TEDxNorthwesternU
Alice Dreger: Is anatomy destiny?
Filmed:
Readability: 4.3
1,217,075 views
Alice Dreger works with people at the edge of anatomy, such as conjoined twins and intersexed people. In her observation, it's often a fuzzy line between male and female, among other anatomical distinctions. Which brings up a huge question: Why do we let our anatomy determine our fate?
Alice Dreger - Historian
Alice Dreger studies history and anatomy, and acts as a patient advocate. Full bio
Alice Dreger studies history and anatomy, and acts as a patient advocate. Full bio
Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.
00:15
I want you to imagine two couples
0
0
3000
00:18
in the middle of 1979
1
3000
2000
00:20
on the exact same day, at the exact same moment,
2
5000
3000
00:23
each conceiving a baby -- okay?
3
8000
2000
00:25
So two couples each conceiving one baby.
4
10000
2000
00:27
Now I don't want you to spend too much time imagining the conception,
5
12000
3000
00:30
because if you spend all that time imagining that conception,
6
15000
2000
00:32
you're not going to listen to me.
7
17000
2000
00:34
So just imagine that for a moment.
8
19000
2000
00:36
And in this scenario,
9
21000
2000
00:38
I want to imagine that, in one case,
10
23000
2000
00:40
the sperm is carrying a Y chromosome,
11
25000
2000
00:42
meeting that X chromosome of the egg.
12
27000
2000
00:44
And in the other case,
13
29000
2000
00:46
the sperm is carrying an X chromosome,
14
31000
2000
00:48
meeting the X chromosome of the egg.
15
33000
2000
00:50
Both are viable; both take off.
16
35000
2000
00:52
We'll come back to these people later.
17
37000
2000
00:54
So I wear two hats
18
39000
2000
00:56
in most of what I do.
19
41000
2000
00:58
As the one hat,
20
43000
2000
01:00
I do history of anatomy.
21
45000
2000
01:02
I'm a historian by training,
22
47000
2000
01:04
and what I study in that case
23
49000
2000
01:06
is the way that people have dealt with anatomy --
24
51000
3000
01:09
meaning human bodies, animal bodies --
25
54000
2000
01:11
how they dealt with bodily fluids, concepts of bodies;
26
56000
3000
01:14
how have they thought about bodies.
27
59000
2000
01:16
The other hat that I've worn in my work
28
61000
2000
01:18
is as an activist,
29
63000
2000
01:20
as a patient advocate --
30
65000
2000
01:22
or, as I sometimes say, as an impatient advocate --
31
67000
3000
01:25
for people who are patients of doctors.
32
70000
2000
01:27
In that case, what I've worked with
33
72000
2000
01:29
is people who have body types
34
74000
2000
01:31
that challenge social norms.
35
76000
2000
01:33
So some of what I've worked on, for example,
36
78000
2000
01:35
is people who are conjoined twins --
37
80000
2000
01:37
two people within one body.
38
82000
2000
01:39
Some of what I've worked on is people who have dwarfism --
39
84000
2000
01:41
so people who are much shorter than typical.
40
86000
3000
01:44
And a lot of what I've worked on
41
89000
2000
01:46
is people who have atypical sex --
42
91000
2000
01:48
so people who don't have the standard male
43
93000
2000
01:50
or the standard female body types.
44
95000
2000
01:52
And as a general term, we can use the term intersex for this.
45
97000
4000
01:56
Intersex comes in a lot of different forms.
46
101000
2000
01:58
I'll just give you a few examples
47
103000
2000
02:00
of the types of ways you can have sex
48
105000
2000
02:02
that isn't standard for male or female.
49
107000
2000
02:04
So in one instance,
50
109000
2000
02:06
you can have somebody who has an XY chromosomal basis,
51
111000
3000
02:09
and that SRY gene on the Y chromosome
52
114000
3000
02:12
tells the proto-gonads, which we all have in the fetal life,
53
117000
2000
02:14
to become testes.
54
119000
2000
02:16
And so in the fetal life the testes are pumping out testosterone.
55
121000
3000
02:19
But because this individual lacks receptors
56
124000
3000
02:22
to hear that testosterone,
57
127000
2000
02:24
the body doesn't react to the testosterone.
58
129000
2000
02:26
And this is a syndrome called androgen insensitivity syndrome.
59
131000
4000
02:30
So lots of levels of testosterone, but no reaction to it.
60
135000
3000
02:33
As a consequence, the body develops
61
138000
2000
02:35
more along the female typical path.
62
140000
2000
02:37
When the child is born, she looks like a girl.
63
142000
2000
02:39
She is a girl. She is raised as a girl.
64
144000
3000
02:42
And it's often not until she hits puberty
65
147000
2000
02:44
and she's growing and developing breasts,
66
149000
2000
02:46
but she's not getting her period,
67
151000
2000
02:48
that somebody figures out something's up here.
68
153000
2000
02:50
And they do some tests and figure out
69
155000
2000
02:52
that, instead of having ovaries inside and a uterus,
70
157000
2000
02:54
she actually has testes inside, and she has a Y chromosome.
71
159000
3000
02:57
Now what's important to understand
72
162000
2000
02:59
is you may think of this person as really being male,
73
164000
2000
03:01
but they're really not.
74
166000
2000
03:03
Females, like males,
75
168000
2000
03:05
have in our bodies something called the adrenal glands.
76
170000
2000
03:07
They're in the back of our body.
77
172000
2000
03:09
And the adrenal glands make androgens,
78
174000
2000
03:11
which are a masculinizing hormone.
79
176000
2000
03:13
Most females like me -- I believe myself to be a typical female --
80
178000
2000
03:15
I don't actually know my chromosomal make-up
81
180000
2000
03:17
but I think I'm probably typical --
82
182000
2000
03:19
most females like me are actually androgen-sensitive.
83
184000
3000
03:22
We're making androgen, and we're responding to androgens.
84
187000
3000
03:25
The consequence is that somebody like me
85
190000
2000
03:27
has actually had a brain exposed to more androgens
86
192000
3000
03:30
than the woman born with testes
87
195000
2000
03:32
who has androgen insensitivity syndrome.
88
197000
2000
03:34
So sex is really complicated; it's not just that intersex people
89
199000
2000
03:36
are in the middle of all the sex spectrum --
90
201000
2000
03:38
in some ways, they can be all over the place.
91
203000
2000
03:40
Another example:
92
205000
2000
03:42
a few years ago I got a call from a man who was 19 years old,
93
207000
3000
03:45
who was born a boy, raised a boy,
94
210000
2000
03:47
had a girlfriend, had sex with his girlfriend,
95
212000
3000
03:50
had a life as a guy
96
215000
2000
03:52
and had just found out that he had ovaries and a uterus inside.
97
217000
3000
03:55
What he had was an extreme form
98
220000
2000
03:57
of a condition called congenital adrenal hyperplasia.
99
222000
2000
03:59
He had XX chromosomes,
100
224000
2000
04:01
and in the womb,
101
226000
2000
04:03
his adrenal glands were in such high gear
102
228000
2000
04:05
that it created, essentially, a masculine hormonal environment.
103
230000
4000
04:09
And as a consequence, his genitals were masculinzed,
104
234000
2000
04:11
his brain was subject
105
236000
2000
04:13
to the more typical masculine component of hormones.
106
238000
2000
04:15
And he was born looking like a boy -- nobody suspected anything.
107
240000
3000
04:18
And it was only when he had reached the age of 19
108
243000
3000
04:21
that he began to have enough medical problems
109
246000
2000
04:23
actually from menstruating internally,
110
248000
2000
04:25
that doctors figured out that, in fact, he was female internally.
111
250000
3000
04:28
Okay, so just one more quick example
112
253000
2000
04:30
of a way you can have intersex.
113
255000
2000
04:32
Some people who have XX chromosomes
114
257000
2000
04:34
develop what are called ovotestis,
115
259000
2000
04:36
which is when you have ovarian tissue
116
261000
2000
04:38
with testicular tissue wrapped around it.
117
263000
2000
04:40
And we're not exactly sure why that happens.
118
265000
2000
04:42
So sex can come in lots of different varieties.
119
267000
3000
04:45
The reason
120
270000
2000
04:47
that children with these kinds of bodies --
121
272000
2000
04:49
whether it's dwarfism, or it's conjoined twinning,
122
274000
3000
04:52
or it's an intersex type --
123
277000
2000
04:54
are often normalized by surgeons
124
279000
2000
04:56
is not because it actually leaves them better off
125
281000
2000
04:58
in terms of physical health.
126
283000
2000
05:00
In many cases, people are actually perfectly healthy.
127
285000
3000
05:03
The reason they're often subject to various kinds of surgeries
128
288000
3000
05:06
is because they threaten our social categories.
129
291000
3000
05:09
Or system has been based typically on the idea
130
294000
3000
05:12
that a particular kind of anatomy comes with a particular identity.
131
297000
3000
05:15
So we have the concept that what it means to be a woman
132
300000
2000
05:17
is to have a female identity;
133
302000
2000
05:19
what it means to be a black person is, allegedly,
134
304000
2000
05:21
is to have an African anatomy
135
306000
3000
05:24
in terms of your history.
136
309000
2000
05:26
And so we have this terribly simplistic idea.
137
311000
3000
05:29
And when we're faced with a body
138
314000
2000
05:31
that actually presents us something quite different,
139
316000
3000
05:34
it startles us in terms of those categorizations.
140
319000
3000
05:37
So we have a lot of very romantic ideas in our culture
141
322000
2000
05:39
about individualism.
142
324000
2000
05:41
And our nation's really founded on a very romantic concept of individualism.
143
326000
3000
05:44
Well you can imagine how startling then it is
144
329000
3000
05:47
when you have children that are born
145
332000
2000
05:49
who are two people inside of one body.
146
334000
2000
05:51
Where I ran into the most heat from this most recently
147
336000
4000
05:55
was last year the South African runner, Caster Semenya,
148
340000
3000
05:58
had her sex called into question at the International Games in Berlin.
149
343000
3000
06:01
I had a lot of journalists calling me, asking me,
150
346000
3000
06:04
"Which is the test they're going to run
151
349000
2000
06:06
that will tell us whether or not
152
351000
2000
06:08
Caster Semenya is male or female?"
153
353000
2000
06:10
And I had to explain to the journalists there isn't such a test.
154
355000
3000
06:13
In fact, we now know
155
358000
2000
06:15
that sex is complicated enough
156
360000
2000
06:17
that we have to admit
157
362000
2000
06:19
nature doesn't draw the line for us between male and female,
158
364000
3000
06:22
or between male and intersex and female and intersex;
159
367000
3000
06:25
we actually draw that line on nature.
160
370000
3000
06:28
So what we have is a sort of situation
161
373000
2000
06:30
where the farther our science goes,
162
375000
2000
06:32
the more we have to admit to ourselves
163
377000
2000
06:34
that these categories
164
379000
2000
06:36
that we thought of as stable anatomical categories
165
381000
2000
06:38
that mapped very simply
166
383000
2000
06:40
to stable identity categories
167
385000
2000
06:42
are a lot more fuzzy than we thought.
168
387000
2000
06:44
And it's not just in terms of sex.
169
389000
2000
06:46
It's also in terms of race,
170
391000
2000
06:48
which turns out to be vastly more complicated
171
393000
2000
06:50
than our terminology has allowed.
172
395000
2000
06:52
As we look, we get into all sorts of uncomfortable areas.
173
397000
3000
06:55
We look, for example, about the fact
174
400000
2000
06:57
that we share at least 95 percent of our DNA
175
402000
2000
06:59
with chimpanzees.
176
404000
2000
07:01
What are we to make of the fact
177
406000
2000
07:03
that we differ from them only really by a few nucleotides?
178
408000
3000
07:06
And as we get farther and farther with our science,
179
411000
3000
07:09
we get more and more into a discomforted zone
180
414000
2000
07:11
where we have to acknowledge
181
416000
2000
07:13
that the simplistic categories we've had
182
418000
2000
07:15
are probably overly simplistic.
183
420000
2000
07:17
So we're seeing this
184
422000
2000
07:19
in all sorts of places in human life.
185
424000
2000
07:21
One of the places we're seeing it, for example,
186
426000
2000
07:23
in our culture today, in the United States today,
187
428000
2000
07:25
is battles over the beginning of life and the end of life.
188
430000
3000
07:28
We have difficult conversations
189
433000
2000
07:30
about at what point we decide a body becomes a human,
190
435000
3000
07:33
such that it has a different right than a fetal life.
191
438000
3000
07:36
We have very difficult conversations nowadays --
192
441000
2000
07:38
probably not out in the open as much as within medicine --
193
443000
3000
07:41
about the question of when somebody's dead.
194
446000
2000
07:43
In the past, our ancestors never had to struggle so much
195
448000
2000
07:45
with this question of when somebody was dead.
196
450000
2000
07:47
At most, they'd stick a feather on somebody's nose,
197
452000
2000
07:49
and if it twitched, they didn't bury them yet.
198
454000
2000
07:51
If it stopped twitching, you bury them.
199
456000
3000
07:54
But today, we have a situation
200
459000
2000
07:56
where we want to take vital organs out of beings
201
461000
2000
07:58
and give them to other beings.
202
463000
2000
08:00
And as a consequence,
203
465000
2000
08:02
we're stuck with having to struggle with this really difficult question
204
467000
2000
08:04
about who's dead,
205
469000
2000
08:06
and this leads us to a really difficult situation
206
471000
2000
08:08
where we don't have such simple categories as we've had before.
207
473000
3000
08:11
Now you might think that all this breaking-down of categories
208
476000
3000
08:14
would make somebody like me really happy.
209
479000
2000
08:16
I'm a political progressive, I defend people with unusual bodies,
210
481000
3000
08:19
but I have to admit to you that it makes me nervous.
211
484000
2000
08:21
Understanding that these categories
212
486000
2000
08:23
are really much more unstable than we thought makes me tense.
213
488000
3000
08:26
And it makes me tense
214
491000
2000
08:28
from the point of view of thinking about democracy.
215
493000
2000
08:30
So in order to tell you about that tension,
216
495000
2000
08:32
I have to first admit to you that I'm a huge fan of the Founding Fathers.
217
497000
3000
08:35
I know they were racists, I know they were sexist,
218
500000
2000
08:37
but they were great.
219
502000
2000
08:39
I mean, they were so brave and so bold
220
504000
3000
08:42
and so radical in what they did
221
507000
3000
08:45
that I find myself watching that cheesy musical "1776" every few years,
222
510000
3000
08:48
and it's not because of the music, which is totally forgettable.
223
513000
3000
08:51
It's because of what happened in 1776
224
516000
2000
08:53
with the Founding Fathers.
225
518000
2000
08:55
The Founding Fathers were, for my point of view,
226
520000
2000
08:57
the original anatomical activists,
227
522000
2000
08:59
and this is why.
228
524000
2000
09:01
What they rejected was an anatomical concept
229
526000
3000
09:04
and replaced it with another one
230
529000
2000
09:06
that was radical and beautiful and held us for 200 years.
231
531000
3000
09:09
So as you all recall,
232
534000
2000
09:11
what our Founding Fathers were rejecting was a concept of monarchy,
233
536000
3000
09:14
and the monarchy was basically based
234
539000
2000
09:16
on a very simplistic concept of anatomy.
235
541000
2000
09:18
The monarchs of the old world
236
543000
2000
09:20
didn't have a concept of DNA,
237
545000
2000
09:22
but they did have a concept of birthright.
238
547000
2000
09:24
They had a concept of blue blood.
239
549000
2000
09:26
They had the idea that the people who would be in political power
240
551000
3000
09:29
should be in political power
241
554000
2000
09:31
because of the blood being passed down
242
556000
2000
09:33
from grandfather to father to son and so forth.
243
558000
3000
09:36
The Founding Fathers rejected that idea,
244
561000
2000
09:38
and they replaced it with a new anatomical concept,
245
563000
3000
09:41
and that concept
246
566000
2000
09:43
was all men are created equal.
247
568000
2000
09:45
They leveled that playing field
248
570000
2000
09:47
and decided the anatomy that mattered
249
572000
2000
09:49
was the commonality of anatomy,
250
574000
2000
09:51
not the difference in anatomy,
251
576000
2000
09:53
and that was a really radical thing to do.
252
578000
3000
09:56
Now they were doing it in part
253
581000
2000
09:58
because they were part of an Enlightenment system
254
583000
2000
10:00
where two things were growing up together.
255
585000
2000
10:02
And that was democracy growing up,
256
587000
2000
10:04
but it was also science growing up at the same time.
257
589000
3000
10:07
And it's really clear, if you look at the history of the Founding Fathers,
258
592000
2000
10:09
a lot of them were very interested in science,
259
594000
2000
10:11
and they were interested in a concept
260
596000
2000
10:13
of a naturalistic world.
261
598000
2000
10:15
They were moving away from supernatural explanations,
262
600000
3000
10:18
and they were rejecting things like a supernatural concept of power,
263
603000
3000
10:21
where it transmitted
264
606000
2000
10:23
because of a very vague concept of birthright.
265
608000
3000
10:26
They were moving towards a naturalistic concept.
266
611000
2000
10:28
And if you look, for example, in the Declaration of Independence,
267
613000
3000
10:31
they talk about nature and nature's God.
268
616000
3000
10:34
They don't talk about God and God's nature.
269
619000
2000
10:36
They're talking about the power of nature
270
621000
2000
10:38
to tell us who we are.
271
623000
2000
10:40
So as part of that,
272
625000
2000
10:42
they were coming to us with a concept
273
627000
2000
10:44
that was about anatomical commonality.
274
629000
2000
10:46
And in doing so, they were really setting up in a beautiful way
275
631000
3000
10:49
the Civil Rights movement of the future.
276
634000
2000
10:51
They didn't think of it that way, but they did it for us, and it was great.
277
636000
3000
10:54
So what happened years afterward?
278
639000
2000
10:56
What happened was women, for example,
279
641000
2000
10:58
who wanted the right to vote,
280
643000
2000
11:00
took the Founding Fathers' concept
281
645000
2000
11:02
of anatomical commonality being more important
282
647000
2000
11:04
than anatomical difference
283
649000
2000
11:06
and said, "The fact that we have a uterus and ovaries
284
651000
2000
11:08
is not significant enough in terms of a difference
285
653000
3000
11:11
to mean that we shouldn't have the right to vote,
286
656000
2000
11:13
the right to full citizenship,
287
658000
2000
11:15
the right to own property, etc., etc."
288
660000
2000
11:17
And women successfully argued that.
289
662000
2000
11:19
Next came the successful Civil Rights movement,
290
664000
3000
11:22
where we found people like Sojourner Truth
291
667000
2000
11:24
talking about, "Ain't I a woman?"
292
669000
2000
11:26
We find men
293
671000
2000
11:28
on the marching lines of the Civil Rights movement
294
673000
2000
11:30
saying, "I am a man."
295
675000
2000
11:32
Again, people of color
296
677000
2000
11:34
appealing to a commonality of anatomy over a difference of anatomy,
297
679000
2000
11:36
again, successfully.
298
681000
2000
11:38
We see the same thing with the disability rights movement.
299
683000
3000
11:42
The problem is, of course,
300
687000
2000
11:44
that, as we begin to look at all that commonality,
301
689000
2000
11:46
we have to begin to question
302
691000
2000
11:48
why we maintain certain divisions.
303
693000
2000
11:50
Now mind you, I want to maintain some divisions,
304
695000
2000
11:52
anatomically, in our culture.
305
697000
2000
11:54
For example, I don't want
306
699000
2000
11:56
to give a fish the same rights as a human.
307
701000
2000
11:58
I don't want to say we give up entirely on anatomy.
308
703000
2000
12:00
I don't want to say five-year-olds
309
705000
2000
12:02
should be allowed to consent to sex or consent to marry.
310
707000
3000
12:05
So there are some anatomical divisions
311
710000
2000
12:07
that make sense to me and that I think we should retain.
312
712000
3000
12:10
But the challenge is trying to figure out which ones they are
313
715000
3000
12:13
and why do we retain them and do they have meaning.
314
718000
3000
12:16
So let's go back to those two beings
315
721000
2000
12:18
conceived at the beginning of this talk.
316
723000
2000
12:20
We have two beings, both conceived
317
725000
2000
12:22
in the middle of 1979 on the exact same day.
318
727000
3000
12:25
Let's imagine one of them, Mary,
319
730000
2000
12:27
is born three months prematurely,
320
732000
2000
12:29
so she's born on June 1, 1980.
321
734000
2000
12:31
Henry, by contrast, is born at term,
322
736000
2000
12:33
so he's born on March 1, 1980.
323
738000
3000
12:36
Simply by virtue of the fact
324
741000
2000
12:38
that Mary was born prematurely three months,
325
743000
2000
12:40
she comes into all sorts of rights
326
745000
2000
12:42
three months earlier than Henry does --
327
747000
3000
12:45
the right to consent to sex,
328
750000
2000
12:47
the right to vote, the right to drink.
329
752000
2000
12:49
Henry has to wait for all of that,
330
754000
2000
12:51
not because he's actually any different in age, biologically,
331
756000
3000
12:54
except in terms of when he was born.
332
759000
2000
12:56
We find other kinds of weirdness in terms of what their rights are.
333
761000
3000
12:59
Henry, by virtue of being assumed to be male --
334
764000
3000
13:02
although I haven't told you that he's the XY one --
335
767000
2000
13:04
by virtue of being assumed to be male
336
769000
3000
13:07
is now liable to be drafted,
337
772000
2000
13:09
which Mary does not need to worry about.
338
774000
2000
13:11
Mary, meanwhile, cannot in all the states
339
776000
2000
13:13
have the same right that Henry has in all the states,
340
778000
2000
13:15
namely, the right to marry.
341
780000
2000
13:17
Henry can marry in every state a woman,
342
782000
3000
13:20
but Mary can only marry today in a few states a woman.
343
785000
4000
13:24
So we have these anatomical categories that persist
344
789000
3000
13:27
that are in many ways problematic and questionable.
345
792000
3000
13:30
And the question to me becomes:
346
795000
2000
13:32
What do we do,
347
797000
2000
13:34
as our science gets to be so good
348
799000
2000
13:36
in looking at anatomy,
349
801000
2000
13:38
that we reach the point where we have to admit
350
803000
3000
13:41
that a democracy that's been based on anatomy
351
806000
3000
13:44
might start falling apart?
352
809000
2000
13:46
I don't want to give up the science,
353
811000
2000
13:48
but at the same time it kind of feels sometimes
354
813000
2000
13:50
like the science is coming out from under us.
355
815000
2000
13:52
So where do we go?
356
817000
2000
13:54
It seems like what happens in our culture
357
819000
2000
13:56
is a sort of pragmatic attitude:
358
821000
2000
13:58
"Well, we have to draw the line somewhere,
359
823000
2000
14:00
so we will draw the line somewhere."
360
825000
2000
14:02
But a lot of people get stuck in a very strange position.
361
827000
2000
14:04
So for example,
362
829000
2000
14:06
Texas has at one point decided
363
831000
2000
14:08
that what it means to marry a man
364
833000
2000
14:10
is to mean that you don't have a Y chromosome,
365
835000
2000
14:12
and what it means to marry a woman means you do have a Y chromosome.
366
837000
2000
14:14
Now in practice they don't actually test people for their chromosomes.
367
839000
3000
14:17
But this is also very bizarre,
368
842000
2000
14:19
because of the story I told you at the beginning
369
844000
2000
14:21
about androgen insensitivity syndrome.
370
846000
2000
14:23
If we look at one of the founding fathers of modern democracy,
371
848000
3000
14:26
Dr. Martin Luther King,
372
851000
2000
14:28
he offers us something of a solution in his "I have a dream" speech.
373
853000
3000
14:31
He says we should judge people "based not on the color of their skin,
374
856000
3000
14:34
but on the content of their character,"
375
859000
2000
14:36
moving beyond anatomy.
376
861000
2000
14:38
And I want to say, "Yeah, that sounds like a really good idea."
377
863000
3000
14:41
But in practice, how do you do it?
378
866000
2000
14:43
How do you judge people based on the content of character?
379
868000
3000
14:46
I also want to point out
380
871000
2000
14:48
that I'm not sure that is how we should distribute rights in terms of humans,
381
873000
3000
14:51
because, I have to admit, that there are some golden retrievers I know
382
876000
3000
14:54
that are probably more deserving of social services
383
879000
2000
14:56
than some humans I know.
384
881000
2000
14:58
I also want to say there are probably also some yellow Labradors that I know
385
883000
3000
15:01
that are more capable of informed, intelligent, mature decisions
386
886000
3000
15:04
about sexual relations than some 40-year-olds that I know.
387
889000
3000
15:07
So how do we operationalize
388
892000
3000
15:10
the question of content of character?
389
895000
2000
15:12
It turns out to be really difficult.
390
897000
2000
15:14
And part of me also wonders,
391
899000
2000
15:16
what if content of character
392
901000
2000
15:18
turns out to be something that's scannable in the future --
393
903000
3000
15:21
able to be seen with an fMRI?
394
906000
2000
15:23
Do we really want to go there?
395
908000
2000
15:25
I'm not sure where we go.
396
910000
2000
15:27
What I do know is that it seems to be really important
397
912000
2000
15:29
to think about the idea of the United States being in the lead
398
914000
3000
15:32
of thinking about this issue of democracy.
399
917000
2000
15:34
We've done a really good job struggling with democracy,
400
919000
3000
15:37
and I think we would do a good job in the future.
401
922000
2000
15:39
We don't have a situation that Iran has, for example,
402
924000
3000
15:42
where a man who's sexually attracted to other men
403
927000
2000
15:44
is liable to be murdered,
404
929000
2000
15:46
unless he's willing to submit to a sex change,
405
931000
2000
15:48
in which case he's allowed to live.
406
933000
2000
15:50
We don't have that kind of situation.
407
935000
2000
15:52
I'm glad to say we don't have the kind of situation with --
408
937000
3000
15:55
a surgeon I talked to a few years ago
409
940000
2000
15:57
who had brought over a set of conjoined twins
410
942000
3000
16:00
in order to separate them, partly to make a name for himself.
411
945000
2000
16:02
But when I was on the phone with him,
412
947000
2000
16:04
asking why he was going to do this surgery --
413
949000
2000
16:06
this was a very high-risk surgery --
414
951000
2000
16:08
his answer was that, in this other nation,
415
953000
2000
16:10
these children were going to be treated very badly, and so he had to do this.
416
955000
3000
16:13
My response to him was, "Well, have you considered political asylum
417
958000
3000
16:16
instead of a separation surgery?"
418
961000
3000
16:19
The United States has offered tremendous possibility
419
964000
2000
16:21
for allowing people to be the way they are,
420
966000
3000
16:24
without having them have to be changed for the sake of the state.
421
969000
3000
16:27
So I think we have to be in the lead.
422
972000
2000
16:29
Well, just to close, I want to suggest to you
423
974000
3000
16:32
that I've been talking a lot about the fathers.
424
977000
2000
16:34
And I want to think about the possibilities
425
979000
3000
16:37
of what democracy might look like, or might have looked like,
426
982000
2000
16:39
if we had more involved the mothers.
427
984000
3000
16:42
And I want to say something a little bit radical for a feminist,
428
987000
3000
16:45
and that is that I think that there may be
429
990000
2000
16:47
different kinds of insights
430
992000
2000
16:49
that can come from different kinds of anatomies,
431
994000
2000
16:51
particularly when we have people thinking in groups.
432
996000
3000
16:54
Now for years, because I've been interested in intersex,
433
999000
2000
16:56
I've also been interested in sex difference research.
434
1001000
2000
16:58
And one of the things that I've been really interested in
435
1003000
2000
17:00
is looking at the differences between males and females
436
1005000
3000
17:03
in terms of the way they think and operate in the world.
437
1008000
3000
17:06
And what we know from cross-cultural studies
438
1011000
3000
17:09
is that females, on average --
439
1014000
2000
17:11
not everyone, but on average --
440
1016000
2000
17:13
are more inclined to be very attentive
441
1018000
2000
17:15
to complex social relations
442
1020000
2000
17:17
and to taking care of people
443
1022000
2000
17:19
who are basically vulnerable within the group.
444
1024000
3000
17:22
And so if we think about that,
445
1027000
2000
17:24
we have an interesting situation on our hands.
446
1029000
2000
17:26
Years ago, when I was in graduate school,
447
1031000
2000
17:28
one of my graduate advisers who knew I was interested in feminism --
448
1033000
2000
17:30
I considered myself a feminist, as I still do --
449
1035000
3000
17:33
asked a really strange question.
450
1038000
2000
17:35
He said, "Tell me what's feminine about feminism."
451
1040000
3000
17:38
And I thought, "Well that's the dumbest question I've ever heard.
452
1043000
2000
17:40
Feminism is all about undoing stereotypes about gender,
453
1045000
3000
17:43
so there's nothing feminine about feminism."
454
1048000
3000
17:46
But the more I thought about his question,
455
1051000
2000
17:48
the more I thought there might be something feminine about feminism.
456
1053000
3000
17:51
That is to say, there might be something, on average,
457
1056000
3000
17:54
different about female brains from male brains
458
1059000
3000
17:57
that makes us more attentive
459
1062000
2000
17:59
to deeply complex social relationships
460
1064000
3000
18:02
and more attentive to taking care of the vulnerable.
461
1067000
3000
18:05
So whereas the fathers were extremely attentive
462
1070000
3000
18:08
to figuring out how to protect individuals from the state,
463
1073000
3000
18:11
it's possible that if we injected more mothers
464
1076000
2000
18:13
into this concept,
465
1078000
2000
18:15
what we would have is more of a concept
466
1080000
2000
18:17
of, not just how to protect,
467
1082000
2000
18:19
but how to care for each other.
468
1084000
2000
18:21
And maybe that's where we need to go in the future,
469
1086000
3000
18:24
when we take democracy beyond anatomy,
470
1089000
2000
18:26
is to think less about the individual body,
471
1091000
2000
18:28
in terms of the identity,
472
1093000
2000
18:30
and think more about those relationships.
473
1095000
2000
18:32
So that as we the people try to create a more perfect union,
474
1097000
3000
18:35
we're thinking about what we do for each other.
475
1100000
3000
18:38
Thank you.
476
1103000
2000
18:40
(Applause)
477
1105000
3000
ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Alice Dreger - HistorianAlice Dreger studies history and anatomy, and acts as a patient advocate.
Why you should listen
Alice Dreger is a professor of clinical medical humanities and bioethics at the Feinberg School of Medicine of Northwestern University in Chicago. She describes her focus as "social justice work in medicine and science" through research, writing, speaking and advocacy.
She's written several books that study subjects on the edge of norm-challenging bodies, including One of Us: Conjoined Twins and the Future of Normal and Hermaphrodites and the Medical Invention of Sex and Intersex in the Age of Ethics.
She says: "The question that has motivated many of my projects is this: Why not change minds instead of bodies?"
JOIN OUR LIVE Q&A with Alice Dreger on June 28, 1pm Eastern, in TED Conversations.
Alice Dreger | Speaker | TED.com