a breast cancer,
220
544000
3000
09:22
had a small breast cancer detected --
221
547000
3000
09:25
had her lumpectomy in the town in which I lived.
222
550000
2000
09:27
This is when I was in Texas.
223
552000
2000
09:29
And she then spent a lot of time researching
224
554000
3000
09:32
to find the best cancer center in the world
225
557000
3000
09:35
to get her subsequent care.
226
560000
2000
09:37
And she found the place and decided to go there, went there.
227
562000
3000
09:40
Which is why I was surprised a few months later
228
565000
3000
09:43
to see her back in our own town,
229
568000
3000
09:46
getting her subsequent care with her private oncologist.
230
571000
3000
09:49
And I pressed her, and I asked her,
231
574000
2000
09:51
"Why did you come back and get your care here?"
232
576000
3000
09:54
And she was reluctant to tell me.
233
579000
2000
09:56
She said, "The cancer center was wonderful.
234
581000
3000
09:59
It had a beautiful facility,
235
584000
2000
10:01
giant atrium, valet parking,
236
586000
2000
10:03
a piano that played itself,
237
588000
2000
10:05
a concierge that took you around from here to there.
238
590000
3000
10:08
But," she said,
239
593000
2000
10:10
"but they did not touch my breasts."
240
595000
4000
10:14
Now you and I could argue
241
599000
2000
10:16
that they probably did not need to touch her breasts.
242
601000
2000
10:18
They had her scanned inside out.
243
603000
2000
10:20
They understood her breast cancer at the molecular level;
244
605000
3000
10:23
they had no need to touch her breasts.
245
608000
2000
10:25
But to her, it mattered deeply.
246
610000
3000
10:28
It was enough for her to make the decision
247
613000
4000
10:32
to get her subsequent care with her private oncologist
248
617000
3000
10:35
who, every time she went,
249
620000
2000
10:37
examined both breasts including the axillary tail,
250
622000
3000
10:40
examined her axilla carefully,
251
625000
2000
10:42
examined her cervical region, her inguinal region,
252
627000
2000
10:44
did a thorough exam.
253
629000
2000
10:46
And to her, that spoke of a kind of attentiveness that she needed.
254
631000
4000
10:50
I was very influenced by that anecdote.
255
635000
2000
10:52
I was also influenced by another experience that I had,
256
637000
3000
10:55
again, when I was in Texas, before I moved to Stanford.
257
640000
3000
10:58
I had a reputation
258
643000
2000
11:00
as being interested in patients
259
645000
2000
11:02
with chronic fatigue.
260
647000
3000
11:05
This is not a reputation you would wish on your worst enemy.
261
650000
4000
11:09
I say that because these are difficult patients.
262
654000
3000
11:12
They have often been rejected by their families,
263
657000
3000
11:15
have had bad experiences with medical care
264
660000
2000
11:17
and they come to you fully prepared
265
662000
3000
11:20
for you to join the long list of people
266
665000
2000
11:22
who's about to disappoint them.
267
667000
2000
11:24
And I learned very early on with my first patient
268
669000
3000
11:27
that I could not do justice
269
672000
2000
11:29
to this very complicated patient
270
674000
2000
11:31
with all the records they were bringing
271
676000
2000
11:33
in a new patient visit of 45 minutes.
272
678000
2000
11:35
There was just no way.
273
680000
2000
11:37
And if I tried, I'd disappoint them.
274
682000
3000
11:40
And so I hit on this method
275
685000
2000
11:42
where I invited the patient
276
687000
2000
11:44
to tell me the story for their entire first visit,
277
689000
3000
11:47
and I tried not to interrupt them.
278
692000
3000
11:50
We know the average American physician
279
695000
2000
11:52
interrupts their patient in 14 seconds.
280
697000
3000
11:55
And if I ever get to heaven,
281
700000
2000
11:57
it will be because I held my piece for 45 minutes
282
702000
3000
12:00
and did not interrupt my patient.
283
705000
2000
12:02
I then scheduled the physical exam for two weeks hence,
284
707000
3000
12:05
and when the patient came for the physical,
285
710000
2000
12:07
I was able to do a thorough physical,
286
712000
2000
12:09
because I had nothing else to do.
287
714000
2000
12:11
I like to think that I do a thorough physical exam,
288
716000
3000
12:14
but because the whole visit was now about the physical,
289
719000
3000
12:17
I could do an extraordinarily thorough exam.
290
722000
3000
12:20
And I remember my very first patient in that series
291
725000
4000
12:24
continued to tell me more history
292
729000
2000
12:26
during what was meant to be the physical exam visit.
293
731000
3000
12:29
And I began my ritual.
294
734000
2000
12:31
I always begin with the pulse,
295
736000
2000
12:33
then I examine the hands, then I look at the nail beds,
296
738000
3000
12:36
then I slide my hand up to the epitrochlear node,
297
741000
2000
12:38
and I was into my ritual.
298
743000
2000
12:40
And when my ritual began,
299
745000
2000
12:42
this very voluble patient
300
747000
2000
12:44
began to quiet down.
301
749000
2000
12:46
And I remember having a very eerie sense
302
751000
3000
12:49
that the patient and I
303
754000
3000
12:52
had slipped back into a primitive ritual
304
757000
2000
12:54
in which I had a role
305
759000
2000
12:56
and the patient had a role.
306
761000
2000
12:58
And when I was done,
307
763000
2000
13:00
the patient said to me with some awe,
308
765000
2000
13:02
"I have never been examined like this before."
309
767000
3000
13:05
Now if that were true,
310
770000
2000
13:07
it's a true condemnation of our health care system,
311
772000
2000
13:09
because they had been seen in other places.
312
774000
3000
13:12
I then proceeded to tell the patient,
313
777000
2000
13:14
once the patient was dressed,
314
779000
2000
13:16
the standard things that the person must have heard in other institutions,
315
781000
3000
13:19
which is, "This is not in your head.
316
784000
2000
13:21
This is real.
317
786000
2000
13:23
The good news, it's not cancer, it's not tuberculosis,
318
788000
3000
13:26
it's not coccidioidomycosis or some obscure fungal infection.
319
791000
3000
13:29
The bad news is we don't know exactly what's causing this,
320
794000
3000
13:32
but here's what you should do, here's what we should do."
321
797000
3000
13:35
And I would lay out all the standard treatment options
322
800000
3000
13:38
that the patient had heard elsewhere.
323
803000
3000
13:41
And I always felt
324
806000
2000
13:43
that if my patient gave up the quest
325
808000
2000
13:45
for the magic doctor, the magic treatment
326
810000
3000
13:48
and began with me on a course towards wellness,
327
813000
3000
13:51
it was because I had earned the right
328
816000
2000
13:53
to tell them these things
329
818000
2000
13:55
by virtue of the examination.
330
820000
2000
13:57
Something of importance had transpired in the exchange.
331
822000
4000
14:01
I took this to my colleagues
332
826000
2000
14:03
at Stanford in anthropology
333
828000
2000
14:05
and told them the same story.
334
830000
2000
14:07
And they immediately said to me,
335
832000
2000
14:09
"Well you are describing a classic ritual."
336
834000
2000
14:11
And they helped me understand
337
836000
2000
14:13
that rituals are all about transformation.
338
838000
3000
14:16
We marry, for example,
339
841000
2000
14:18
with great pomp and ceremony and expense
340
843000
3000
14:21
to signal our departure
341
846000
2000
14:23
from a life of solitude and misery and loneliness
342
848000
2000
14:25
to one of eternal bliss.
343
850000
3000
14:28
I'm not sure why you're laughing.
344
853000
2000
14:30
That was the original intent, was it not?
345
855000
2000
14:32
We signal transitions of power
346
857000
2000
14:34
with rituals.
347
859000
2000
14:36
We signal the passage of a life with rituals.
348
861000
2000
14:38
Rituals are terribly important.
349
863000
2000
14:40
They're all about transformation.
350
865000
2000
14:42
Well I would submit to you
351
867000
2000
14:44
that the ritual
352
869000
2000
14:46
of one individual coming to another
353
871000
2000
14:48
and telling them things
354
873000
2000
14:50
that they would not tell their preacher or rabbi,
355
875000
3000
14:53
and then, incredibly on top of that,
356
878000
2000
14:55
disrobing and allowing touch --
357
880000
3000
14:58
I would submit to you that that is a ritual of exceeding importance.
358
883000
4000
15:02
And if you shortchange that ritual
359
887000
2000
15:04
by not undressing the patient,
360
889000
2000
15:06
by listening with your stethoscope on top of the nightgown,
361
891000
3000
15:09
by not doing a complete exam,
362
894000
2000
15:11
you have bypassed on the opportunity
363
896000
2000
15:13
to seal the patient-physician relationship.
364
898000
4000
15:17
I am a writer,
365
902000
2000
15:19
and I want to close by reading you a short passage that I wrote
366
904000
4000
15:23
that has to do very much with this scene.
367
908000
2000
15:25
I'm an infectious disease physician,
368
910000
2000
15:27
and in the early days of HIV, before we had our medications,
369
912000
3000
15:30
I presided over so many scenes like this.
370
915000
4000
15:34
I remember, every time I went to a patient's deathbed,
371
919000
3000
15:37
whether in the hospital or at home,
372
922000
2000
15:39
I remember my sense of failure --
373
924000
4000
15:43
the feeling of I don't know what I have to say;
374
928000
2000
15:45
I don't know what I can say;
375
930000
2000
15:47
I don't know what I'm supposed to do.
376
932000
2000
15:49
And out of that sense of failure,
377
934000
2000
15:51
I remember, I would always examine the patient.
378
936000
3000
15:54
I would pull down the eyelids.
379
939000
2000
15:56
I would look at the tongue.
380
941000
2000
15:58
I would percuss the chest. I would listen to the heart.
381
943000
3000
16:01
I would feel the abdomen.
382
946000
2000
16:03
I remember so many patients,
383
948000
3000
16:06
their names still vivid on my tongue,
384
951000
2000
16:08
their faces still so clear.
385
953000
2000
16:10
I remember so many huge, hollowed out, haunted eyes
386
955000
4000
16:14
staring up at me as I performed this ritual.
387
959000
3000
16:17
And then the next day,
388
962000
2000
16:19
I would come, and I would do it again.
389
964000
2000
16:21
And I wanted to read you this one closing passage
390
966000
3000
16:24
about one patient.
391
969000
2000
16:26
"I recall one patient
392
971000
2000
16:28
who was at that point
393
973000
2000
16:30
no more than a skeleton
394
975000
2000
16:32
encased in shrinking skin,
395
977000
2000
16:34
unable to speak,
396
979000
2000
16:36
his mouth crusted with candida
397
981000
2000
16:38
that was resistant to the usual medications.
398
983000
3000
16:41
When he saw me
399
986000
2000
16:43
on what turned out to be his last hours on this earth,
400
988000
2000
16:45
his hands moved as if in slow motion.
401
990000
3000
16:48
And as I wondered what he was up to,
402
993000
2000
16:50
his stick fingers made their way
403
995000
2000
16:52
up to his pajama shirt,
404
997000
2000
16:54
fumbling with his buttons.
405
999000
3000
16:57
I realized that he was wanting
406
1002000
2000
16:59
to expose his wicker-basket chest to me.
407
1004000
3000
17:02
It was an offering, an invitation.
408
1007000
3000
17:05
I did not decline.
409
1010000
2000
17:07
I percussed. I palpated. I listened to the chest.
410
1012000
3000
17:10
I think he surely must have known by then
411
1015000
2000
17:12
that it was vital for me
412
1017000
2000
17:14
just as it was necessary for him.
413
1019000
2000
17:16
Neither of us could skip this ritual,
414
1021000
3000
17:19
which had nothing to do with detecting rales in the lung,
415
1024000
3000
17:22
or finding the gallop rhythm of heart failure.
416
1027000
3000
17:25
No, this ritual was about the one message
417
1030000
3000
17:28
that physicians have needed to convey to their patients.
418
1033000
3000
17:31
Although, God knows, of late, in our hubris,
419
1036000
2000
17:33
we seem to have drifted away.
420
1038000
2000
17:35
We seem to have forgotten --
421
1040000
2000
17:37
as though, with the explosion of knowledge,
422
1042000
2000
17:39
the whole human genome mapped out at our feet,
423
1044000
3000
17:42
we are lulled into inattention,
424
1047000
2000
17:44
forgetting that the ritual is cathartic to the physician,
425
1049000
3000
17:47
necessary for the patient --
426
1052000
2000
17:49
forgetting that the ritual has meaning
427
1054000
2000
17:51
and a singular message to convey to the patient.
428
1056000
4000
17:55
And the message, which I didn't fully understand then,
429
1060000
3000
17:58
even as I delivered it,
430
1063000
2000
18:00
and which I understand better now is this:
431
1065000
3000
18:03
I will always, always, always be there.
432
1068000
3000
18:06
I will see you through this.
433
1071000
2000
18:08
I will never abandon you.
434
1073000
2000
18:10
I will be with you through the end."
435
1075000
2000
18:12
Thank you very much.
436
1077000
2000
18:14
(Applause)
437
1079000
12000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Abraham Verghese - Physician and author
In our era of the patient-as-data-point, Abraham Verghese believes in the old-fashioned physical exam, the bedside chat, the power of informed observation.

Why you should listen

Before he finished medical school, Abraham Verghese spent a year on the other end of the medical pecking order, as a hospital orderly. Moving unseen through the wards, he saw the patients with new eyes, as human beings rather than collections of illnesses. The experience has informed his work as a doctor -- and as a writer. "Imagining the Patient’s Experience" was the motto of the Center for Medical Humanities & Ethics, which he founded at the University of Texas San Antonio, where he brought a deep-seated empathy. He’s now a professor for the Theory and Practice of Medicine at Stanford, where his old-fashioned weekly rounds have inspired a new initiative, the Stanford 25, teaching 25 fundamental physical exam skills and their diagnostic benefits to interns.

He’s also a best-selling writer, with two memoirs and a novel, Cutting for Stone, a moving story of two Ethiopian brothers bound by medicine and betrayal.

He says: “I still find the best way to understand a hospitalized patient is not by staring at the computer screen but by going to see the patient; it's only at the bedside that I can figure out what is important.”

In 2011, Verghese was elected to the Institute of Medicine, which advises the government and private institutions on medicine and health on a national level.

More profile about the speaker
Abraham Verghese | Speaker | TED.com

Data provided by TED.

This site was created in May 2015 and the last update was on January 12, 2020. It will no longer be updated.

We are currently creating a new site called "eng.lish.video" and would be grateful if you could access it.

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to write comments in your language on the contact form.

Privacy Policy

Developer's Blog

Buy Me A Coffee