Steven Wise: Chimps have feelings and thoughts. They should also have rights
斯蒂芬.懷斯: 黑猩猩有感情和思想 - 他們也該擁有法律上的權利!
By challenging long-held legal notions of “personhood”, Steven Wise seeks to grant cognitively advanced animals access to a full spectrum of fundamental rights. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
or the cars you own.
所看到漂亮的黑猩猩,
法律上的物品做這種事,
to my book or my car.
車子做任何事。
這些漂亮的黑猩猩,
named James Mollison
的詹姆士.莫里森所拍下來的,
"James & Other Apes."
每單隻、幾乎每一隻,
how every single one them,
在眼前死去的孤兒,
die before his eyes.
a great legal wall
一直有道法律高牆
from legal persons.
和「法律上的常人」,
are invisible to judges.
對法官來說就像空氣一樣,
the capacity for legal rights.
are the legal persons.
for an infinite number of rights.
are legal things.
都是法律上的物品、
synonymous with a legal person.
與法人有相同涵義的,
are not synonymous.
over the centuries
were sometimes legal things.
struggle over the last centuries
世紀以來大量的民權抗爭
through that wall and begin to feed
而且開始把這些人送過高牆去,
and have them become legal persons.
limited to human beings.
legal persons who are not even alive.
that corporations are legal persons.
一尊印度神像是法人、
was a legal person,
of the Sikh religion was a legal person,
the indigenous peoples of New Zealand
that a river was a legal person
「彼得.辛格」的著作,
of lush, brown hair,
I wanted to speak for the voiceless,
來替弱勢者出聲、
and defenseless the trillions,
有多如牛毛的非人類動物
as an animal protection lawyer.
to accomplish something
自己正嘗試在做某種
I was trying to defend,
牠們必須 - 至少有些動物 -
was they had, at least some of them,
that we could open up again in that wall
再度打開的孔洞,
nonhuman animals through that hole
of being legal persons.
very little known about or spoken about
or legal rights for a nonhuman animal,
或是法律上之權力的概念,
to take a long time.
would take about 30 years
我以為會花上三十年的時間,
a strategic litigation,
策略性訴訟、長期抗爭,
to punch another hole through that wall.
that it only took 28.
這只花了 28 年。
to begin was not only
and teach classes, write books,
to get down to the nuts and bolts
was figure out what a cause of action was,
便是釐清事由 -
is a vehicle that lawyers use
用來表達論點的方法。
a very interesting case
in London called Somerset vs. Stewart,
被稱做「桑莫塞特與史都華爭訟」,
had used the legal system
to a legal person.
eventually wrote an entire book about it.
我最終還為此寫了一整本書。
when he was kidnapped from West Africa.
遭到綁架時年僅八歲,
named Charles Stewart in Virginia.
蘇格蘭商人查爾斯.史都華。
brought James Somerset to London,
he was going to escape.
was to get himself baptized,
a set of godparents,
responsibilities of godfathers
就是幫助你脫逃。
with Charles Stewart.
but then James dropped out of sight.
不過後來詹姆斯消失不見了。
then hired slave catchers
獵奴人查訪倫敦市,
not back to Charles Stewart,
「安與瑪莉號」船上
that was floating in London Harbour,
in the slave markets
years of life that a slave had
三到五年裡不停收割甘蔗。
swung into action.
迅速有所行動,
of the court of King's Bench,
其為「王座法庭」的首席法官。
a common law writ of habeus corpus
人身保護令普通法傳票。
that English-speaking judges can make
by statutes or constitutions,
制訂法條的法律;
is called the Great Writ,
遭受拘禁的任何人。
who are detained against our will.
to bring the detainee in
for depriving him of his bodily liberty.
在法律上的充分理由。
a decision right off the bat,
即刻做出決定,
was a legal thing,
for a writ of habeus corpus,
that he would assume,
他將會假定而不是裁定
was indeed a legal person,
and James's body was brought in
詹姆士人就被該船船長帶來法庭上。
over the next six months.
said that slavery was so odious,
大法官直言奴隸制度是如此醜惡,
and he ordered James free.
他發出釋放詹姆士的命令。
underwent a legal transubstantiation.
out of the courtroom
who had walked in,
they had nothing whatsoever in common.
他倆已經沒有任何相同之處了。
the Nonhuman Rights Project,
所做的下一件事情是
what kind of values and principles
是什麼樣的價值觀和原則,
did they imbibe with their mother's milk,
對他們來說再自然不過?
do they use every day,
他們打從心底相信?
and we chose liberty and equality.
to which you're entitled
你的外觀所被賦予的權利,
protects a fundamental interest.
and self-determination.
in a common law country,
而拒絕了保命的醫療救治,
life-saving medical treatment,
your self-determination and your autonomy.
of right to which you're entitled
in a relevant way,
they have the right, you're like them,
然後因為他們有權利、你和他們相像,
draw lines all the time.
不時劃分出界限,
at the bare minimum you must --
to a legitimate end.
得要是合理的方式,
argues that drawing a line
據理說明:畫出一條線
and self-determining being
有自主和自決力的生物,
to find the jurisdiction
filing our first suit.
訴案的司法管轄地,
who our plaintiffs are going to be.
原告 - 黑猩猩,
was on our board of directors,
當時是我們董事會的成員,
研究黑猩猩幾十年了。
intensively for decades.
cognitive capabilities that they have,
驚人的認知能力、
that human beings have.
and we began to then canvass the world
之後我們開始到世界處探問,
in chimpanzee cognition.
Scotland, England and the United States,
英格蘭和美國找到這些人,
100 pages of affidavits
cognitive capability,
單獨也好、共同也罷,
and self-determination.
that they were conscious.
這些非人類動物是有意識的,
that they're conscious.
自己是有意識的;
They know that others have minds.
他們知道其他黑猩猩有心智;
and that they can live.
而且能夠過日子;
and they will live tomorrow.
而且明天還會活着;
They remember what happened yesterday.
他們記得昨天發生過的事情、
a chimpanzee, especially alone.
尤其是單獨一隻有多麼駭人;
to our worst criminals,
without even thinking about it.
連想都沒有想過這點!
with human beings,
even when they're not required to do so.
儘管沒人要求牠們這麼做。
They understand numbers.
or to stay out of the language wars,
and referential communication
to the attitudes of those
講話之對象的態度;
a social culture.
in the Ivory Coast
these rocks to smash open
果殼異常堅硬之核果的黑猩猩,
to learn how to do that,
and they found
而發現這個實物文化,
this way of doing it,
for at least 4,300 years
至少 4,300 年,
in the state of New York.
we could even get our suits filed.
訴訟之前就死掉;
You see him behind me.
大家看牠就在我背後的螢幕上,
We found him in that cage.
我們在籠子裏找到了牠,
that was filled with cages
的小房間裡發現他的,
trailer lot in central New York.
一間大型倉儲建物裡。
他有一邊的耳朵聾掉了。
storefront in western Massachusetts.
一排水泥鄰街店舖的後方;
anatomical research at Stony Brook.
接受生物醫學、解剖學的研究,
suits all across the state of New York
提交了三起訴訟,
writ of habeus corpus argument
案子的一般法人身保護令傳票,
these common law writs of habeus corpus.
普通法人身保護令傳票。
to Save the Chimps,
sanctuary in South Florida
極棒的黑猩猩庇護地,
with 12 or 13 islands --
小島的人工湖,
where two dozen chimpanzees live
每個小島上住著二十四隻的黑猩猩。
the life of a chimpanzee,
黑猩猩的生活,
that was as close to Africa as possible.
盡可能接近西非的環境,
our Lord Mansfield.
我們的曼斯菲爾德大法官,
litigation campaign. We shall.
我們應該會碰上的啦。
is that they're not the end,
它們並非是個結束,
the end of the beginning.
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Steven Wise - Animal rights lawyerBy challenging long-held legal notions of “personhood”, Steven Wise seeks to grant cognitively advanced animals access to a full spectrum of fundamental rights.
Why you should listen
Using a long-term litigation campaign based on existing habeas corpus law, Steven Wise and the Nonhuman Rights Project are redefining the playing field for animal rights law. While the high-profile New York lawsuits Wise has initiated on behalf of captive chimpanzees have yet to bear fruit, they’re only the first stage of a strategy that is changing the conversation about animal rights.
Wise’s work with the Nonhuman Rights Project is the subject of Unlocking the Cage, a forthcoming film by Chris Hegedus and D.A. Pennebaker.
Steven Wise | Speaker | TED.com