ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Niall Ferguson - Historian
History is a curious thing, and Niall Ferguson investigates not only what happened but why. (Hint: Politics and money explain a lot.)

Why you should listen

Niall Ferguson teaches history and business administration at Harvard and is a senior research fellow at several other universities, including Oxford. His books chronicle a wide range of political and socio-economic events; he has written about everything from German politics during the era of inflation to a financial history of the world. He’s now working on a biography of former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.

Ferguson is a prolific and often controversial commentator on contemporary politics and economics. He frequently writes, reviews, and hosts for the British and American press. His latest book and TV series, Civilization: The West and the Rest, aims to help 21st-century audiences understand the past and the present. In it, he asks how, since the 1500s, Western nations have surpassed their Eastern counterparts and came to dominate the world (his answer: thanks to six “killer apps”: science, medicine, protestant work ethic, competition, property rights, consumer society). And he wonders whether that domination is now threatened by the rise of Asia. His theories have drawn criticism and prompted discussions, which he says was his intent. “It’s designed to be slightly annoying, so that you talk about it,” he told The Observer.

He says: "If a majority of people subscribe to a particular view, it pays to question it. It pays to think: maybe this is wrong."

More profile about the speaker
Niall Ferguson | Speaker | TED.com
TEDGlobal 2011

Niall Ferguson: The 6 killer apps of prosperity

Filmed:
1,762,544 views

Over the past few centuries, Western cultures have been very good at creating general prosperity for themselves. Historian Niall Ferguson asks: Why the West, and less so the rest? He suggests half a dozen big ideas from Western culture -- call them the 6 killer apps -- that promote wealth, stability and innovation. And in this new century, he says, these apps are all shareable.
- Historian
History is a curious thing, and Niall Ferguson investigates not only what happened but why. (Hint: Politics and money explain a lot.) Full bio

Double-click the English transcript below to play the video.

00:15
Let's talk about billions.
0
0
3000
00:18
Let's talk about
1
3000
3000
00:21
past and future billions.
2
6000
3000
00:24
We know
3
9000
2000
00:26
that about 106 billion people
4
11000
3000
00:29
have ever lived.
5
14000
2000
00:31
And we know that most of them are dead.
6
16000
3000
00:34
And we also know
7
19000
2000
00:36
that most of them live or lived in Asia.
8
21000
2000
00:38
And we also know
9
23000
2000
00:40
that most of them were or are very poor --
10
25000
4000
00:44
did not live for very long.
11
29000
3000
00:47
Let's talk about billions.
12
32000
3000
00:50
Let's talk about
13
35000
2000
00:52
the 195,000 billion dollars of wealth
14
37000
4000
00:56
in the world today.
15
41000
3000
00:59
We know that most of that wealth
16
44000
3000
01:02
was made after the year 1800.
17
47000
3000
01:05
And we know that most of it
18
50000
3000
01:08
is currently owned
19
53000
2000
01:10
by people we might call Westerners:
20
55000
4000
01:14
Europeans, North Americans, Australasians.
21
59000
4000
01:18
19 percent of the world's population today,
22
63000
3000
01:21
Westerners own two-thirds of its wealth.
23
66000
4000
01:25
Economic historians
24
70000
2000
01:27
call this "The Great Divergence."
25
72000
3000
01:30
And this slide here
26
75000
2000
01:32
is the best simplification
27
77000
2000
01:34
of the Great Divergence story
28
79000
2000
01:36
I can offer you.
29
81000
2000
01:38
It's basically two ratios
30
83000
2000
01:40
of per capita GDP,
31
85000
2000
01:42
per capita gross domestic product,
32
87000
3000
01:45
so average income.
33
90000
2000
01:47
One, the red line,
34
92000
2000
01:49
is the ratio of British to Indian
35
94000
2000
01:51
per capita income.
36
96000
2000
01:53
And the blue line
37
98000
2000
01:55
is the ratio of American to Chinese.
38
100000
3000
01:58
And this chart goes back to 1500.
39
103000
2000
02:00
And you can see here
40
105000
2000
02:02
that there's an exponential Great Divergence.
41
107000
3000
02:05
They start off pretty close together.
42
110000
2000
02:07
In fact, in 1500,
43
112000
2000
02:09
the average Chinese was richer than the average North American.
44
114000
3000
02:13
When you get to the 1970s,
45
118000
3000
02:16
which is where this chart ends,
46
121000
2000
02:18
the average Briton is more than 10 times richer
47
123000
2000
02:20
than the average Indian.
48
125000
2000
02:22
And that's allowing
49
127000
2000
02:24
for differences in the cost of living.
50
129000
2000
02:26
It's based on purchasing power parity.
51
131000
3000
02:29
The average American
52
134000
2000
02:31
is nearly 20 times richer
53
136000
2000
02:33
than the average Chinese
54
138000
2000
02:35
by the 1970s.
55
140000
2000
02:37
So why?
56
142000
3000
02:40
This wasn't just an economic story.
57
145000
3000
02:43
If you take the 10 countries
58
148000
2000
02:45
that went on to become
59
150000
3000
02:48
the Western empires,
60
153000
2000
02:50
in 1500 they were really quite tiny --
61
155000
3000
02:53
five percent of the world's land surface,
62
158000
2000
02:55
16 percent of its population,
63
160000
2000
02:57
maybe 20 percent of its income.
64
162000
3000
03:00
By 1913,
65
165000
2000
03:02
these 10 countries, plus the United States,
66
167000
3000
03:05
controlled vast global empires --
67
170000
3000
03:08
58 percent of the world's territory,
68
173000
2000
03:10
about the same percentage of its population,
69
175000
3000
03:13
and a really huge, nearly three-quarters share
70
178000
3000
03:16
of global economic output.
71
181000
2000
03:18
And notice, most of that went to the motherland,
72
183000
4000
03:22
to the imperial metropoles,
73
187000
2000
03:24
not to their colonial possessions.
74
189000
3000
03:28
Now you can't just blame this on imperialism --
75
193000
2000
03:30
though many people have tried to do so --
76
195000
3000
03:33
for two reasons.
77
198000
3000
03:36
One, empire was the least original thing
78
201000
3000
03:39
that the West did after 1500.
79
204000
3000
03:42
Everybody did empire.
80
207000
3000
03:45
They beat preexisting Oriental empires
81
210000
3000
03:48
like the Mughals and the Ottomans.
82
213000
2000
03:50
So it really doesn't look like empire is a great explanation
83
215000
3000
03:53
for the Great Divergence.
84
218000
2000
03:55
In any case, as you may remember,
85
220000
2000
03:57
the Great Divergence reaches its zenith in the 1970s,
86
222000
3000
04:00
some considerable time after decolonization.
87
225000
4000
04:04
This is not a new question.
88
229000
2000
04:06
Samuel Johnson,
89
231000
2000
04:08
the great lexicographer,
90
233000
2000
04:10
[posed] it through his character Rasselas
91
235000
3000
04:13
in his novel "Rasselas, Prince of Abissinia,"
92
238000
3000
04:16
published in 1759.
93
241000
3000
04:19
"By what means are the Europeans thus powerful;
94
244000
3000
04:22
or why, since they can so easily visit Asia and Africa
95
247000
3000
04:25
for trade or conquest,
96
250000
3000
04:28
cannot the Asiaticks and Africans
97
253000
2000
04:30
invade their coasts,
98
255000
2000
04:32
plant colonies in their ports,
99
257000
2000
04:34
and give laws to their natural princes?
100
259000
3000
04:37
The same wind that carries them back
101
262000
3000
04:40
would bring us thither?"
102
265000
2000
04:42
That's a great question.
103
267000
2000
04:44
And you know what,
104
269000
2000
04:46
it was also being asked at roughly the same time
105
271000
2000
04:48
by the Resterners -- by the people in the rest of the world --
106
273000
3000
04:51
like Ibrahim Muteferrika,
107
276000
3000
04:54
an Ottoman official,
108
279000
2000
04:56
the man who introduced printing, very belatedly,
109
281000
3000
04:59
to the Ottoman Empire --
110
284000
2000
05:01
who said in a book published in 1731,
111
286000
3000
05:04
"Why do Christian nations which were so weak in the past
112
289000
2000
05:06
compared with Muslim nations
113
291000
2000
05:08
begin to dominate so many lands in modern times
114
293000
4000
05:12
and even defeat the once victorious Ottoman armies?"
115
297000
4000
05:16
Unlike Rasselas,
116
301000
2000
05:18
Muteferrika had an answer to that question,
117
303000
2000
05:20
which was correct.
118
305000
3000
05:23
He said it was "because they have laws and rules
119
308000
4000
05:27
invented by reason."
120
312000
4000
05:31
It's not geography.
121
316000
3000
05:34
You may think we can explain the Great Divergence
122
319000
2000
05:36
in terms of geography.
123
321000
2000
05:38
We know that's wrong,
124
323000
2000
05:40
because we conducted two great natural experiments in the 20th century
125
325000
2000
05:42
to see if geography mattered more than institutions.
126
327000
2000
05:44
We took all the Germans,
127
329000
3000
05:47
we divided them roughly in two,
128
332000
2000
05:49
and we gave the ones in the East communism,
129
334000
3000
05:52
and you see the result.
130
337000
3000
05:55
Within an incredibly short period of time,
131
340000
2000
05:57
people living in the German Democratic Republic
132
342000
2000
05:59
produced Trabants, the Trabbi,
133
344000
3000
06:02
one of the world's worst ever cars,
134
347000
3000
06:05
while people in the West produced the Mercedes Benz.
135
350000
3000
06:08
If you still don't believe me,
136
353000
2000
06:10
we conducted the experiment also in the Korean Peninsula.
137
355000
2000
06:12
And we decided we'd take Koreans
138
357000
2000
06:14
in roughly the same geographical place
139
359000
2000
06:16
with, notice, the same basic traditional culture,
140
361000
4000
06:20
and we divided them in two, and we gave the Northerners communism.
141
365000
3000
06:23
And the result is an even bigger divergence
142
368000
3000
06:26
in a very short space of time
143
371000
2000
06:28
than happened in Germany.
144
373000
2000
06:30
Not a big divergence in terms of uniform design for border guards admittedly,
145
375000
4000
06:34
but in almost every other respect,
146
379000
2000
06:36
it's a huge divergence.
147
381000
2000
06:38
Which leads me to think
148
383000
2000
06:40
that neither geography nor national character,
149
385000
2000
06:42
popular explanations for this kind of thing,
150
387000
2000
06:44
are really significant.
151
389000
3000
06:47
It's the ideas.
152
392000
2000
06:49
It's the institutions.
153
394000
2000
06:51
This must be true
154
396000
2000
06:53
because a Scotsman said it.
155
398000
2000
06:55
And I think I'm the only Scotsman here at the Edinburgh TED.
156
400000
3000
06:58
So let me just explain to you
157
403000
2000
07:00
that the smartest man ever was a Scotsman.
158
405000
3000
07:03
He was Adam Smith --
159
408000
2000
07:05
not Billy Connolly, not Sean Connery --
160
410000
3000
07:08
though he is very smart indeed.
161
413000
3000
07:11
(Laughter)
162
416000
3000
07:14
Smith -- and I want you to go
163
419000
2000
07:16
and bow down before his statue in the Royal Mile;
164
421000
3000
07:19
it's a wonderful statue --
165
424000
2000
07:21
Smith, in the "Wealth of Nations"
166
426000
2000
07:23
published in 1776 --
167
428000
2000
07:25
that's the most important thing that happened that year ...
168
430000
3000
07:28
(Laughter)
169
433000
3000
07:31
You bet.
170
436000
3000
07:34
There was a little local difficulty in some of our minor colonies, but ...
171
439000
3000
07:37
(Laughter)
172
442000
2000
07:39
"China seems to have been long stationary,
173
444000
2000
07:41
and probably long ago acquired that full complement of riches
174
446000
3000
07:44
which is consistent with the nature of its laws and institutions.
175
449000
4000
07:48
But this complement may be much inferior
176
453000
2000
07:50
to what, with other laws and institutions,
177
455000
3000
07:53
the nature of its soil, climate, and situation
178
458000
2000
07:55
might admit of."
179
460000
2000
07:57
That is so right and so cool.
180
462000
2000
07:59
And he said it such a long time ago.
181
464000
3000
08:02
But you know, this is a TED audience,
182
467000
3000
08:05
and if I keep talking about institutions,
183
470000
2000
08:07
you're going to turn off.
184
472000
2000
08:09
So I'm going to translate this into language that you can understand.
185
474000
3000
08:13
Let's call them the killer apps.
186
478000
4000
08:17
I want to explain to you that there were six killer apps
187
482000
3000
08:20
that set the West apart from the rest.
188
485000
3000
08:23
And they're kind of like the apps on your phone,
189
488000
2000
08:25
in the sense that they look quite simple.
190
490000
2000
08:27
They're just icons; you click on them.
191
492000
2000
08:29
But behind the icon, there's complex code.
192
494000
3000
08:32
It's the same with institutions.
193
497000
2000
08:34
There are six
194
499000
2000
08:36
which I think explain the Great Divergence.
195
501000
3000
08:39
One, competition.
196
504000
2000
08:41
Two, the scientific revolution.
197
506000
2000
08:43
Three, property rights.
198
508000
2000
08:45
Four, modern medicine.
199
510000
2000
08:47
Five, the consumer society.
200
512000
2000
08:49
And six, the work ethic.
201
514000
2000
08:51
You can play a game and try and think of one I've missed at,
202
516000
2000
08:53
or try and boil it down to just four,
203
518000
3000
08:56
but you'll lose.
204
521000
2000
08:58
(Laughter)
205
523000
2000
09:00
Let me very briefly tell you what I mean by this,
206
525000
3000
09:03
synthesizing the work of many economic historians
207
528000
3000
09:06
in the process.
208
531000
2000
09:08
Competition means,
209
533000
2000
09:10
not only were there a hundred different political units in Europe in 1500,
210
535000
2000
09:12
but within each of these units,
211
537000
2000
09:14
there was competition between corporations as well as sovereigns.
212
539000
4000
09:18
The ancestor of the modern corporation, the City of London Corporation,
213
543000
3000
09:21
existed in the 12th century.
214
546000
2000
09:23
Nothing like this existed in China,
215
548000
2000
09:25
where there was one monolithic state
216
550000
2000
09:27
covering a fifth of humanity,
217
552000
2000
09:29
and anyone with any ambition
218
554000
2000
09:31
had to pass one standardized examination,
219
556000
2000
09:33
which took three days and was very difficult
220
558000
2000
09:35
and involved memorizing vast numbers of characters
221
560000
3000
09:38
and very complex Confucian essay writing.
222
563000
4000
09:42
The scientific revolution was different
223
567000
3000
09:45
from the science that had been achieved in the Oriental world
224
570000
3000
09:48
in a number of crucial ways,
225
573000
2000
09:50
the most important being
226
575000
2000
09:52
that, through the experimental method,
227
577000
2000
09:54
it gave men control over nature in a way that had not been possible before.
228
579000
3000
09:57
Example: Benjamin Robins's extraordinary application
229
582000
4000
10:01
of Newtonian physics to ballistics.
230
586000
3000
10:04
Once you do that,
231
589000
2000
10:06
your artillery becomes accurate.
232
591000
3000
10:09
Think of what that means.
233
594000
2000
10:11
That really was a killer application.
234
596000
2000
10:13
(Laughter)
235
598000
3000
10:16
Meanwhile, there's no scientific revolution anywhere else.
236
601000
3000
10:19
The Ottoman Empire's not that far from Europe,
237
604000
2000
10:21
but there's no scientific revolution there.
238
606000
2000
10:23
In fact, they demolish Taqi al-Din's observatory,
239
608000
3000
10:26
because it's considered blasphemous
240
611000
2000
10:28
to inquire into the mind of God.
241
613000
3000
10:31
Property rights: It's not the democracy, folks;
242
616000
3000
10:34
it's having the rule of law based on private property rights.
243
619000
3000
10:37
That's what makes the difference
244
622000
2000
10:39
between North America and South America.
245
624000
2000
10:41
You could turn up in North America
246
626000
2000
10:43
having signed a deed of indenture
247
628000
2000
10:45
saying, "I'll work for nothing for five years.
248
630000
2000
10:47
You just have to feed me."
249
632000
2000
10:49
But at the end of it, you've got a hundred acres of land.
250
634000
3000
10:52
That's the land grant
251
637000
2000
10:54
on the bottom half of the slide.
252
639000
2000
10:56
That's not possible in Latin America
253
641000
3000
10:59
where land is held onto
254
644000
2000
11:01
by a tiny elite descended from the conquistadors.
255
646000
2000
11:03
And you can see here the huge divergence
256
648000
2000
11:05
that happens in property ownership between North and South.
257
650000
3000
11:08
Most people in rural North America
258
653000
2000
11:10
owned some land by 1900.
259
655000
3000
11:13
Hardly anyone in South America did.
260
658000
2000
11:15
That's another killer app.
261
660000
3000
11:18
Modern medicine in the late 19th century
262
663000
2000
11:20
began to make major breakthroughs
263
665000
2000
11:22
against the infectious diseases that killed a lot of people.
264
667000
2000
11:24
And this was another killer app --
265
669000
2000
11:26
the very opposite of a killer,
266
671000
2000
11:28
because it doubled, and then more than doubled, human life expectancy.
267
673000
3000
11:31
It even did that
268
676000
2000
11:33
in the European empires.
269
678000
2000
11:35
Even in places like Senegal,
270
680000
2000
11:37
beginning in the early 20th century,
271
682000
2000
11:39
there were major breakthroughs in public health,
272
684000
2000
11:41
and life expectancy began to rise.
273
686000
2000
11:43
It doesn't rise any faster
274
688000
2000
11:45
after these countries become independent.
275
690000
2000
11:47
The empires weren't all bad.
276
692000
2000
11:49
The consumer society is what you need
277
694000
2000
11:51
for the Industrial Revolution to have a point.
278
696000
3000
11:54
You need people to want to wear tons of clothes.
279
699000
2000
11:56
You've all bought an article of clothing in the last month;
280
701000
2000
11:58
I guarantee it.
281
703000
2000
12:00
That's the consumer society,
282
705000
2000
12:02
and it propels economic growth
283
707000
2000
12:04
more than even technological change itself.
284
709000
3000
12:07
Japan was the first non-Western society
285
712000
2000
12:09
to embrace it.
286
714000
2000
12:11
The alternative,
287
716000
2000
12:13
which was proposed by Mahatma Gandhi,
288
718000
2000
12:15
was to institutionalize and make poverty permanent.
289
720000
3000
12:18
Very few Indians today
290
723000
2000
12:20
wish that India had gone down
291
725000
2000
12:22
Mahatma Gandhi's road.
292
727000
3000
12:25
Finally, the work ethic.
293
730000
2000
12:27
Max Weber thought that was peculiarly Protestant.
294
732000
3000
12:30
He was wrong.
295
735000
2000
12:32
Any culture can get the work ethic
296
737000
2000
12:34
if the institutions are there
297
739000
2000
12:36
to create the incentive to work.
298
741000
2000
12:38
We know this
299
743000
2000
12:40
because today the work ethic
300
745000
2000
12:42
is no longer a Protestant, Western phenomenon.
301
747000
3000
12:45
In fact, the West has lost its work ethic.
302
750000
3000
12:48
Today, the average Korean
303
753000
3000
12:51
works a thousand hours more a year
304
756000
4000
12:55
than the average German --
305
760000
2000
12:57
a thousand.
306
762000
2000
12:59
And this is part
307
764000
2000
13:01
of a really extraordinary phenomenon,
308
766000
3000
13:04
and that is the end of the Great Divergence.
309
769000
3000
13:07
Who's got the work ethic now?
310
772000
2000
13:09
Take a look at mathematical attainment
311
774000
3000
13:12
by 15 year-olds.
312
777000
2000
13:14
At the top of the international league table
313
779000
2000
13:16
according to the latest PISA study,
314
781000
3000
13:19
is the Shanghai district of China.
315
784000
2000
13:21
The gap between Shanghai
316
786000
2000
13:23
and the United Kingdom and the United States
317
788000
3000
13:26
is as big as the gap between the U.K. and the U.S.
318
791000
3000
13:29
and Albania and Tunisia.
319
794000
3000
13:32
You probably assume
320
797000
2000
13:34
that because the iPhone was designed in California
321
799000
2000
13:36
but assembled in China
322
801000
2000
13:38
that the West still leads in terms of technological innovation.
323
803000
3000
13:41
You're wrong.
324
806000
2000
13:43
In terms of patents,
325
808000
2000
13:45
there's no question that the East is ahead.
326
810000
2000
13:47
Not only has Japan been ahead for some time,
327
812000
3000
13:50
South Korea has gone into third place,
328
815000
3000
13:53
and China is just about to overtake Germany.
329
818000
3000
13:56
Why?
330
821000
2000
13:58
Because the killer apps can be downloaded.
331
823000
2000
14:00
It's open source.
332
825000
2000
14:02
Any society can adopt these institutions,
333
827000
2000
14:04
and when they do,
334
829000
2000
14:06
they achieve what the West achieved after 1500 --
335
831000
4000
14:10
only faster.
336
835000
2000
14:12
This is the Great Reconvergence,
337
837000
2000
14:14
and it's the biggest story of your lifetime.
338
839000
4000
14:18
Because it's on your watch that this is happening.
339
843000
3000
14:21
It's our generation
340
846000
2000
14:23
that is witnessing the end of Western predominance.
341
848000
2000
14:25
The average American used to be more than 20 times richer
342
850000
2000
14:27
than the average Chinese.
343
852000
2000
14:29
Now it's just five times,
344
854000
2000
14:31
and soon it will be 2.5 times.
345
856000
2000
14:33
So I want to end with three questions
346
858000
3000
14:36
for the future billions,
347
861000
2000
14:38
just ahead of 2016,
348
863000
3000
14:41
when the United States will lose its place
349
866000
2000
14:43
as number one economy to China.
350
868000
3000
14:46
The first is, can you delete these apps,
351
871000
4000
14:50
and are we in the process of doing so
352
875000
2000
14:52
in the Western world?
353
877000
2000
14:54
The second question is,
354
879000
2000
14:56
does the sequencing of the download matter?
355
881000
4000
15:00
And could Africa get that sequencing wrong?
356
885000
5000
15:05
One obvious implication of modern economic history
357
890000
2000
15:07
is that it's quite hard to transition to democracy
358
892000
3000
15:10
before you've established
359
895000
2000
15:12
secure private property rights.
360
897000
3000
15:15
Warning: that may not work.
361
900000
3000
15:18
And third, can China do without
362
903000
2000
15:20
killer app number three?
363
905000
2000
15:22
That's the one that John Locke systematized
364
907000
4000
15:26
when he said that freedom was rooted in private property rights
365
911000
4000
15:30
and the protection of law.
366
915000
2000
15:32
That's the basis
367
917000
2000
15:34
for the Western model
368
919000
2000
15:36
of representative government.
369
921000
3000
15:39
Now this picture shows the demolition
370
924000
2000
15:41
of the Chinese artist Ai Weiwei's studio
371
926000
3000
15:44
in Shanghai earlier this year.
372
929000
2000
15:46
He's now free again,
373
931000
2000
15:48
having been detained, as you know, for some time.
374
933000
2000
15:50
But I don't think his studio has been rebuilt.
375
935000
3000
15:55
Winston Churchill once defined civilization
376
940000
4000
15:59
in a lecture he gave in the fateful year of 1938.
377
944000
4000
16:03
And I think these words really nail it:
378
948000
3000
16:06
"It means a society based upon the opinion of civilians.
379
951000
4000
16:10
It means that violence, the rule of warriors and despotic chiefs,
380
955000
3000
16:13
the conditions of camps and warfare, of riot and tyranny,
381
958000
3000
16:16
give place to parliaments where laws are made,
382
961000
3000
16:19
and independent courts of justice
383
964000
2000
16:21
in which over long periods those laws are maintained.
384
966000
3000
16:24
That is civilization --
385
969000
2000
16:26
and in its soil grow continually
386
971000
2000
16:28
freedom, comfort and culture,"
387
973000
3000
16:31
what all TEDsters care about most.
388
976000
4000
16:35
"When civilization reigns in any country,
389
980000
3000
16:38
a wider and less harassed life
390
983000
3000
16:41
is afforded to the masses of the people."
391
986000
3000
16:44
That's so true.
392
989000
3000
16:48
I don't think the decline of Western civilization
393
993000
3000
16:51
is inevitable,
394
996000
2000
16:53
because I don't think history operates
395
998000
3000
16:56
in this kind of life-cycle model,
396
1001000
2000
16:58
beautifully illustrated by Thomas Cole's
397
1003000
2000
17:00
"Course of Empire" paintings.
398
1005000
3000
17:03
That's not the way history works.
399
1008000
3000
17:06
That's not the way the West rose,
400
1011000
2000
17:08
and I don't think it's the way the West will fall.
401
1013000
3000
17:11
The West may collapse very suddenly.
402
1016000
3000
17:14
Complex civilizations do that,
403
1019000
3000
17:17
because they operate, most of the time,
404
1022000
2000
17:19
on the edge of chaos.
405
1024000
2000
17:21
That's one of the most profound insights
406
1026000
3000
17:24
to come out of the historical study of complex institutions
407
1029000
3000
17:27
like civilizations.
408
1032000
3000
17:30
No, we may hang on,
409
1035000
2000
17:32
despite the huge burdens of debt that we've accumulated,
410
1037000
4000
17:36
despite the evidence that we've lost our work ethic
411
1041000
3000
17:39
and other parts of our historical mojo.
412
1044000
3000
17:42
But one thing is for sure,
413
1047000
2000
17:44
the Great Divergence
414
1049000
2000
17:46
is over, folks.
415
1051000
2000
17:48
Thanks very much.
416
1053000
2000
17:50
(Applause)
417
1055000
25000
18:15
Bruno Giussani: Niall,
418
1080000
2000
18:17
I am just curious
419
1082000
2000
18:19
about your take on the other region of the world that's booming,
420
1084000
3000
18:22
which is Latin America.
421
1087000
3000
18:25
What's your view on that?
422
1090000
3000
18:28
Niall Ferguson: Well I really am not just talking
423
1093000
2000
18:30
about the rise of the East;
424
1095000
2000
18:32
I'm talking about the rise of the Rest,
425
1097000
2000
18:34
and that includes South America.
426
1099000
2000
18:36
I once asked one of my colleagues at Harvard,
427
1101000
2000
18:38
"Hey, is South America part of the West?"
428
1103000
2000
18:40
He was an expert in Latin American history.
429
1105000
2000
18:42
He said, "I don't know; I'll have to think about that."
430
1107000
2000
18:44
That tells you something really important.
431
1109000
2000
18:46
I think if you look at what is happening in Brazil in particular,
432
1111000
2000
18:48
but also Chile,
433
1113000
2000
18:50
which was in many ways the one that led the way
434
1115000
3000
18:53
in transforming the institutions of economic life,
435
1118000
3000
18:56
there's a very bright future indeed.
436
1121000
3000
18:59
So my story really is
437
1124000
2000
19:01
as much about that convergence in the Americas
438
1126000
3000
19:04
as it's a convergence story in Eurasia.
439
1129000
2000
19:06
BG: And there is this impression
440
1131000
2000
19:08
that North America and Europe
441
1133000
2000
19:10
are not really paying attention
442
1135000
2000
19:12
to these trends.
443
1137000
2000
19:14
Mostly they're worried about each other.
444
1139000
3000
19:17
The Americans think that the European model is going to crumble tomorrow.
445
1142000
3000
19:20
The Europeans think that the American budget is going to explode tomorrow.
446
1145000
3000
19:23
And that's all we seem to be caring about recently.
447
1148000
3000
19:26
NF: I think the fiscal crisis
448
1151000
2000
19:28
that we see in the developed World right now -- both sides of the Atlantic --
449
1153000
3000
19:31
is essentially the same thing
450
1156000
2000
19:33
taking different forms
451
1158000
2000
19:35
in terms of political culture.
452
1160000
2000
19:37
And it's a crisis that has its structural facet --
453
1162000
4000
19:41
it's partly to do with demographics.
454
1166000
2000
19:43
But it's also, of course, to do with the massive crisis
455
1168000
3000
19:46
that followed excessive leverage,
456
1171000
2000
19:48
excessive borrowing in the private sector.
457
1173000
2000
19:50
That crisis,
458
1175000
2000
19:52
which has been the focus of so much attention, including by me,
459
1177000
3000
19:55
I think is an epiphenomenon.
460
1180000
2000
19:57
The financial crisis is really a relatively small historic phenomenon,
461
1182000
3000
20:00
which has just accelerated
462
1185000
2000
20:02
this huge shift,
463
1187000
2000
20:04
which ends half a millennium of Western ascendancy.
464
1189000
2000
20:06
I think that's its real importance.
465
1191000
2000
20:08
BG: Niall, thank you. (NF: Thank you very much, Bruno.)
466
1193000
2000
20:10
(Applause)
467
1195000
3000

▲Back to top

ABOUT THE SPEAKER
Niall Ferguson - Historian
History is a curious thing, and Niall Ferguson investigates not only what happened but why. (Hint: Politics and money explain a lot.)

Why you should listen

Niall Ferguson teaches history and business administration at Harvard and is a senior research fellow at several other universities, including Oxford. His books chronicle a wide range of political and socio-economic events; he has written about everything from German politics during the era of inflation to a financial history of the world. He’s now working on a biography of former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.

Ferguson is a prolific and often controversial commentator on contemporary politics and economics. He frequently writes, reviews, and hosts for the British and American press. His latest book and TV series, Civilization: The West and the Rest, aims to help 21st-century audiences understand the past and the present. In it, he asks how, since the 1500s, Western nations have surpassed their Eastern counterparts and came to dominate the world (his answer: thanks to six “killer apps”: science, medicine, protestant work ethic, competition, property rights, consumer society). And he wonders whether that domination is now threatened by the rise of Asia. His theories have drawn criticism and prompted discussions, which he says was his intent. “It’s designed to be slightly annoying, so that you talk about it,” he told The Observer.

He says: "If a majority of people subscribe to a particular view, it pays to question it. It pays to think: maybe this is wrong."

More profile about the speaker
Niall Ferguson | Speaker | TED.com

Data provided by TED.

This site was created in May 2015 and the last update was on January 12, 2020. It will no longer be updated.

We are currently creating a new site called "eng.lish.video" and would be grateful if you could access it.

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to write comments in your language on the contact form.

Privacy Policy

Developer's Blog

Buy Me A Coffee