TEDGlobal 2005
Richard Dawkins: Why the universe seems so strange
Filmed:
Readability: 4.6
4,013,427 views
Biologist Richard Dawkins makes a case for "thinking the improbable" by looking at how the human frame of reference limits our understanding of the universe.
Richard Dawkins - Evolutionary biologist
Oxford professor Richard Dawkins has helped steer evolutionary science into the 21st century, and his concept of the "meme" contextualized the spread of ideas in the information age. In recent years, his devastating critique of religion has made him a leading figure in the New Atheism. Full bio
Oxford professor Richard Dawkins has helped steer evolutionary science into the 21st century, and his concept of the "meme" contextualized the spread of ideas in the information age. In recent years, his devastating critique of religion has made him a leading figure in the New Atheism. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:25
My title: "Queerer than we can suppose: The strangeness of science."
0
0
6000
00:31
"Queerer than we can suppose" comes from J.B.S. Haldane,
1
6000
3000
00:34
the famous biologist, who said, "Now, my own suspicion is
2
9000
3000
00:38
that the universe is not only queerer than we suppose,
3
13000
4000
00:42
but queerer than we can suppose.
4
17000
2000
00:44
I suspect that there are more things in heaven and earth
5
19000
3000
00:47
than are dreamed of, or can be dreamed of, in any philosophy."
6
22000
5000
00:53
Richard Feynman compared the accuracy of quantum theories --
7
28000
5000
00:58
experimental predictions -- to specifying the width of North America
8
33000
5000
01:03
to within one hair's breadth of accuracy.
9
38000
4000
01:07
This means that quantum theory has got to be in some sense true.
10
42000
5000
01:12
Yet the assumptions that quantum theory needs to make
11
47000
2000
01:14
in order to deliver those predictions are so mysterious
12
49000
3000
01:18
that even Feynman himself was moved to remark,
13
53000
3000
01:21
"If you think you understand quantum theory,
14
56000
3000
01:24
you don't understand quantum theory."
15
59000
3000
01:27
It's so queer that physicists resort to one or another
16
62000
5000
01:32
paradoxical interpretation of it.
17
67000
2000
01:34
David Deutsch, who's talking here, in "The Fabric of Reality,"
18
69000
5000
01:39
embraces the "many worlds" interpretation of quantum theory,
19
74000
6000
01:45
because the worst that you can say about it is
20
80000
2000
01:47
that it's preposterously wasteful.
21
82000
2000
01:49
It postulates a vast and rapidly growing number of universes
22
84000
4000
01:54
existing in parallel -- mutually undetectable except through
23
89000
4000
01:58
the narrow porthole of quantum mechanical experiments.
24
93000
6000
02:04
And that's Richard Feynman.
25
99000
3000
02:07
The biologist Lewis Wolpert
26
102000
3000
02:10
believes that the queerness of modern physics
27
105000
2000
02:12
is just an extreme example. Science, as opposed to technology,
28
107000
4000
02:16
does violence to common sense.
29
111000
3000
02:19
Every time you drink a glass of water, he points out,
30
114000
3000
02:23
the odds are that you will imbibe at least one molecule
31
118000
3000
02:26
that passed through the bladder of Oliver Cromwell. (Laughter)
32
121000
5000
02:31
It's just elementary probability theory.
33
126000
3000
02:34
The number of molecules per glassful is hugely greater
34
129000
3000
02:38
than the number of glassfuls, or bladdersful, in the world --
35
133000
3000
02:41
and, of course, there's nothing special about Cromwell
36
136000
3000
02:44
or bladders. You have just breathed in a nitrogen atom
37
139000
3000
02:47
that passed through the right lung of the third iguanodon
38
142000
3000
02:51
to the left of the tall cycad tree.
39
146000
2000
02:56
"Queerer than we can suppose."
40
151000
2000
03:00
What is it that makes us capable of supposing anything,
41
155000
3000
03:03
and does this tell us anything about what we can suppose?
42
158000
3000
03:07
Are there things about the universe that will be
43
162000
3000
03:10
forever beyond our grasp, but not beyond the grasp of some
44
165000
4000
03:14
superior intelligence? Are there things about the universe
45
169000
3000
03:18
that are, in principle, ungraspable by any mind,
46
173000
4000
03:22
however superior?
47
177000
2000
03:25
The history of science has been one long series
48
180000
3000
03:28
of violent brainstorms, as successive generations
49
183000
3000
03:32
have come to terms with increasing levels of queerness
50
187000
3000
03:35
in the universe.
51
190000
1000
03:37
We're now so used to the idea that the Earth spins --
52
192000
2000
03:40
rather than the Sun moves across the sky -- it's hard for us to realize
53
195000
3000
03:43
what a shattering mental revolution that must have been.
54
198000
3000
03:47
After all, it seems obvious that the Earth is large and motionless,
55
202000
3000
03:51
the Sun small and mobile. But it's worth recalling
56
206000
4000
03:55
Wittgenstein's remark on the subject.
57
210000
1000
03:57
"Tell me," he asked a friend, "why do people always say, it was natural
58
212000
5000
04:02
for man to assume that the sun went round the earth
59
217000
3000
04:05
rather than that the earth was rotating?"
60
220000
2000
04:09
His friend replied, "Well, obviously because it just looks as though
61
224000
3000
04:12
the Sun is going round the Earth."
62
227000
2000
04:15
Wittgenstein replied, "Well, what would it have looked like
63
230000
3000
04:18
if it had looked as though the Earth was rotating?" (Laughter)
64
233000
8000
04:27
Science has taught us, against all intuition,
65
242000
2000
04:30
that apparently solid things, like crystals and rocks,
66
245000
3000
04:33
are really almost entirely composed of empty space.
67
248000
4000
04:37
And the familiar illustration is the nucleus of an atom is a fly
68
252000
5000
04:43
in the middle of a sports stadium and the next atom
69
258000
2000
04:46
is in the next sports stadium.
70
261000
1000
04:49
So it would seem the hardest, solidest, densest rock
71
264000
2000
04:52
is really almost entirely empty space, broken only by tiny particles
72
267000
5000
04:58
so widely spaced they shouldn't count.
73
273000
2000
05:01
Why, then, do rocks look and feel solid and hard and impenetrable?
74
276000
3000
05:06
As an evolutionary biologist, I'd say this: our brains have evolved
75
281000
4000
05:11
to help us survive within the orders of magnitude of size and speed
76
286000
5000
05:17
which our bodies operate at. We never evolved to navigate
77
292000
3000
05:21
in the world of atoms.
78
296000
1000
05:22
If we had, our brains probably would perceive rocks
79
297000
3000
05:25
as full of empty space. Rocks feel hard and impenetrable
80
300000
4000
05:29
to our hands precisely because objects like rocks and hands
81
304000
4000
05:34
cannot penetrate each other. It's therefore useful
82
309000
4000
05:38
for our brains to construct notions like "solidity" and "impenetrability,"
83
313000
6000
05:44
because such notions help us to navigate our bodies through
84
319000
4000
05:48
the middle-sized world in which we have to navigate.
85
323000
4000
05:52
Moving to the other end of the scale, our ancestors never had to
86
327000
3000
05:56
navigate through the cosmos at speeds close to
87
331000
3000
05:59
the speed of light. If they had, our brains would be much better
88
334000
3000
06:03
at understanding Einstein. I want to give the name "Middle World"
89
338000
5000
06:08
to the medium-scaled environment in which we've evolved
90
343000
3000
06:11
the ability to take act -- nothing to do with Middle Earth.
91
346000
2000
06:13
Middle World. (Laughter)
92
348000
3000
06:17
We are evolved denizens of Middle World, and that limits
93
352000
4000
06:21
what we are capable of imagining. We find it intuitively easy
94
356000
3000
06:25
to grasp ideas like, when a rabbit moves at the sort of
95
360000
2000
06:28
medium velocity at which rabbits and other Middle World objects move,
96
363000
3000
06:32
and hits another Middle World object, like a rock, it knocks itself out.
97
367000
3000
06:38
May I introduce Major General Albert Stubblebine III,
98
373000
5000
06:44
commander of military intelligence in 1983.
99
379000
3000
06:49
He stared at his wall in Arlington, Virginia, and decided to do it.
100
384000
4000
06:54
As frightening as the prospect was, he was going into the next office.
101
389000
4000
07:00
He stood up, and moved out from behind his desk.
102
395000
3000
07:05
What is the atom mostly made of? he thought. Space.
103
400000
3000
07:09
He started walking. What am I mostly made of? Atoms.
104
404000
5000
07:15
He quickened his pace, almost to a jog now.
105
410000
2000
07:18
What is the wall mostly made of? Atoms.
106
413000
4000
07:23
All I have to do is merge the spaces.
107
418000
3000
07:27
Then, General Stubblebine banged his nose hard on the wall
108
422000
5000
07:32
of his office. Stubblebine, who commanded 16,000 soldiers,
109
427000
5000
07:38
was confounded by his continual failure to walk through the wall.
110
433000
3000
07:42
He has no doubt that this ability will, one day, be a common tool
111
437000
3000
07:45
in the military arsenal. Who would screw around with an army
112
440000
3000
07:48
that could do that? That's from an article in Playboy,
113
443000
4000
07:53
which I was reading the other day. (Laughter)
114
448000
3000
07:56
I have every reason to think it's true; I was reading Playboy
115
451000
2000
07:59
because I, myself, had an article in it. (Laughter)
116
454000
8000
08:07
Unaided human intuition schooled in Middle World
117
462000
4000
08:12
finds it hard to believe Galileo when he tells us
118
467000
3000
08:15
a heavy object and a light object, air friction aside,
119
470000
3000
08:19
would hit the ground at the same instant.
120
474000
1000
08:20
And that's because in Middle World, air friction is always there.
121
475000
4000
08:24
If we'd evolved in a vacuum, we would expect them
122
479000
2000
08:27
to hit the ground simultaneously. If we were bacteria,
123
482000
3000
08:30
constantly buffeted by thermal movements of molecules,
124
485000
3000
08:33
it would be different,
125
488000
1000
08:35
but we Middle Worlders are too big to notice Brownian motion.
126
490000
3000
08:39
In the same way, our lives are dominated by gravity
127
494000
3000
08:42
but are almost oblivious to the force of surface tension.
128
497000
3000
08:46
A small insect would reverse these priorities.
129
501000
2000
08:50
Steve Grand -- he's the one on the left,
130
505000
2000
08:52
Douglas Adams is on the right -- Steve Grand, in his book,
131
507000
3000
08:55
"Creation: Life and How to Make It," is positively scathing
132
510000
4000
08:59
about our preoccupation with matter itself.
133
514000
3000
09:03
We have this tendency to think that only solid, material things
134
518000
4000
09:07
are really things at all. Waves of electromagnetic fluctuation
135
522000
5000
09:12
in a vacuum seem unreal.
136
527000
2000
09:15
Victorians thought the waves had to be waves in some material medium:
137
530000
4000
09:20
the ether. But we find real matter comforting only because
138
535000
4000
09:24
we've evolved to survive in Middle World,
139
539000
3000
09:28
where matter is a useful fiction.
140
543000
2000
09:31
A whirlpool, for Steve Grand, is a thing with just as much reality
141
546000
3000
09:35
as a rock.
142
550000
1000
09:38
In a desert plain in Tanzania, in the shadow of the volcano
143
553000
4000
09:42
Ol Donyo Lengai, there's a dune made of volcanic ash.
144
557000
3000
09:46
The beautiful thing is that it moves bodily.
145
561000
3000
09:50
It's what's technically known as a "barchan," and the entire dune
146
565000
3000
09:53
walks across the desert in a westerly direction
147
568000
3000
09:56
at a speed of about 17 meters per year.
148
571000
3000
10:00
It retains its crescent shape and moves in the direction of the horns.
149
575000
4000
10:04
What happens is that the wind blows the sand
150
579000
2000
10:07
up the shallow slope on the other side, and then,
151
582000
2000
10:10
as each sand grain hits the top of the ridge,
152
585000
1000
10:11
it cascades down on the inside of the crescent,
153
586000
2000
10:14
and so the whole horn-shaped dune moves.
154
589000
3000
10:20
Steve Grand points out that you and I are, ourselves,
155
595000
2000
10:23
more like a wave than a permanent thing.
156
598000
2000
10:27
He invites us, the reader, to "think of an experience
157
602000
3000
10:30
from your childhood -- something you remember clearly,
158
605000
2000
10:33
something you can see, feel, maybe even smell,
159
608000
2000
10:36
as if you were really there.
160
611000
1000
10:37
After all, you really were there at the time, weren't you?
161
612000
4000
10:41
How else would you remember it?
162
616000
1000
10:43
But here is the bombshell: You weren't there.
163
618000
2000
10:46
Not a single atom that is in your body today was there
164
621000
3000
10:49
when that event took place. Matter flows from place to place
165
624000
4000
10:53
and momentarily comes together to be you.
166
628000
2000
10:56
Whatever you are, therefore, you are not the stuff
167
631000
2000
10:59
of which you are made.
168
634000
1000
11:02
If that doesn't make the hair stand up on the back of your neck,
169
637000
2000
11:04
read it again until it does, because it is important."
170
639000
3000
11:09
So "really" isn't a word that we should use with simple confidence.
171
644000
4000
11:14
If a neutrino had a brain,
172
649000
2000
11:16
which it evolved in neutrino-sized ancestors,
173
651000
2000
11:19
it would say that rocks really do consist of empty space.
174
654000
3000
11:24
We have brains that evolved in medium-sized ancestors
175
659000
2000
11:26
which couldn't walk through rocks.
176
661000
2000
11:29
"Really," for an animal, is whatever its brain needs it to be
177
664000
4000
11:33
in order to assist its survival,
178
668000
2000
11:36
and because different species live in different worlds,
179
671000
2000
11:39
there will be a discomforting variety of "really"s.
180
674000
3000
11:45
What we see of the real world is not the unvarnished world
181
680000
4000
11:49
but a model of the world, regulated and adjusted by sense data,
182
684000
4000
11:54
but constructed so it's useful for dealing with the real world.
183
689000
3000
11:58
The nature of the model depends on the kind of animal we are.
184
693000
3000
12:02
A flying animal needs a different kind of model
185
697000
2000
12:05
from a walking, climbing or swimming animal.
186
700000
3000
12:08
A monkey's brain must have software capable of simulating
187
703000
4000
12:13
a three-dimensional world of branches and trunks.
188
708000
2000
12:16
A mole's software for constructing models of its world
189
711000
3000
12:19
will be customized for underground use.
190
714000
3000
12:22
A water strider's brain doesn't need 3D software at all,
191
717000
4000
12:26
since it lives on the surface of the pond
192
721000
2000
12:28
in an Edwin Abbott flatland.
193
723000
2000
12:32
I've speculated that bats may see color with their ears.
194
727000
4000
12:37
The world model that a bat needs in order to navigate
195
732000
3000
12:40
through three dimensions catching insects
196
735000
2000
12:42
must be pretty similar to the world model that any flying bird,
197
737000
3000
12:45
a day-flying bird like a swallow, needs to perform
198
740000
3000
12:48
the same kind of tasks.
199
743000
1000
12:50
The fact that the bat uses echoes in pitch darkness
200
745000
2000
12:53
to input the current variables to its model,
201
748000
2000
12:56
while the swallow uses light, is incidental.
202
751000
2000
12:59
Bats, I've even suggested, use perceived hues, such as red and blue,
203
754000
5000
13:04
as labels, internal labels, for some useful aspect of echoes --
204
759000
6000
13:11
perhaps the acoustic texture of surfaces, furry or smooth and so on,
205
766000
4000
13:15
in the same way as swallows or, indeed, we, use those
206
770000
4000
13:19
perceived hues -- redness and blueness etc. --
207
774000
2000
13:22
to label long and short wavelengths of light.
208
777000
2000
13:24
There's nothing inherent about red that makes it long wavelength.
209
779000
3000
13:29
And the point is that the nature of the model is governed by
210
784000
2000
13:31
how it is to be used, rather than by the sensory modality involved.
211
786000
5000
13:38
J. B .S. Haldane himself had something to say about animals
212
793000
2000
13:41
whose world is dominated by smell.
213
796000
2000
13:44
Dogs can distinguish two very similar fatty acids, extremely diluted:
214
799000
5000
13:49
caprylic acid and caproic acid.
215
804000
3000
13:52
The only difference, you see, is that one has an extra pair of
216
807000
3000
13:55
carbon atoms in the chain.
217
810000
1000
13:57
Haldane guesses that a dog would probably be able to place the acids
218
812000
4000
14:01
in the order of their molecular weights by their smells,
219
816000
3000
14:05
just as a man could place a number of piano wires
220
820000
2000
14:08
in the order of their lengths by means of their notes.
221
823000
2000
14:12
Now, there's another fatty acid, capric acid,
222
827000
3000
14:16
which is just like the other two,
223
831000
1000
14:17
except that it has two more carbon atoms.
224
832000
2000
14:20
A dog that had never met capric acid would, perhaps,
225
835000
3000
14:23
have no more trouble imagining its smell than we would have trouble
226
838000
4000
14:28
imagining a trumpet, say, playing one note higher
227
843000
3000
14:31
than we've heard a trumpet play before.
228
846000
2000
14:36
Perhaps dogs and rhinos and other smell-oriented animals
229
851000
4000
14:41
smell in color. And the argument would be
230
856000
3000
14:44
exactly the same as for the bats.
231
859000
1000
14:48
Middle World -- the range of sizes and speeds
232
863000
3000
14:52
which we have evolved to feel intuitively comfortable with --
233
867000
3000
14:55
is a bit like the narrow range of the electromagnetic spectrum
234
870000
4000
14:59
that we see as light of various colors.
235
874000
3000
15:02
We're blind to all frequencies outside that,
236
877000
2000
15:04
unless we use instruments to help us.
237
879000
3000
15:09
Middle World is the narrow range of reality
238
884000
3000
15:12
which we judge to be normal, as opposed to the queerness
239
887000
3000
15:15
of the very small, the very large and the very fast.
240
890000
3000
15:20
We could make a similar scale of improbabilities;
241
895000
2000
15:23
nothing is totally impossible.
242
898000
2000
15:25
Miracles are just events that are extremely improbable.
243
900000
3000
15:29
A marble statue could wave its hand at us; the atoms that make up
244
904000
4000
15:33
its crystalline structure are all vibrating back and forth anyway.
245
908000
3000
15:37
Because there are so many of them,
246
912000
1000
15:39
and because there's no agreement among them
247
914000
1000
15:41
in their preferred direction of movement, the marble,
248
916000
2000
15:44
as we see it in Middle World, stays rock steady.
249
919000
3000
15:47
But the atoms in the hand could all just happen to move
250
922000
2000
15:49
the same way at the same time, and again and again.
251
924000
3000
15:52
In this case, the hand would move and we'd see it waving at us
252
927000
4000
15:56
in Middle World. The odds against it, of course, are so great
253
931000
4000
16:00
that if you set out writing zeros at the time of
254
935000
3000
16:03
the origin of the universe, you still would not have
255
938000
3000
16:06
written enough zeros to this day.
256
941000
1000
16:12
Evolution in Middle World has not equipped us to handle
257
947000
1000
16:13
very improbable events; we don't live long enough.
258
948000
2000
16:16
In the vastness of astronomical space and geological time,
259
951000
4000
16:21
that which seems impossible in Middle World
260
956000
2000
16:24
might turn out to be inevitable.
261
959000
2000
16:28
One way to think about that is by counting planets.
262
963000
3000
16:32
We don't know how many planets there are in the universe,
263
967000
1000
16:34
but a good estimate is about 10 to the 20, or 100 billion billion.
264
969000
3000
16:38
And that gives us a nice way to express our estimate
265
973000
2000
16:41
of life's improbability.
266
976000
2000
16:44
Could make some sort of landmark points
267
979000
2000
16:46
along a spectrum of improbability, which might look like
268
981000
3000
16:49
the electromagnetic spectrum we just looked at.
269
984000
3000
16:54
If life has arisen only once on any --
270
989000
2000
16:58
if -- if life could -- I mean, life could originate once per planet,
271
993000
3000
17:01
could be extremely common, or it could originate once per star,
272
996000
4000
17:06
or once per galaxy or maybe only once in the entire universe,
273
1001000
4000
17:11
in which case it would have to be here. And somewhere up there
274
1006000
3000
17:14
would be the chance that a frog would turn into a prince
275
1009000
2000
17:16
and similar magical things like that.
276
1011000
3000
17:20
If life has arisen on only one planet in the entire universe,
277
1015000
3000
17:24
that planet has to be our planet, because here we are talking about it.
278
1019000
4000
17:28
And that means that if we want to avail ourselves of it,
279
1023000
2000
17:31
we're allowed to postulate chemical events in the origin of life
280
1026000
3000
17:35
which have a probability as low as one in 100 billion billion.
281
1030000
3000
17:39
I don't think we shall have to avail ourselves of that,
282
1034000
2000
17:42
because I suspect that life is quite common in the universe.
283
1037000
2000
17:45
And when I say quite common, it could still be so rare
284
1040000
2000
17:48
that no one island of life ever encounters another,
285
1043000
3000
17:52
which is a sad thought.
286
1047000
1000
17:55
How shall we interpret "queerer than we can suppose?"
287
1050000
2000
17:58
Queerer than can in principle be supposed,
288
1053000
2000
18:01
or just queerer than we can suppose, given the limitations
289
1056000
2000
18:04
of our brain's evolutionary apprenticeship in Middle World?
290
1059000
4000
18:09
Could we, by training and practice, emancipate ourselves
291
1064000
3000
18:12
from Middle World and achieve some sort of intuitive,
292
1067000
2000
18:15
as well as mathematical, understanding of the very small
293
1070000
3000
18:18
and the very large? I genuinely don't know the answer.
294
1073000
3000
18:22
I wonder whether we might help ourselves to understand, say,
295
1077000
2000
18:25
quantum theory, if we brought up children to play computer games,
296
1080000
3000
18:29
beginning in early childhood, which had a sort of
297
1084000
2000
18:32
make-believe world of balls going through two slits on a screen,
298
1087000
2000
18:34
a world in which the strange goings on of quantum mechanics
299
1089000
3000
18:37
were enlarged by the computer's make-believe,
300
1092000
3000
18:40
so that they became familiar on the Middle-World scale of the stream.
301
1095000
3000
18:44
And, similarly, a relativistic computer game in which
302
1099000
3000
18:47
objects on the screen manifest the Lorenz Contraction, and so on,
303
1102000
4000
18:52
to try to get ourselves into the way of thinking --
304
1107000
2000
18:54
get children into the way of thinking about it.
305
1109000
2000
18:57
I want to end by applying the idea of Middle World
306
1112000
3000
19:01
to our perceptions of each other.
307
1116000
2000
19:04
Most scientists today subscribe to a mechanistic view of the mind:
308
1119000
3000
19:08
we're the way we are because our brains are wired up as they are;
309
1123000
3000
19:12
our hormones are the way they are.
310
1127000
1000
19:13
We'd be different, our characters would be different,
311
1128000
2000
19:15
if our neuro-anatomy and our physiological chemistry were different.
312
1130000
4000
19:20
But we scientists are inconsistent. If we were consistent,
313
1135000
3000
19:24
our response to a misbehaving person, like a child-murderer,
314
1139000
3000
19:27
should be something like, this unit has a faulty component;
315
1142000
3000
19:30
it needs repairing. That's not what we say.
316
1145000
3000
19:33
What we say -- and I include the most austerely mechanistic among us,
317
1148000
4000
19:37
which is probably me --
318
1152000
1000
19:38
what we say is, "Vile monster, prison is too good for you."
319
1153000
4000
19:42
Or worse, we seek revenge, in all probability thereby triggering
320
1157000
4000
19:46
the next phase in an escalating cycle of counter-revenge,
321
1161000
3000
19:49
which we see, of course, all over the world today.
322
1164000
2000
19:52
In short, when we're thinking like academics,
323
1167000
2000
19:55
we regard people as elaborate and complicated machines,
324
1170000
3000
19:58
like computers or cars, but when we revert to being human
325
1173000
4000
20:03
we behave more like Basil Fawlty, who, we remember,
326
1178000
3000
20:06
thrashed his car to teach it a lesson when it wouldn't start
327
1181000
3000
20:09
on gourmet night. (Laughter)
328
1184000
3000
20:13
The reason we personify things like cars and computers
329
1188000
3000
20:16
is that just as monkeys live in an arboreal world
330
1191000
3000
20:19
and moles live in an underground world
331
1194000
3000
20:22
and water striders live in a surface tension-dominated flatland,
332
1197000
3000
20:26
we live in a social world. We swim through a sea of people --
333
1201000
4000
20:30
a social version of Middle World.
334
1205000
2000
20:34
We are evolved to second-guess the behavior of others
335
1209000
2000
20:37
by becoming brilliant, intuitive psychologists.
336
1212000
3000
20:41
Treating people as machines
337
1216000
2000
20:43
may be scientifically and philosophically accurate,
338
1218000
3000
20:47
but it's a cumbersome waste of time
339
1222000
1000
20:48
if you want to guess what this person is going to do next.
340
1223000
3000
20:52
The economically useful way to model a person
341
1227000
2000
20:55
is to treat him as a purposeful, goal-seeking agent
342
1230000
3000
20:58
with pleasures and pains, desires and intentions,
343
1233000
2000
21:01
guilt, blame-worthiness.
344
1236000
1000
21:03
Personification and the imputing of intentional purpose
345
1238000
4000
21:08
is such a brilliantly successful way to model humans,
346
1243000
2000
21:11
it's hardly surprising the same modeling software
347
1246000
3000
21:14
often seizes control when we're trying to think about entities
348
1249000
4000
21:18
for which it's not appropriate, like Basil Fawlty with his car
349
1253000
3000
21:21
or like millions of deluded people with the universe as a whole. (Laughter)
350
1256000
8000
21:29
If the universe is queerer than we can suppose,
351
1264000
2000
21:32
is it just because we've been naturally selected to suppose
352
1267000
3000
21:35
only what we needed to suppose in order to survive
353
1270000
3000
21:38
in the Pleistocene of Africa?
354
1273000
2000
21:41
Or are our brains so versatile and expandable that we can
355
1276000
4000
21:45
train ourselves to break out of the box of our evolution?
356
1280000
4000
21:50
Or, finally, are there some things in the universe so queer
357
1285000
4000
21:54
that no philosophy of beings, however godlike, could dream them?
358
1289000
6000
22:01
Thank you very much.
359
1296000
1000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Richard Dawkins - Evolutionary biologistOxford professor Richard Dawkins has helped steer evolutionary science into the 21st century, and his concept of the "meme" contextualized the spread of ideas in the information age. In recent years, his devastating critique of religion has made him a leading figure in the New Atheism.
Why you should listen
As an evolutionary biologist, Richard Dawkins has broadened our understanding of the genetic origin of our species; as a popular author, he has helped lay readers understand complex scientific concepts. He's best-known for the ideas laid out in his landmark book The Selfish Gene and fleshed out in The Extended Phenotype: the rather radical notion that Darwinian selection happens not at the level of the individual, but at the level of our DNA. The implication: We evolved for only one purpose — to serve our genes.
Of perhaps equal importance is Dawkins' concept of the meme, which he defines as a self-replicating unit of culture -- an idea, a chain letter, a catchy tune, an urban legend -- which is passed person-to-person, its longevity based on its ability to lodge in the brain and inspire transmission to others. Introduced in The Selfish Gene in 1976, the concept of memes has itself proven highly contagious, inspiring countless accounts and explanations of idea propagation in the information age.
In recent years, Dawkins has become outspoken in his atheism, coining the word "bright" (as an alternate to atheist), and encouraging fellow non-believers to stand up and be identified. His controversial, confrontational 2002 TED talk was a seminal moment for the New Atheism, as was the publication of his 2006 book, The God Delusion, a bestselling critique of religion that championed atheism and promoted scientific principles over creationism and intelligent design.
Richard Dawkins | Speaker | TED.com